Cyclic Fatigue of Three Types of Rotary Nickel-Titanium Files in a Dynamic Model

The cyclic fatigue resistance of three types of nickel-titanium rotary files was compared in a model using reciprocating axial movement. The influence of file size and taper was also investigated and fracture patterns were examined under SEM. The 10 experimental groups consisted of ProFiles, K3s, an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of endodontics 2006, Vol.32 (1), p.55-57
Hauptverfasser: Yao, James H., Schwartz, Scott A., Beeson, Thomas J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 57
container_issue 1
container_start_page 55
container_title Journal of endodontics
container_volume 32
creator Yao, James H.
Schwartz, Scott A.
Beeson, Thomas J.
description The cyclic fatigue resistance of three types of nickel-titanium rotary files was compared in a model using reciprocating axial movement. The influence of file size and taper was also investigated and fracture patterns were examined under SEM. The 10 experimental groups consisted of ProFiles, K3s, and RaCe files, size 25 in .04 and .06 tapers, as well as ProFiles and K3s, size 40 in .04 and .06 tapers. Each file was rotated freely at 300 rpm inside a stainless steel tube with a 60 degree and 5 mm radius of curvature. A continuous 3 mm oscillating axial motion was applied at 1 cycle per second by attaching an electric dental handpiece to the most inferior load cell of an Instron machine using a custom-made jig. The number of rotations to failure was determined and analyzed using analysis of variance and Tukey′s post hoc tests. Overall, K3 25/.04 files were significantly more resistant to cyclic fatigue compared to any other group in this study. In the 25/.04 category, K3s were significantly more resistant to failure than ProFiles and RaCe files. Also in the same category, ProFiles significantly outlasted RaCe files. In the 25/.06 group, K3s and ProFiles were significantly more resistant to failure than RaCe files, but K3s were not significantly different than ProFiles. In the 40/.04 and 40/.06 groups, K3s were significantly more resistant to cyclic fatigue than ProFiles. SEM observations demonstrated mostly a ductile mode of fracture. The results suggest that different cross-sectional designs, diameters, and tapers all contribute to a nickel-titanium instrument′s vulnerability to cyclic failure.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.joen.2005.10.013
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70673760</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0099239905000531</els_id><sourcerecordid>70673760</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-ca8dc02c44379ca2f85b443b441ba178b17e00d4ea25c8f57cf0e0ad866853983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMo7rr6BzxIT95aJ03bpOBFVleF9QOp55CmU83aj7Vphf57U3bBm4dhvt55YR5CzikEFGhytQk2LTZBCBC7QQCUHZA5FVz4LI6jQzIHSFM_ZGk6IyfWbgAoZ4wfkxlNIgrAYU5el6OujPZWqjcfA3pt6WWfHaKXjVu0U_vW9qobvWejv7DyM9Orxgy1tzKV25vGU97t2KjaeTy1BVan5KhUlcWzfV6Q99Vdtnzw1y_3j8ubta-jEHpfK1FoCHUUMZ5qFZYizl3tguaKcpFTjgBFhCqMtShjrktAUIVIEhGzVLAFudz5brv2e0Dby9pYjVWlGmwHKzkknPEEnDDcCXXXWtthKbedqd1LkoKcOMqNnDjKieM0cxzd0cXefchrLP5O9uCc4HonQPfjj8FOWm2w0ViYDnUvi9b85_8LssWCqg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70673760</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cyclic Fatigue of Three Types of Rotary Nickel-Titanium Files in a Dynamic Model</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Yao, James H. ; Schwartz, Scott A. ; Beeson, Thomas J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Yao, James H. ; Schwartz, Scott A. ; Beeson, Thomas J.</creatorcontrib><description>The cyclic fatigue resistance of three types of nickel-titanium rotary files was compared in a model using reciprocating axial movement. The influence of file size and taper was also investigated and fracture patterns were examined under SEM. The 10 experimental groups consisted of ProFiles, K3s, and RaCe files, size 25 in .04 and .06 tapers, as well as ProFiles and K3s, size 40 in .04 and .06 tapers. Each file was rotated freely at 300 rpm inside a stainless steel tube with a 60 degree and 5 mm radius of curvature. A continuous 3 mm oscillating axial motion was applied at 1 cycle per second by attaching an electric dental handpiece to the most inferior load cell of an Instron machine using a custom-made jig. The number of rotations to failure was determined and analyzed using analysis of variance and Tukey′s post hoc tests. Overall, K3 25/.04 files were significantly more resistant to cyclic fatigue compared to any other group in this study. In the 25/.04 category, K3s were significantly more resistant to failure than ProFiles and RaCe files. Also in the same