Bone stress and interfacial sliding analysis of implant designs on an immediately loaded maxillary implant: A non-linear finite element study
Abstract Objectives This study investigated the surrounding bone stress and the implant–bone interfacial sliding of implant designs and implant sizes of immediately loaded implant with maxillary sinus augmentation by using three-dimensional (3D) non-linear finite element (FE) analysis. Methods Twent...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of dentistry 2008-06, Vol.36 (6), p.409-417 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 417 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 409 |
container_title | Journal of dentistry |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Huang, Heng-Li Hsu, Jui-Ting Fuh, Lih-Jyh Tu, Ming-Gene Ko, Ching-Chang Shen, Yen-Wen |
description | Abstract Objectives This study investigated the surrounding bone stress and the implant–bone interfacial sliding of implant designs and implant sizes of immediately loaded implant with maxillary sinus augmentation by using three-dimensional (3D) non-linear finite element (FE) analysis. Methods Twenty-four FE models including four implant designs (cylindrical, threaded, stepped and step-thread implants) and three implant dimensions (standard, long and wide threaded implants) with a bonded and three levels of frictional contact of implant–bone interfaces were analyzed. The maxillary model was constructed from computer tomography (CT) images of a human skull and all 3D implant models were created via the computer-aided design (CAD) software. Results The use of threaded implants decreased the bone stress and sliding distance obviously about 30% as compared with non-threaded (cylindrical and stepped) implants. Increasing the implant's length or diameter reduced the bone stress by 13–26%. Employing a immediately loaded implant with smooth machine surface ( μ = 0.3, μ represents frictional coefficient) increased the bone stress by 28–63% as compared with the osseointegrated (bonded interfaces) implants. Roughening the implant surface ( μ > 0.3) did not reduced the bone stress, however it did decrease the interfacial sliding between implant and bone. Conclusions For an immediately loaded implant placed with sinus augmentation, using threaded implant could decrease both the bone stress and implant–bone sliding distance which may improve the implant initial stability and long-term survival. Rough surface of implants shows no benefit to reduce the bone stress but they could lower the interfacial sliding. On the contrary, employing long or wide implants decrease the bone stress but they cannot diminish the interfacial sliding. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.02.015 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70747714</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0300571208000626</els_id><sourcerecordid>2720383851</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-321bb035070dd1b9b527970324be36ade11c1ade93c364f2dd7ccd59e718cb7e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUl2L1TAQLaK419VfIEhA8K110rRNK7iwLn7Bgg8q-BbSZLrkmqbXpBX7I_zPTr1XFvbFp4HJOTNzzkmWPeVQcODNy32xtxjmogRoCygL4PW9bMdb2eVcNt_uZzsQAHkteXmWPUppDwAVlN3D7Iy3oq26stllv99MAVmaI6bEdLDMhRnjoI3TniXvrAs31Nd-TS6xaWBuPHgdZmYxuZtArUDP1B3ROj2jX5mftEXLRv3Lea_j-o_yil2yMIXcu4A6ssEFNyNDjyOpoBMWuz7OHgzaJ3xyqufZ13dvv1x9yK8_vf94dXmdmxqaORcl73sQNUiwlvddX5eykyDKqkfR0HbODafSCSOaaiitlcbYukPJW9NLFOfZi-PcQ5x-LJhmNbpkkM4NOC1JSZCVlLwi4PM7wP20RLIjKb6520rRbShxRJk4pRRxUIfoRpJOILVlpfbqb1Zqy0pBqSgrYj07zV56cu-WcwqHAK-PACQrfjqMKhmHwZDTEc2s7OT-s-DiDt-Q985o_x1XTLdKVCKC-rwJ2n4LtPRTGjrgD9fSvUk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1030087394</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bone stress and interfacial sliding analysis of implant designs on an immediately loaded maxillary implant: A non-linear finite element study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Huang, Heng-Li ; Hsu, Jui-Ting ; Fuh, Lih-Jyh ; Tu, Ming-Gene ; Ko, Ching-Chang ; Shen, Yen-Wen</creator><creatorcontrib>Huang, Heng-Li ; Hsu, Jui-Ting ; Fuh, Lih-Jyh ; Tu, Ming-Gene ; Ko, Ching-Chang ; Shen, Yen-Wen</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objectives This study investigated the surrounding bone stress and the implant–bone interfacial sliding of implant designs and implant sizes of immediately loaded implant with maxillary sinus augmentation by using three-dimensional (3D) non-linear finite element (FE) analysis. Methods Twenty-four FE models including four implant designs (cylindrical, threaded, stepped