Empirical antibiotic monotherapy for febrile neutropenia: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Objectives: Early, empirical broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment is the established practice for febrile neutropenia. Several β-lactams are accepted for monotherapy. We asked whether patients' outcomes are influenced by the chosen β-lactam. Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis of random...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy 2006-02, Vol.57 (2), p.176-189 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 189 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 176 |
container_title | Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy |
container_volume | 57 |
creator | Paul, Mical Yahav, Dafna Fraser, Abigail Leibovici, Leonard |
description | Objectives: Early, empirical broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment is the established practice for febrile neutropenia. Several β-lactams are accepted for monotherapy. We asked whether patients' outcomes are influenced by the chosen β-lactam. Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing anti-pseudomonal β-lactams administered as empirical monotherapy for febrile neutropenia, with or without vancomycin. The search included The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Lilacs databases, bibliography, conference proceedings, trial registries and FDA new drug approvals. Two reviewers independently applied selection criteria, performed quality assessment and extracted the data. Trials assessing the same β-lactam were pooled using the fixed effect model. Relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. The primary outcome assessed was all-cause mortality. Results: Thirty-three trials fulfilled inclusion criteria. Cefepime was associated with higher all-cause mortality at 30 days than other β-lactams (RR 1.44, 95% CI 1.06–1.94, 3123 participants). Carbapenems were associated with fewer treatment modifications, including addition of glycopeptides, than ceftazidime or other comparators. Adverse events were significantly more frequent with carbapenems, specifically pseudomembranous colitis (RR 1.94, 95% CI 1.24–3.04, 2025 participants). All-cause mortality was unaltered. Piperacillin/tazobactam was compared only with cefepime and carbapenems, in six trials. No significant differences were demonstrated with paucity of data for all-cause mortality. Conclusions: The use of cefepime for febrile neutropenia is associated with increased mortality and should be carefully considered pending further analysis. Empirical use of carbapenems entails fewer treatment modifications, but an increased rate of pseudomembranous colitis. Ceftazidime, piperacillin/tazobactam, imipenem/cilastatin and meropenem appear to be suitable agents for monotherapy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/jac/dki448 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70706793</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70706793</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-561fae65cc24cca1119d6672f3c920368db854e39e214a7088e182adf7d0e16f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0U2LFDEQBuAgijuOXvwBEgQ9CO3mO2lvsuy4woAeFBYvIZOuYGa7O23SrY7gfzfLDC548VQheVIk9SL0lJLXlLT8fO_8eXcThTD30IoKRRpGWnofrQgnstFC8jP0qJQ9IURJZR6iM6q4EMzIFfp9OUwxR-967MY57mKao8dDGtP8FbKbDjikjAPscuwBj7DMOU0wRvcGl0OZYXC3PsP3CD9qhw4PMLvGja4_lFhwCjjX3TTEX9Bhn8Z6ve_rcs7R9eUxehBqgSenukafN5efLq6a7Yd37y_ebhsvhJ4bqWhwoKT3THjvKKVtp5RmgfuWEa5MtzNSAG-BUeE0MQaoYa4LuiNAVeBr9PLYd8rp2wJltkMsHvrejZCWYjXRROmW_xcyojg3dXxr9PwfuE9Lrt-uhmqlOWtlRa-OyOdUSoZgpxwHlw-WEnsbna3R2WN0FT87dVx2A3R39JRVBS9OwJWaV6iD9bHcOS1aUROurjm6WPP5-ffc5Rtb36Wlvbr-Yj9eG7aV243d8D_qJrNe</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>217673295</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Empirical antibiotic monotherapy for febrile neutropenia: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Paul, Mical ; Yahav, Dafna ; Fraser, Abigail ; Leibovici, Leonard</creator><creatorcontrib>Paul, Mical ; Yahav, Dafna ; Fraser, Abigail ; Leibovici, Leonard</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: Early, empirical broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment is the established practice for febrile neutropenia. Several β-lactams are accepted for monotherapy. We asked whether patients' outcomes are influenced by the chosen β-lactam. Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing anti-pseudomonal β-lactams administered as empirical monotherapy for febrile neutropenia, with or without vancomycin. The search included The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Lilacs databases, bibliography, conference proceedings, trial registries and FDA new drug approvals. Two reviewers independently applied selection criteria, performed quality assessment and extracted the data. Trials assessing the same β-lactam were pooled using the fixed effect model. Relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. The primary outcome assessed was all-cause mortality. Results: Thirty-three trials fulfilled inclusion criteria. Cefepime was associated with higher all-cause mortality at 30 days than other β-lactams (RR 1.44, 95% CI 1.06–1.94, 3123 participants). Carbapenems were associated with fewer treatment modifications, including addition of glycopeptides, than ceftazidime or other comparators. Adverse events were significantly more frequent with carbapenems, specifically pseudomembranous colitis (RR 1.94, 95% CI 1.24–3.04, 2025 participants). All-cause mortality was unaltered. Piperacillin/tazobactam was compared only with cefepime and carbapenems, in six trials. No significant differences were demonstrated with paucity of data for all-cause mortality. Conclusions: The use of cefepime for febrile neutropenia is associated with increased mortality and should be carefully considered pending further analysis. Empirical use of carbapenems entails fewer treatment modifications, but an increased rate of pseudomembranous colitis. Ceftazidime, piperacillin/tazobactam, imipenem/cilastatin and meropenem appear to be suitable agents for monotherapy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-7453</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2091</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jac/dki448</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16344285</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JACHDX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use ; Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents ; beta-Lactamase Inhibitors ; Biological and medical sciences ; carbapenems ; Carbapenems - therapeutic use ; cefepime ; ceftazidime ; Cephalosporins - therapeutic use ; Enzyme Inhibitors - therapeutic use ; Fever - complications ; Fever - drug therapy ; Hematologic and hematopoietic diseases ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Neutropenia - complications ; Neutropenia - drug therapy ; Other diseases. Hematologic involvement in other diseases ; Penicillanic Acid - analogs & derivatives ; Penicillanic Acid - therapeutic use ; Penicillins - therapeutic use ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; piperacillin/tazobactam ; Quality Assurance, Health Care ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Treatment Outcome ; β-lactams</subject><ispartof>Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2006-02, Vol.57 (2), p.176-189</ispartof><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press(England) Feb 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-561fae65cc24cca1119d6672f3c920368db854e39e214a7088e182adf7d0e16f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-561fae65cc24cca1119d6672f3c920368db854e39e214a7088e182adf7d0e16f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17494006$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16344285$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Paul, Mical</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yahav, Dafna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fraser, Abigail</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leibovici, Leonard</creatorcontrib><title>Empirical antibiotic monotherapy for febrile neutropenia: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials</title><title>Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy</title><addtitle>J. Antimicrob. Chemother</addtitle><description>Objectives: Early, empirical broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment is the established practice for febrile neutropenia. Several β-lactams are accepted for monotherapy. We asked whether patients' outcomes are influenced by the chosen β-lactam. Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing anti-pseudomonal β-lactams administered as empirical monotherapy for febrile neutropenia, with or without vancomycin. The search included The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Lilacs databases, bibliography, conference proceedings, trial registries and FDA new drug approvals. Two reviewers independently applied selection criteria, performed quality assessment and extracted the data. Trials assessing the same β-lactam were pooled using the fixed effect model. Relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. The primary outcome assessed was all-cause mortality. Results: Thirty-three trials fulfilled inclusion criteria. Cefepime was associated with higher all-cause mortality at 30 days than other β-lactams (RR 1.44, 95% CI 1.06–1.94, 3123 participants). Carbapenems were associated with fewer treatment modifications, including addition of glycopeptides, than ceftazidime or other comparators. Adverse events were significantly more frequent with carbapenems, specifically pseudomembranous colitis (RR 1.94, 95% CI 1.24–3.04, 2025 participants). All-cause mortality was unaltered. Piperacillin/tazobactam was compared only with cefepime and carbapenems, in six trials. No significant differences were demonstrated with paucity of data for all-cause mortality. Conclusions: The use of cefepime for febrile neutropenia is associated with increased mortality and should be carefully considered pending further analysis. Empirical use of carbapenems entails fewer treatment modifications, but an increased rate of pseudomembranous colitis. Ceftazidime, piperacillin/tazobactam, imipenem/cilastatin and meropenem appear to be suitable agents for monotherapy.</description><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents</subject><subject>beta-Lactamase Inhibitors</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>carbapenems</subject><subject>Carbapenems - therapeutic use</subject><subject>cefepime</subject><subject>ceftazidime</subject><subject>Cephalosporins - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Enzyme Inhibitors - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Fever - complications</subject><subject>Fever - drug therapy</subject><subject>Hematologic and hematopoietic diseases</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Neutropenia - complications</subject><subject>Neutropenia - drug therapy</subject><subject>Other diseases. Hematologic involvement in other diseases</subject><subject>Penicillanic Acid - analogs & derivatives</subject><subject>Penicillanic Acid - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Penicillins - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>piperacillin/tazobactam</subject><subject>Quality Assurance, Health Care</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>β-lactams</subject><issn>0305-7453</issn><issn>1460-2091</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0U2LFDEQBuAgijuOXvwBEgQ9CO3mO2lvsuy4woAeFBYvIZOuYGa7O23SrY7gfzfLDC548VQheVIk9SL0lJLXlLT8fO_8eXcThTD30IoKRRpGWnofrQgnstFC8jP0qJQ9IURJZR6iM6q4EMzIFfp9OUwxR-967MY57mKao8dDGtP8FbKbDjikjAPscuwBj7DMOU0wRvcGl0OZYXC3PsP3CD9qhw4PMLvGja4_lFhwCjjX3TTEX9Bhn8Z6ve_rcs7R9eUxehBqgSenukafN5efLq6a7Yd37y_ebhsvhJ4bqWhwoKT3THjvKKVtp5RmgfuWEa5MtzNSAG-BUeE0MQaoYa4LuiNAVeBr9PLYd8rp2wJltkMsHvrejZCWYjXRROmW_xcyojg3dXxr9PwfuE9Lrt-uhmqlOWtlRa-OyOdUSoZgpxwHlw-WEnsbna3R2WN0FT87dVx2A3R39JRVBS9OwJWaV6iD9bHcOS1aUROurjm6WPP5-ffc5Rtb36Wlvbr-Yj9eG7aV243d8D_qJrNe</recordid><startdate>20060201</startdate><enddate>20060201</enddate><creator>Paul, Mical</creator><creator>Yahav, Dafna</creator><creator>Fraser, Abigail</creator><creator>Leibovici, Leonard</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060201</creationdate><title>Empirical antibiotic monotherapy for febrile neutropenia: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials</title><author>Paul, Mical ; Yahav, Dafna ; Fraser, Abigail ; Leibovici, Leonard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-561fae65cc24cca1119d6672f3c920368db854e39e214a7088e182adf7d0e16f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents</topic><topic>beta-Lactamase Inhibitors</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>carbapenems</topic><topic>Carbapenems - therapeutic use</topic><topic>cefepime</topic><topic>ceftazidime</topic><topic>Cephalosporins - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Enzyme Inhibitors - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Fever - complications</topic><topic>Fever - drug therapy</topic><topic>Hematologic and hematopoietic diseases</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Neutropenia - complications</topic><topic>Neutropenia - drug therapy</topic><topic>Other diseases. Hematologic involvement in other diseases</topic><topic>Penicillanic Acid - analogs & derivatives</topic><topic>Penicillanic Acid - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Penicillins - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>piperacillin/tazobactam</topic><topic>Quality Assurance, Health