category, ProFiles significantly outlasted RaCe files. In the 25/.06 group, K3s and ProFiles were significantly more resistant to failure than RaCe files, but K3s were not significantly different than ProFiles. In the 40/.04 and 40/.06 groups, K3s were significantly more resistant to cyclic fatigue than ProFiles. SEM observations demonstrated mostly a ductile mode of fracture. The results suggest that different cross-sectional designs, diameters, and tapers all contribute to a nickel-titanium instrument′s vulnerability to cyclic failure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0099-2399</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-3554</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2005.10.013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16410070</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Analysis of Variance ; Dental Alloys ; Dental Instruments ; Dental Models ; Dental Stress Analysis ; Dentistry ; Equipment Design ; Equipment Failure ; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning ; Nickel ; Root Canal Preparation - instrumentation ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Titanium</subject><ispartof>Journal of endodontics, 2006, Vol.32 (1), p.55-57</ispartof><rights>2006 American Association of Endodontists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-ca8dc02c44379ca2f85b443b441ba178b17e00d4ea25c8f57cf0e0ad866853983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-ca8dc02c44379ca2f85b443b441ba178b17e00d4ea25c8f57cf0e0ad866853983</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2005.10.013$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4024,27923,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16410070$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yao, James H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Scott A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beeson, Thomas J.</creatorcontrib><title>Cyclic Fatigue of Three Types of Rotary Nickel-Titanium Files in a Dynamic Model</title><title>Journal of endodontics</title><addtitle>J Endod</addtitle><description>The cyclic fatigue resistance of three types of nickel-titanium rotary files was compared in a model using reciprocating axial movement. The influence of file size and taper was also investigated and fracture patterns were examined under SEM. The 10 experimental groups consisted of ProFiles, K3s, and RaCe files, size 25 in .04 and .06 tapers, as well as ProFiles and K3s, size 40 in .04 and .06 tapers. Each file was rotated freely at 300 rpm inside a stainless steel tube with a 60 degree and 5 mm radius of curvature. A continuous 3 mm oscillating axial motion was applied at 1 cycle per second by attaching an electric dental handpiece to the most inferior load cell of an Instron machine using a custom-made jig. The number of rotations to failure was determined and analyzed using analysis of variance and Tukey′s post hoc tests. Overall, K3 25/.04 files were significantly more resistant to cyclic fatigue compared to any other group in this study. In the 25/.04 category, K3s were significantly more resistant to failure than ProFiles and RaCe files. Also in the same category, ProFiles significantly outlasted RaCe files. In the 25/.06 group, K3s and ProFiles were significantly more resistant to failure than RaCe files, but K3s were not significantly different than ProFiles. In the 40/.04 and 40/.06 groups, K3s were significantly more resistant to cyclic fatigue than ProFiles. SEM observations demonstrated mostly a ductile mode of fracture. The results suggest that different cross-sectional designs, diameters, and tapers all contribute to a nickel-titanium instrument′s vulnerability to cyclic failure.</description><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Dental Alloys</subject><subject>Dental Instruments</subject><subject>Dental Models</subject><subject>Dental Stress Analysis</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Equipment Failure</subject><subject>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</subject><subject>Nickel</subject><subject>Root Canal Preparation - instrumentation</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Titanium</subject><issn>0099-2399</issn><issn>1878-3554</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMo7rr6BzxIT95aJ03bpOBFVleF9QOp55CmU83aj7Vphf57U3bBm4dhvt55YR5CzikEFGhytQk2LTZBCBC7QQCUHZA5FVz4LI6jQzIHSFM_ZGk6IyfWbgAoZ4wfkxlNIgrAYU5el6OujPZWqjcfA3pt6WWfHaKXjVu0U_vW9qobvWejv7DyM9Orxgy1tzKV25vGU97t2KjaeTy1BVan5KhUlcWzfV6Q99Vdtnzw1y_3j8ubta-jEHpfK1FoCHUUMZ5qFZYizl3tguaKcpFTjgBFhCqMtShjrktAUIVIEhGzVLAFudz5brv2e0Dby9pYjVWlGmwHKzkknPEEnDDcCXXXWtthKbedqd1LkoKcOMqNnDjKieM0cxzd0cXefchrLP5O9uCc4HonQPfjj8FOWm2w0ViYDnUvi9b85_8LssWCqg</recordid><startdate>2006</startdate><enddate>2006</enddate><creator>Yao, James H.