Redefining the normal angiogram using population-derived ranges for coronary size and shape: validation using intravascular ultrasound and applications in diverse patient cohorts

To develop a method for quantitating coronary angiographic abnormalities of segmental size and shape (tapering) in comparison to gender- and segment-specific, population derived, normal values. In the absence of obvious focal stenoses, remodeling renders the angiogram insensitive to the presence of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 2007-08, Vol.23 (4), p.441-453
Hauptverfasser: Mancini, G B John, Ryomoto, Arnold, Kamimura, Craig, Yeoh, Eunice, Ramanathan, Krishnan, Schulzer, Michael, Hamburger, Jaap, Ricci, Donald
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 453
container_issue 4
container_start_page 441
container_title International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
container_volume 23
creator Mancini, G B John
Ryomoto, Arnold
Kamimura, Craig
Yeoh, Eunice
Ramanathan, Krishnan
Schulzer, Michael
Hamburger, Jaap
Ricci, Donald
description To develop a method for quantitating coronary angiographic abnormalities of segmental size and shape (tapering) in comparison to gender- and segment-specific, population derived, normal values. In the absence of obvious focal stenoses, remodeling renders the angiogram insensitive to the presence of atherosclerosis and invalidates use of a "normal reference segment" for calculation of percent diameter stenosis. Equations were created for detection of size/shape abnormalities of coronary angiographic segments. After validation using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), the equations were applied to a cohort of segments judged to be completely normal by a panel of highly experienced, core laboratory technicians; and a cohort of patients judged by an experienced interventionalist to have completely normal coronaries. In patients assessed by core technicians, 53% (162/303) of males, 39% (209/538) of normal segments in males, 60% (56/94) of females, and 40% (81/205) of normal segments in females had quantifiable abnormalities. In patients with normal coronaries as judged by an experienced interventionalist, 100% of males (n = 14) and females (n = 19), 37% (67/182) of segments in males and 43% (105/247) of segments in females had abnormalities. The left main segment was most commonly abnormal. We propose a set of equations validated using IVUS and based on gender- and segment-specific normal values for coronary angiographic size and shape that markedly improves the sensitivity of the coronary angiogram for detection of abnormalities. The method should replace the unfounded practice of labeling coronary angiograms as "normal" based solely on the failure to detect focal stenoses.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10554-006-9199-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70720624</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1305731391</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-e7094a250dc0026eef4074392bdf33c583e4b3daacd1d8879d6ab8956fe6bcf93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFks2KFDEUhQtRnHH0AdxIUHAXzU8lqbgbBv9gQBBdh1RyqztDVVImVQ32Y_mEpqYbBEFcJbn5zrkk9zTNc0reUELU20KJEC0mRGJNtcbHB80lFYpjolr-cNtLjYXS7UXzpJQ7QqjiWj9uLqhiVFLWXja_voKHIcQQd2jZA4opT3ZENu5C2mU7obVsV3Oa19EuIUXsIYcDeJQrAwUNKSOXcoo2_0QlHKFqPSp7O8M7dLBj8Peys0-IS7YHW1x1y2gd66mktQo2kZ3nMbh7vFQS-donF0BzLUFcapt9ykt52jwa7Fjg2Xm9ar5_eP_t5hO-_fLx8831LXa8EwsGRXRrmSDeEcIkwNBu36JZ7wfOneg4tD331jpPfdcp7aXtOy3kALJ3g-ZXzeuT75zTjxXKYqZQHIyjjZDWYhRRjEjW_hekWgkppajgq7_Au7TmWB9hmJQtI0rzre_Lf1J1okwLzStET5DLqZQMg5lzmOoMDCVmC4c5hcPUcJgtHOZYNS_Oxms_gf-jOKeB_wZjiroh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215629593</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Redefining the normal angiogram using population-derived ranges for coronary size and shape: validation using intravascular ultrasound and applications in diverse patient cohorts</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Mancini, G B John ; Ryomoto, Arnold ; Kamimura, Craig ; Yeoh, Eunice ; Ramanathan, Krishnan ; Schulzer, Michael ; Hamburger, Jaap ; Ricci, Donald</creator><creatorcontrib>Mancini, G B John ; Ryomoto, Arnold ; Kamimura, Craig ; Yeoh, Eunice ; Ramanathan, Krishnan ; Schulzer, Michael ; Hamburger, Jaap ; Ricci, Donald</creatorcontrib><description>To develop a method for quantitating coronary angiographic abnormalities of segmental size and shape (tapering) in comparison to gender- and segment-specific, population derived, normal values. In the absence of obvious focal stenoses, remodeling