Dose-dependent influence of barbiturates but not of propofol on human leukocyte phagocytosis of viable Staphylococcus aureus

OBJECTIVE:Deep sedation with barbiturates or propofol is a standard therapy for patients with critically elevated intracranial pressure. Such patients are prone to infectious complications, especially to pneumonias, which are most commonly caused by Staphylococcus aureus. Although various immunomodu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Critical care medicine 2006-02, Vol.34 (2), p.478-483
Hauptverfasser: Ploppa, Annette, Kiefer, Ralph-Thomas, Nohé, Boris, Haeberle, Helene A, Dieterich, Hans-Jürgen, Unertl, Klaus E, Krueger, Wolfgang A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 483
container_issue 2
container_start_page 478
container_title Critical care medicine
container_volume 34
creator Ploppa, Annette
Kiefer, Ralph-Thomas
Nohé, Boris
Haeberle, Helene A
Dieterich, Hans-Jürgen
Unertl, Klaus E
Krueger, Wolfgang A
description OBJECTIVE:Deep sedation with barbiturates or propofol is a standard therapy for patients with critically elevated intracranial pressure. Such patients are prone to infectious complications, especially to pneumonias, which are most commonly caused by Staphylococcus aureus. Although various immunomodulatory effects of barbiturates have been described in vitro, their influence on the phagocytosis of viable S. aureus has yet to be investigated. Therefore, we examined the effects of thiopentone, methohexitone, and propofol on the phagocytosis of viable S. aureus. DESIGN:Laboratory study. SETTING:University laboratory. PATIENTS:Ten healthy volunteers aged 32.5 ± 7 yrs. INTERVENTIONS:Blood sampling. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:Whole blood samples were preincubated with different concentrations of thiopentone, methohexitone, and propofol, which is an isopropylphenol derivate. After viable S. aureus was added, phagocytosis was stopped at different time points. Leukocytes were then stained with monoclonal antibodies for flow cytometric analysis of granulocyte recruitment (ratio of ingesting granulocytes) and phagocytosis activity (fluorescence intensity of ingested bacteria). Both barbiturates inhibited granulocyte recruitment and phagocytosis activity in a dose-dependent manner, whereas propofol did not affect any of the investigated variables. At concentrations higher than 7.6 × 10 M (for thiopentone, p < .008) and 1.1 × 10 M (for methohexitone, p < .04), granulocyte recruitment and phagocytosis activity were significantly inhibited. The calculated inhibitory concentrations (IC50) of thiopentone for granulocyte recruitment and for phagocytosis activity were 1.3 × 10 M and 1.1 × 10 M, respectively. The corresponding values for methohexitone were 3.6 × 10 M and 1.1 × 10 M. CONCLUSIONS:Our in vitro model points at substantially different effects of barbiturates and propofol on phagocytosis of S. aureus, which is one of the most important pathogens in patients who need neuroprotective therapy. The inhibitory effects of both barbiturates demonstrate a strong dose-dependency, with more pronounced effects for methohexitone. Impairment of phagocytosis activity was more pronounced than granulocyte recruitment.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/01.CCM.0000199067.71968.6E
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70693149</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70693149</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3928-33942481351096d3fdf0a703f6f2b877ff73e5a49c9a7ef8e43593d88c588ac53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkVuv1CAQgInReNbVv2CIib61QmkL-GbW9ZIc44P6TCgdbD1sqVw82cQfL3t2k-UByOQbZuYDoVeU1JRI_pbQerf7WpOyqJSk5zWnshd1v3-ENrRjpCKNZI_RhhBJKtZKdoOexfi74G3H2VN0Q_u2aTmjG_Tvg49QjbDCMsKS8LxYl2ExgL3Fgw7DnHLQCSIecsKLT6f4GvzqrXfYL3jKB71gB_nOm2MCvE761-nm4xxP7N9ZDw7w96TX6ei88cbkiHUOkONz9MRqF-HF5dyinx_3P3afq9tvn77s3t9WhslGVIzJ0q6grCvj9yOzoyWaE2Z72wyCc2s5g0630kjNwQpoWSfZKITphNCmY1v05vxuafxPhpjUYY4GnNML-BwVJ71ktHjaondn0AQfYwCr1jAfdDgqStTJvSJUFffq6l49uFf9viS_vFTJwwHGa-pFdgFeXwAdjXY26MXM8crxlrcdE4Vrz9y9dwlCvHP5HoKaQLs0PZRmTdtXDSE9KVv5bkIawf4Dq-2e-w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70693149</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dose-dependent influence of barbiturates but not of propofol on human leukocyte phagocytosis of viable Staphylococcus aureus</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Ploppa, Annette ; Kiefer, Ralph-Thomas ; Nohé, Boris ; Haeberle, Helene A ; Dieterich, Hans-Jürgen ; Unertl, Klaus E ; Krueger, Wolfgang A</creator><creatorcontrib>Ploppa, Annette ; Kiefer, Ralph-Thomas ; Nohé, Boris ; Haeberle, Helene A ; Dieterich, Hans-Jürgen ; Unertl, Klaus E ; Krueger, Wolfgang A</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVE:Deep sedation with barbiturates or propofol is a standard therapy for patients with critically elevated intracranial pressure. Such patients are prone to infectious complications, especially to pneumonias, which are most commonly caused by Staphylococcus aureus. Although various immunomodulatory effects of barbiturates have been described in vitro, their influence on the phagocytosis of viable S. aureus has yet to be investigated. Therefore, we examined the effects of thiopentone, methohexitone, and propofol on the phagocytosis of viable S. aureus. DESIGN:Laboratory study. SETTING:University laboratory. PATIENTS:Ten healthy volunteers aged 32.5 ± 7 yrs. INTERVENTIONS:Blood sampling. