An In Vitro Investigation of a Comparison of Bond Strengths of Composite to Etched and Air-Abraded Human Enamel Surfaces

Purpose: The purposes of the study were to measure the tensile bond strength of composite resin to human enamel specimens that had been either etched or air‐abraded, and to compare the quality of the marginal seal, through the assessment of microleakage, of composite resin to human enamel specimens...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of prosthodontics 2006-01, Vol.15 (1), p.2-8
Hauptverfasser: Gray, G.B., Carey, G.P.D., Jagger, D.C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 8
container_issue 1
container_start_page 2
container_title Journal of prosthodontics
container_volume 15
creator Gray, G.B.
Carey, G.P.D.
Jagger, D.C.
description Purpose: The purposes of the study were to measure the tensile bond strength of composite resin to human enamel specimens that had been either etched or air‐abraded, and to compare the quality of the marginal seal, through the assessment of microleakage, of composite resin to human enamel specimens that had been either etched or air‐abraded. Materials and Methods: Thirty mandibular molar teeth were decoronated and sectioned mesio‐distally to produce six groups, each containing ten specimens that were embedded in acrylic resin using a jig. In each of the four treatment groups, the specimen surfaces were treated by either abrasion with 27 or 50 μm alumina at 4 mm or 20 mm distance, and a composite resin was bonded to the treated surfaces in a standardized manner. In the two control groups the specimens were treated with 15 seconds exposure to 36% phosphoric acid gel and then similarly treated before being stored in sterile water for 1 week. All specimens were then subjected to tensile bond strength testing at either 1 or 5 mm/min crosshead speed. For the microleakage study, the degree of dye penetration was measured 32 times for each treatment group, using a neutral methylene blue dye at the interface between composite and either 27 or 50 μm air‐abraded tooth structure or etched enamel surfaces. Results: The mean bond strength values recorded for Group 1 (phosphoric acid etch, 5 mm/min crosshead speed) was 25.4 MPa; Group 2 (phosphoric acid etch, 1 mm/min), 22.2 MPa; Group 3 (27 μm alumina at 4 mm distance), 16.8 MPa; Group 4 (50 μm alumina at 4 mm distance), 16.9 MPa; Group 5 (27 μm alumina at 20 mm distance), 4.2 MPa; and for Group 6 (50 μm alumina at 20 mm distance) 3.4 MPa. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) demonstrated significant differences among the groups, and a multiple comparison test (Tukey) demonstrated that conventionally etched specimens had a greater bond strength than air‐abraded specimen groups. No significant difference in dye penetration could be demonstrated among the groups (p= 0.58). Conclusions: Composite resin applied to enamel surfaces prepared using an acid etch procedure exhibited higher bond strengths than those prepared with air abrasion technology. The abrasion particle size did not affect the bond strength produced, but the latter was adversely affected by the distance of the air abrasion nozzle from the enamel surface. The crosshead speed of the bond testing apparatus had no effect on the bond strengths recorded. The marginal s
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2006.00062.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70702950</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70702950</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3202-ef6014455f9d4e402e5fe023af043240ac8a67c5cfc5b8f827113018c3cd1d7d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEtv1DAUhSMEoqXwF5BX7BKuX3ksWExH02mhooXy6M7yOHbrIYkH24Hpv8cho7LFC_tc33Ou5S_LEIYCp_V2W2BOSV6z5rYgAGUBaSPF_kl2_Nh4mjTwJm8Yvj3KXoSwBcCY1_h5doRLRmnJ-HG2XwzoYkDfbPQuiV86RHsno3UDcgZJtHT9Tnob5vrUDS26iV4Pd_E-TDdT3wUbNYoOraK61y2SybSwPl9svGxTfT72ckCrQfa6QzejN1Lp8DJ7ZmQX9KvDeZJ9PVt9WZ7nl1fri-XiMleUAMm1KQEzxrlpWqYZEM2NBkKlAUYJA6lqWVaKK6P4pjY1qTCmgGtFVYvbqqUn2Zt57s67n2P6nuhtULrr5KDdGEQFFZCGQzLWs1F5F4LXRuy87aV_EBjERF1sxQRXTHDFRF38pS72Kfr68Ma46XX7L3jAnAzvZsNv2-mH_x4s3l9df04q5fM5b0PU-8e89D9EWdGKi-8f12LNPlXk7MOpuKZ_AO84n_A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70702950</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An In Vitro Investigation of a Comparison of Bond Strengths of Composite to Etched and Air-Abraded Human Enamel Surfaces</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Gray, G.B. ; Carey, G.P.D. ; Jagger, D.C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gray, G.B. ; Carey, G.P.D. ; Jagger, D.C.