Prospective comparison of short and long GnRH agonist protocols using recombinant gonadotrophins for IVF/ICSI treatments
Abstract This is a prospective comparative study investigating cost and effectiveness of IVF/ intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatments after stimulation with recombinant gonadotrophins following either the short or long gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist protocol. Patients in t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Reproductive biomedicine online 2008, Vol.16 (5), p.632-639 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 639 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 632 |
container_title | Reproductive biomedicine online |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Ho, Chi-Hong Chen, Shee-Uan Peng, Fu-Shiang Chang, Chih-Yuan Lien, Yih-Ron Yang, Yu-Shih |
description | Abstract This is a prospective comparative study investigating cost and effectiveness of IVF/ intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatments after stimulation with recombinant gonadotrophins following either the short or long gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist protocol. Patients in the short protocol ( n = 120) were administered buserelin nasal sprays from day 2 of the menstrual cycle and recombinant FSH from day 5. Patients in the long protocol ( n = 120) were administered buserelin from the previous mid-luteal phase and recombinant FSH after achieving down-regulation. The average age and basal FSH concentrations of both groups were similar. The serum LH concentrations during ovarian stimulation were significantly higher with the short protocol. The total cost of recombinant gonadotrophins (US$527 ± 184 versus US$795 ± 244, P < 0.001) was significantly lower in the short protocol, but there was no significant difference in delivery rates (47.5 versus 36.7%) between the short and long protocols. LH flare-up during the short protocol does not seem to impair the treatment outcome. Using recombinant gonadotrophins, the short GnRH agonist protocol is an effective and cheaper choice for IVF/ICSI treatments. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60476-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70748667</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1472648310604762</els_id><sourcerecordid>70748667</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-d49370051245019f5761656f18e619d8d2f496728f4d3b26cadf79e36d19d0a63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkF9vFSEQxYnR2Fr9CBqejD6sBZaF3ReNubHtTZporPpKuDC01F3YAtvYby_3TzTxxaeZzJxzBn4IvaTkHSVUnF5RLlkjeN--oeStIFyKhj1Cx4fxQB__6fv2CD3L-ZYQ2pO-fYqOaM8H1gpxjH59STHPYIq_B2ziNOvkcww4OpxvYipYB4vHGK7xefh6gfV1DD4XPKdYooljxkv2dZmgejc-6FBwlWgbS4rzjQ8Zu5jw-sfZ6Xp1tcYlgS4ThJKfoydOjxleHOoJ-n726dvqorn8fL5efbxsDBddaSwfWklIRxnvCB1cJwUVnXC0B0EH21vm-CAk6x237YYJo62TA7TC1i3Roj1Br_e59cl3C-SiJp8NjKMOEJesJJG8F0JWYbcXmkokJ3BqTn7S6UFRorbI1Q652vLcjnbIFau-V4cDy2YC-9d1YFwFH_YCqN-895BUNh6CAesrtqJs9P898f6fBDP64I0ef8ID5Nu4pFAZKqoyU2Qfss2gZJfA2t-8cqZz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70748667</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prospective comparison of short and long GnRH agonist protocols using recombinant gonadotrophins for IVF/ICSI treatments</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Ho, Chi-Hong ; Chen, Shee-Uan ; Peng, Fu-Shiang ; Chang, Chih-Yuan ; Lien, Yih-Ron ; Yang, Yu-Shih</creator><creatorcontrib>Ho, Chi-Hong ; Chen, Shee-Uan ; Peng, Fu-Shiang ; Chang, Chih-Yuan ; Lien, Yih-Ron ; Yang, Yu-Shih</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract This is a prospective comparative study investigating cost and effectiveness of IVF/ intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatments after stimulation with recombinant gonadotrophins following either the short or long gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist protocol. Patients in the short protocol ( n = 120) were administered buserelin nasal sprays from day 2 of the menstrual cycle and recombinant FSH from day 5. Patients in the long protocol ( n = 120) were administered buserelin from the previous mid-luteal phase and recombinant FSH after achieving down-regulation. The average age and basal FSH concentrations of both groups were similar. The serum LH concentrations during ovarian stimulation were significantly higher with the short protocol. The total cost of recombinant gonadotrophins (US$527 ± 184 versus US$795 ± 244, P < 0.001) was significantly lower in the short protocol, but there was no significant difference in delivery rates (47.5 versus 36.7%) between the short and long protocols. LH flare-up during the short protocol does not seem to impair the treatment outcome. Using recombinant gonadotrophins, the short GnRH agonist protocol is an