and step-thread implants) and three implant dimensions (standard, long and wide threaded implants) with a bonded and three levels of frictional contact of implant–bone interfaces were analyzed. The maxillary model was constructed from computer tomography (CT) images of a human skull and all 3D implant models were created via the computer-aided design (CAD) software. Results The use of threaded implants decreased the bone stress and sliding distance obviously about 30% as compared with non-threaded (cylindrical and stepped) implants. Increasing the implant's length or diameter reduced the bone stress by 13–26%. Employing a immediately loaded implant with smooth machine surface ( μ = 0.3, μ represents frictional coefficient) increased the bone stress by 28–63% as compared with the osseointegrated (bonded interfaces) implants. Roughening the implant surface ( μ > 0.3) did not reduced the bone stress, however it did decrease the interfacial sliding between implant and bone. Conclusions For an immediately loaded implant placed with sinus augmentation, using threaded implant could decrease both the bone stress and implant–bone sliding distance which may improve the implant initial stability and long-term survival. Rough surface of implants shows no benefit to reduce the bone stress but they could lower the interfacial sliding. On the contrary, employing long or wide implants decrease the bone stress but they cannot diminish the interfacial sliding.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-5712</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-176X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.02.015</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18384926</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Alveolar Process - physiology ; Computer Simulation ; Computer-Aided Design ; Crowns ; CT-imaging ; Dental Implants ; Dental Models ; Dental Prosthesis Design ; Dental Prosthesis Retention - methods ; Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported ; Dental Stress Analysis - methods ; Dentistry ; Failure ; Finite Element Analysis ; Friction ; Humans ; Immediately loaded implants ; Implant designs ; Maxilla - diagnostic imaging ; Maxillary Sinus - surgery ; Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic ; Radiography ; Sinus augmentation ; Sinuses ; Studies ; Surface Properties ; Time Factors ; Transplants & implants</subject><ispartof>Journal of dentistry, 2008-06, Vol.36 (6), p.409-417</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2008 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-321bb035070dd1b9b527970324be36ade11c1ade93c364f2dd7ccd59e718cb7e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-321bb035070dd1b9b527970324be36ade11c1ade93c364f2dd7ccd59e718cb7e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300571208000626$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18384926$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huang, Heng-Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsu, Jui-Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuh, Lih-Jyh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tu, Ming-Gene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ko, Ching-Chang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Yen-Wen</creatorcontrib><title>Bone stress and interfacial sliding analysis of implant designs on an immediately loaded maxillary implant: A non-linear finite element study</title><title>Journal of dentistry</title><addtitle>J Dent</addtitle><description>Abstract Objectives This study investigated the surrounding bone stress and the implant–bone interfacial sliding of implant designs and implant sizes of immediately loaded implant with maxillary sinus augmentation by using three-dimensional (3D) non-linear finite element (FE) analysis. Methods Twenty-four FE models including four implant designs (cylindrical, threaded, stepped and step-thread implants) and three implant dimensions (standard, long and wide threaded implants) with a bonded and three levels of frictional contact of implant–bone interfaces were analyzed. The maxillary model was constructed from computer tomography (CT) images of a human skull and all 3D implant models were created via the computer-aided design (CAD) software. Results The use of threaded implants decreased the bone stress and sliding distance obviously about 30% as compared with non-threaded (cylindrical and stepped) implants. Increasing the implant's length or diameter reduced the bone stress by 13–26%. Employing a immediately loaded implant with smooth