Internal Consistency Reliability of the Self-Report Antisocial Process Screening Device
The self-report version of the Antisocial Process Screening Device (APSD) has become a popular measure for assessing psychopathic features in justice-involved adolescents. However, the internal consistency reliability of its component scales (Narcissism, Callous-Unemotional, and Impulsivity) has bee...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Assessment (Odessa, Fla.) Fla.), 2006-03, Vol.13 (1), p.107-113 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 113 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 107 |
container_title | Assessment (Odessa, Fla.) |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Poythress, Norman G. Douglas, Kevin S. Falkenbach, Diana Cruise, Keith Lee, Zina Murrie, Daniel C. Vitacco, Michael |
description | The self-report version of the Antisocial Process Screening Device (APSD) has become a popular measure for assessing psychopathic features in justice-involved adolescents. However, the internal consistency reliability of its component scales (Narcissism, Callous-Unemotional, and Impulsivity) has been questioned in several studies. This study evaluates the internal consistency reliability of the self-report APSD by examining various indices (e.g., Cronbach's alpha, mean interitem correlation) across 11 studies. Whereas the Narcissism and Impulsivity scales display moderate to good reliability, internal consistency indices for the Callous-Unemotional scale are consistently poor across studies. Suggestions are made for revisions to this scale that would substantially improve its internal consistency reliability. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1073191105284279 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70736168</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ734833</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_1073191105284279</sage_id><sourcerecordid>70736168</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-f1ffd36513b830883857a088c44750c2b9b13acaf94dd0b18887278f059d26f03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM9LwzAUx4Mobk7vHkR68lZNmqZJj2POXwyUTfFY0vRlZnTNTFph_70ZHQqCp_fg8_2-Bx-Ezgm-JoTzG4I5JTkhmCUiTXh-gIaEsSSmqcgPwx5wvOMDdOL9CmPCslwcowHJ0pTyJBmi98emBdfIOprYxhvfQqO20RxqI0tTm3YbWR21HxAtoNbxHDbWtdG4aY23yoTWi7MKvI8WygE0pllGt_BlFJyiIy1rD2f7OUJvd9PXyUM8e75_nIxnsaIsa2NNtK5oxggtBcVCUMG4DFOlKWdYJWVeEiqV1HlaVbgkQgiecKExy6sk05iO0FV_d-PsZwe-LdbGK6hr2YDtfMGDgoxkIgRxH1TOeu9AFxtn1tJtC4KLnczir8xQudzf7so1VL-Fvb0QuOgD4Iz6wdMnHvxTGnDcYy-XUKxst_Ps___3DTTahIs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70736168</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Internal Consistency Reliability of the Self-Report Antisocial Process Screening Device</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Poythress, Norman G. ; Douglas, Kevin S. ; Falkenbach, Diana ; Cruise, Keith ; Lee, Zina ; Murrie, Daniel C. ; Vitacco, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Poythress, Norman G. ; Douglas, Kevin S. ; Falkenbach, Diana ; Cruise, Keith ; Lee, Zina ; Murrie, Daniel C. ; Vitacco, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>The self-report version of the Antisocial Process Screening Device (APSD) has become a popular measure for assessing psychopathic features in justice-involved adolescents. However, the internal consistency reliability of its component scales (Narcissism, Callous-Unemotional, and Impulsivity) has been questioned in several studies. This study evaluates the internal consistency reliability of the self-report APSD by examining various indices (e.g., Cronbach's alpha, mean interitem correlation) across 11 studies. Whereas the Narcissism and Impulsivity scales display moderate to good reliability, internal consistency indices for the Callous-Unemotional scale are consistently poor across studies. Suggestions are made for revisions to this scale that would substantially improve its internal consistency reliability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1073-1911</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3489</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1073191105284279</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16443722</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adolescents ; Antisocial Behavior ; Antisocial Personality Disorder - diagnosis ; Behavior Disorders ; Behavior Rating Scales ; Conceptual Tempo ; Construct Validity ; Correlation ; Delinquency ; Factor Analysis, Statistical ; Humans ; Internal Consistency ; Juvenile Delinquency - psychology ; Juvenile Justice ; Mass Screening - methods ; Measurement Techniques ; Measures (Individuals) ; Personality Studies ; Reliability ; Reproducibility of Results ; Screening Tests ; Self-Assessment</subject><ispartof>Assessment (Odessa, Fla.), 2006-03, Vol.13 (1), p.107-113</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-f1ffd36513b830883857a088c44750c2b9b13acaf94dd0b18887278f059d26f03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-f1ffd36513b830883857a088c44750c2b9b13acaf94dd0b18887278f059d26f03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1073191105284279$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1073191105284279$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21799,27903,27904,43600,43601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ734833$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16443722$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Poythress, Norman G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Douglas, Kevin S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falkenbach, Diana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cruise, Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Zina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murrie, Daniel C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vitacco, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Internal Consistency Reliability of the Self-Report Antisocial Process Screening Device</title><title>Assessment (Odessa, Fla.)</title><addtitle>Assessment</addtitle><description>The self-report version of the Antisocial Process Screening Device (APSD) has become a popular measure for assessing psychopathic features in justice-involved adolescents. However, the internal consistency reliability of its component scales (Narcissism, Callous-Unemotional, and Impulsivity) has been questioned in several studies. This study evaluates the internal consistency reliability of the self-report APSD by examining various indices (e.g., Cronbach's alpha, mean interitem correlation) across 11 studies. Whereas the Narcissism and Impulsivity scales display moderate to good reliability, internal consistency indices for the Callous-Unemotional scale are consistently poor across studies. Suggestions are made for revisions to this scale that would substantially improve its internal consistency reliability.</description><subject>Adolescents</subject><subject>Antisocial Behavior</subject><subject>Antisocial Personality Disorder - diagnosis</subject><subject>Behavior Disorders</subject><subject>Behavior Rating Scales</subject><subject>Conceptual Tempo</subject><subject>Construct Validity</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Delinquency</subject><subject>Factor Analysis, Statistical</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Consistency</subject><subject>Juvenile Delinquency - psychology</subject><subject>Juvenile Justice</subject><subject>Mass Screening - methods</subject><subject>Measurement Techniques</subject><subject>Measures (Individuals)</subject><subject>Personality Studies</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Screening Tests</subject><subject>Self-Assessment</subject><issn>1073-1911</issn><issn>1552-3489</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM9LwzAUx4Mobk7vHkR68lZNmqZJj2POXwyUTfFY0vRlZnTNTFph_70ZHQqCp_fg8_2-Bx-Ezgm-JoTzG4I5JTkhmCUiTXh-gIaEsSSmqcgPwx5wvOMDdOL9CmPCslwcowHJ0pTyJBmi98emBdfIOprYxhvfQqO20RxqI0tTm3YbWR21HxAtoNbxHDbWtdG4aY23yoTWi7MKvI8WygE0pllGt_BlFJyiIy1rD2f7OUJvd9PXyUM8e75_nIxnsaIsa2NNtK5oxggtBcVCUMG4DFOlKWdYJWVeEiqV1HlaVbgkQgiecKExy6sk05iO0FV_d-PsZwe-LdbGK6hr2YDtfMGDgoxkIgRxH1TOeu9AFxtn1tJtC4KLnczir8xQudzf7so1VL-Fvb0QuOgD4Iz6wdMnHvxTGnDcYy-XUKxst_Ps___3DTTahIs</recordid><startdate>20060301</startdate><enddate>20060301</enddate><creator>Poythress, Norman G.</creator><creator>Douglas, Kevin S.</creator><creator>Falkenbach, Diana</creator><creator>Cruise, Keith</creator><creator>Lee, Zina</creator><creator>Murrie, Daniel C.