Therapeutic effect of pulsed electromagnetic field in conservative treatment of subacromial impingement syndrome

Subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS) is a frequent cause of shoulder pain. Our purpose in this double-blinded, randomized, and controlled study was to demonstrate whether the pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) provides additional benefit when used with other conservative treatment modalities in a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical rheumatology 2007-08, Vol.26 (8), p.1234-1239
Hauptverfasser: Aktas, Ilknur, Akgun, Kenan, Cakmak, Bahar
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1239
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1234
container_title Clinical rheumatology
container_volume 26
creator Aktas, Ilknur
Akgun, Kenan
Cakmak, Bahar
description Subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS) is a frequent cause of shoulder pain. Our purpose in this double-blinded, randomized, and controlled study was to demonstrate whether the pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) provides additional benefit when used with other conservative treatment modalities in acute phase rehabilitation program of SIS. Forty-six patients with unilateral shoulder pain who had been diagnosed as having SIS were included in this trial. The cases were randomly separated into two groups. All cases received a treatment program for 3 weeks consisting of Codman's pendulum exercises and subsequent cold pack gel application on shoulders with pain 5 times a day, restriction of daily activities that require the hands to be used over the head, and meloxicam tablet 15 mg daily. One group was given PEMF; the other group was given sham PEMF daily, 25 min per session, 5 days per week for 3 weeks. Shoulder pain during rest and activity and which causes disturbance of sleep was evaluated using a visual analogue scale, and total Constant score investigated shoulder function. Daily living activities were evaluated by shoulder disability questionnaire. Results were assessed before and after treatment. When compared with the baseline values, significant improvements in all these variables were observed at the end of the treatment in both groups (p0.05). There is no convincing evidence that electromagnetic therapy is of additional benefit in acute phase rehabilitation program of SIS.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10067-006-0464-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70664910</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70664910</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-d807544e56ffcb23f7d9f9c0ad057b2aaa9221b7276ebdbe8208ec8405db8a323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUctqHDEQFCEmu358QC5hyMG3iVsarR7HsCSOwZCLfRYaqeXIzCvSzML-vTXehUAu1bS6qmh1EfKZwjcKIO9yQSHrAjVwwWv2gWwpb3itNdcfyRakhLqhWm3IZc6vAMCUpp_IhkpQolFsS6anP5jshMscXYUhoJurMVTT0mX0FXalT2NvXwZcCSFi56s4VG4cMqaDneMBqzmhnXsc3pV5aa0rkmi7KvZTHF7wfZSPgy_PeE0ugi3mN-d6RZ5__nja_6off98_7L8_1q5hYq69ArnjHHciBNeyJkivg3ZgPexky6y1mjHaSiYFtr5FxUChUxx2vlW2Yc0VuT35Tmn8u2CeTR-zw66zA45LNhKE4JpCIX79j_g6LmkouxmlKBNa6dWNnkjlazknDGZKsbfpaCiYNQtzysIUMGsWZtV8ORsvbY_-n-J8_OYNQ06HRQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>881269892</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Therapeutic effect of pulsed electromagnetic field in conservative treatment of subacromial impingement syndrome</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Aktas, Ilknur ; Akgun, Kenan ; Cakmak, Bahar</creator><creatorcontrib>Aktas, Ilknur ; Akgun, Kenan ; Cakmak, Bahar</creatorcontrib><description>Subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS) is a frequent cause of shoulder pain. Our purpose in this double-blinded, randomized, and controlled study was to demonstrate whether the pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) provides additional benefit when used with other conservative treatment modalities in acute phase rehabilitation program of SIS. Forty-six patients with unilateral shoulder pain who had been diagnosed as having SIS were included in this trial. The cases were randomly separated into two groups. All cases received a treatment program for 3 weeks consisting of Codman's pendulum exercises and subsequent cold pack gel application on shoulders with pain 5 times a day, restriction of daily activities that require the hands to be used over the head, and meloxicam tablet 15 mg daily. One group was given PEMF; the other group was given sham PEMF daily, 25 min per session, 5 days per week for 3 weeks. Shoulder pain during rest and activity and which causes disturbance of sleep was evaluated using a visual analogue scale, and total Constant score investigated shoulder function. Daily living activities were evaluated by shoulder disability questionnaire. Results were assessed before and after treatment. When compared with the