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:Whole blood samples were preincubated with different concentrations of thiopentone, methohexitone, and propofol, which is an isopropylphenol derivate. After viable S. aureus was added, phagocytosis was stopped at different time points. Leukocytes were then stained with monoclonal antibodies for flow cytometric analysis of granulocyte recruitment (ratio of ingesting granulocytes) and phagocytosis activity (fluorescence intensity of ingested bacteria). Both barbiturates inhibited granulocyte recruitment and phagocytosis activity in a dose-dependent manner, whereas propofol did not affect any of the investigated variables. At concentrations higher than 7.6 × 10 M (for thiopentone, p &lt; .008) and 1.1 × 10 M (for methohexitone, p &lt; .04), granulocyte recruitment and phagocytosis activity were significantly inhibited. The calculated inhibitory concentrations (IC50) of thiopentone for granulocyte recruitment and for phagocytosis activity were 1.3 × 10 M and 1.1 × 10 M, respectively. The corresponding values for methohexitone were 3.6 × 10 M and 1.1 × 10 M. CONCLUSIONS:Our in vitro model points at substantially different effects of barbiturates and propofol on phagocytosis of S. aureus, which is one of the most important pathogens in patients who need neuroprotective therapy. The inhibitory effects of both barbiturates demonstrate a strong dose-dependency, with more pronounced effects for methohexitone. Impairment of phagocytosis activity was more pronounced than granulocyte recruitment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-3493</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-0293</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000199067.71968.6E</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16424731</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CCMDC7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Anesthetics, Intravenous - administration &amp; dosage ; Anesthetics, Intravenous - pharmacology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blood coagulation. Blood cells ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Flow Cytometry ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects, investigation methods, hemostasis, fibrinolysis ; Humans ; Hypnotics. Sedatives ; Intensive care medicine ; Leukocytes - drug effects ; Medical sciences ; Methohexital - administration &amp; dosage ; Methohexital - pharmacology ; Molecular and cellular biology ; Neuropharmacology ; Phagocytosis - drug effects ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Propofol - administration &amp; dosage ; Propofol - pharmacology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopharmacology ; Staphylococcus aureus - drug effects ; Staphylococcus aureus - metabolism ; Thiopental - administration &amp; dosage ; Thiopental - pharmacology</subject><ispartof>Critical care medicine, 2006-02, Vol.34 (2), p.478-483</ispartof><rights>2006 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3928-33942481351096d3fdf0a703f6f2b877ff73e5a49c9a7ef8e43593d88c588ac53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3928-33942481351096d3fdf0a703f6f2b877ff73e5a49c9a7ef8e43593d88c588ac53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17474538$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16424731$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ploppa, Annette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiefer, Ralph-Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nohé, Boris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haeberle, Helene A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dieterich, Hans-Jürgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Unertl, Klaus E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krueger, Wolfgang A</creatorcontrib><title>Dose-dependent influence of barbiturates but not of propofol on human leukocyte phagocytosis of viable Staphylococcus aureus</title><title>Critical care medicine</title><addtitle>Crit Care Med</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVE:Deep sedation with barbiturates or propofol is a standard therapy for patients with critically elevated intracranial pressure. Such patients are prone to infectious complications, especially to pneumonias, which are most commonly caused by Staphylococcus aureus. Although various immunomodulatory effects of barbiturates have been described in vitro, their influence on the phagocytosis of viable S. aureus has yet to be investigated. Therefore, we examined the effects of thiopentone, methohexitone, and propofol on the phagocytosis of viable S. aureus. DESIGN:Laboratory study. SETTING:University laboratory. PATIENTS:Ten healthy volunteers aged 32.5 ± 7 yrs. INTERVENTIONS:Blood sampling. