Prospective comparison of short and long GnRH agonist protocols using recombinant gonadotrophins for IVF/ICSI treatments

Abstract This is a prospective comparative study investigating cost and effectiveness of IVF/ intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatments after stimulation with recombinant gonadotrophins following either the short or long gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist protocol. Patients in t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Reproductive biomedicine online 2008, Vol.16 (5), p.632-639
Hauptverfasser: Ho, Chi-Hong, Chen, Shee-Uan, Peng, Fu-Shiang, Chang, Chih-Yuan, Lien, Yih-Ron, Yang, Yu-Shih
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 639
container_issue 5
container_start_page 632
container_title Reproductive biomedicine online
container_volume 16
creator Ho, Chi-Hong
Chen, Shee-Uan
Peng, Fu-Shiang
Chang, Chih-Yuan
Lien, Yih-Ron
Yang, Yu-Shih
description Abstract This is a prospective comparative study investigating cost and effectiveness of IVF/ intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatments after stimulation with recombinant gonadotrophins following either the short or long gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist protocol. Patients in the short protocol ( n = 120) were administered buserelin nasal sprays from day 2 of the menstrual cycle and recombinant FSH from day 5. Patients in the long protocol ( n = 120) were administered buserelin from the previous mid-luteal phase and recombinant FSH after achieving down-regulation. The average age and basal FSH concentrations of both groups were similar. The serum LH concentrations during ovarian stimulation were significantly higher with the short protocol. The total cost of recombinant gonadotrophins (US$527 ± 184 versus US$795 ± 244, P < 0.001) was significantly lower in the short protocol, but there was no significant difference in delivery rates (47.5 versus 36.7%) between the short and long protocols. LH flare-up during the short protocol does not seem to impair the treatment outcome. Using recombinant gonadotrophins, the short GnRH agonist protocol is an effective and cheaper choice for IVF/ICSI treatments.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60476-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70748667</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1472648310604762</els_id><sourcerecordid>70748667</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-d49370051245019f5761656f18e619d8d2f496728f4d3b26cadf79e36d19d0a63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkF9vFSEQxYnR2Fr9CBqejD6sBZaF3ReNubHtTZporPpKuDC01F3YAtvYby_3TzTxxaeZzJxzBn4IvaTkHSVUnF5RLlkjeN--oeStIFyKhj1Cx4fxQB__6fv2CD3L-ZYQ2pO-fYqOaM8H1gpxjH59STHPYIq_B2ziNOvkcww4OpxvYipYB4vHGK7xefh6gfV1DD4XPKdYooljxkv2dZmgejc-6FBwlWgbS4rzjQ8Zu5jw-sfZ6Xp1tcYlgS4ThJKfoydOjxleHOoJ-n726dvqorn8fL5efbxsDBddaSwfWklIRxnvCB1cJwUVnXC0B0EH21vm-CAk6x237YYJo62TA7TC1i3Roj1Br_e59cl3C-SiJp8NjKMOEJesJJG8F0JWYbcXmkokJ3BqTn7S6UFRorbI1Q652vLcjnbIFau-V4cDy2YC-9d1YFwFH_YCqN-895BUNh6CAesrtqJs9P898f6fBDP64I0ef8ID5Nu4pFAZKqoyU2Qfss2gZJfA2t-8cqZz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70748667</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prospective comparison of short and long GnRH agonist protocols using recombinant gonadotrophins for IVF/ICSI treatments</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Ho, Chi-Hong ; Chen, Shee-Uan ; Peng, Fu-Shiang ; Chang, Chih-Yuan ; Lien, Yih-Ron ; Yang, Yu-Shih</creator><creatorcontrib>Ho, Chi-Hong ; Chen, Shee-Uan ; Peng, Fu-Shiang ; Chang, Chih-Yuan ; Lien, Yih-Ron ; Yang, Yu-Shih</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract This is a prospective comparative study investigating cost and effectiveness of IVF/ intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatments after stimulation with recombinant gonadotrophins following either the short or long gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist protocol. Patients in the short protocol ( n = 120) were administered buserelin nasal sprays from day 2 of the menstrual cycle and recombinant FSH from day 5. Patients in the long protocol ( n = 120) were administered buserelin from the previous mid-luteal phase and recombinant FSH after achieving down-regulation. The average age and basal FSH concentrations of both groups were similar. The serum LH concentrations during ovarian stimulation were significantly higher with the short protocol. The total cost of recombinant gonadotrophins (US$527 ± 184 versus US$795 ± 244, P &lt; 0.001) was significantly lower in the short protocol, but there was no significant difference in delivery rates (47.5 versus 36.7%) between the short and long protocols. LH flare-up during the short protocol does not seem to impair the treatment outcome. Using recombinant gonadotrophins, the