baseline values, significant improvements in all these variables were observed at the end of the treatment in both groups (p&lt;0.05). No significant difference between treatments was observed for any of these variables (p&gt;0.05). There is no convincing evidence that electromagnetic therapy is of additional benefit in acute phase rehabilitation program of SIS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0770-3198</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1434-9949</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10067-006-0464-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17086382</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Activities of Daily Living ; Adult ; Aged ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Double-Blind Method ; Electric Stimulation Therapy - methods ; Electromagnetic Fields ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medical treatment ; Meloxicam ; Middle Aged ; Pain ; Pain Measurement ; Recovery of Function ; Rehabilitation ; Severity of Illness Index ; Shoulder ; Shoulder Impingement Syndrome - therapy ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Clinical rheumatology, 2007-08, Vol.26 (8), p.1234-1239</ispartof><rights>Clinical Rheumatology 2006.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-d807544e56ffcb23f7d9f9c0ad057b2aaa9221b7276ebdbe8208ec8405db8a323</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-d807544e56ffcb23f7d9f9c0ad057b2aaa9221b7276ebdbe8208ec8405db8a323</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17086382$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aktas, Ilknur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akgun, Kenan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cakmak, Bahar</creatorcontrib><title>Therapeutic effect of pulsed electromagnetic field in conservative treatment of subacromial impingement syndrome</title><title>Clinical rheumatology</title><addtitle>Clin Rheumatol</addtitle><description>Subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS) is a frequent cause of shoulder pain. Our purpose in this double-blinded, randomized, and controlled study was to demonstrate whether the pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) provides additional benefit when used with other conservative treatment modalities in acute phase rehabilitation program of SIS. Forty-six patients with unilateral shoulder pain who had been diagnosed as having SIS were included in this trial. The cases were randomly separated into two groups. All cases received a treatment program for 3 weeks consisting of Codman's pendulum exercises and subsequent cold pack gel application on shoulders with pain 5 times a day, restriction of daily activities that require the hands to be used over the head, and meloxicam tablet 15 mg daily. One group was given PEMF; the other group was given sham PEMF daily, 25 min per session, 5 days per week for 3 weeks. Shoulder pain during rest and activity and which causes disturbance of sleep was evaluated using a visual analogue scale, and total Constant score investigated shoulder function. Daily living activities were evaluated by shoulder disability questionnaire. Results were assessed before and after treatment. When compared with the baseline values, significant improvements in all these variables were observed at the end of the treatment in both groups (p&lt;0.05). No significant difference between treatments was observed for any of these variables (p&gt;0.05). There is no convincing evidence that electromagnetic therapy is of additional benefit in acute phase rehabilitation program of SIS.</description><subject>Activities of Daily Living</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Combined Modality Therapy</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Electromagnetic Fields</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical treatment</subject><subject>Meloxicam</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Recovery of Function</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Shoulder</subject><subject>Shoulder Impingement Syndrome - therapy</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0770-3198</issn><issn>1434-9949</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUctqHDEQFCEmu358QC5hyMG3iVsarR7HsCSOwZCLfRYaqeXIzCvSzML-vTXehUAu1bS6qmh1EfKZwjcKIO9yQSHrAjVwwWv2gWwpb3itNdcfyRakhLqhWm3IZc6vAMCUpp_IhkpQolFsS6anP5jshMscXYUhoJurMVTT0mX0FXalT2NvXwZcCSFi56s4VG4cMqaDneMBqzmhnXsc3pV5aa0rkmi7KvZTHF7wfZSPgy_PeE0ugi3mN-d6RZ5__nja_6off98_7L8_1q5hYq69ArnjHHciBNeyJkivg3ZgPexky6y1mjHaSiYFtr5FxUChUxx2vlW2Yc0VuT35Tmn8u2CeTR-zw66zA45LNhKE4JpCIX79j_g6LmkouxmlKBNa6dWNnkjlazknDGZKsbfpaCiYNQtzysIUMGsWZtV8ORsvbY_-n-J8_OYNQ06HRQ</recordid><startdate>200708</startdate><enddate>200708</enddate><creator>Aktas, Ilknur</creator><creator>Akgun, Kenan</creator><creator>Cakmak, Bahar</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200708</creationdate><title>Therapeutic