Therapeutic effect of pulsed electromagnetic field in conservative treatment of subacromial impingement syndrome
Subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS) is a frequent cause of shoulder pain. Our purpose in this double-blinded, randomized, and controlled study was to demonstrate whether the pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) provides additional benefit when used with other conservative treatment modalities in a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical rheumatology 2007-08, Vol.26 (8), p.1234-1239 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1239 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1234 |
container_title | Clinical rheumatology |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Aktas, Ilknur Akgun, Kenan Cakmak, Bahar |
description | Subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS) is a frequent cause of shoulder pain. Our purpose in this double-blinded, randomized, and controlled study was to demonstrate whether the pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) provides additional benefit when used with other conservative treatment modalities in acute phase rehabilitation program of SIS. Forty-six patients with unilateral shoulder pain who had been diagnosed as having SIS were included in this trial. The cases were randomly separated into two groups. All cases received a treatment program for 3 weeks consisting of Codman's pendulum exercises and subsequent cold pack gel application on shoulders with pain 5 times a day, restriction of daily activities that require the hands to be used over the head, and meloxicam tablet 15 mg daily. One group was given PEMF; the other group was given sham PEMF daily, 25 min per session, 5 days per week for 3 weeks. Shoulder pain during rest and activity and which causes disturbance of sleep was evaluated using a visual analogue scale, and total Constant score investigated shoulder function. Daily living activities were evaluated by shoulder disability questionnaire. Results were assessed before and after treatment. When compared with the baseline values, significant improvements in all these variables were observed at the end of the treatment in both groups (p0.05). There is no convincing evidence that electromagnetic therapy is of additional benefit in acute phase rehabilitation program of SIS. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10067-006-0464-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70664910</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70664910</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-d807544e56ffcb23f7d9f9c0ad057b2aaa9221b7276ebdbe8208ec8405db8a323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUctqHDEQFCEmu358QC5hyMG3iVsarR7HsCSOwZCLfRYaqeXIzCvSzML-vTXehUAu1bS6qmh1EfKZwjcKIO9yQSHrAjVwwWv2gWwpb3itNdcfyRakhLqhWm3IZc6vAMCUpp_IhkpQolFsS6anP5jshMscXYUhoJurMVTT0mX0FXalT2NvXwZcCSFi56s4VG4cMqaDneMBqzmhnXsc3pV5aa0rkmi7KvZTHF7wfZSPgy_PeE0ugi3mN-d6RZ5__nja_6off98_7L8_1q5hYq69ArnjHHciBNeyJkivg3ZgPexky6y1mjHaSiYFtr5FxUChUxx2vlW2Yc0VuT35Tmn8u2CeTR-zw66zA45LNhKE4JpCIX79j_g6LmkouxmlKBNa6dWNnkjlazknDGZKsbfpaCiYNQtzysIUMGsWZtV8ORsvbY_-n-J8_OYNQ06HRQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>881269892</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Therapeutic effect of pulsed electromagnetic field in conservative treatment of subacromial impingement syndrome</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Aktas, Ilknur ; Akgun, Kenan ; Cakmak, Bahar</creator><creatorcontrib>Aktas, Ilknur ; Akgun, Kenan ; Cakmak, Bahar</creatorcontrib><description>Subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS) is a frequent cause of shoulder pain. Our purpose in this double-blinded, randomized, and controlled study was to demonstrate whether the pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) provides additional benefit when used with other conservative treatment modalities in acute phase rehabilitation program of SIS. Forty-six patients with unilateral shoulder pain who had been diagnosed as having SIS were included in this trial. The cases were randomly separated into two groups. All cases received a treatment program for 3 weeks consisting of Codman's pendulum exercises and subsequent cold pack gel application on shoulders with pain 5 times a day, restriction of daily activities that require the hands to be used over the head, and meloxicam tablet 15 mg daily. One group was given PEMF; the other group was given sham PEMF daily, 25 min per session, 5 days per week for 3 weeks. Shoulder pain during rest and activity and which causes disturbance of sleep was evaluated using a visual analogue scale, and total Constant score investigated shoulder function. Daily living activities were evaluated by shoulder disability questionnaire. Results were assessed before and after treatment. When compared with the baseline