short GnRH agonist protocol is an effective and cheaper choice for IVF/ICSI treatments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1472-6483</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-6491</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60476-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18492366</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Buserelin - administration &amp; dosage ; Female ; Fertilization in Vitro ; Follicle Stimulating Hormone - administration &amp; dosage ; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - agonists ; Humans ; IVF ; long GnRH agonist protocol ; Obstetrics and Gynecology ; Prospective Studies ; short GnRH agonist protocol ; Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic</subject><ispartof>Reproductive biomedicine online, 2008, Vol.16 (5), p.632-639</ispartof><rights>Reproductive Healthcare Ltd, Duck End Farm, Dry Drayton, Cambridge CB23 8DB, UK</rights><rights>2008 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd, Duck End Farm, Dry Drayton, Cambridge CB23 8DB, UK</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-d49370051245019f5761656f18e619d8d2f496728f4d3b26cadf79e36d19d0a63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-d49370051245019f5761656f18e619d8d2f496728f4d3b26cadf79e36d19d0a63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60476-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4024,27923,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18492366$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ho, Chi-Hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Shee-Uan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Fu-Shiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Chih-Yuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lien, Yih-Ron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Yu-Shih</creatorcontrib><title>Prospective comparison of short and long GnRH agonist protocols using recombinant gonadotrophins for IVF/ICSI treatments</title><title>Reproductive biomedicine online</title><addtitle>Reprod Biomed Online</addtitle><description>Abstract This is a prospective comparative study investigating cost and effectiveness of IVF/ intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatments after stimulation with recombinant gonadotrophins following either the short or long gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist protocol. Patients in the short protocol ( n = 120) were administered buserelin nasal sprays from day 2 of the menstrual cycle and recombinant FSH from day 5. Patients in the long protocol ( n = 120) were administered buserelin from the previous mid-luteal phase and recombinant FSH after achieving down-regulation. The average age and basal FSH concentrations of both groups were similar. The serum LH concentrations during ovarian stimulation were significantly higher with the short protocol. The total cost of recombinant gonadotrophins (US$527 ± 184 versus US$795 ± 244, P &lt; 0.001) was significantly lower in the short protocol, but there was no significant difference in delivery rates (47.5 versus 36.7%) between the short and long protocols. LH flare-up during the short protocol does not seem to impair the treatment outcome. Using recombinant gonadotrophins, the short GnRH agonist protocol is an effective and cheaper choice for IVF/ICSI treatments.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Buserelin - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertilization in Vitro</subject><subject>Follicle Stimulating Hormone - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - agonists</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>IVF</subject><subject>long GnRH agonist protocol</subject><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>short GnRH agonist protocol</subject><subject>Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic</subject><issn>1472-6483</issn><issn>1472-6491</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkF9vFSEQxYnR2Fr9CBqejD6sBZaF3ReNubHtTZporPpKuDC01F3YAtvYby_3TzTxxaeZzJxzBn4IvaTkHSVUnF5RLlkjeN--oeStIFyKhj1Cx4fxQB__6fv2CD3L-ZYQ2pO-fYqOaM8H1gpxjH59STHPYIq_B2ziNOvkcww4OpxvYipYB4vHGK7xefh6gfV1DD4XPKdYooljxkv2dZmgejc-6FBwlWgbS4rzjQ8Zu5jw-sfZ6Xp1tcYlgS4ThJKfoydOjxleHOoJ-n726dvqorn8fL5efbxsDBddaSwfWklIRxnvCB1cJwUVnXC0B0EH21vm-CAk6x237YYJo62TA7TC1i3Roj1Br_e59cl3C-SiJp8NjKMOEJesJJG8F0JWYbcXmkokJ3BqTn7S6UFRorbI1Q652vLcjnbIFau-V4cDy2YC-9d1YFwFH_YCqN-895BUNh6CAesrtqJs9P898f6fBDP64I0ef8ID5Nu4pFAZKqoyU2Qfss2gZJfA2t-8cqZz</recordid><startdate>2008</startdate><enddate>2008</enddate><creator>Ho, Chi-Hong</creator><creator>Chen, Shee-Uan</creator><creator>Peng, Fu-Shiang</creator><creator>Chang, Chih-Yuan</creator><creator>Lien, Yih-Ron</creator><creator>Yang, Yu-Shih</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2008</creationdate><title>Prospective