effect of pulsed electromagnetic field in conservative treatment of subacromial impingement syndrome</title><author>Aktas, Ilknur ; Akgun, Kenan ; Cakmak, Bahar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-d807544e56ffcb23f7d9f9c0ad057b2aaa9221b7276ebdbe8208ec8405db8a323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Activities of Daily Living</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Combined Modality Therapy</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Electromagnetic Fields</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical treatment</topic><topic>Meloxicam</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Recovery of Function</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Shoulder</topic><topic>Shoulder Impingement Syndrome - therapy</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aktas, Ilknur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akgun, Kenan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cakmak, Bahar</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical rheumatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aktas, Ilknur</au><au>Akgun, Kenan</au><au>Cakmak, Bahar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Therapeutic effect of pulsed electromagnetic field in conservative treatment of subacromial impingement syndrome</atitle><jtitle>Clinical rheumatology</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Rheumatol</addtitle><date>2007-08</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1234</spage><epage>1239</epage><pages>1234-1239</pages><issn>0770-3198</issn><eissn>1434-9949</eissn><abstract>Subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS) is a frequent cause of shoulder pain. Our purpose in this double-blinded, randomized, and controlled study was to demonstrate whether the pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) provides additional benefit when used with other conservative treatment modalities in acute phase rehabilitation program of SIS. Forty-six patients with unilateral shoulder pain who had been diagnosed as having SIS were included in this trial. The cases were randomly separated into two groups. All cases received a treatment program for 3 weeks consisting of Codman's pendulum exercises and subsequent cold pack gel application on shoulders with pain 5 times a day, restriction of daily activities that require the hands to be used over the head, and meloxicam tablet 15 mg daily. One group was given PEMF; the other group was given sham PEMF daily, 25 min per session, 5 days per week for 3 weeks. Shoulder pain during rest and activity and which causes disturbance of sleep was evaluated using a visual analogue scale, and total Constant score investigated shoulder function. Daily living activities were evaluated by shoulder disability questionnaire. Results were assessed before and after treatment. When compared with the baseline values, significant improvements in all these variables were observed at the end of the treatment in both groups (p&lt;0.05). No significant difference between treatments was observed for any of these variables (p&gt;0.05). There is no convincing evidence that electromagnetic therapy is of additional benefit in acute phase rehabilitation program of SIS.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>17086382</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10067-006-0464-2</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0770-3198
ispartof Clinical rheumatology, 2007-08, Vol.26 (8), p.1234-1239
issn 0770-3198
1434-9949
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70664910
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Activities of Daily Living
Adult
Aged
Combined Modality Therapy
Double-Blind Method
Electric Stimulation Therapy - methods
Electromagnetic Fields
Female
Humans
Male
Medical treatment
Meloxicam
Middle Aged
Pain
Pain Measurement
Recovery of Function
Rehabilitation
Severity of Illness Index
Shoulder
Shoulder Impingement Syndrome - therapy
Treatment Outcome
title Therapeutic effect of pulsed electromagnetic field in conservative treatment of subacromial impingement syndrome
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T03%3A31%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Therapeutic%20effect%20of%20pulsed%20electromagnetic%20field%20in%20conservative%20treatment%20of%20subacromial%20impingement%20syndrome&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20rheumatology&rft.au=Aktas,%20Ilknur&rft.date=2007-08&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1234&rft.epage=1239&rft.pages=1234-1239&rft.issn=0770-3198&rft.eissn=1434-9949&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10067-006-0464-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70664910%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=881269892&rft_id=info:pmid/17086382&rfr_iscdi=true