Bone stress and interfacial sliding analysis of implant designs on an immediately loaded maxillary implant: A non-linear finite element study

Abstract Objectives This study investigated the surrounding bone stress and the implant–bone interfacial sliding of implant designs and implant sizes of immediately loaded implant with maxillary sinus augmentation by using three-dimensional (3D) non-linear finite element (FE) analysis. Methods Twent...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of dentistry 2008-06, Vol.36 (6), p.409-417
Hauptverfasser: Huang, Heng-Li, Hsu, Jui-Ting, Fuh, Lih-Jyh, Tu, Ming-Gene, Ko, Ching-Chang, Shen, Yen-Wen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 417
container_issue 6
container_start_page 409
container_title Journal of dentistry
container_volume 36
creator Huang, Heng-Li
Hsu, Jui-Ting
Fuh, Lih-Jyh
Tu, Ming-Gene
Ko, Ching-Chang
Shen, Yen-Wen
description Abstract Objectives This study investigated the surrounding bone stress and the implant–bone interfacial sliding of implant designs and implant sizes of immediately loaded implant with maxillary sinus augmentation by using three-dimensional (3D) non-linear finite element (FE) analysis. Methods Twenty-four FE models including four implant designs (cylindrical, threaded, stepped and step-thread implants) and three implant dimensions (standard, long and wide threaded implants) with a bonded and three levels of frictional contact of implant–bone interfaces were analyzed. The maxillary model was constructed from computer tomography (CT) images of a human skull and all 3D implant models were created via the computer-aided design (CAD) software. Results The use of threaded implants decreased the bone stress and sliding distance obviously about 30% as compared with non-threaded (cylindrical and stepped) implants. Increasing the implant's length or diameter reduced the bone stress by 13–26%. Employing a immediately loaded implant with smooth machine surface ( μ = 0.3, μ represents frictional coefficient) increased the bone stress by 28–63% as compared with the osseointegrated (bonded interfaces) implants. Roughening the implant surface ( μ > 0.3) did not reduced the bone stress, however it did decrease the interfacial sliding between implant and bone. Conclusions For an immediately loaded implant placed with sinus augmentation, using threaded implant could decrease both the bone stress and implant–bone sliding distance which may improve the implant initial stability and long-term survival. Rough surface of implants shows no benefit to reduce the bone stress but they could lower the interfacial sliding. On the contrary, employing long or wide implants decrease the bone stress but they cannot diminish the interfacial sliding.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.02.015
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70747714</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0300571208000626</els_id><sourcerecordid>2720383851</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-321bb035070dd1b9b527970324be36ade11c1ade93c364f2dd7ccd59e718cb7e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUl2L1TAQLaK419VfIEhA8K110rRNK7iwLn7Bgg8q-BbSZLrkmqbXpBX7I_zPTr1XFvbFp4HJOTNzzkmWPeVQcODNy32xtxjmogRoCygL4PW9bMdb2eVcNt_uZzsQAHkteXmWPUppDwAVlN3D7Iy3oq26stllv99MAVmaI6bEdLDMhRnjoI3TniXvrAs31Nd-TS6xaWBuPHgdZmYxuZtArUDP1B3ROj2jX5mftEXLRv3Lea_j-o_yil2yMIXcu4A6ssEFNyNDjyOpoBMWuz7OHgzaJ3xyqufZ13dvv1x9yK8_vf94dXmdmxqaORcl73sQNUiwlvddX5eykyDKqkfR0HbODafSCSOaaiitlcbYukPJW9NLFOfZi-PcQ5x-LJhmNbpkkM4NOC1JSZCVlLwi4PM7wP20RLIjKb6520rRbShxRJk4pRRxUIfoRpJOILVlpfbqb1Zqy0pBqSgrYj07zV56cu-WcwqHAK-PACQrfjqMKhmHwZDTEc2s7OT-s-DiDt-Q985o_x1XTLdKVCKC-rwJ2n4LtPRTGjrgD9fSvUk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1030087394</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bone stress and interfacial sliding analysis of implant designs on an immediately loaded maxillary implant: A non-linear finite element study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Huang, Heng-Li ; Hsu, Jui-Ting ; Fuh, Lih-Jyh ; Tu, Ming-Gene ; Ko, Ching-Chang ; Shen, Yen-Wen</creator><creatorcontrib>Huang, Heng-Li ; Hsu, Jui-Ting ; Fuh, Lih-Jyh ; Tu, Ming-Gene ; Ko, Ching-Chang ; Shen, Yen-Wen</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objectives This study investigated the surrounding bone stress and the implant–bone interfacial sliding of implant designs and implant sizes of immediately loaded implant with maxillary sinus augmentation by using three-dimensional (3D) non-linear finite element (FE) analysis. Methods Twenty-four FE models including