</creator><creator>Schwartz, Scott A.</creator><creator>Beeson, Thomas J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2006</creationdate><title>Cyclic Fatigue of Three Types of Rotary Nickel-Titanium Files in a Dynamic Model</title><author>Yao, James H. ; Schwartz, Scott A. ; Beeson, Thomas J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-ca8dc02c44379ca2f85b443b441ba178b17e00d4ea25c8f57cf0e0ad866853983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Dental Alloys</topic><topic>Dental Instruments</topic><topic>Dental Models</topic><topic>Dental Stress Analysis</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Equipment Failure</topic><topic>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</topic><topic>Nickel</topic><topic>Root Canal Preparation - instrumentation</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Titanium</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yao, James H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Scott A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beeson, Thomas J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of endodontics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yao, James H.</au><au>Schwartz, Scott A.</au><au>Beeson, Thomas J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cyclic Fatigue of Three Types of Rotary Nickel-Titanium Files in a Dynamic Model</atitle><jtitle>Journal of endodontics</jtitle><addtitle>J Endod</addtitle><date>2006</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>55</spage><epage>57</epage><pages>55-57</pages><issn>0099-2399</issn><eissn>1878-3554</eissn><abstract>The cyclic fatigue resistance of three types of nickel-titanium rotary files was compared in a model using reciprocating axial movement. The influence of file size and taper was also investigated and fracture patterns were examined under SEM. The 10 experimental groups consisted of ProFiles, K3s, and RaCe files, size 25 in .04 and .06 tapers, as well as ProFiles and K3s, size 40 in .04 and .06 tapers. Each file was rotated freely at 300 rpm inside a stainless steel tube with a 60 degree and 5 mm radius of curvature. A continuous 3 mm oscillating axial motion was applied at 1 cycle per second by attaching an electric dental handpiece to the most inferior load cell of an Instron machine using a custom-made jig. The number of rotations to failure was determined and analyzed using analysis of variance and Tukey′s post hoc tests. Overall, K3 25/.04 files were significantly more resistant to cyclic fatigue compared to any other group in this study. In the 25/.04 category, K3s were significantly more resistant to failure than ProFiles and RaCe files. Also in the same category, ProFiles significantly outlasted RaCe files. In the 25/.06 group, K3s and ProFiles were significantly more resistant to failure than RaCe files, but K3s were not significantly different than ProFiles. In the 40/.04 and 40/.06 groups, K3s were significantly more resistant to cyclic fatigue than ProFiles. SEM observations demonstrated mostly a ductile mode of fracture. The results suggest that different cross-sectional designs, diameters, and tapers all contribute to a nickel-titanium instrument′s vulnerability to cyclic failure.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>16410070</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.joen.2005.10.013</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0099-2399
ispartof Journal of endodontics, 2006, Vol.32 (1), p.55-57
issn 0099-2399
1878-3554
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70673760
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Analysis of Variance
Dental Alloys
Dental Instruments
Dental Models
Dental Stress Analysis
Dentistry
Equipment Design
Equipment Failure
Microscopy, Electron, Scanning
Nickel
Root Canal Preparation - instrumentation
Statistics, Nonparametric
Titanium
title Cyclic Fatigue of Three Types of Rotary Nickel-Titanium Files in a Dynamic Model
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T20%3A51%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cyclic%20Fatigue%20of%20Three%20Types%20of%20Rotary%20Nickel-Titanium%20Files%20in%20a%20Dynamic%20Model&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20endodontics&rft.au=Yao,%20James%20H.&rft.date=2006&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=55&rft.epage=57&rft.pages=55-57&rft.issn=0099-2399&rft.eissn=1878-3554&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.joen.2005.10.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70673760%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70673760&rft_id=info:pmid/16410070&rft_els_id=S0099239905000531&rfr_iscdi=true