machine surface ( μ = 0.3, μ represents frictional coefficient) increased the bone stress by 28–63% as compared with the osseointegrated (bonded interfaces) implants. Roughening the implant surface ( μ > 0.3) did not reduced the bone stress, however it did decrease the interfacial sliding between implant and bone. Conclusions For an immediately loaded implant placed with sinus augmentation, using threaded implant could decrease both the bone stress and implant–bone sliding distance which may improve the implant initial stability and long-term survival. Rough surface of implants shows no benefit to reduce the bone stress but they could lower the interfacial sliding. On the contrary, employing long or wide implants decrease the bone stress but they cannot diminish the interfacial sliding.</description><subject>Alveolar Process - physiology</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Computer-Aided Design</subject><subject>Crowns</subject><subject>CT-imaging</subject><subject>Dental Implants</subject><subject>Dental Models</subject><subject>Dental Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Dental Prosthesis Retention - methods</subject><subject>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</subject><subject>Dental Stress Analysis - methods</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Failure</subject><subject>Finite Element Analysis</subject><subject>Friction</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immediately loaded implants</subject><subject>Implant designs</subject><subject>Maxilla - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Maxillary Sinus - surgery</subject><subject>Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Sinus augmentation</subject><subject>Sinuses</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surface Properties</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Transplants & implants</subject><issn>0300-5712</issn><issn>1879-176X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUl2L1TAQLaK419VfIEhA8K110rRNK7iwLn7Bgg8q-BbSZLrkmqbXpBX7I_zPTr1XFvbFp4HJOTNzzkmWPeVQcODNy32xtxjmogRoCygL4PW9bMdb2eVcNt_uZzsQAHkteXmWPUppDwAVlN3D7Iy3oq26stllv99MAVmaI6bEdLDMhRnjoI3TniXvrAs31Nd-TS6xaWBuPHgdZmYxuZtArUDP1B3ROj2jX5mftEXLRv3Lea_j-o_yil2yMIXcu4A6ssEFNyNDjyOpoBMWuz7OHgzaJ3xyqufZ13dvv1x9yK8_vf94dXmdmxqaORcl73sQNUiwlvddX5eykyDKqkfR0HbODafSCSOaaiitlcbYukPJW9NLFOfZi-PcQ5x-LJhmNbpkkM4NOC1JSZCVlLwi4PM7wP20RLIjKb6520rRbShxRJk4pRRxUIfoRpJOILVlpfbqb1Zqy0pBqSgrYj07zV56cu-WcwqHAK-PACQrfjqMKhmHwZDTEc2s7OT-s-DiDt-Q985o_x1XTLdKVCKC-rwJ2n4LtPRTGjrgD9fSvUk</recordid><startdate>20080601</startdate><enddate>20080601</enddate><creator>Huang, Heng-Li</creator><creator>Hsu, Jui-Ting</creator><creator>Fuh, Lih-Jyh</creator><creator>Tu, Ming-Gene</creator><creator>Ko, Ching-Chang</creator><creator>Shen, Yen-Wen</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080601</creationdate><title>Bone stress and interfacial sliding analysis of implant designs on an immediately loaded maxillary implant: A non-linear finite element study</title><author>Huang, Heng-Li ; Hsu, Jui-Ting ; Fuh, Lih-Jyh ; Tu, Ming-Gene ; Ko, Ching-Chang ; Shen, Yen-Wen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-321bb035070dd1b9b527970324be36ade11c1ade93c364f2dd7ccd59e718cb7e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Alveolar Process - physiology</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Computer-Aided Design</topic><topic>Crowns</topic><topic>CT-imaging</topic><topic>Dental Implants</topic><topic>Dental Models</topic><topic>Dental Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Dental Prosthesis Retention - methods</topic><topic>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</topic><topic>Dental Stress Analysis - methods</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Failure</topic><topic>Finite Element Analysis</topic><topic>Friction</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immediately loaded implants</topic><topic>Implant designs</topic><topic>Maxilla - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Maxillary Sinus - surgery</topic><topic>Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Sinus augmentation</topic><topic>Sinuses</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surface Properties</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Transplants & implants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huang, Heng-Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsu, Jui-Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuh, Lih-Jyh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tu, Ming-Gene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ko, Ching-Chang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Yen-Wen</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huang, Heng-Li</au><au>Hsu, Jui-Ting</au><au>Fuh, Lih-Jyh</au><au>Tu, Ming-Gene</au><au>Ko, Ching-Chang</au><au>Shen, Yen-Wen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bone stress and interfacial sliding analysis of implant designs on an immediately loaded maxillary implant: A non-linear finite element study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>J Dent</addtitle><date>2008-06-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>409</spage><epage>417</epage><pages>409-417</pages><issn>0300-5712</issn><eissn>1879-176X</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objectives This study investigated the surrounding bone stress and the implant–bone interfacial sliding of implant designs and implant sizes of immediately loaded implant with maxillary sinus augmentation by using three-dimensional (3D) non-linear finite element (FE) analysis. Methods Twenty-four FE models including four implant designs (cylindrical, threaded, stepped and step-thread implants) and three implant dimensions (standard, long and wide threaded implants) with a bonded and three levels of frictional contact of implant–bone interfaces were analyzed. The maxillary model was constructed from computer tomography (CT) images of a human skull and all 3D implant models were created via the computer-aided design (CAD) software. Results The use of threaded implants decreased the bone stress and sliding distance obviously about 30% as compared with non-threaded (cylindrical and stepped) implants. Increasing the implant's length or diameter reduced the bone stress by 13–26%. Employing a immediately loaded implant with smooth machine surface ( μ = 0.3, μ represents frictional coefficient) increased the bone stress by 28–63% as compared with the osseointegrated (bonded interfaces) implants. Roughening the implant surface ( μ > 0.3) did not reduced the bone stress, however it did decrease the interfacial sliding between implant and bone. Conclusions For an immediately loaded implant placed with sinus augmentation, using threaded implant could decrease both the bone stress and implant–bone sliding distance which may improve the implant initial stability and long-term survival. Rough surface of implants shows no benefit to reduce the bone stress but they could lower the interfacial sliding. On the contrary, employing long or wide implants decrease the bone stress but they cannot diminish the interfacial sliding.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>18384926</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jdent.2008.02.015</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0300-5712 |
ispartof | Journal of dentistry, 2008-06, Vol.36 (6), p.409-417 |
issn | 0300-5712 1879-176X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70747714 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Alveolar Process - physiology Computer Simulation Computer-Aided Design Crowns CT-imaging Dental Implants Dental Models Dental Prosthesis Design Dental Prosthesis Retention - methods Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported Dental Stress Analysis - methods Dentistry Failure Finite Element Analysis Friction Humans Immediately loaded implants Implant designs Maxilla - diagnostic imaging Maxillary Sinus - surgery Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic Radiography Sinus augmentation Sinuses Studies Surface Properties Time Factors Transplants & implants |
title | Bone stress and interfacial sliding analysis of implant designs on an immediately loaded maxillary implant: A non-linear finite element study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T15%3A37%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bone%20stress%20and%20interfacial%20sliding%20analysis%20of%20implant%20designs%20on%20an%20immediately%20loaded%20maxillary%20implant:%20A%20non-linear%20finite%20element%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20dentistry&rft.au=Huang,%20Heng-Li&rft.date=2008-06-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=409&rft.epage=417&rft.pages=409-417&rft.issn=0300-5712&rft.eissn=1879-176X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jdent.2008.02.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2720383851%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1030087394&rft_id=info:pmid/18384926&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0300571208000626&rfr_iscdi=true |