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: The purposes of the study were to measure the tensile bond strength of composite resin to human enamel specimens that had been either etched or air‐abraded, and to compare the quality of the marginal seal, through the assessment of microleakage, of composite resin to human enamel specimens that had been either etched or air‐abraded. Materials and Methods: Thirty mandibular molar teeth were decoronated and sectioned mesio‐distally to produce six groups, each containing ten specimens that were embedded in acrylic resin using a jig. In each of the four treatment groups, the specimen surfaces were treated by either abrasion with 27 or 50 μm alumina at 4 mm or 20 mm distance, and a composite resin was bonded to the treated surfaces in a standardized manner. In the two control groups the specimens were treated with 15 seconds exposure to 36% phosphoric acid gel and then similarly treated before being stored in sterile water for 1 week. All specimens were then subjected to tensile bond strength testing at either 1 or 5 mm/min crosshead speed. For the microleakage study, the degree of dye penetration was measured 32 times for each treatment group, using a neutral methylene blue dye at the interface between composite and either 27 or 50 μm air‐abraded tooth structure or etched enamel surfaces. Results: The mean bond strength values recorded for Group 1 (phosphoric acid etch, 5 mm/min crosshead speed) was 25.4 MPa; Group 2 (phosphoric acid etch, 1 mm/min), 22.2 MPa; Group 3 (27 μm alumina at 4 mm distance), 16.8 MPa; Group 4 (50 μm alumina at 4 mm distance), 16.9 MPa; Group 5 (27 μm alumina at 20 mm distance), 4.2 MPa; and for Group 6 (50 μm alumina at 20 mm distance) 3.4 MPa. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) demonstrated significant differences among the groups, and a multiple comparison test (Tukey) demonstrated that conventionally etched specimens had a greater bond strength than air‐abraded specimen groups. No significant difference in dye penetration could be demonstrated among the groups (p= 0.58). Conclusions: Composite resin applied to enamel surfaces prepared using an acid etch procedure exhibited higher bond strengths than those prepared with air abrasion technology. The abrasion particle size did not affect the bond strength produced, but the latter was adversely affected by the distance of the air abrasion nozzle from the enamel surface. The crosshead speed of the bond testing apparatus had no effect on the bond strengths recorded. The marginal seal of composite to prepared enamel was unaffected by the method of enamel preparation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1059-941X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-849X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2006.00062.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16433645</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>350 Main Street , Malden , MA 02148-5020 , USA , and PO Box 1354, 9600 Garsington Road , Oxford OX4 2XG , England: Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><subject>acid etching ; Acid Etching, Dental ; air abrasion ; Air Abrasion, Dental ; Analysis of Variance ; Composite Resins ; dental bonding ; Dental Bonding - methods ; Dental Enamel ; Dental Leakage - prevention &amp; control ; Dental Stress Analysis ; Dentistry ; Humans ; Mandible ; microleakage ; Molar ; Polymethacrylic Acids ; Resin Cements ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Surface Properties ; Tensile Strength ; Tooth Preparation - methods</subject><ispartof>Journal of prosthodontics, 2006-01, Vol.15 (1), p.2-8</ispartof><rights>Copyright (c) 2006 by The American College of Prosthodontists.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3202-ef6014455f9d4e402e5fe023af043240ac8a67c5cfc5b8f827113018c3cd1d7d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3202-ef6014455f9d4e402e5fe023af043240ac8a67c5cfc5b8f827113018c3cd1d7d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1532-849X.2006.00062.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1532-849X.2006.00062.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16433645$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gray, G.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carey, G.P.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jagger, D.C.</creatorcontrib><title>An In Vitro Investigation of a Comparison of Bond Strengths of Composite to Etched and Air-Abraded Human Enamel Surfaces</title><title>Journal of prosthodontics</title><addtitle>J Prosthodont</addtitle><description>Purpose: The purposes of the study were to measure the tensile bond strength of composite resin to human enamel specimens that had been either etched or air‐abraded, and to compare the quality of the marginal seal, through the assessment of microleakage, of composite resin to human enamel specimens that had been either etched or air‐abraded. Materials and Methods: Thirty mandibular molar teeth were decoronated and sectioned mesio‐distally to produce six groups, each containing ten specimens that were embedded in acrylic resin using a jig. In each of the four treatment groups, the specimen surfaces were