renders the angiogram insensitive to the presence of atherosclerosis and invalidates use of a "normal reference segment" for calculation of percent diameter stenosis. Equations were created for detection of size/shape abnormalities of coronary angiographic segments. After validation using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), the equations were applied to a cohort of segments judged to be completely normal by a panel of highly experienced, core laboratory technicians; and a cohort of patients judged by an experienced interventionalist to have completely normal coronaries. In patients assessed by core technicians, 53% (162/303) of males, 39% (209/538) of normal segments in males, 60% (56/94) of females, and 40% (81/205) of normal segments in females had quantifiable abnormalities. In patients with normal coronaries as judged by an experienced interventionalist, 100% of males (n = 14) and females (n = 19), 37% (67/182) of segments in males and 43% (105/247) of segments in females had abnormalities. The left main segment was most commonly abnormal. We propose a set of equations validated using IVUS and based on gender- and segment-specific normal values for coronary angiographic size and shape that markedly improves the sensitivity of the coronary angiogram for detection of abnormalities. The method should replace the unfounded practice of labeling coronary angiograms as "normal" based solely on the failure to detect focal stenoses.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1569-5794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0743</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10554-006-9199-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17216124</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJCIBI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Abnormalities ; Arteriosclerosis ; Atherosclerosis ; Cohort Studies ; Coronary Angiography - methods ; Coronary Angiography - standards ; Coronary Stenosis - diagnostic imaging ; Coronary Vessels - diagnostic imaging ; Coronary Vessels - pathology ; Female ; Females ; Gender ; Humans ; Male ; Males ; Mathematical analysis ; Models, Cardiovascular ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Reference Standards ; Reference Values ; Reproducibility of Results ; Segments ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Severity of Illness Index ; Sex Factors ; Stenosis ; Tapering ; Technicians ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasonography, Interventional ; Ultrasound</subject><ispartof>International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 2007-08, Vol.23 (4), p.441-453</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-e7094a250dc0026eef4074392bdf33c583e4b3daacd1d8879d6ab8956fe6bcf93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-e7094a250dc0026eef4074392bdf33c583e4b3daacd1d8879d6ab8956fe6bcf93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17216124$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mancini, G B John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryomoto, Arnold</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamimura, Craig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeoh, Eunice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramanathan, Krishnan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulzer, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamburger, Jaap</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ricci, Donald</creatorcontrib><title>Redefining the normal angiogram using population-derived ranges for coronary size and shape: validation using intravascular ultrasound and applications in diverse patient cohorts</title><title>International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging</title><addtitle>Int J Cardiovasc Imaging</addtitle><description>To develop a method for quantitating coronary angiographic abnormalities of segmental size and shape (tapering) in comparison to gender- and segment-specific, population derived, normal values. In the absence of obvious focal stenoses, remodeling renders the angiogram insensitive to the presence of atherosclerosis and invalidates use of a "normal reference segment" for calculation of percent diameter stenosis. Equations were created for detection of size/shape abnormalities of coronary angiographic segments. After validation using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), the equations were applied to a cohort of segments judged to be completely normal by a panel of highly experienced, core laboratory technicians; and a cohort of patients judged by