comparison of short and long GnRH agonist protocols using recombinant gonadotrophins for IVF/ICSI treatments</title><author>Ho, Chi-Hong ; Chen, Shee-Uan ; Peng, Fu-Shiang ; Chang, Chih-Yuan ; Lien, Yih-Ron ; Yang, Yu-Shih</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-d49370051245019f5761656f18e619d8d2f496728f4d3b26cadf79e36d19d0a63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Buserelin - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertilization in Vitro</topic><topic>Follicle Stimulating Hormone - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - agonists</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>IVF</topic><topic>long GnRH agonist protocol</topic><topic>Obstetrics and Gynecology</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>short GnRH agonist protocol</topic><topic>Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ho, Chi-Hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Shee-Uan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Fu-Shiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Chih-Yuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lien, Yih-Ron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Yu-Shih</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Reproductive biomedicine online</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ho, Chi-Hong</au><au>Chen, Shee-Uan</au><au>Peng, Fu-Shiang</au><au>Chang, Chih-Yuan</au><au>Lien, Yih-Ron</au><au>Yang, Yu-Shih</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prospective comparison of short and long GnRH agonist protocols using recombinant gonadotrophins for IVF/ICSI treatments</atitle><jtitle>Reproductive biomedicine online</jtitle><addtitle>Reprod Biomed Online</addtitle><date>2008</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>632</spage><epage>639</epage><pages>632-639</pages><issn>1472-6483</issn><eissn>1472-6491</eissn><abstract>Abstract This is a prospective comparative study investigating cost and effectiveness of IVF/ intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatments after stimulation with recombinant gonadotrophins following either the short or long gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist protocol. Patients in the short protocol ( n = 120) were administered buserelin nasal sprays from day 2 of the menstrual cycle and recombinant FSH from day 5. Patients in the long protocol ( n = 120) were administered buserelin from the previous mid-luteal phase and recombinant FSH after achieving down-regulation. The average age and basal FSH concentrations of both groups were similar. The serum LH concentrations during ovarian stimulation were significantly higher with the short protocol. The total cost of recombinant gonadotrophins (US$527 ± 184 versus US$795 ± 244, P &lt; 0.001) was significantly lower in the short protocol, but there was no significant difference in delivery rates (47.5 versus 36.7%) between the short and long protocols. LH flare-up during the short protocol does not seem to impair the treatment outcome. Using recombinant gonadotrophins, the short GnRH agonist protocol is an effective and cheaper choice for IVF/ICSI treatments.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>18492366</pmid><doi>10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60476-2</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1472-6483
ispartof Reproductive biomedicine online, 2008, Vol.16 (5), p.632-639
issn 1472-6483
1472-6491
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70748667
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Adult
Buserelin - administration & dosage
Female
Fertilization in Vitro
Follicle Stimulating Hormone - administration & dosage
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - agonists
Humans
IVF
long GnRH agonist protocol
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Prospective Studies
short GnRH agonist protocol
Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic
title Prospective comparison of short and long GnRH agonist protocols using recombinant gonadotrophins for IVF/ICSI treatments
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T18%3A18%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prospective%20comparison%20of%20short%20and%20long%20GnRH%20agonist%20protocols%20using%20recombinant%20gonadotrophins%20for%20IVF/ICSI%20treatments&rft.jtitle=Reproductive%20biomedicine%20online&rft.au=Ho,%20Chi-Hong&rft.date=2008&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=632&rft.epage=639&rft.pages=632-639&rft.issn=1472-6483&rft.eissn=1472-6491&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60476-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70748667%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70748667&rft_id=info:pmid/18492366&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1472648310604762&rfr_iscdi=true