four implant designs (cylindrical, threaded, stepped and step-thread implants) and three implant dimensions (standard, long and wide threaded implants) with a bonded and three levels of frictional contact of implant–bone interfaces were analyzed. The maxillary model was constructed from computer tomography (CT) images of a human skull and all 3D implant models were created via the computer-aided design (CAD) software. Results The use of threaded implants decreased the bone stress and sliding distance obviously about 30% as compared with non-threaded (cylindrical and stepped) implants. Increasing the implant's length or diameter reduced the bone stress by 13–26%. Employing a immediately loaded implant with smooth machine surface ( μ = 0.3, μ represents frictional coefficient) increased the bone stress by 28–63% as compared with the osseointegrated (bonded interfaces) implants. Roughening the implant surface ( μ &gt; 0.3) did not reduced the bone stress, however it did decrease the interfacial sliding between implant and bone. Conclusions For an immediately loaded implant placed with sinus augmentation, using threaded implant could decrease both the bone stress and implant–bone sliding distance which may improve the implant initial stability and long-term survival. Rough surface of implants shows no benefit to reduce the bone stress but they could lower the interfacial sliding. On the contrary, employing long or wide implants decrease the bone stress but they cannot diminish the interfacial sliding.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-5712</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-176X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.02.015</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18384926</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Alveolar Process - physiology ; Computer Simulation ; Computer-Aided Design ; Crowns ; CT-imaging ; Dental Implants ; Dental Models ; Dental Prosthesis Design ; Dental Prosthesis Retention - methods ; Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported ; Dental Stress Analysis - methods ; Dentistry ; Failure ; Finite Element Analysis ; Friction ; Humans ; Immediately loaded implants ; Implant designs ; Maxilla - diagnostic imaging ; Maxillary Sinus - surgery ; Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic ; Radiography ; Sinus augmentation ; Sinuses ; Studies ; Surface Properties ; Time Factors ; Transplants &amp; implants</subject><ispartof>Journal of dentistry, 2008-06, Vol.36 (6), p.409-417</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2008 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-321bb035070dd1b9b527970324be36ade11c1ade93c364f2dd7ccd59e718cb7e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-321bb035070dd1b9b527970324be36ade11c1ade93c364f2dd7ccd59e718cb7e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300571208000626$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18384926$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huang, Heng-Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsu, Jui-Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuh, Lih-Jyh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tu, Ming-Gene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ko, Ching-Chang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Yen-Wen</creatorcontrib><title>Bone stress and interfacial sliding analysis of implant designs on an immediately loaded maxillary implant: A non-linear finite element study</title><title>Journal of dentistry</title><addtitle>J Dent</addtitle><description>Abstract Objectives This study investigated the surrounding bone stress and the implant–bone interfacial sliding of implant designs and implant sizes of immediately loaded implant with maxillary sinus augmentation by using three-dimensional (3D) non-linear finite element (FE) analysis. Methods Twenty-four FE models including four implant designs (cylindrical, threaded, stepped and step-thread implants) and three implant dimensions (standard, long and wide threaded implants) with a bonded and three levels of frictional contact of implant–bone interfaces were analyzed. The maxillary model was constructed from computer tomography (CT) images of a human skull and all 3D implant models were created via the computer-aided design (CAD) software. Results The use of threaded implants decreased the bone stress and sliding distance obviously about 30% as compared with non-threaded (cylindrical and stepped) implants. Increasing the implant's length or diameter reduced the bone stress by 13–26%. Employing a immediately