Surgical treatment of fractures of the mandibular condyle: A comparison of long-term results following different approaches – Functional, axiographical, and radiological findings
Summary Aim While functionally stable osteosynthesis is a generally accepted method to treat all dislocated fractures of the skull, open reduction and rigid fixation of fractures of the mandibular condyle are still controversial. The risks involved in the surgical approaches and the difficulties dur...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery 2007-04, Vol.35 (3), p.151-160 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 160 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 151 |
container_title | Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Schneider, Matthias Lauer, Günter Eckelt, Uwe |
description | Summary Aim While functionally stable osteosynthesis is a generally accepted method to treat all dislocated fractures of the skull, open reduction and rigid fixation of fractures of the mandibular condyle are still controversial. The risks involved in the surgical approaches and the difficulties during reposition are the main controversies. Improvements made in surgical access and osteosynthesis materials as well as the development of special instruments were the reasons for re-evaluating the surgical results. Methods Forty patients with displaced or dislocated fractures of the mandibular condyle were re-examined. In 20 patients (21 fractures) an intraoral approach, in 20 more patients (24 fractures) an extraoral perimandibular approach was applied. The results were compared by means of axiography and radiology as well as clinically with regard to function 6 months postoperatively. Results While almost all fractures were correctly reduced following application of an extraoral access, reduction was correct in only 50% of the patients treated with an intraoral approach. Re-displacement and complications during osteosynthesis were the reasons. The group of patients treated via the intraoral approach showed less favourable results radiologically, clinically, and as judged by the patients’ subjective feelings. Especially axiographical examination of the latter fractures revealed a restricted translation indicating that the fractures had not healed primarily. Conclusion In order to avoid complications, the only fractures which should be treated intraorally are those which allow exact reduction even under the conditions of a limited view and reduced possibilities of surgical manipulation during reduction. This applies in general to fractures of the mandibular condyle with a laterally displaced condyle and a shortened ascending ramus. For all other dislocated or displaced fractures, extraoral reduction and osteosynthesis are the methods of choice. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jcms.2007.01.003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70708543</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1010518207000467</els_id><sourcerecordid>70708543</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-164005c66763800c95ded076cebdba35b5f8159fb88b59617c4c8a908defa1483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ksGKFDEQhhtR3HX1BTxILnqyx8p0pzsti7AsrgoLHlbPIZ1UZjOmkzFJq3PzHXwVn8gnMc0MLHjwlAp89fNX_VVVTymsKNDu1Xa1VVNarQH6FdAVQHOvOqW853VL6XC_1EChZpSvT6pHKW0BoAM-PKxOaM94w9bstPp9M8eNVdKRHFHmCX0mwRATpcpzxLR88i2SSXptx9nJSFTweu_wNbko5bST0abgF84Fv6kzxomUxtnlRExwLny3fkO0NQbjoi53uxikui3af37-IlezV9kGL91LIn_YsIlyd7sYKl-vSZTaBhcOFo0tJvwmPa4eGOkSPjm-Z9Xnq7efLt_X1x_ffbi8uK4VA5Zr2rUATHVd3zUcQA1Mo4a-UzjqUTZsZIZTNpiR85ENHe1Vq7gcgGs0kra8OateHHSL468zpiwmmxQ6Jz2GOYkeeuCsbQq4PoAqhpQiGrGLdpJxLyiIJSuxFUtWYslKABUlq9L07Kg-jxPqu5ZjOAV4fgRkKuOXTLyy6Y7jQ8m5bwt3fuCw7OKbxSiSsugVahtRZaGD_b-PN_-0K2f9svAvuMe0DXMs6SRBRVoLEDfLVS1HVYYHaLu--QuiLMxb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70708543</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Surgical treatment of fractures of the mandibular condyle: A comparison of long-term results following different approaches – Functional, axiographical, and radiological findings</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Schneider, Matthias ; Lauer, Günter ; Eckelt, Uwe</creator><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Matthias ; Lauer, Günter ; Eckelt, Uwe</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Aim While functionally stable osteosynthesis is a generally accepted method to treat all dislocated fractures of the skull, open reduction and rigid fixation of fractures of the mandibular condyle are still controversial. The risks involved in the surgical approaches and the difficulties during reposition are the main controversies. Improvements made in surgical access and osteosynthesis materials as well as the development of special instruments were the reasons for re-evaluating the surgical results. Methods Forty patients with displaced or dislocated fractures of the mandibular condyle were re-examined. In 20 patients (21 fractures) an intraoral approach, in 20 more patients (24 fractures) an extraoral perimandibular approach was applied. The results were compared by means of axiography and radiology as well as clinically with regard to function 6 months postoperatively. Results While almost all fractures were correctly reduced following application of an extraoral access, reduction was correct in only 50% of the patients treated with an intraoral approach. Re-displacement and complications during osteosynthesis were the reasons. The group of patients treated via the intraoral approach showed less favourable results radiologically, clinically, and as judged by the patients’ subjective feelings. Especially axiographical examination of the latter fractures revealed a restricted translation indicating that the fractures had not healed primarily. Conclusion In order to avoid complications, the only fractures which should be treated intraorally are those which allow exact reduction even under the conditions of a limited view and reduced possibilities of surgical manipulation during reduction. This applies in general to fractures of the mandibular condyle with a laterally displaced condyle and a shortened ascending ramus. For all other dislocated or displaced fractures, extraoral reduction and osteosynthesis are the methods of choice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1010-5182</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-4119</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2007.01.