Empirical antibiotic monotherapy for febrile neutropenia: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Objectives: Early, empirical broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment is the established practice for febrile neutropenia. Several β-lactams are accepted for monotherapy. We asked whether patients' outcomes are influenced by the chosen β-lactam. Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis of random...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy 2006-02, Vol.57 (2), p.176-189
Hauptverfasser: Paul, Mical, Yahav, Dafna, Fraser, Abigail, Leibovici, Leonard
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 189
container_issue 2
container_start_page 176
container_title Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy
container_volume 57
creator Paul, Mical
Yahav, Dafna
Fraser, Abigail
Leibovici, Leonard
description Objectives: Early, empirical broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment is the established practice for febrile neutropenia. Several β-lactams are accepted for monotherapy. We asked whether patients' outcomes are influenced by the chosen β-lactam. Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing anti-pseudomonal β-lactams administered as empirical monotherapy for febrile neutropenia, with or without vancomycin. The search included The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Lilacs databases, bibliography, conference proceedings, trial registries and FDA new drug approvals. Two reviewers independently applied selection criteria, performed quality assessment and extracted the data. Trials assessing the same β-lactam were pooled using the fixed effect model. Relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. The primary outcome assessed was all-cause mortality. Results: Thirty-three trials fulfilled inclusion criteria. Cefepime was associated with higher all-cause mortality at 30 days than other β-lactams (RR 1.44, 95% CI 1.06–1.94, 3123 participants). Carbapenems were associated with fewer treatment modifications, including addition of glycopeptides, than ceftazidime or other comparators. Adverse events were significantly more frequent with carbapenems, specifically pseudomembranous colitis (RR 1.94, 95% CI 1.24–3.04, 2025 participants). All-cause mortality was unaltered. Piperacillin/tazobactam was compared only with cefepime and carbapenems, in six trials. No significant differences were demonstrated with paucity of data for all-cause mortality. Conclusions: The use of cefepime for febrile neutropenia is associated with increased mortality and should be carefully considered pending further analysis. Empirical use of carbapenems entails fewer treatment modifications, but an increased rate of pseudomembranous colitis. Ceftazidime, piperacillin/tazobactam, imipenem/cilastatin and meropenem appear to be suitable agents for monotherapy.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jac/dki448
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70706793</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70706793</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-561fae65cc24cca1119d6672f3c920368db854e39e214a7088e182adf7d0e16f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0U2LFDEQBuAgijuOXvwBEgQ9CO3mO2lvsuy4woAeFBYvIZOuYGa7O23SrY7gfzfLDC548VQheVIk9SL0lJLXlLT8fO_8eXcThTD30IoKRRpGWnofrQgnstFC8jP0qJQ9IURJZR6iM6q4EMzIFfp9OUwxR-967MY57mKao8dDGtP8FbKbDjikjAPscuwBj7DMOU0wRvcGl0OZYXC3PsP3CD9qhw4PMLvGja4_lFhwCjjX3TTEX9Bhn8Z6ve_rcs7R9eUxehBqgSenukafN5efLq6a7Yd37y_ebhsvhJ4bqWhwoKT3THjvKKVtp5RmgfuWEa5MtzNSAG-BUeE0MQaoYa4LuiNAVeBr9PLYd8rp2wJltkMsHvrejZCWYjXRROmW_xcyojg3dXxr9PwfuE9Lrt-uhmqlOWtlRa-OyOdUSoZgpxwHlw-WEnsbna3R2WN0FT87dVx2A3R39JRVBS9OwJWaV6iD9bHcOS1aUROurjm6WPP5-ffc5Rtb36Wlvbr-Yj9eG7aV243d8D_qJrNe</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>217673295</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Empirical antibiotic monotherapy for febrile neutropenia: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Paul, Mical ; Yahav, Dafna ; Fraser, Abigail ; Leibovici, Leonard</creator><creatorcontrib>Paul, Mical ; Yahav, Dafna ; Fraser, Abigail ; Leibovici, Leonard</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: Early, empirical broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment is the established practice for febrile neutropenia. Several β-lactams are accepted for monotherapy. We asked whether patients' outcomes are influenced by the chosen β-lactam. Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing anti-pseudomonal β-lactams administered as empirical monotherapy for febrile neutropenia, with or without vancomycin. The search included The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Lilacs databases, bibliography, conference proceedings, trial registries and FDA new drug approvals. Two reviewers independently applied selection criteria, performed quality assessment and extracted the data. Trials assessing the same β-lactam were pooled using the fixed effect model. Relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. The primary outcome assessed was all-cause mortality. Results: Thirty-three trials fulfilled inclusion criteria. Cefepime was associated with higher all-cause mortality at 30 days than other β-lactams (RR 1.44, 95% CI 1.06–1.94, 3123 participants). Carbapenems were associated with fewer treatment modifications, including addition of glycopeptides, than ceftazidime or other comparators. Adverse events were significantly more frequent with carbapenems, specifically pseudomembranous colitis (RR 1.94, 95% CI 1.24–3.04, 2025 participants). All-cause mortality was unaltered. Piperacillin/tazobactam was compared only with cefepime and carbapenems, in six trials. No significant differences were demonstrated with paucity of data for all-cause mortality. Conclusions: The use of cefepime for febrile neutropenia is associated with increased mortality and should be carefully considered pending further analysis. Empirical use of carbapenems entails fewer treatment modifications, but an increased rate of pseudomembranous colitis. Ceftazidime, piperacillin/tazobactam, imipenem/cilastatin and meropenem appear to be suitable agents for monotherapy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-7453</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2091</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jac/dki448</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16344285</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JACHDX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use ; Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents ; beta-Lactamase Inhibitors ; Biological and medical sciences ; carbapenems ; Carbapenems - therapeutic use ; cefepime ; ceftazidime ; Cephalosporins - therapeutic use ; Enzyme Inhibitors - therapeutic use ; Fever - complications ; Fever - drug therapy ; Hematologic and hematopoietic diseases ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Neutropenia - complications ; Neutropenia - drug therapy ; Other diseases. Hematologic involvement in other diseases ; Penicillanic Acid - analogs &amp; derivatives ; Penicillanic Acid - therapeutic use ; Penicillins - therapeutic use ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; piperacillin/tazobactam ; Quality Assurance, Health Care ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Treatment Outcome ; β-lactams</subject><ispartof>Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2006-02, Vol.57 (2), p.176-189</ispartof><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press(England) Feb 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-561fae65cc24cca1119d6672f3c920368db854e39e214a7088e182adf7d0e16f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-561fae65cc24cca1119d6672f3c920368db854e39e214a7088e182adf7d0e16f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17494006$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16344285$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Paul, Mical</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yahav, Dafna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fraser, Abigail</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leibovici, Leonard</creatorcontrib><title>Empirical antibiotic monotherapy for febrile neutropenia: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials</title><title>Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy</title><addtitle>J. Antimicrob. Chemother</addtitle><description>Objectives: Early, empirical broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment is the established practice for febrile neutropenia. Several β-lactams are accepted for monotherapy. We asked whether patients' outcomes are influenced by the chosen β-lactam. Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing anti-pseudomonal β-lactams administered as empirical monotherapy for febrile neutropenia, with or without vancomycin. The search included The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Lilacs databases, bibliography, conference proceedings, trial registries and FDA new drug approvals. Two reviewers independently applied selection criteria, performed quality assessment and extracted the data. Trials assessing the same β-lactam were pooled using the fixed effect model. Relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. The primary outcome assessed was all-cause mortality. Results: Thirty-three trials fulfilled inclusion criteria. Cefepime was associated with higher all-cause mortality at 30 days than other β-lactams (RR 1.44, 95% CI 1.06–1.94, 3123 participants). Carbapenems were associated with fewer treatment modifications, including addition of glycopeptides, than ceftazidime or other comparators. Adverse events were significantly more frequent with carbapenems, specifically pseudomembranous colitis (RR 1.94, 95% CI 1.24–3.04, 2025 participants). All-cause mortality was unaltered. Piperacillin/tazobactam was compared only with cefepime and carbapenems, in six trials. No significant differences were demonstrated with paucity of data for all-cause mortality. Conclusions: The use of cefepime for febrile neutropenia is associated with increased mortality and should be carefully considered pending further analysis. Empirical use of carbapenems entails fewer treatment modifications, but an increased rate of pseudomembranous colitis. Ceftazidime, piperacillin/tazobactam, imipenem/cilastatin and meropenem appear to be suitable agents for monotherapy.</description><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents</subject><subject>beta-Lactamase Inhibitors</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>carbapenems</subject><subject>Carbapenems - therapeutic use</subject><subject>cefepime</subject><subject>ceftazidime</subject><subject>Cephalosporins - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Enzyme Inhibitors - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Fever - complications</subject><subject>Fever - drug therapy</subject><subject>Hematologic and hematopoietic diseases</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Neutropenia - complications</subject><subject>Neutropenia - drug therapy</subject><subject>Other diseases. Hematologic involvement in other diseases</subject><subject>Penicillanic Acid - analogs &amp; derivatives</subject><subject>Penicillanic Acid - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Penicillins - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>piperacillin/tazobactam</subject><subject>Quality Assurance, Health Care</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>β-lactams</subject><issn>0305-7453</issn><issn>1460-2091</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0U2LFDEQBuAgijuOXvwBEgQ9CO3mO2lvsuy4woAeFBYvIZOuYGa7O23SrY7gfzfLDC548VQheVIk9SL0lJLXlLT8fO_8eXcThTD30IoKRRpGWnofrQgnstFC8jP0qJQ9IURJZR6iM6q4EMzIFfp9OUwxR-967MY57mKao8dDGtP8FbKbDjikjAPscuwBj7DMOU0wRvcGl0OZYXC3PsP3CD9qhw4PMLvGja4_lFhwCjjX3TTEX9Bhn8Z6ve_rcs7R9eUxehBqgSenukafN5efLq6a7Yd37y_ebhsvhJ4bqWhwoKT3THjvKKVtp5RmgfuWEa5MtzNSAG-BUeE0MQaoYa4LuiNAVeBr9PLYd8rp2wJltkMsHvrejZCWYjXRROmW_xcyojg3dXxr9PwfuE9Lrt-uhmqlOWtlRa-OyOdUSoZgpxwHlw-WEnsbna3R2WN0FT87dVx2A3R39JRVBS9OwJWaV6iD9bHcOS1aUROurjm6WPP5-ffc5Rtb36Wlvbr-Yj9eG7aV243d8D_qJrNe</recordid><startdate>20060201</startdate><enddate>20060201</enddate><creator>Paul, Mical</creator><creator>Yahav, Dafna</creator><creator>Fraser, Abigail</creator><creator>Leibovici, Leonard</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060201</creationdate><title>Empirical antibiotic monotherapy for febrile neutropenia: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials</title><author>Paul, Mical ; Yahav, Dafna ; Fraser, Abigail ; Leibovici, Leonard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-561fae65cc24cca1119d6672f3c920368db854e39e214a7088e182adf7d0e16f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents</topic><topic>beta-Lactamase Inhibitors</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>carbapenems</topic><topic>Carbapenems - therapeutic use</topic><topic>cefepime</topic><topic>ceftazidime</topic><topic>Cephalosporins - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Enzyme Inhibitors - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Fever - complications</topic><topic>Fever - drug therapy</topic><topic>Hematologic and hematopoietic diseases</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Neutropenia - complications</topic><topic>Neutropenia - drug therapy</topic><topic>Other diseases. Hematologic involvement in other diseases</topic><topic>Penicillanic Acid - analogs &amp; derivatives</topic><topic>Penicillanic Acid - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Penicillins - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>piperacillin/tazobactam</topic><topic>Quality Assurance, Health