effective and cheaper choice for IVF/ICSI treatments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1472-6483</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-6491</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60476-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18492366</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Buserelin - administration & dosage ; Female ; Fertilization in Vitro ; Follicle Stimulating Hormone - administration & dosage ; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - agonists ; Humans ; IVF ; long GnRH agonist protocol ; Obstetrics and Gynecology ; Prospective Studies ; short GnRH agonist protocol ; Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic</subject><ispartof>Reproductive biomedicine online, 2008, Vol.16 (5), p.632-639</ispartof><rights>Reproductive Healthcare Ltd, Duck End Farm, Dry Drayton, Cambridge CB23 8DB, UK</rights><rights>2008 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd, Duck End Farm, Dry Drayton, Cambridge CB23 8DB, UK</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-d49370051245019f5761656f18e619d8d2f496728f4d3b26cadf79e36d19d0a63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-d49370051245019f5761656f18e619d8d2f496728f4d3b26cadf79e36d19d0a63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60476-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4024,27923,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18492366$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ho, Chi-Hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Shee-Uan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Fu-Shiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Chih-Yuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lien, Yih-Ron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Yu-Shih</creatorcontrib><title>Prospective comparison of short and long GnRH agonist protocols using recombinant gonadotrophins for IVF/ICSI treatments</title><title>Reproductive biomedicine online</title><addtitle>Reprod Biomed Online</addtitle><description>Abstract This is a prospective comparative study investigating cost and effectiveness of IVF/ intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatments after stimulation with recombinant gonadotrophins following either the short or long gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist protocol. Patients in the short protocol ( n = 120) were administered buserelin nasal sprays from day 2 of the menstrual cycle and recombinant FSH from day 5. Patients in the long protocol ( n = 120) were administered buserelin from the previous mid-luteal phase and recombinant FSH after achieving down-regulation. The average age and basal FSH concentrations of both groups were similar. The serum LH concentrations during ovarian stimulation were significantly higher with the short protocol. The total cost of recombinant gonadotrophins (US$527 ± 184 versus US$795 ± 244, P < 0.001) was significantly lower in the short protocol, but there was no significant difference in delivery rates (47.5 versus 36.7%) between the short and long protocols. LH flare-up during the short protocol does not seem to impair the treatment outcome. Using recombinant gonadotrophins, the short GnRH agonist protocol is an effective and cheaper choice for IVF/ICSI treatments.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Buserelin - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertilization in Vitro</subject><subject>Follicle Stimulating Hormone - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - agonists</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>IVF</subject><subject>long GnRH agonist protocol</subject><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>short GnRH agonist protocol</subject><subject>Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic</subject><issn>1472-6483</issn><issn>1472-6491</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkF9vFSEQxYnR2Fr9CBqejD6sBZaF3ReNubHtTZporPpKuDC01F3YAtvYby_3TzTxxaeZzJxzBn4IvaTkHSVUnF5RLlkjeN--oeStIFyKhj1Cx4fxQB__6fv2CD3L-ZYQ2pO-fYqOaM8H1gpxjH59STHPYIq_B2ziNOvkcww4OpxvYipYB4vHGK7xefh6gfV1DD4XPKdYooljxkv2dZmgejc-6FBwlWgbS4rzjQ8Zu5jw-sfZ6Xp1tcYlgS4ThJKfoydOjxleHOoJ-n726dvqorn8fL5efbxsDBddaSwfWklIRxnvCB1cJwUVnXC0B0EH21vm-CAk6x237YYJo62TA7TC1i3Roj1Br_e59cl3C-SiJp8NjKMOEJesJJG8F0JWYbcXmkokJ3BqTn7S6UFRorbI1Q652vLcjnbIFau-V4cDy2YC-9d1YFwFH_YCqN-895BUNh6CAesrtqJs9P898f6fBDP64I0ef8ID5Nu4pFAZKqoyU2Qfss2gZJfA2t-8cqZz</recordid><startdate>2008</startdate><enddate>2008</enddate><creator>Ho, Chi-Hong</creator><creator>Chen, Shee-Uan</creator><creator>Peng, Fu-Shiang</creator><creator>Chang, Chih-Yuan</creator><creator>Lien, Yih-Ron</creator><creator>Yang, Yu-Shih</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2008</creationdate><title>Prospective comparison of short