values, significant improvements in all these variables were observed at the end of the treatment in both groups (p<0.05). No significant difference between treatments was observed for any of these variables (p>0.05). There is no convincing evidence that electromagnetic therapy is of additional benefit in acute phase rehabilitation program of SIS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0770-3198</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1434-9949</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10067-006-0464-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17086382</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Activities of Daily Living ; Adult ; Aged ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Double-Blind Method ; Electric Stimulation Therapy - methods ; Electromagnetic Fields ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medical treatment ; Meloxicam ; Middle Aged ; Pain ; Pain Measurement ; Recovery of Function ; Rehabilitation ; Severity of Illness Index ; Shoulder ; Shoulder Impingement Syndrome - therapy ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Clinical rheumatology, 2007-08, Vol.26 (8), p.1234-1239</ispartof><rights>Clinical Rheumatology 2006.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-d807544e56ffcb23f7d9f9c0ad057b2aaa9221b7276ebdbe8208ec8405db8a323</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-d807544e56ffcb23f7d9f9c0ad057b2aaa9221b7276ebdbe8208ec8405db8a323</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17086382$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aktas, Ilknur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akgun, Kenan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cakmak, Bahar</creatorcontrib><title>Therapeutic effect of pulsed electromagnetic field in conservative treatment of subacromial impingement syndrome</title><title>Clinical rheumatology</title><addtitle>Clin Rheumatol</addtitle><description>Subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS) is a frequent cause of shoulder pain. Our purpose in this double-blinded, randomized, and controlled study was to demonstrate whether the pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) provides additional benefit when used with other conservative treatment modalities in acute phase rehabilitation program of SIS. Forty-six patients with unilateral shoulder pain who had been diagnosed as having SIS were included in this trial. The cases were randomly separated into two groups. All cases received a treatment program for 3 weeks consisting of Codman's pendulum exercises and subsequent cold pack gel application on shoulders with pain 5 times a day, restriction of daily activities that require the hands to be used over the head, and meloxicam tablet 15 mg daily. One group was given PEMF; the other group was given sham PEMF daily, 25 min per session, 5 days per week for 3 weeks. Shoulder pain during rest and activity and which causes disturbance of sleep was evaluated using a visual analogue scale, and total Constant score investigated shoulder function. Daily living activities were evaluated by shoulder disability questionnaire. Results were assessed before and after treatment. When compared with the baseline values, significant improvements in all these variables were observed at the end of the treatment in both groups (p<0.05). No significant difference between treatments was observed for any of these variables (p>0.05). There is no convincing evidence that electromagnetic therapy is of additional benefit in acute phase rehabilitation program of SIS.</description><subject>Activities of Daily Living</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Combined Modality Therapy</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Electromagnetic Fields</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical treatment</subject><subject>Meloxicam</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Recovery of Function</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Shoulder</subject><subject>Shoulder Impingement Syndrome - therapy</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0770-3198</issn><issn>1434-9949</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUctqHDEQFCEmu358QC5hyMG3iVsarR7HsCSOwZCLfRYaqeXIzCvSzML-vTXehUAu1bS6qmh1EfKZwjcKIO9yQSHrAjVwwWv2gWwpb3itNdcfyRakhLqhWm3IZc6vAMCUpp_IhkpQolFsS6anP5jshMscXYUhoJurMVTT0mX0FXalT2NvXwZcCSFi56s4VG4cMqaDneMBqzmhnXsc3pV5aa0rkmi7KvZTHF7wfZSPgy_PeE0ugi3mN-d6RZ5__nja_6off98_7L8_1q5hYq69ArnjHHciBNeyJkivg3ZgPexky6y1mjHaSiYFtr5FxUChUxx2vlW2Yc0VuT35Tmn8u2CeTR-zw66zA45LNhKE4JpCIX79j_g6LmkouxmlKBNa6dWNnkjlazknDGZKsbfpaCiYNQtzysIUMGsWZtV8ORsvbY_-n-J8_OYNQ06HRQ</recordid><startdate>200708</startdate><enddate>200708</enddate><creator>Aktas, Ilknur</creator><creator>Akgun, Kenan</creator><creator>Cakmak, Bahar</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200708</creationdate><title>Therapeutic