Surgical treatment of fractures of the mandibular condyle: A comparison of long-term results following different approaches – Functional, axiographical, and radiological findings

Summary Aim While functionally stable osteosynthesis is a generally accepted method to treat all dislocated fractures of the skull, open reduction and rigid fixation of fractures of the mandibular condyle are still controversial. The risks involved in the surgical approaches and the difficulties dur...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery 2007-04, Vol.35 (3), p.151-160
Hauptverfasser: Schneider, Matthias, Lauer, Günter, Eckelt, Uwe
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 160
container_issue 3
container_start_page 151
container_title Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery
container_volume 35
creator Schneider, Matthias
Lauer, Günter
Eckelt, Uwe
description Summary Aim While functionally stable osteosynthesis is a generally accepted method to treat all dislocated fractures of the skull, open reduction and rigid fixation of fractures of the mandibular condyle are still controversial. The risks involved in the surgical approaches and the difficulties during reposition are the main controversies. Improvements made in surgical access and osteosynthesis materials as well as the development of special instruments were the reasons for re-evaluating the surgical results. Methods Forty patients with displaced or dislocated fractures of the mandibular condyle were re-examined. In 20 patients (21 fractures) an intraoral approach, in 20 more patients (24 fractures) an extraoral perimandibular approach was applied. The results were compared by means of axiography and radiology as well as clinically with regard to function 6 months postoperatively. Results While almost all fractures were correctly reduced following application of an extraoral access, reduction was correct in only 50% of the patients treated with an intraoral approach. Re-displacement and complications during osteosynthesis were the reasons. The group of patients treated via the intraoral approach showed less favourable results radiologically, clinically, and as judged by the patients’ subjective feelings. Especially axiographical examination of the latter fractures revealed a restricted translation indicating that the fractures had not healed primarily. Conclusion In order to avoid complications, the only fractures which should be treated intraorally are those which allow exact reduction even under the conditions of a limited view and reduced possibilities of surgical manipulation during reduction. This applies in general to fractures of the mandibular condyle with a laterally displaced condyle and a shortened ascending ramus. For all other dislocated or displaced fractures, extraoral reduction and osteosynthesis are the methods of choice.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jcms.2007.01.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70708543</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1010518207000467</els_id><sourcerecordid>70708543</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-164005c66763800c95ded076cebdba35b5f8159fb88b59617c4c8a908defa1483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ksGKFDEQhhtR3HX1BTxILnqyx8p0pzsti7AsrgoLHlbPIZ1UZjOmkzFJq3PzHXwVn8gnMc0MLHjwlAp89fNX_VVVTymsKNDu1Xa1VVNarQH6FdAVQHOvOqW853VL6XC_1EChZpSvT6pHKW0BoAM-PKxOaM94w9bstPp9M8eNVdKRHFHmCX0mwRATpcpzxLR88i2SSXptx9nJSFTweu_wNbko5bST0abgF84Fv6kzxomUxtnlRExwLny3fkO0NQbjoi53uxikui3af37-IlezV9kGL91LIn_YsIlyd7sYKl-vSZTaBhcOFo0tJvwmPa4eGOkSPjm-Z9Xnq7efLt_X1x_ffbi8uK4VA5Zr2rUATHVd3zUcQA1Mo4a-UzjqUTZsZIZTNpiR85ENHe1Vq7gcgGs0kra8OateHHSL468zpiwmmxQ6Jz2GOYkeeuCsbQq4PoAqhpQiGrGLdpJxLyiIJSuxFUtWYslKABUlq9L07Kg-jxPqu5ZjOAV4fgRkKuOXTLyy6Y7jQ8m5bwt3fuCw7OKbxSiSsugVahtRZaGD_b-PN_-0K2f9svAvuMe0DXMs6SRBRVoLEDfLVS1HVYYHaLu--QuiLMxb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70708543</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Surgical treatment of fractures of the mandibular condyle: A comparison of long-term results following different approaches – Functional, axiographical, and radiological findings</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Schneider, Matthias ; Lauer, Günter ; Eckelt, Uwe</creator><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Matthias ; Lauer, Günter ; Eckelt, Uwe</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Aim While functionally stable osteosynthesis is a generally accepted method to treat all dislocated fractures of the skull, open reduction and rigid fixation of fractures of the mandibular condyle are still controversial. The risks involved in the surgical approaches and the difficulties during reposition are the main controversies. Improvements made in surgical access and osteosynthesis materials as well as the development of special instruments were the reasons for re-evaluating the surgical results. Methods Forty patients with displaced or dislocated fractures of the mandibular condyle were re-examined. In 20 patients (21 fractures) an intraoral approach, in 20 more patients (24 fractures) an extraoral perimandibular approach was applied. The results were compared by means of axiography and radiology as well as clinically with regard to function 6 months postoperatively. Results While almost all fractures were correctly reduced following application of an extraoral access, reduction was correct in only 50% of the patients treated with an intraoral approach. Re-displacement and complications during osteosynthesis were the reasons. The group of patients treated via the intraoral approach showed less favourable results radiologically, clinically, and as judged by the patients’ subjective feelings. Especially axiographical examination of the latter fractures revealed a restricted translation indicating that the fractures had not healed primarily. Conclusion In order to avoid complications, the only fractures which should be treated intraorally are those which allow exact reduction even under the conditions of a limited view and reduced possibilities of surgical manipulation during reduction. This applies in general to fractures of the mandibular condyle with a laterally displaced condyle and a shortened ascending ramus. For all other dislocated or displaced fractures, extraoral reduction and osteosynthesis are the methods of choice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1010-5182</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-4119</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2007.01.