treated by either abrasion with 27 or 50 μm alumina at 4 mm or 20 mm distance, and a composite resin was bonded to the treated surfaces in a standardized manner. In the two control groups the specimens were treated with 15 seconds exposure to 36% phosphoric acid gel and then similarly treated before being stored in sterile water for 1 week. All specimens were then subjected to tensile bond strength testing at either 1 or 5 mm/min crosshead speed. For the microleakage study, the degree of dye penetration was measured 32 times for each treatment group, using a neutral methylene blue dye at the interface between composite and either 27 or 50 μm air‐abraded tooth structure or etched enamel surfaces. Results: The mean bond strength values recorded for Group 1 (phosphoric acid etch, 5 mm/min crosshead speed) was 25.4 MPa; Group 2 (phosphoric acid etch, 1 mm/min), 22.2 MPa; Group 3 (27 μm alumina at 4 mm distance), 16.8 MPa; Group 4 (50 μm alumina at 4 mm distance), 16.9 MPa; Group 5 (27 μm alumina at 20 mm distance), 4.2 MPa; and for Group 6 (50 μm alumina at 20 mm distance) 3.4 MPa. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) demonstrated significant differences among the groups, and a multiple comparison test (Tukey) demonstrated that conventionally etched specimens had a greater bond strength than air‐abraded specimen groups. No significant difference in dye penetration could be demonstrated among the groups (p= 0.58). Conclusions: Composite resin applied to enamel surfaces prepared using an acid etch procedure exhibited higher bond strengths than those prepared with air abrasion technology. The abrasion particle size did not affect the bond strength produced, but the latter was adversely affected by the distance of the air abrasion nozzle from the enamel surface. The crosshead speed of the bond testing apparatus had no effect on the bond strengths recorded. The marginal seal of composite to prepared enamel was unaffected by the method of enamel preparation.</description><subject>acid etching</subject><subject>Acid Etching, Dental</subject><subject>air abrasion</subject><subject>Air Abrasion, Dental</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Composite Resins</subject><subject>dental bonding</subject><subject>Dental Bonding - methods</subject><subject>Dental Enamel</subject><subject>Dental Leakage - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Dental Stress Analysis</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mandible</subject><subject>microleakage</subject><subject>Molar</subject><subject>Polymethacrylic Acids</subject><subject>Resin Cements</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Surface Properties</subject><subject>Tensile Strength</subject><subject>Tooth Preparation - methods</subject><issn>1059-941X</issn><issn>1532-849X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEtv1DAUhSMEoqXwF5BX7BKuX3ksWExH02mhooXy6M7yOHbrIYkH24Hpv8cho7LFC_tc33Ou5S_LEIYCp_V2W2BOSV6z5rYgAGUBaSPF_kl2_Nh4mjTwJm8Yvj3KXoSwBcCY1_h5doRLRmnJ-HG2XwzoYkDfbPQuiV86RHsno3UDcgZJtHT9Tnob5vrUDS26iV4Pd_E-TDdT3wUbNYoOraK61y2SybSwPl9svGxTfT72ckCrQfa6QzejN1Lp8DJ7ZmQX9KvDeZJ9PVt9WZ7nl1fri-XiMleUAMm1KQEzxrlpWqYZEM2NBkKlAUYJA6lqWVaKK6P4pjY1qTCmgGtFVYvbqqUn2Zt57s67n2P6nuhtULrr5KDdGEQFFZCGQzLWs1F5F4LXRuy87aV_EBjERF1sxQRXTHDFRF38pS72Kfr68Ma46XX7L3jAnAzvZsNv2-mH_x4s3l9df04q5fM5b0PU-8e89D9EWdGKi-8f12LNPlXk7MOpuKZ_AO84n_A</recordid><startdate>200601</startdate><enddate>200601</enddate><creator>Gray, G.B.</creator><creator>Carey, G.P.D.</creator><creator>Jagger, D.C.</creator><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200601</creationdate><title>An In Vitro Investigation of a Comparison of Bond Strengths of Composite to Etched and Air-Abraded Human Enamel Surfaces</title><author>Gray, G.B. ; Carey, G.P.D. ; Jagger, D.C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3202-ef6014455f9d4e402e5fe023af043240ac8a67c5cfc5b8f827113018c3cd1d7d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>acid etching</topic><topic>Acid Etching, Dental</topic><topic>air abrasion</topic><topic>Air Abrasion, Dental</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Composite Resins</topic><topic>dental bonding</topic><topic>Dental Bonding - methods</topic><topic>Dental Enamel</topic><topic>Dental Leakage - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Dental Stress Analysis</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mandible</topic><topic>microleakage</topic><topic>Molar</topic><topic>Polymethacrylic Acids</topic><topic>Resin Cements</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Surface Properties</topic><topic>Tensile Strength</topic><topic>Tooth Preparation - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gray, G.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carey, G.P.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jagger, D.C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of prosthodontics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gray, G.B.