Care</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>β-lactams</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Paul, Mical</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yahav, Dafna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fraser, Abigail</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leibovici, Leonard</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Paul, Mical</au><au>Yahav, Dafna</au><au>Fraser, Abigail</au><au>Leibovici, Leonard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Empirical antibiotic monotherapy for febrile neutropenia: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials</atitle><jtitle>Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy</jtitle><addtitle>J. Antimicrob. Chemother</addtitle><date>2006-02-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>176</spage><epage>189</epage><pages>176-189</pages><issn>0305-7453</issn><eissn>1460-2091</eissn><coden>JACHDX</coden><abstract>Objectives: Early, empirical broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment is the established practice for febrile neutropenia. Several β-lactams are accepted for monotherapy. We asked whether patients' outcomes are influenced by the chosen β-lactam. Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing anti-pseudomonal β-lactams administered as empirical monotherapy for febrile neutropenia, with or without vancomycin. The search included The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Lilacs databases, bibliography, conference proceedings, trial registries and FDA new drug approvals. Two reviewers independently applied selection criteria, performed quality assessment and extracted the data. Trials assessing the same β-lactam were pooled using the fixed effect model. Relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. The primary outcome assessed was all-cause mortality. Results: Thirty-three trials fulfilled inclusion criteria. Cefepime was associated with higher all-cause mortality at 30 days than other β-lactams (RR 1.44, 95% CI 1.06–1.94, 3123 participants). Carbapenems were associated with fewer treatment modifications, including addition of glycopeptides, than ceftazidime or other comparators. Adverse events were significantly more frequent with carbapenems, specifically pseudomembranous colitis (RR 1.94, 95% CI 1.24–3.04, 2025 participants). All-cause mortality was unaltered. Piperacillin/tazobactam was compared only with cefepime and carbapenems, in six trials. No significant differences were demonstrated with paucity of data for all-cause mortality. Conclusions: The use of cefepime for febrile neutropenia is associated with increased mortality and should be carefully considered pending further analysis. Empirical use of carbapenems entails fewer treatment modifications, but an increased rate of pseudomembranous colitis. Ceftazidime, piperacillin/tazobactam, imipenem/cilastatin and meropenem appear to be suitable agents for monotherapy.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>16344285</pmid><doi>10.1093/jac/dki448</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0305-7453
ispartof Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2006-02, Vol.57 (2), p.176-189
issn 0305-7453
1460-2091
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70706793
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use
Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents
beta-Lactamase Inhibitors
Biological and medical sciences
carbapenems
Carbapenems - therapeutic use
cefepime
ceftazidime
Cephalosporins - therapeutic use
Enzyme Inhibitors - therapeutic use
Fever - complications
Fever - drug therapy
Hematologic and hematopoietic diseases
Humans
Medical sciences
Neutropenia - complications
Neutropenia - drug therapy
Other diseases. Hematologic involvement in other diseases
Penicillanic Acid - analogs & derivatives
Penicillanic Acid - therapeutic use
Penicillins - therapeutic use
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
piperacillin/tazobactam
Quality Assurance, Health Care
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Treatment Outcome
β-lactams
title Empirical antibiotic monotherapy for febrile neutropenia: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T11%3A25%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Empirical%20antibiotic%20monotherapy%20for%20febrile%20neutropenia:%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis%20of%20randomized%20controlled%20trials&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20antimicrobial%20chemotherapy&rft.au=Paul,%20Mical&rft.date=2006-02-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=176&rft.epage=189&rft.pages=176-189&rft.issn=0305-7453&rft.eissn=1460-2091&rft.coden=JACHDX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jac/dki448&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70706793%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=217673295&rft_id=info:pmid/16344285&rfr_iscdi=true