Care</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>β-lactams</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Paul, Mical</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yahav, Dafna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fraser, Abigail</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leibovici, Leonard</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Paul, Mical</au><au>Yahav, Dafna</au><au>Fraser, Abigail</au><au>Leibovici, Leonard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Empirical antibiotic monotherapy for febrile neutropenia: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials</atitle><jtitle>Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy</jtitle><addtitle>J. Antimicrob. Chemother</addtitle><date>2006-02-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>176</spage><epage>189</epage><pages>176-189</pages><issn>0305-7453</issn><eissn>1460-2091</eissn><coden>JACHDX</coden><abstract>Objectives: Early, empirical broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment is the established practice for febrile neutropenia. Several β-lactams are accepted for monotherapy. We asked whether patients' outcomes are influenced by the chosen β-lactam. Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing anti-pseudomonal β-lactams administered as empirical monotherapy for febrile neutropenia, with or without vancomycin. The search included The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Lilacs databases, bibliography, conference proceedings, trial registries and FDA new drug approvals. Two reviewers independently applied selection criteria, performed quality assessment and extracted the data. Trials assessing the same β-lactam were pooled using the fixed effect model. Relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. The primary outcome assessed was all-cause mortality. Results: Thirty-three trials fulfilled inclusion criteria. Cefepime was associated with higher all-cause mortality at 30 days than other β-lactams (RR 1.44, 95% CI 1.06–1.94, 3123 participants). Carbapenems were associated with fewer treatment modifications, including addition of glycopeptides, than ceftazidime or other comparators. Adverse events were significantly more frequent with carbapenems, specifically pseudomembranous colitis (RR 1.94, 95% CI 1.24–3.04, 2025 participants). All-cause mortality was unaltered. Piperacillin/tazobactam was compared only with cefepime and carbapenems, in six trials. No significant differences were demonstrated with paucity of data for all-cause mortality. Conclusions: The use of cefepime for febrile neutropenia is associated with increased mortality and should be carefully considered pending further analysis. Empirical use of carbapenems entails fewer treatment modifications, but an increased rate of pseudomembranous colitis. Ceftazidime, piperacillin/tazobactam, imipenem/cilastatin and meropenem appear to be suitable agents for monotherapy.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>16344285</pmid><doi>10.1093/jac/dki448</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0305-7453 |
ispartof | Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2006-02, Vol.57 (2), p.176-189 |
issn | 0305-7453 1460-2091 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70706793 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents beta-Lactamase Inhibitors Biological and medical sciences carbapenems Carbapenems - therapeutic use cefepime ceftazidime Cephalosporins - therapeutic use Enzyme Inhibitors - therapeutic use Fever - complications Fever - drug therapy Hematologic and hematopoietic diseases Humans Medical sciences Neutropenia - complications Neutropenia - drug therapy Other diseases. Hematologic involvement in other diseases Penicillanic Acid - analogs & derivatives Penicillanic Acid - therapeutic use Penicillins - therapeutic use Pharmacology. Drug treatments piperacillin/tazobactam Quality Assurance, Health Care Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Treatment Outcome β-lactams |
title | Empirical antibiotic monotherapy for febrile neutropenia: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T11%3A25%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Empirical%20antibiotic%20monotherapy%20for%20febrile%20neutropenia:%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis%20of%20randomized%20controlled%20trials&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20antimicrobial%20chemotherapy&rft.au=Paul,%20Mical&rft.date=2006-02-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=176&rft.epage=189&rft.pages=176-189&rft.issn=0305-7453&rft.eissn=1460-2091&rft.coden=JACHDX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jac/dki448&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70706793%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=217673295&rft_id=info:pmid/16344285&rfr_iscdi=true |