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17583525</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCMSET</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bone Plates ; Bone Screws ; Dentistry ; Female ; Fracture Fixation, Internal - adverse effects ; Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation ; Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods ; Fractures, Malunited - etiology ; Humans ; Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine ; Jaw Relation Record ; Male ; Mandibular Condyle - diagnostic imaging ; Mandibular Condyle - injuries ; Mandibular Condyle - physiopathology ; mandibular condyle, osteosynthesis, axiography ; Mandibular Fractures - diagnostic imaging ; Mandibular Fractures - physiopathology ; Mandibular Fractures - surgery ; Medical sciences ; Oral Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology ; Radiography ; Surgery ; Temporomandibular Joint Disorders - etiology ; Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</subject><ispartof>Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery, 2007-04, Vol.35 (3), p.151-160</ispartof><rights>European Association for Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery</rights><rights>2007 European Association for Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-164005c66763800c95ded076cebdba35b5f8159fb88b59617c4c8a908defa1483</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-164005c66763800c95ded076cebdba35b5f8159fb88b59617c4c8a908defa1483</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1010518207000467$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18941174$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17583525$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lauer, Günter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eckelt, Uwe</creatorcontrib><title>Surgical treatment of fractures of the mandibular condyle: A comparison of long-term results following different approaches – Functional, axiographical, and radiological findings</title><title>Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery</title><addtitle>J Craniomaxillofac Surg</addtitle><description>Summary Aim While functionally stable osteosynthesis is a generally accepted method to treat all dislocated fractures of the skull, open reduction and rigid fixation of fractures of the mandibular condyle are still controversial. The risks involved in the surgical approaches and the difficulties during reposition are the main controversies. Improvements made in surgical access and osteosynthesis materials as well as the development of special instruments were the reasons for re-evaluating the surgical results. Methods Forty patients with displaced or dislocated fractures of the mandibular condyle were re-examined. In 20 patients (21 fractures) an intraoral approach, in 20 more patients (24 fractures) an extraoral perimandibular approach was applied. The results were compared by means of axiography and radiology as well as clinically with regard to function 6 months postoperatively. Results While almost all fractures were correctly reduced following application of an extraoral access, reduction was correct in only 50% of the patients treated with an intraoral approach. Re-displacement and complications during osteosynthesis were the reasons. The group of patients treated via the intraoral approach showed less favourable results radiologically, clinically, and as judged by the patients’ subjective feelings. Especially axiographical examination of the latter fractures revealed a restricted translation indicating that the fractures had not healed primarily. Conclusion In order to avoid complications, the only fractures which should be treated intraorally are those which allow exact reduction even under the conditions of a limited view and reduced possibilities of surgical manipulation during reduction. This applies in general to fractures of the mandibular condyle with a laterally displaced condyle and a shortened ascending ramus. For all other dislocated or displaced fractures, extraoral reduction and osteosynthesis are the methods of choice.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bone Plates</subject><subject>Bone Screws</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Internal - adverse effects</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods</subject><subject>Fractures, Malunited - etiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine</subject><subject>Jaw Relation Record</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mandibular Condyle - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Mandibular Condyle - injuries</subject><subject>Mandibular Condyle - physiopathology</subject><subject>mandibular condyle, osteosynthesis, axiography</subject><subject>Mandibular Fractures - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Mandibular Fractures - physiopathology</subject><subject>Mandibular Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Oral Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Temporomandibular Joint Disorders - etiology</subject><subject>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</subject><issn>1010-5182</issn><issn>1878-4119</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ksGKFDEQhhtR3HX1BTxILnqyx8p0pzsti7AsrgoLHlbPIZ1UZjOmkzFJq3PzHXwVn8gnMc0MLHjwlAp89fNX_VVVTymsKNDu1Xa1VVNarQH6FdAVQHOvOqW853VL6XC_1EChZpSvT6pHKW0BoAM-PKxOaM94w9bstPp9M8eNVdKRHFHmCX0mwRATpcpzxLR88i2SSXptx9nJSFTweu_wNbko5bST0abgF84Fv6kzxomUxtnlRExwLny3fkO0NQbjoi53uxikui3af37-IlezV9kGL91LIn_YsIlyd7sYKl-vSZTaBhcOFo0tJvwmPa4eGOkSPjm-Z9Xnq7efLt_X1x_ffbi8uK4VA5Zr2rUATHVd3zUcQA1Mo4a-UzjqUTZsZIZTNpiR85ENHe1Vq7gcgGs0kra8OateHHSL468zpiwmmxQ6Jz2GOYkeeuCsbQq4PoAqhpQiGrGLdpJxLyiIJSuxFUtWYslKABUlq9L07Kg-jxPqu5ZjOAV4fgRkKuOXTLyy6Y7jQ8m5bwt3fuCw7OKbxSiSsugVahtRZaGD_b-PN_-0K2f9svAvuMe0DXMs6SRBRVoLEDfLVS1HVYYHaLu--QuiLMxb</recordid><startdate>20070401</startdate><enddate>20070401</enddate><creator>Schneider, Matthias</creator><creator>Lauer, Günter</creator><creator>Eckelt, Uwe</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070401</creationdate><title>Surgical treatment of fractures of the mandibular condyle: A comparison of long-term results following different approaches – Functional, axiographical, and radiological findings</title><author>Schneider, Matthias ; Lauer, Günter ; Eckelt, Uwe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-164005c66763800c95ded076cebdba35b5f8159fb88b59617c4c8a908defa1483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bone Plates</topic><topic>Bone Screws</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Internal - adverse effects</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods</topic><topic>Fractures, Malunited - etiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine</topic><topic>Jaw Relation Record</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mandibular Condyle - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Mandibular Condyle - injuries</topic><topic>Mandibular Condyle - physiopathology</topic><topic>mandibular condyle, osteosynthesis, axiography</topic><topic>Mandibular Fractures - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Mandibular Fractures - physiopathology</topic><topic>Mandibular Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Oral Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Temporomandibular Joint Disorders - etiology</topic><topic>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lauer, Günter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eckelt, Uwe</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schneider, Matthias</au><au>Lauer, Günter</au><au>Eckelt, Uwe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Surgical treatment of fractures of the mandibular condyle: A comparison of long-term results following different approaches – Functional, axiographical, and radiological findings</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Craniomaxillofac Surg</addtitle><date>2007-04-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>151</spage><epage>160</epage><pages>151-160</pages><issn>1010-5182</issn><eissn>1878-4119</eissn><coden>JCMSET</coden><abstract>Summary Aim While functionally stable osteosynthesis is a generally accepted method to treat all dislocated fractures of the skull, open reduction and rigid fixation of fractures of the mandibular condyle are still controversial. The risks involved in the surgical approaches and the difficulties during reposition are the main controversies. Improvements made in surgical access and osteosynthesis materials as well as the development of special instruments were the reasons for re-evaluating the surgical results. Methods Forty patients with displaced or dislocated fractures of the mandibular condyle were re-examined. In 20 patients (21 fractures) an intraoral approach, in 20 more patients (24 fractures) an extraoral perimandibular approach was applied. The results were compared by means of axiography and radiology as well as clinically with regard to function 6 months postoperatively. Results While almost all fractures were correctly reduced following application of an extraoral access, reduction was correct in only 50% of the patients treated with an intraoral approach. Re-displacement and complications during osteosynthesis were the reasons. The group of patients treated via the intraoral approach showed less favourable results radiologically, clinically, and as judged by the patients’ subjective feelings. Especially axiographical examination of the latter fractures revealed a restricted translation indicating that the fractures had not healed primarily. Conclusion In order to avoid complications, the only fractures which should be treated intraorally are those which allow exact reduction even under the conditions of a limited view and reduced possibilities of surgical manipulation during reduction. This applies in general to fractures of the mandibular condyle with a laterally displaced condyle and a shortened ascending ramus. For all other dislocated or displaced fractures, extraoral reduction and osteosynthesis are the methods of choice.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>17583525</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jcms.2007.01.003</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1010-5182
ispartof Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery, 2007-04, Vol.35 (3), p.151-160
issn 1010-5182
1878-4119
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70708543
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Bone Plates
Bone Screws
Dentistry
Female
Fracture Fixation, Internal - adverse effects
Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation
Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods
Fractures, Malunited - etiology
Humans
Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine
Jaw Relation Record
Male
Mandibular Condyle - diagnostic imaging
Mandibular Condyle - injuries
Mandibular Condyle - physiopathology
mandibular condyle, osteosynthesis, axiography
Mandibular Fractures - diagnostic imaging
Mandibular Fractures - physiopathology
Mandibular Fractures - surgery
Medical sciences
Oral Surgical Procedures - adverse effects
Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology
Radiography
Surgery
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders - etiology
Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents
title Surgical treatment of fractures of the mandibular condyle: A comparison of long-term results following different approaches – Functional, axiographical, and radiological findings
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T16%3A35%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Surgical%20treatment%20of%20fractures%20of%20the%20mandibular%20condyle:%20A%20comparison%20of%20long-term%20results%20following%20different%20approaches%20%E2%80%93%20Functional,%20axiographical,%20and%20radiological%20findings&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cranio-maxillo-facial%20surgery&rft.au=Schneider,%20Matthias&rft.date=2007-04-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=151&rft.epage=160&rft.pages=151-160&rft.issn=1010-5182&rft.eissn=1878-4119&rft.coden=JCMSET&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jcms.2007.01.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70708543%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70708543&rft_id=info:pmid/17583525&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1010518207000467&rfr_iscdi=true