A Comparison of Vancomycin and Metronidazole for the Treatment of Clostridium difficile–Associated Diarrhea, Stratified by Disease Severity
Background. The incidence and severity of Clostridium difficile–associated diarrhea (CDAD) has been increasing, and there have been recent reports of metronidazole treatment failure. Metronidazole is still commonly used as first-line treatment for CDAD but has never been compared with vancomycin in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical infectious diseases 2007-08, Vol.45 (3), p.302-307 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 307 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 302 |
container_title | Clinical infectious diseases |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Zar, Fred A. Bakkanagari, Srinivasa R. Moorthi, K. M. L. S. T. Davis, Melinda B. |
description | Background. The incidence and severity of Clostridium difficile–associated diarrhea (CDAD) has been increasing, and there have been recent reports of metronidazole treatment failure. Metronidazole is still commonly used as first-line treatment for CDAD but has never been compared with vancomycin in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. We conducted such a trial, stratifying patients according to disease severity, to investigate whether one agent was superior for treating either mild or severe disease. Methods. From October 1994 through June 2002, patients with CDAD were stratified according to whether they had mild or severe disease based on clinical criteria and were randomly assigned to receive oral metronidazole (250 mg 4 times per day) or oral vancomycin (125 mg 4 times per day) for 10 days. Both groups received an oral placebo in addition to the study drug. Patients were followed up for 21 days to assess cure, treatment failure, relapse, or intolerance. Results. One hundred seventy-two patients were enrolled, and 150 of these patients successfully completed the trial. Among the patients with mild CDAD, treatment with metronidazole or vancomycin resulted in clinical cure in 90% and 98% of the patients, respectively (P = .36). Among the patients with severe CDAD, treatment with metronidazole or vancomycin resulted in clinical cure in 76% and 97% of the patients, respectively (P = .02). Clinical symptoms recurred in 15% of the patients treated with metronidazole and 14% of those treated with vancomycin. Conclusions. Our findings suggest that metronidazole and vancomycin are equally effective for the treatment of mild CDAD, but vancomycin is superior for treating patients with severe CDAD. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1086/519265 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70677941</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4464187</jstor_id><oup_id>10.1086/519265</oup_id><sourcerecordid>4464187</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-b4721cd5c605f798fb2534fc663bfdaefc9337c27cffcdcb351b6089e03ec5283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0d2K1DAUB_Aiiruu-gQiUdArq0nTfF2O48cKu4jMOoo3IU1P2IxtMyapOF75Al75hj6JHWaYBUG8Ssj55SSHf1HcJfgpwZI_Y0RVnF0rjgmjouRMkevTHjNZ1pLKo-JWSiuMCZGY3SyOiGBKUcyPi58zNA_92kSfwoCCQ0sz2NBvrB-QGVp0DjmGwbfme-gAuRBRvgR0EcHkHoa8vTHvQsrRt37sUeud89Z38PvHr1lKwXqToUUvvInxEswTtMjRZO_8dNhspvMEJgFawFeIPm9uFzec6RLc2a8nxftXLy_mp-XZ29dv5rOz0jLCc9nUoiK2ZZZj5oSSrqkYrZ3lnDauNeCsolTYSljnbGsbykjDsVSAKVhWSXpSPN71XcfwZYSUde-Tha4zA4QxaYG5EKom_4UVlrWsajbBh3_BVRjjMA2hK6IUExKLq242hpQiOL2OvjdxownW2xj1LsYJ3t93G5se2iu2z20Cj_bAJGs6F6fUfDq4ClcKU7kd9MHOhXH978fu7cwq5RAPqq55TeT20-Wu7FOGb4eyiZ81F1Qwffrxk14-X0q2ePdBn9M_-sjJZg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219957807</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Comparison of Vancomycin and Metronidazole for the Treatment of Clostridium difficile–Associated Diarrhea, Stratified by Disease Severity</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Zar, Fred A. ; Bakkanagari, Srinivasa R. ; Moorthi, K. M. L. S. T. ; Davis, Melinda B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Zar, Fred A. ; Bakkanagari, Srinivasa R. ; Moorthi, K. M. L. S. T. ; Davis, Melinda B.</creatorcontrib><description>Background. The incidence and severity of Clostridium difficile–associated diarrhea (CDAD) has been increasing, and there have been recent reports of metronidazole treatment failure. Metronidazole is still commonly used as first-line treatment for CDAD but has never been compared with vancomycin in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. We conducted such a trial, stratifying patients according to disease severity, to investigate whether one agent was superior for treating either mild or severe disease. Methods. From October 1994 through June 2002, patients with CDAD were stratified according to whether they had mild or severe disease based on clinical criteria and were randomly assigned to receive oral metronidazole (250 mg 4 times per day) or oral vancomycin (125 mg 4 times per day) for 10 days. Both groups received an oral placebo in addition to the study drug. Patients were followed up for 21 days to assess cure, treatment failure, relapse, or intolerance. Results. One hundred seventy-two patients were enrolled, and 150 of these patients successfully completed the trial. Among the patients with mild CDAD, treatment with metronidazole or vancomycin resulted in clinical cure in 90% and 98% of the patients, respectively (P = .36). Among the patients with severe CDAD, treatment with metronidazole or vancomycin resulted in clinical cure in 76% and 97% of the patients, respectively (P = .02). Clinical symptoms recurred in 15% of the patients treated with metronidazole and 14% of those treated with vancomycin. Conclusions. Our findings suggest that metronidazole and vancomycin are equally effective for the treatment of mild CDAD, but vancomycin is superior for treating patients with severe CDAD.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-4838</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-6591</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/519265</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17599306</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CIDIEL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Administration, Oral ; Adult ; Aged ; Anti-Infective Agents - therapeutic use ; Antibacterial agents ; Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents ; Antifungal agents ; Articles and Commentaries ; Bacterial diseases ; Bacterial diseases of the digestive system and abdomen ; Biological and medical sciences ; Clinical trials ; Clostridium ; Clostridium difficile ; Colitis ; Comparative analysis ; Diabetes ; Diarrhea ; Double-Blind Method ; Drug therapy ; Drugs ; Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous - drug therapy ; Epidemiology ; Female ; Human bacterial diseases ; Humans ; Infectious diseases ; Male ; Medical cures ; Medical sciences ; Medical treatment failures ; Metronidazole - administration & dosage ; Metronidazole - therapeutic use ; Middle Aged ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Prospective Studies ; Relapse ; Severity of Illness Index ; Toxins ; Treatment Outcome ; Vancomycin - administration & dosage ; Vancomycin - therapeutic use</subject><ispartof>Clinical infectious diseases, 2007-08, Vol.45 (3), p.302-307</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2007 The Infectious Diseases Society of America</rights><rights>2007 of the Infectious Diseases Society of America 2007</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago, acting through its Press Aug 1, 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-b4721cd5c605f798fb2534fc663bfdaefc9337c27cffcdcb351b6089e03ec5283</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-b4721cd5c605f798fb2534fc663bfdaefc9337c27cffcdcb351b6089e03ec5283</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4464187$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4464187$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20290388$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17599306$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zar, Fred A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bakkanagari, Srinivasa R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moorthi, K. M. L. S. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Melinda B.</creatorcontrib><title>A Comparison of Vancomycin and Metronidazole for the Treatment of Clostridium difficile–Associated Diarrhea, Stratified by Disease Severity</title><title>Clinical infectious diseases</title><addtitle>Clinical Infectious Diseases</addtitle><addtitle>Clinical Infectious Diseases</addtitle><description>Background. The incidence and severity of Clostridium difficile–associated diarrhea (CDAD) has been increasing, and there have been recent reports of metronidazole treatment failure. Metronidazole is still commonly used as first-line treatment for CDAD but has never been compared with vancomycin in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. We conducted such a trial, stratifying patients according to disease severity, to investigate whether one agent was superior for treating either mild or severe disease. Methods. From October 1994 through June 2002, patients with CDAD were stratified according to whether they had mild or severe disease based on clinical criteria and were randomly assigned to receive oral metronidazole (250 mg 4 times per day) or oral vancomycin (125 mg 4 times per day) for 10 days. Both groups received an oral placebo in addition to the study drug. Patients were followed up for 21 days to assess cure, treatment failure, relapse, or intolerance. Results. One hundred seventy-two patients were enrolled, and 150 of these patients successfully completed the trial. Among the patients with mild CDAD, treatment with metronidazole or vancomycin resulted in clinical cure in 90% and 98% of the patients, respectively (P = .36). Among the patients with severe CDAD, treatment with metronidazole or vancomycin resulted in clinical cure in 76% and 97% of the patients, respectively (P = .02). Clinical symptoms recurred in 15% of the patients treated with metronidazole and 14% of those treated with vancomycin. Conclusions. Our findings suggest that metronidazole and vancomycin are equally effective for the treatment of mild CDAD, but vancomycin is superior for treating patients with severe CDAD.