effect of pulsed electromagnetic field in conservative treatment of subacromial impingement syndrome</title><author>Aktas, Ilknur ; Akgun, Kenan ; Cakmak, Bahar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-d807544e56ffcb23f7d9f9c0ad057b2aaa9221b7276ebdbe8208ec8405db8a323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Activities of Daily Living</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Combined Modality Therapy</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Electromagnetic Fields</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical treatment</topic><topic>Meloxicam</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Recovery of Function</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Shoulder</topic><topic>Shoulder Impingement Syndrome - therapy</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aktas, Ilknur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akgun, Kenan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cakmak, Bahar</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical rheumatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aktas, Ilknur</au><au>Akgun, Kenan</au><au>Cakmak, Bahar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Therapeutic effect of pulsed electromagnetic field in conservative treatment of subacromial impingement syndrome</atitle><jtitle>Clinical rheumatology</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Rheumatol</addtitle><date>2007-08</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1234</spage><epage>1239</epage><pages>1234-1239</pages><issn>0770-3198</issn><eissn>1434-9949</eissn><abstract>Subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS) is a frequent cause of shoulder pain. Our purpose in this double-blinded, randomized, and controlled study was to demonstrate whether the pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) provides additional benefit when used with other conservative treatment modalities in acute phase rehabilitation program of SIS. Forty-six patients with unilateral shoulder pain who had been diagnosed as having SIS were included in this trial. The cases were randomly separated into two groups. All cases received a treatment program for 3 weeks consisting of Codman's pendulum exercises and subsequent cold pack gel application on shoulders with pain 5 times a day, restriction of daily activities that require the hands to be used over the head, and meloxicam tablet 15 mg daily. One group was given PEMF; the other group was given sham PEMF daily, 25 min per session, 5 days per week for 3 weeks. Shoulder pain during rest and activity and which causes disturbance of sleep was evaluated using a visual analogue scale, and total Constant score investigated shoulder function. Daily living activities were evaluated by shoulder disability questionnaire. Results were assessed before and after treatment. When compared with the baseline values, significant improvements in all these variables were observed at the end of the treatment in both groups (p<0.05). No significant difference between treatments was observed for any of these variables (p>0.05). There is no convincing evidence that electromagnetic therapy is of additional benefit in acute phase rehabilitation program of SIS.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>17086382</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10067-006-0464-2</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0770-3198 |
ispartof | Clinical rheumatology, 2007-08, Vol.26 (8), p.1234-1239 |
issn | 0770-3198 1434-9949 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70664910 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Activities of Daily Living Adult Aged Combined Modality Therapy Double-Blind Method Electric Stimulation Therapy - methods Electromagnetic Fields Female Humans Male Medical treatment Meloxicam Middle Aged Pain Pain Measurement Recovery of Function Rehabilitation Severity of Illness Index Shoulder Shoulder Impingement Syndrome - therapy Treatment Outcome |
title | Therapeutic effect of pulsed electromagnetic field in conservative treatment of subacromial impingement syndrome |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T03%3A31%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Therapeutic%20effect%20of%20pulsed%20electromagnetic%20field%20in%20conservative%20treatment%20of%20subacromial%20impingement%20syndrome&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20rheumatology&rft.au=Aktas,%20Ilknur&rft.date=2007-08&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1234&rft.epage=1239&rft.pages=1234-1239&rft.issn=0770-3198&rft.eissn=1434-9949&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10067-006-0464-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70664910%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=881269892&rft_id=info:pmid/17086382&rfr_iscdi=true |