an experienced interventionalist to have completely normal coronaries. In patients assessed by core technicians, 53% (162/303) of males, 39% (209/538) of normal segments in males, 60% (56/94) of females, and 40% (81/205) of normal segments in females had quantifiable abnormalities. In patients with normal coronaries as judged by an experienced interventionalist, 100% of males (n = 14) and females (n = 19), 37% (67/182) of segments in males and 43% (105/247) of segments in females had abnormalities. The left main segment was most commonly abnormal. We propose a set of equations validated using IVUS and based on gender- and segment-specific normal values for coronary angiographic size and shape that markedly improves the sensitivity of the coronary angiogram for detection of abnormalities. The method should replace the unfounded practice of labeling coronary angiograms as "normal" based solely on the failure to detect focal stenoses.</description><subject>Abnormalities</subject><subject>Arteriosclerosis</subject><subject>Atherosclerosis</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Coronary Angiography - methods</subject><subject>Coronary Angiography - standards</subject><subject>Coronary Stenosis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Coronary Vessels - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Coronary Vessels - pathology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Models, Cardiovascular</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Reference Standards</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Segments</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Stenosis</subject><subject>Tapering</subject><subject>Technicians</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Interventional</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><issn>1569-5794</issn><issn>1573-0743</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFks2KFDEUhQtRnHH0AdxIUHAXzU8lqbgbBv9gQBBdh1RyqztDVVImVQ32Y_mEpqYbBEFcJbn5zrkk9zTNc0reUELU20KJEC0mRGJNtcbHB80lFYpjolr-cNtLjYXS7UXzpJQ7QqjiWj9uLqhiVFLWXja_voKHIcQQd2jZA4opT3ZENu5C2mU7obVsV3Oa19EuIUXsIYcDeJQrAwUNKSOXcoo2_0QlHKFqPSp7O8M7dLBj8Peys0-IS7YHW1x1y2gd66mktQo2kZ3nMbh7vFQS-donF0BzLUFcapt9ykt52jwa7Fjg2Xm9ar5_eP_t5hO-_fLx8831LXa8EwsGRXRrmSDeEcIkwNBu36JZ7wfOneg4tD331jpPfdcp7aXtOy3kALJ3g-ZXzeuT75zTjxXKYqZQHIyjjZDWYhRRjEjW_hekWgkppajgq7_Au7TmWB9hmJQtI0rzre_Lf1J1okwLzStET5DLqZQMg5lzmOoMDCVmC4c5hcPUcJgtHOZYNS_Oxms_gf-jOKeB_wZjiroh</recordid><startdate>200708</startdate><enddate>200708</enddate><creator>Mancini, G B John</creator><creator>Ryomoto, Arnold</creator><creator>Kamimura, Craig</creator><creator>Yeoh, Eunice</creator><creator>Ramanathan, Krishnan</creator><creator>Schulzer, Michael</creator><creator>Hamburger, Jaap</creator><creator>Ricci, Donald</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200708</creationdate><title>Redefining the normal angiogram using population-derived ranges for coronary size and shape: validation using intravascular ultrasound and applications in diverse patient cohorts</title><author>Mancini, G B John ; Ryomoto, Arnold ; Kamimura, Craig ; Yeoh, Eunice ; Ramanathan, Krishnan ; Schulzer, Michael ; Hamburger, Jaap ; Ricci, Donald</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-e7094a250dc0026eef4074392bdf33c583e4b3daacd1d8879d6ab8956fe6bcf93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Abnormalities</topic><topic>Arteriosclerosis</topic><topic>Atherosclerosis</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Coronary Angiography - methods</topic><topic>Coronary Angiography - standards</topic><topic>Coronary Stenosis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Coronary Vessels - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Coronary Vessels - pathology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Models, Cardiovascular</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Reference Standards</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Segments</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Stenosis</topic><topic>Tapering</topic><topic>Technicians</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Interventional</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mancini, G B John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryomoto, Arnold</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamimura, Craig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeoh, Eunice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramanathan, Krishnan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulzer, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamburger, Jaap</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ricci, Donald</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mancini, G