</au><au>Carey, G.P.D.</au><au>Jagger, D.C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An In Vitro Investigation of a Comparison of Bond Strengths of Composite to Etched and Air-Abraded Human Enamel Surfaces</atitle><jtitle>Journal of prosthodontics</jtitle><addtitle>J Prosthodont</addtitle><date>2006-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>2</spage><epage>8</epage><pages>2-8</pages><issn>1059-941X</issn><eissn>1532-849X</eissn><abstract>Purpose: The purposes of the study were to measure the tensile bond strength of composite resin to human enamel specimens that had been either etched or air‐abraded, and to compare the quality of the marginal seal, through the assessment of microleakage, of composite resin to human enamel specimens that had been either etched or air‐abraded. Materials and Methods: Thirty mandibular molar teeth were decoronated and sectioned mesio‐distally to produce six groups, each containing ten specimens that were embedded in acrylic resin using a jig. In each of the four treatment groups, the specimen surfaces were treated by either abrasion with 27 or 50 μm alumina at 4 mm or 20 mm distance, and a composite resin was bonded to the treated surfaces in a standardized manner. In the two control groups the specimens were treated with 15 seconds exposure to 36% phosphoric acid gel and then similarly treated before being stored in sterile water for 1 week. All specimens were then subjected to tensile bond strength testing at either 1 or 5 mm/min crosshead speed. For the microleakage study, the degree of dye penetration was measured 32 times for each treatment group, using a neutral methylene blue dye at the interface between composite and either 27 or 50 μm air‐abraded tooth structure or etched enamel surfaces. Results: The mean bond strength values recorded for Group 1 (phosphoric acid etch, 5 mm/min crosshead speed) was 25.4 MPa; Group 2 (phosphoric acid etch, 1 mm/min), 22.2 MPa; Group 3 (27 μm alumina at 4 mm distance), 16.8 MPa; Group 4 (50 μm alumina at 4 mm distance), 16.9 MPa; Group 5 (27 μm alumina at 20 mm distance), 4.2 MPa; and for Group 6 (50 μm alumina at 20 mm distance) 3.4 MPa. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) demonstrated significant differences among the groups, and a multiple comparison test (Tukey) demonstrated that conventionally etched specimens had a greater bond strength than air‐abraded specimen groups. No significant difference in dye penetration could be demonstrated among the groups (p= 0.58). Conclusions: Composite resin applied to enamel surfaces prepared using an acid etch procedure exhibited higher bond strengths than those prepared with air abrasion technology. The abrasion particle size did not affect the bond strength produced, but the latter was adversely affected by the distance of the air abrasion nozzle from the enamel surface. The crosshead speed of the bond testing apparatus had no effect on the bond strengths recorded. The marginal seal of composite to prepared enamel was unaffected by the method of enamel preparation.</abstract><cop>350 Main Street , Malden , MA 02148-5020 , USA , and PO Box 1354, 9600 Garsington Road , Oxford OX4 2XG , England</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Ltd</pub><pmid>16433645</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1532-849X.2006.00062.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1059-941X
ispartof Journal of prosthodontics, 2006-01, Vol.15 (1), p.2-8
issn 1059-941X
1532-849X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70702950
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects acid etching
Acid Etching, Dental
air abrasion
Air Abrasion, Dental
Analysis of Variance
Composite Resins
dental bonding
Dental Bonding - methods
Dental Enamel
Dental Leakage - prevention & control
Dental Stress Analysis
Dentistry
Humans
Mandible
microleakage
Molar
Polymethacrylic Acids
Resin Cements
Statistics, Nonparametric
Surface Properties
Tensile Strength
Tooth Preparation - methods
title An In Vitro Investigation of a Comparison of Bond Strengths of Composite to Etched and Air-Abraded Human Enamel Surfaces
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T20%3A09%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20In%20Vitro%20Investigation%20of%20a%20Comparison%20of%20Bond%20Strengths%20of%20Composite%20to%20Etched%20and%20Air-Abraded%20Human%20Enamel%20Surfaces&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20prosthodontics&rft.au=Gray,%20G.B.&rft.date=2006-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=2&rft.epage=8&rft.pages=2-8&rft.issn=1059-941X&rft.eissn=1532-849X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2006.00062.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70702950%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70702950&rft_id=info:pmid/16433645&rfr_iscdi=true