Proliferation of masseter myocytes after distraction osteogenesis of the porcine mandible

Purpose: Long-term success of distraction osteogenesis depends on the ability of the surrounding soft tissues to tolerate distraction forces and to adapt to the resulting increase in skeletal length and volume. The hypothesis tested in this study was that mandibular elongation by distraction induces...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery 2001-03, Vol.59 (3), p.302-307
Hauptverfasser: Castaño, Francisco J., Troulis, Maria J., Glowacki, Julie, Kaban, Leonard B., Yates, Karen E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose: Long-term success of distraction osteogenesis depends on the ability of the surrounding soft tissues to tolerate distraction forces and to adapt to the resulting increase in skeletal length and volume. The hypothesis tested in this study was that mandibular elongation by distraction induces myocyte proliferation. Materials and Methods: Unilateral mandibular angle osteotomies were performed in 16 Yucatan minipigs. The hemimandibles were lengthened using semiburied distraction devices (Synthes Maxillofacial, Paoli, PA) with 0-day latency, 1, 2, or 4 mm/d distraction rates, and a neutral fixation period of twice the gap size in days. In 2 additional animals, the dissection and osteotomies were performed, and distraction devices were placed without activation (sham control). At the end of neutral fixation, tissues were taken from masseter muscle overlying the osteotomy and the equivalent region on the unoperated side (contralateral control). Proliferation of myocytes was estimated using immunohistochemical localization with antibodies against proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). Results: Muscle overlying the distracted mandible showed 6-fold more PCNA-positive myocytes (16.8% ± 11.3%) than the contralateral control side (2.8% ± 1.1%, P
ISSN:0278-2391
1531-5053
DOI:10.1053/joms.2001.21000