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17583525</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCMSET</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bone Plates ; Bone Screws ; Dentistry ; Female ; Fracture Fixation, Internal - adverse effects ; Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation ; Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods ; Fractures, Malunited - etiology ; Humans ; Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine ; Jaw Relation Record ; Male ; Mandibular Condyle - diagnostic imaging ; Mandibular Condyle - injuries ; Mandibular Condyle - physiopathology ; mandibular condyle, osteosynthesis, axiography ; Mandibular Fractures - diagnostic imaging ; Mandibular Fractures - physiopathology ; Mandibular Fractures - surgery ; Medical sciences ; Oral Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology ; Radiography ; Surgery ; Temporomandibular Joint Disorders - etiology ; Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</subject><ispartof>Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery, 2007-04, Vol.35 (3), p.151-160</ispartof><rights>European Association for Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery</rights><rights>2007 European Association for Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-164005c66763800c95ded076cebdba35b5f8159fb88b59617c4c8a908defa1483</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-164005c66763800c95ded076cebdba35b5f8159fb88b59617c4c8a908defa1483</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1010518207000467$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18941174$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17583525$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lauer, Günter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eckelt, Uwe</creatorcontrib><title>Surgical treatment of fractures of the mandibular condyle: A comparison of long-term results following different approaches – Functional, axiographical, and radiological findings</title><title>Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery</title><addtitle>J Craniomaxillofac Surg</addtitle><description>Summary Aim While functionally stable osteosynthesis is a generally accepted method to treat all dislocated fractures of the skull, open reduction and rigid fixation of fractures of the mandibular condyle are still controversial. The risks involved in the surgical approaches and the difficulties during reposition are the main controversies. Improvements made in surgical access and osteosynthesis materials as well as the development of special instruments were the reasons for re-evaluating the surgical results. Methods Forty patients with displaced or dislocated fractures of the mandibular condyle were re-examined. In 20 patients (21 fractures) an intraoral approach, in 20 more patients (24 fractures) an extraoral perimandibular approach was applied. The results were compared by means of axiography and radiology as well as clinically with regard to function 6 months postoperatively. Results While almost all fractures were correctly reduced following application of an extraoral access, reduction was correct in only 50% of the patients treated with an intraoral approach. Re-displacement and complications during osteosynthesis were the reasons. The group of patients treated via the intraoral approach showed less favourable results radiologically, clinically, and as judged by the patients’ subjective feelings. Especially axiographical examination of the latter fractures revealed a restricted translation indicating that the fractures had not healed primarily. Conclusion In order to avoid complications, the only fractures which should be treated intraorally are those which allow exact reduction even under the conditions of a limited view and reduced possibilities of surgical manipulation during reduction. This applies in general to fractures of the mandibular condyle with a laterally displaced condyle and a shortened ascending ramus. For all other dislocated or displaced fractures, extraoral reduction and osteosynthesis are the methods of choice.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bone Plates</subject><subject>Bone Screws</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Internal - adverse effects</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods</subject><subject>Fractures, Malunited - etiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine</subject><subject>Jaw Relation Record</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mandibular Condyle - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Mandibular Condyle - injuries</subject><subject>Mandibular Condyle - physiopathology</subject><subject>mandibular condyle, osteosynthesis, axiography</subject><subject>Mandibular Fractures - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Mandibular Fractures - physiopathology</subject><subject>Mandibular Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Oral Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Temporomandibular Joint Disorders - etiology</subject><subject>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</subject><issn>1010-5182</issn><issn>1878-4119</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ksGKFDEQhhtR3HX1BTxILnqyx8p0pzsti7AsrgoLHlbPIZ1UZjOmkzFJq3PzHXwVn8gnMc0MLHjwlAp89fNX_VVVTymsKNDu1Xa1VVNarQH6FdAVQHOvOqW853VL6XC_1EChZpSvT6pHKW0BoAM-PKxOaM94w9bstPp9M8eNVdKRHFHmCX0mwRATpcpzxLR88i2SSXptx9nJSFTweu_wNbko5bST0abgF84Fv6kzxomUxtnlRExwLny3fkO0NQbjoi53uxikui3af37-IlezV9kGL91LIn_YsIlyd7sYKl-vSZTaBhcOFo0tJvwmPa4eGOkSPjm-Z9Xnq7efLt_X1x_ffbi8uK4VA5Zr2rUATHVd3zUcQA1Mo4a-UzjqUTZsZIZTNpiR85ENHe1Vq7gcgGs0kra8OateHHSL468zpiwmmxQ6Jz2GOYkeeuCsbQq4PoAqhpQiGrGLdpJxLyiIJSuxFUtWYslKABUlq9L07Kg-jxPqu5ZjOAV4fgRkKuOXTLyy6Y7jQ8m5bwt3fuCw7OKbxSiSsugVahtRZaGD_b-PN_-0K2f9svAvuMe0DXMs6SRBRVoLEDfLVS1HVYYHaLu--QuiLMxb</recordid><startdate>20070401</startdate><enddate>20070401</enddate><creator>Schneider, Matthias</creator><creator>Lauer, Günter</creator><creator>Eckelt, Uwe</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070401</creationdate><title>Surgical treatment of fractures of the mandibular condyle: A comparison of long-term results following different approaches – Functional, axiographical, and radiological findings</title><author>Schneider, Matthias ; Lauer, Günter ; Eckelt, Uwe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-164005c66763800c95ded076cebdba35b5f8159fb88b59617c4c8a908defa1483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bone Plates</topic><topic>Bone Screws</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Internal - adverse effects</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods</topic><topic>Fractures, Malunited - etiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine</topic><topic>Jaw Relation Record</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mandibular Condyle - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Mandibular Condyle - injuries</topic><topic>Mandibular Condyle - physiopathology</topic><topic>mandibular condyle, osteosynthesis, axiography</topic><topic>Mandibular Fractures - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Mandibular Fractures - physiopathology</topic><topic>Mandibular Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Oral Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Temporomandibular Joint Disorders - etiology</topic><topic>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lauer, Günter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eckelt, Uwe</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schneider, Matthias</au><au>Lauer, Günter</au><au>Eckelt, Uwe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Surgical treatment of fractures of the mandibular condyle: A comparison of long-term results following different approaches – Functional, axiographical, and radiological findings</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Craniomaxillofac Surg</addtitle><date>2007-04-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>151</spage><epage>160</epage><pages>151-160</pages><issn>1010-5182</issn><eissn>1878-4119</eissn><coden>JCMSET</coden><abstract>Summary Aim While functionally stable osteosynthesis is a generally accepted method to treat all dislocated fractures of the skull, open reduction and rigid fixation of fractures of the mandibular condyle are still controversial. The risks involved in the surgical approaches and the difficulties during reposition are the main controversies. Improvements made in surgical access and osteosynthesis materials as well as the development of special instruments were the reasons for re-evaluating the surgical results. Methods Forty patients with displaced or dislocated fractures of the mandibular condyle were re-examined. In 20 patients (21 fractures) an intraoral approach, in 20 more patients (24 fractures) an extraoral perimandibular approach was applied. The results were compared by means of axiography and radiology as well as clinically with regard to function 6 months postoperatively. Results While almost all fractures were correctly reduced following application of an extraoral access, reduction was correct in only 50% of the patients treated with an intraoral approach. Re-displacement and complications during osteosynthesis were the reasons. The group of patients treated via the intraoral approach showed less favourable results radiologically, clinically, and as judged by the patients’ subjective feelings. Especially axiographical examination of the latter fractures revealed a restricted translation indicating that the fractures had not healed primarily. Conclusion In order to avoid complications, the only fractures which should be treated intraorally are those which allow exact reduction even under the conditions of a limited view and reduced possibilities of surgical manipulation during reduction. This applies in general to fractures of the mandibular condyle with a laterally displaced condyle and a shortened ascending ramus. For all other dislocated or displaced fractures, extraoral reduction and osteosynthesis are the methods of choice.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>17583525</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jcms.2007.01.003</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1010-5182 |
ispartof | Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery, 2007-04, Vol.35 (3), p.151-160 |
issn | 1010-5182 1878-4119 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70708543 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adult Biological and medical sciences Bone Plates Bone Screws Dentistry Female Fracture Fixation, Internal - adverse effects Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods Fractures, Malunited - etiology Humans Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine Jaw Relation Record Male Mandibular Condyle - diagnostic imaging Mandibular Condyle - injuries Mandibular Condyle - physiopathology mandibular condyle, osteosynthesis, axiography Mandibular Fractures - diagnostic imaging Mandibular Fractures - physiopathology Mandibular Fractures - surgery Medical sciences Oral Surgical Procedures - adverse effects Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology Radiography Surgery Temporomandibular Joint Disorders - etiology Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents |
title | Surgical treatment of fractures of the mandibular condyle: A comparison of long-term results following different approaches – Functional, axiographical, and radiological findings |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T16%3A35%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Surgical%20treatment%20of%20fractures%20of%20the%20mandibular%20condyle:%20A%20comparison%20of%20long-term%20results%20following%20different%20approaches%20%E2%80%93%20Functional,%20axiographical,%20and%20radiological%20findings&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cranio-maxillo-facial%20surgery&rft.au=Schneider,%20Matthias&rft.date=2007-04-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=151&rft.epage=160&rft.pages=151-160&rft.issn=1010-5182&rft.eissn=1878-4119&rft.coden=JCMSET&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jcms.2007.01.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70708543%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70708543&rft_id=info:pmid/17583525&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1010518207000467&rfr_iscdi=true |