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:Whole blood samples were preincubated with different concentrations of thiopentone, methohexitone, and propofol, which is an isopropylphenol derivate. After viable S. aureus was added, phagocytosis was stopped at different time points. Leukocytes were then stained with monoclonal antibodies for flow cytometric analysis of granulocyte recruitment (ratio of ingesting granulocytes) and phagocytosis activity (fluorescence intensity of ingested bacteria). Both barbiturates inhibited granulocyte recruitment and phagocytosis activity in a dose-dependent manner, whereas propofol did not affect any of the investigated variables. At concentrations higher than 7.6 × 10 M (for thiopentone, p &lt; .008) and 1.1 × 10 M (for methohexitone, p &lt; .04), granulocyte recruitment and phagocytosis activity were significantly inhibited. The calculated inhibitory concentrations (IC50) of thiopentone for granulocyte recruitment and for phagocytosis activity were 1.3 × 10 M and 1.1 × 10 M, respectively. The corresponding values for methohexitone were 3.6 × 10 M and 1.1 × 10 M. CONCLUSIONS:Our in vitro model points at substantially different effects of barbiturates and propofol on phagocytosis of S. aureus, which is one of the most important pathogens in patients who need neuroprotective therapy. The inhibitory effects of both barbiturates demonstrate a strong dose-dependency, with more pronounced effects for methohexitone. Impairment of phagocytosis activity was more pronounced than granulocyte recruitment.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Intravenous - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Intravenous - pharmacology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blood coagulation. Blood cells</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>Flow Cytometry</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects, investigation methods, hemostasis, fibrinolysis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypnotics. Sedatives</subject><subject>Intensive care medicine</subject><subject>Leukocytes - drug effects</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Methohexital - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Methohexital - pharmacology</subject><subject>Molecular and cellular biology</subject><subject>Neuropharmacology</subject><subject>Phagocytosis - drug effects</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Propofol - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Propofol - pharmacology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopharmacology</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus - drug effects</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus - metabolism</subject><subject>Thiopental - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Thiopental - pharmacology</subject><issn>0090-3493</issn><issn>1530-0293</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkVuv1CAQgInReNbVv2CIib61QmkL-GbW9ZIc44P6TCgdbD1sqVw82cQfL3t2k-UByOQbZuYDoVeU1JRI_pbQerf7WpOyqJSk5zWnshd1v3-ENrRjpCKNZI_RhhBJKtZKdoOexfi74G3H2VN0Q_u2aTmjG_Tvg49QjbDCMsKS8LxYl2ExgL3Fgw7DnHLQCSIecsKLT6f4GvzqrXfYL3jKB71gB_nOm2MCvE761-nm4xxP7N9ZDw7w96TX6ei88cbkiHUOkONz9MRqF-HF5dyinx_3P3afq9tvn77s3t9WhslGVIzJ0q6grCvj9yOzoyWaE2Z72wyCc2s5g0630kjNwQpoWSfZKITphNCmY1v05vxuafxPhpjUYY4GnNML-BwVJ71ktHjaondn0AQfYwCr1jAfdDgqStTJvSJUFffq6l49uFf9viS_vFTJwwHGa-pFdgFeXwAdjXY26MXM8crxlrcdE4Vrz9y9dwlCvHP5HoKaQLs0PZRmTdtXDSE9KVv5bkIawf4Dq-2e-w</recordid><startdate>200602</startdate><enddate>200602</enddate><creator>Ploppa, Annette</creator><creator>Kiefer, Ralph-Thomas</creator><creator>Nohé, Boris</creator><creator>Haeberle, Helene A</creator><creator>Dieterich, Hans-Jürgen</creator><creator>Unertl, Klaus E</creator><creator>Krueger, Wolfgang A</creator><general>by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><general>Lippincott</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200602</creationdate><title>Dose-dependent influence of barbiturates but not of propofol on human leukocyte phagocytosis of viable Staphylococcus aureus</title><author>Ploppa, Annette ; Kiefer, Ralph-Thomas ; Nohé, Boris ; Haeberle, Helene A ; Dieterich, Hans-Jürgen ; Unertl, Klaus E ; Krueger, Wolfgang A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3928-33942481351096d3fdf0a703f6f2b877ff73e5a49c9a7ef8e43593d88c588ac53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Intravenous - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Intravenous - pharmacology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blood coagulation. Blood cells</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>Flow Cytometry</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects, investigation methods, hemostasis, fibrinolysis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypnotics. Sedatives</topic><topic>Intensive care medicine</topic><topic>Leukocytes - drug effects</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Methohexital - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Methohexital - pharmacology</topic><topic>Molecular and cellular biology</topic><topic>Neuropharmacology</topic><topic>Phagocytosis - drug effects</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Propofol - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Propofol - pharmacology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopharmacology</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus - drug effects</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus - metabolism</topic><topic>Thiopental - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Thiopental - pharmacology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ploppa, Annette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiefer, Ralph-Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nohé, Boris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haeberle, Helene