loaded implant with smooth machine surface ( μ = 0.3, μ represents frictional coefficient) increased the bone stress by 28–63% as compared with the osseointegrated (bonded interfaces) implants. Roughening the implant surface ( μ &gt; 0.3) did not reduced the bone stress, however it did decrease the interfacial sliding between implant and bone. Conclusions For an immediately loaded implant placed with sinus augmentation, using threaded implant could decrease both the bone stress and implant–bone sliding distance which may improve the implant initial stability and long-term survival. Rough surface of implants shows no benefit to reduce the bone stress but they could lower the interfacial sliding. On the contrary, employing long or wide implants decrease the bone stress but they cannot diminish the interfacial sliding.</description><subject>Alveolar Process - physiology</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Computer-Aided Design</subject><subject>Crowns</subject><subject>CT-imaging</subject><subject>Dental Implants</subject><subject>Dental Models</subject><subject>Dental Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Dental Prosthesis Retention - methods</subject><subject>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</subject><subject>Dental Stress Analysis - methods</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Failure</subject><subject>Finite Element Analysis</subject><subject>Friction</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immediately loaded implants</subject><subject>Implant designs</subject><subject>Maxilla - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Maxillary Sinus - surgery</subject><subject>Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Sinus augmentation</subject><subject>Sinuses</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surface Properties</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Transplants &amp; implants</subject><issn>0300-5712</issn><issn>1879-176X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUl2L1TAQLaK419VfIEhA8K110rRNK7iwLn7Bgg8q-BbSZLrkmqbXpBX7I_zPTr1XFvbFp4HJOTNzzkmWPeVQcODNy32xtxjmogRoCygL4PW9bMdb2eVcNt_uZzsQAHkteXmWPUppDwAVlN3D7Iy3oq26stllv99MAVmaI6bEdLDMhRnjoI3TniXvrAs31Nd-TS6xaWBuPHgdZmYxuZtArUDP1B3ROj2jX5mftEXLRv3Lea_j-o_yil2yMIXcu4A6ssEFNyNDjyOpoBMWuz7OHgzaJ3xyqufZ13dvv1x9yK8_vf94dXmdmxqaORcl73sQNUiwlvddX5eykyDKqkfR0HbODafSCSOaaiitlcbYukPJW9NLFOfZi-PcQ5x-LJhmNbpkkM4NOC1JSZCVlLwi4PM7wP20RLIjKb6520rRbShxRJk4pRRxUIfoRpJOILVlpfbqb1Zqy0pBqSgrYj07zV56cu-WcwqHAK-PACQrfjqMKhmHwZDTEc2s7OT-s-DiDt-Q985o_x1XTLdKVCKC-rwJ2n4LtPRTGjrgD9fSvUk</recordid><startdate>20080601</startdate><enddate>20080601</enddate><creator>Huang, Heng-Li</creator><creator>Hsu, Jui-Ting</creator><creator>Fuh, Lih-Jyh</creator><creator>Tu, Ming-Gene</creator><creator>Ko, Ching-Chang</creator><creator>Shen, Yen-Wen</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080601</creationdate><title>Bone stress and interfacial sliding analysis of implant designs on an immediately loaded maxillary implant: A non-linear finite element study</title><author>Huang, Heng-Li ; Hsu, Jui-Ting ; Fuh, Lih-Jyh ; Tu, Ming-Gene ; Ko, Ching-Chang ; Shen, Yen-Wen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-321bb035070dd1b9b527970324be36ade11c1ade93c364f2dd7ccd59e718cb7e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Alveolar Process - physiology</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Computer-Aided Design</topic><topic>Crowns</topic><topic>CT-imaging</topic><topic>Dental Implants</topic><topic>Dental Models</topic><topic>Dental Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Dental Prosthesis Retention - methods</topic><topic>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</topic><topic>Dental Stress Analysis - methods</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Failure</topic><topic>Finite Element Analysis</topic><topic>Friction</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immediately loaded implants</topic><topic>Implant designs</topic><topic>Maxilla - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Maxillary Sinus - surgery</topic><topic>Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Sinus augmentation</topic><topic>Sinuses</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surface Properties</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Transplants &amp; implants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huang, Heng-Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsu, Jui-Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuh, Lih-Jyh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tu, Ming-Gene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ko, Ching-Chang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Yen-Wen</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huang, Heng-Li</au><au>Hsu, Jui-Ting</au><au>Fuh, Lih-Jyh</au><au>Tu, Ming-Gene</au><au>Ko, Ching-Chang</au><au>Shen, Yen-Wen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bone stress and interfacial sliding analysis of implant designs on an immediately loaded maxillary implant: A non-linear finite element study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>J Dent</addtitle><date>2008-06-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>409</spage><epage>417</epage><pages>409-417</pages><issn>0300-5712</issn><eissn>1879-176X</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objectives This study investigated the surrounding bone stress and the implant–bone interfacial sliding of implant designs and implant sizes of immediately loaded implant with maxillary sinus augmentation by using three-dimensional (3D) non-linear finite element (FE) analysis. Methods Twenty-four FE models including four implant designs (cylindrical, threaded, stepped and step-thread implants) and three implant dimensions (standard, long and wide threaded implants) with a bonded and three levels of frictional contact of implant–bone interfaces were analyzed. The maxillary model was constructed from computer tomography (CT) images of a human skull and all 3D implant models were created via the computer-aided design (CAD) software. Results The use of threaded implants decreased the bone stress and sliding distance obviously about 30% as compared with non-threaded (cylindrical and stepped) implants. Increasing the implant's length or diameter reduced the bone stress by 13–26%. Employing a immediately loaded implant with smooth machine surface ( μ = 0.3, μ represents frictional coefficient) increased the bone stress by 28–63% as compared with the osseointegrated (bonded interfaces) implants. Roughening the implant surface ( μ &gt; 0.3) did not reduced the bone stress, however it did decrease the interfacial sliding between implant and bone. Conclusions For an immediately loaded implant placed with sinus augmentation, using threaded implant could decrease both the bone stress and implant–bone sliding distance which may improve the implant initial stability and long-term survival. Rough surface of implants shows no benefit to reduce the bone stress but they could lower the interfacial sliding. On the contrary, employing long or wide implants decrease the bone stress but they cannot diminish the interfacial sliding.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>18384926</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jdent.2008.02.015</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0300-5712
ispartof Journal of dentistry, 2008-06, Vol.36 (6), p.409-417
issn 0300-5712
1879-176X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70747714
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Alveolar Process - physiology
Computer Simulation
Computer-Aided Design
Crowns
CT-imaging
Dental Implants
Dental Models
Dental Prosthesis Design
Dental Prosthesis Retention - methods
Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported
Dental Stress Analysis - methods
Dentistry
Failure
Finite Element Analysis
Friction
Humans
Immediately loaded implants
Implant designs
Maxilla - diagnostic imaging
Maxillary Sinus - surgery
Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic
Radiography
Sinus augmentation
Sinuses
Studies
Surface Properties
Time Factors
Transplants & implants
title Bone stress and interfacial sliding analysis of implant designs on an immediately loaded maxillary implant: A non-linear finite element study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T15%3A37%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bone%20stress%20and%20interfacial%20sliding%20analysis%20of%20implant%20designs%20on%20an%20immediately%20loaded%20maxillary%20implant:%20A%20non-linear%20finite%20element%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20dentistry&rft.au=Huang,%20Heng-Li&rft.date=2008-06-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=409&rft.epage=417&rft.pages=409-417&rft.issn=0300-5712&rft.eissn=1879-176X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jdent.2008.02.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2720383851%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1030087394&rft_id=info:pmid/18384926&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0300571208000626&rfr_iscdi=true