B John</au><au>Ryomoto, Arnold</au><au>Kamimura, Craig</au><au>Yeoh, Eunice</au><au>Ramanathan, Krishnan</au><au>Schulzer, Michael</au><au>Hamburger, Jaap</au><au>Ricci, Donald</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Redefining the normal angiogram using population-derived ranges for coronary size and shape: validation using intravascular ultrasound and applications in diverse patient cohorts</atitle><jtitle>International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Cardiovasc Imaging</addtitle><date>2007-08</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>441</spage><epage>453</epage><pages>441-453</pages><issn>1569-5794</issn><eissn>1573-0743</eissn><coden>IJCIBI</coden><abstract>To develop a method for quantitating coronary angiographic abnormalities of segmental size and shape (tapering) in comparison to gender- and segment-specific, population derived, normal values. In the absence of obvious focal stenoses, remodeling renders the angiogram insensitive to the presence of atherosclerosis and invalidates use of a "normal reference segment" for calculation of percent diameter stenosis. Equations were created for detection of size/shape abnormalities of coronary angiographic segments. After validation using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), the equations were applied to a cohort of segments judged to be completely normal by a panel of highly experienced, core laboratory technicians; and a cohort of patients judged by an experienced interventionalist to have completely normal coronaries. In patients assessed by core technicians, 53% (162/303) of males, 39% (209/538) of normal segments in males, 60% (56/94) of females, and 40% (81/205) of normal segments in females had quantifiable abnormalities. In patients with normal coronaries as judged by an experienced interventionalist, 100% of males (n = 14) and females (n = 19), 37% (67/182) of segments in males and 43% (105/247) of segments in females had abnormalities. The left main segment was most commonly abnormal. We propose a set of equations validated using IVUS and based on gender- and segment-specific normal values for coronary angiographic size and shape that markedly improves the sensitivity of the coronary angiogram for detection of abnormalities. The method should replace the unfounded practice of labeling coronary angiograms as "normal" based solely on the failure to detect focal stenoses.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>17216124</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10554-006-9199-z</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1569-5794
ispartof International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 2007-08, Vol.23 (4), p.441-453
issn 1569-5794
1573-0743
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70720624
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals
subjects Abnormalities
Arteriosclerosis
Atherosclerosis
Cohort Studies
Coronary Angiography - methods
Coronary Angiography - standards
Coronary Stenosis - diagnostic imaging
Coronary Vessels - diagnostic imaging
Coronary Vessels - pathology
Female
Females
Gender
Humans
Male
Males
Mathematical analysis
Models, Cardiovascular
Predictive Value of Tests
Reference Standards
Reference Values
Reproducibility of Results
Segments
Sensitivity and Specificity
Severity of Illness Index
Sex Factors
Stenosis
Tapering
Technicians
Ultrasonic imaging
Ultrasonography, Interventional
Ultrasound
title Redefining the normal angiogram using population-derived ranges for coronary size and shape: validation using intravascular ultrasound and applications in diverse patient cohorts
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T03%3A09%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Redefining%20the%20normal%20angiogram%20using%20population-derived%20ranges%20for%20coronary%20size%20and%20shape:%20validation%20using%20intravascular%20ultrasound%20and%20applications%20in%20diverse%20patient%20cohorts&rft.jtitle=International%20Journal%20of%20Cardiovascular%20Imaging&rft.au=Mancini,%20G%20B%20John&rft.date=2007-08&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=441&rft.epage=453&rft.pages=441-453&rft.issn=1569-5794&rft.eissn=1573-0743&rft.coden=IJCIBI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10554-006-9199-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1305731391%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215629593&rft_id=info:pmid/17216124&rfr_iscdi=true