A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dieterich, Hans-Jürgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Unertl, Klaus E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krueger, Wolfgang A</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Critical care medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ploppa, Annette</au><au>Kiefer, Ralph-Thomas</au><au>Nohé, Boris</au><au>Haeberle, Helene A</au><au>Dieterich, Hans-Jürgen</au><au>Unertl, Klaus E</au><au>Krueger, Wolfgang A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dose-dependent influence of barbiturates but not of propofol on human leukocyte phagocytosis of viable Staphylococcus aureus</atitle><jtitle>Critical care medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Crit Care Med</addtitle><date>2006-02</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>478</spage><epage>483</epage><pages>478-483</pages><issn>0090-3493</issn><eissn>1530-0293</eissn><coden>CCMDC7</coden><abstract>OBJECTIVE:Deep sedation with barbiturates or propofol is a standard therapy for patients with critically elevated intracranial pressure. Such patients are prone to infectious complications, especially to pneumonias, which are most commonly caused by Staphylococcus aureus. Although various immunomodulatory effects of barbiturates have been described in vitro, their influence on the phagocytosis of viable S. aureus has yet to be investigated. Therefore, we examined the effects of thiopentone, methohexitone, and propofol on the phagocytosis of viable S. aureus. DESIGN:Laboratory study. SETTING:University laboratory. PATIENTS:Ten healthy volunteers aged 32.5 ± 7 yrs. INTERVENTIONS:Blood sampling. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:Whole blood samples were preincubated with different concentrations of thiopentone, methohexitone, and propofol, which is an isopropylphenol derivate. After viable S. aureus was added, phagocytosis was stopped at different time points. Leukocytes were then stained with monoclonal antibodies for flow cytometric analysis of granulocyte recruitment (ratio of ingesting granulocytes) and phagocytosis activity (fluorescence intensity of ingested bacteria). Both barbiturates inhibited granulocyte recruitment and phagocytosis activity in a dose-dependent manner, whereas propofol did not affect any of the investigated variables. At concentrations higher than 7.6 × 10 M (for thiopentone, p &lt; .008) and 1.1 × 10 M (for methohexitone, p &lt; .04), granulocyte recruitment and phagocytosis activity were significantly inhibited. The calculated inhibitory concentrations (IC50) of thiopentone for granulocyte recruitment and for phagocytosis activity were 1.3 × 10 M and 1.1 × 10 M, respectively. The corresponding values for methohexitone were 3.6 × 10 M and 1.1 × 10 M. CONCLUSIONS:Our in vitro model points at substantially different effects of barbiturates and propofol on phagocytosis of S. aureus, which is one of the most important pathogens in patients who need neuroprotective therapy. The inhibitory effects of both barbiturates demonstrate a strong dose-dependency, with more pronounced effects for methohexitone. Impairment of phagocytosis activity was more pronounced than granulocyte recruitment.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>16424731</pmid><doi>10.1097/01.CCM.0000199067.71968.6E</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0090-3493
ispartof Critical care medicine, 2006-02, Vol.34 (2), p.478-483
issn 0090-3493
1530-0293
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70693149
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adult
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Anesthetics, Intravenous - administration & dosage
Anesthetics, Intravenous - pharmacology
Biological and medical sciences
Blood coagulation. Blood cells
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Flow Cytometry
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects, investigation methods, hemostasis, fibrinolysis
Humans
Hypnotics. Sedatives
Intensive care medicine
Leukocytes - drug effects
Medical sciences
Methohexital - administration & dosage
Methohexital - pharmacology
Molecular and cellular biology
Neuropharmacology
Phagocytosis - drug effects
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Propofol - administration & dosage
Propofol - pharmacology
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychopharmacology
Staphylococcus aureus - drug effects
Staphylococcus aureus - metabolism
Thiopental - administration & dosage
Thiopental - pharmacology
title Dose-dependent influence of barbiturates but not of propofol on human leukocyte phagocytosis of viable Staphylococcus aureus
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T10%3A42%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dose-dependent%20influence%20of%20barbiturates%20but%20not%20of%20propofol%20on%20human%20leukocyte%20phagocytosis%20of%20viable%20Staphylococcus%20aureus&rft.jtitle=Critical%20care%20medicine&rft.au=Ploppa,%20Annette&rft.date=2006-02&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=478&rft.epage=483&rft.pages=478-483&rft.issn=0090-3493&rft.eissn=1530-0293&rft.coden=CCMDC7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/01.CCM.0000199067.71968.6E&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70693149%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70693149&rft_id=info:pmid/16424731&rfr_iscdi=true