</description><subject>Administration, Oral</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anti-Infective Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antibacterial agents</subject><subject>Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents</subject><subject>Antifungal agents</subject><subject>Articles and Commentaries</subject><subject>Bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Bacterial diseases of the digestive system and abdomen</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Clostridium</subject><subject>Clostridium difficile</subject><subject>Colitis</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diarrhea</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Drug therapy</subject><subject>Drugs</subject><subject>Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous - drug therapy</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical cures</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medical treatment failures</subject><subject>Metronidazole - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Metronidazole - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Relapse</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Toxins</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Vancomycin - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Vancomycin - therapeutic use</subject><issn>1058-4838</issn><issn>1537-6591</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0d2K1DAUB_Aiiruu-gQiUdArq0nTfF2O48cKu4jMOoo3IU1P2IxtMyapOF75Al75hj6JHWaYBUG8Ssj55SSHf1HcJfgpwZI_Y0RVnF0rjgmjouRMkevTHjNZ1pLKo-JWSiuMCZGY3SyOiGBKUcyPi58zNA_92kSfwoCCQ0sz2NBvrB-QGVp0DjmGwbfme-gAuRBRvgR0EcHkHoa8vTHvQsrRt37sUeud89Z38PvHr1lKwXqToUUvvInxEswTtMjRZO_8dNhspvMEJgFawFeIPm9uFzec6RLc2a8nxftXLy_mp-XZ29dv5rOz0jLCc9nUoiK2ZZZj5oSSrqkYrZ3lnDauNeCsolTYSljnbGsbykjDsVSAKVhWSXpSPN71XcfwZYSUde-Tha4zA4QxaYG5EKom_4UVlrWsajbBh3_BVRjjMA2hK6IUExKLq242hpQiOL2OvjdxownW2xj1LsYJ3t93G5se2iu2z20Cj_bAJGs6F6fUfDq4ClcKU7kd9MHOhXH978fu7cwq5RAPqq55TeT20-Wu7FOGb4eyiZ81F1Qwffrxk14-X0q2ePdBn9M_-sjJZg</recordid><startdate>20070801</startdate><enddate>20070801</enddate><creator>Zar, Fred A.</creator><creator>Bakkanagari, Srinivasa R.</creator><creator>Moorthi, K. M. L. S. T.</creator><creator>Davis, Melinda B.</creator><general>The University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago Press</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070801</creationdate><title>A Comparison of Vancomycin and Metronidazole for the Treatment of Clostridium difficile–Associated Diarrhea, Stratified by Disease Severity</title><author>Zar, Fred A. ; Bakkanagari, Srinivasa R. ; Moorthi, K. M. L. S. T. ; Davis, Melinda B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-b4721cd5c605f798fb2534fc663bfdaefc9337c27cffcdcb351b6089e03ec5283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Administration, Oral</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anti-Infective Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antibacterial agents</topic><topic>Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents</topic><topic>Antifungal agents</topic><topic>Articles and Commentaries</topic><topic>Bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Bacterial diseases of the digestive system and abdomen</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Clostridium</topic><topic>Clostridium difficile</topic><topic>Colitis</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diarrhea</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Drug therapy</topic><topic>Drugs</topic><topic>Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous - drug therapy</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical cures</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medical treatment failures</topic><topic>Metronidazole - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Metronidazole - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Relapse</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Toxins</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Vancomycin - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Vancomycin - therapeutic use</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zar, Fred A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bakkanagari, Srinivasa R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moorthi, K. M. L. S. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Melinda B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical infectious diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zar, Fred A.</au><au>Bakkanagari, Srinivasa R.</au><au>Moorthi, K. M. L. S. T.</au><au>Davis, Melinda B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Comparison of Vancomycin and Metronidazole for the Treatment of Clostridium difficile–Associated Diarrhea, Stratified by Disease Severity</atitle><jtitle>Clinical infectious diseases</jtitle><stitle>Clinical Infectious Diseases</stitle><addtitle>Clinical Infectious Diseases</addtitle><date>2007-08-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>302</spage><epage>307</epage><pages>302-307</pages><issn>1058-4838</issn><eissn>1537-6591</eissn><coden>CIDIEL</coden><abstract>Background. The incidence and severity of Clostridium difficile–associated diarrhea (CDAD) has been increasing, and there have been recent reports of metronidazole treatment failure. Metronidazole is still commonly used as first-line treatment for CDAD but has never been compared with vancomycin in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. We conducted such a trial, stratifying patients according to disease severity, to investigate whether one agent was superior for treating either mild or severe disease. Methods. From October 1994 through June 2002, patients with CDAD were stratified according to whether they had mild or severe disease based on clinical criteria and were randomly assigned to receive oral metronidazole (250 mg 4 times per day) or oral vancomycin (125 mg 4 times per day) for 10 days. Both groups received an oral placebo in addition to the study drug. Patients were followed up for 21 days to assess cure, treatment failure, relapse, or intolerance. Results. One hundred seventy-two patients were enrolled, and 150 of these patients successfully completed the trial. Among the patients with mild CDAD, treatment with metronidazole or vancomycin resulted in clinical cure in 90% and 98% of the patients, respectively (P = .36). Among the patients with severe CDAD, treatment with metronidazole or vancomycin resulted in clinical cure in 76% and 97% of the patients, respectively (P = .02). Clinical symptoms recurred in 15% of the patients treated with metronidazole and 14% of those treated with vancomycin. Conclusions. Our findings suggest that metronidazole and vancomycin are equally effective for the treatment of mild CDAD, but vancomycin is superior for treating patients with severe CDAD.</abstract><cop>Chicago, IL</cop><pub>The University of Chicago Press</pub><pmid>17599306</pmid><doi>10.1086/519265</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1058-4838 |
ispartof | Clinical infectious diseases, 2007-08, Vol.45 (3), p.302-307 |
issn | 1058-4838 1537-6591 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70677941 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Administration, Oral Adult Aged Anti-Infective Agents - therapeutic use Antibacterial agents Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents Antifungal agents Articles and Commentaries Bacterial diseases Bacterial diseases of the digestive system and abdomen Biological and medical sciences Clinical trials Clostridium Clostridium difficile Colitis Comparative analysis Diabetes Diarrhea Double-Blind Method Drug therapy Drugs Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous - drug therapy Epidemiology Female Human bacterial diseases Humans Infectious diseases Male Medical cures Medical sciences Medical treatment failures Metronidazole - administration & dosage Metronidazole - therapeutic use Middle Aged Pharmacology. Drug treatments Prospective Studies Relapse Severity of Illness Index Toxins Treatment Outcome Vancomycin - administration & dosage Vancomycin - therapeutic use |
title | A Comparison of Vancomycin and Metronidazole for the Treatment of Clostridium difficile–Associated Diarrhea, Stratified by Disease Severity |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T16%3A44%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Comparison%20of%20Vancomycin%20and%20Metronidazole%20for%20the%20Treatment%20of%20Clostridium%20difficile%E2%80%93Associated%20Diarrhea,%20Stratified%20by%20Disease%20Severity&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20infectious%20diseases&rft.au=Zar,%20Fred%20A.&rft.date=2007-08-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=302&rft.epage=307&rft.pages=302-307&rft.issn=1058-4838&rft.eissn=1537-6591&rft.coden=CIDIEL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/519265&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4464187%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219957807&rft_id=info:pmid/17599306&rft_jstor_id=4464187&rft_oup_id=10.1086/519265&rfr_iscdi=true |