</creator><creator>Vitacco, Michael</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060301</creationdate><title>Internal Consistency Reliability of the Self-Report Antisocial Process Screening Device</title><author>Poythress, Norman G. ; Douglas, Kevin S. ; Falkenbach, Diana ; Cruise, Keith ; Lee, Zina ; Murrie, Daniel C. ; Vitacco, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-f1ffd36513b830883857a088c44750c2b9b13acaf94dd0b18887278f059d26f03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adolescents</topic><topic>Antisocial Behavior</topic><topic>Antisocial Personality Disorder - diagnosis</topic><topic>Behavior Disorders</topic><topic>Behavior Rating Scales</topic><topic>Conceptual Tempo</topic><topic>Construct Validity</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Delinquency</topic><topic>Factor Analysis, Statistical</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Consistency</topic><topic>Juvenile Delinquency - psychology</topic><topic>Juvenile Justice</topic><topic>Mass Screening - methods</topic><topic>Measurement Techniques</topic><topic>Measures (Individuals)</topic><topic>Personality Studies</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Screening Tests</topic><topic>Self-Assessment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Poythress, Norman G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Douglas, Kevin S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falkenbach, Diana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cruise, Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Zina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murrie, Daniel C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vitacco, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Assessment (Odessa, Fla.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Poythress, Norman G.</au><au>Douglas, Kevin S.</au><au>Falkenbach, Diana</au><au>Cruise, Keith</au><au>Lee, Zina</au><au>Murrie, Daniel C.</au><au>Vitacco, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ734833</ericid><atitle>Internal Consistency Reliability of the Self-Report Antisocial Process Screening Device</atitle><jtitle>Assessment (Odessa, Fla.)</jtitle><addtitle>Assessment</addtitle><date>2006-03-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>107</spage><epage>113</epage><pages>107-113</pages><issn>1073-1911</issn><eissn>1552-3489</eissn><abstract>The self-report version of the Antisocial Process Screening Device (APSD) has become a popular measure for assessing psychopathic features in justice-involved adolescents. However, the internal consistency reliability of its component scales (Narcissism, Callous-Unemotional, and Impulsivity) has been questioned in several studies. This study evaluates the internal consistency reliability of the self-report APSD by examining various indices (e.g., Cronbach's alpha, mean interitem correlation) across 11 studies. Whereas the Narcissism and Impulsivity scales display moderate to good reliability, internal consistency indices for the Callous-Unemotional scale are consistently poor across studies. Suggestions are made for revisions to this scale that would substantially improve its internal consistency reliability.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>16443722</pmid><doi>10.1177/1073191105284279</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1073-1911 |
ispartof | Assessment (Odessa, Fla.), 2006-03, Vol.13 (1), p.107-113 |
issn | 1073-1911 1552-3489 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70736168 |
source | MEDLINE; SAGE Complete |
subjects | Adolescents Antisocial Behavior Antisocial Personality Disorder - diagnosis Behavior Disorders Behavior Rating Scales Conceptual Tempo Construct Validity Correlation Delinquency Factor Analysis, Statistical Humans Internal Consistency Juvenile Delinquency - psychology Juvenile Justice Mass Screening - methods Measurement Techniques Measures (Individuals) Personality Studies Reliability Reproducibility of Results Screening Tests Self-Assessment |
title | Internal Consistency Reliability of the Self-Report Antisocial Process Screening Device |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T15%3A31%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Internal%20Consistency%20Reliability%20of%20the%20Self-Report%20Antisocial%20Process%20Screening%20Device&rft.jtitle=Assessment%20(Odessa,%20Fla.)&rft.au=Poythress,%20Norman%20G.&rft.date=2006-03-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=107&rft.epage=113&rft.pages=107-113&rft.issn=1073-1911&rft.eissn=1552-3489&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1073191105284279&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70736168%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70736168&rft_id=info:pmid/16443722&rft_ericid=EJ734833&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1073191105284279&rfr_iscdi=true |