and long GnRH agonist protocols using recombinant gonadotrophins for IVF/ICSI treatments</title><author>Ho, Chi-Hong ; Chen, Shee-Uan ; Peng, Fu-Shiang ; Chang, Chih-Yuan ; Lien, Yih-Ron ; Yang, Yu-Shih</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-d49370051245019f5761656f18e619d8d2f496728f4d3b26cadf79e36d19d0a63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Buserelin - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertilization in Vitro</topic><topic>Follicle Stimulating Hormone - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - agonists</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>IVF</topic><topic>long GnRH agonist protocol</topic><topic>Obstetrics and Gynecology</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>short GnRH agonist protocol</topic><topic>Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ho, Chi-Hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Shee-Uan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Fu-Shiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Chih-Yuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lien, Yih-Ron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Yu-Shih</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Reproductive biomedicine online</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ho, Chi-Hong</au><au>Chen, Shee-Uan</au><au>Peng, Fu-Shiang</au><au>Chang, Chih-Yuan</au><au>Lien, Yih-Ron</au><au>Yang, Yu-Shih</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prospective comparison of short and long GnRH agonist protocols using recombinant gonadotrophins for IVF/ICSI treatments</atitle><jtitle>Reproductive biomedicine online</jtitle><addtitle>Reprod Biomed Online</addtitle><date>2008</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>632</spage><epage>639</epage><pages>632-639</pages><issn>1472-6483</issn><eissn>1472-6491</eissn><abstract>Abstract This is a prospective comparative study investigating cost and effectiveness of IVF/ intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatments after stimulation with recombinant gonadotrophins following either the short or long gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist protocol. Patients in the short protocol ( n = 120) were administered buserelin nasal sprays from day 2 of the menstrual cycle and recombinant FSH from day 5. Patients in the long protocol ( n = 120) were administered buserelin from the previous mid-luteal phase and recombinant FSH after achieving down-regulation. The average age and basal FSH concentrations of both groups were similar. The serum LH concentrations during ovarian stimulation were significantly higher with the short protocol. The total cost of recombinant gonadotrophins (US$527 ± 184 versus US$795 ± 244, P < 0.001) was significantly lower in the short protocol, but there was no significant difference in delivery rates (47.5 versus 36.7%) between the short and long protocols. LH flare-up during the short protocol does not seem to impair the treatment outcome. Using recombinant gonadotrophins, the short GnRH agonist protocol is an effective and cheaper choice for IVF/ICSI treatments.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>18492366</pmid><doi>10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60476-2</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1472-6483 |
ispartof | Reproductive biomedicine online, 2008, Vol.16 (5), p.632-639 |
issn | 1472-6483 1472-6491 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70748667 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Adult Buserelin - administration & dosage Female Fertilization in Vitro Follicle Stimulating Hormone - administration & dosage Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - agonists Humans IVF long GnRH agonist protocol Obstetrics and Gynecology Prospective Studies short GnRH agonist protocol Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic |
title | Prospective comparison of short and long GnRH agonist protocols using recombinant gonadotrophins for IVF/ICSI treatments |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T18%3A18%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prospective%20comparison%20of%20short%20and%20long%20GnRH%20agonist%20protocols%20using%20recombinant%20gonadotrophins%20for%20IVF/ICSI%20treatments&rft.jtitle=Reproductive%20biomedicine%20online&rft.au=Ho,%20Chi-Hong&rft.date=2008&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=632&rft.epage=639&rft.pages=632-639&rft.issn=1472-6483&rft.eissn=1472-6491&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60476-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70748667%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70748667&rft_id=info:pmid/18492366&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1472648310604762&rfr_iscdi=true |