The innovation value chain
The challenges of coming up with fresh ideas and realizing profits from them are different for every company. One firm may excel at finding good ideas but may have weak systems for bringing them to market. Another organization may have a terrific process for funding and rolling out new products and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Harvard business review 2007-06, Vol.85 (6), p.121-142 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Magazinearticle |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 142 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 121 |
container_title | Harvard business review |
container_volume | 85 |
creator | Hansen, Morten T Birkinshaw, Julian |
description | The challenges of coming up with fresh ideas and realizing profits from them are different for every company. One firm may excel at finding good ideas but may have weak systems for bringing them to market. Another organization may have a terrific process for funding and rolling out new products and services but a shortage of concepts to develop. In this article, Hansen and Birkinshaw caution executives against using the latest and greatest innovation approaches and tools without understanding the unique deficiencies in their companies' innovation systems. They offer a framework for evaluating innovation performance: the innovation value chain. It comprises the three main phases of innovation (idea generation, conversion, and diffusion) as well as the critical activities performed during those phases (looking for ideas inside your unit; looking for them in other units; looking for them externally; selecting ideas; funding them; and promoting and spreading ideas companywide). Using this framework, managers get an end-to-end view of their innovation efforts. They can pinpoint their weakest links and tailor innovation best practices appropriately to strengthen those links. Companies typically succumb to one of three broad "weakest-link" scenarios. They are idea poor, conversion poor, or diffusion poor. The article looks at the ways smart companies - including Intuit, P&G, Sara Lee, Shell, and Siemens- modify the best innovation practices and apply them to address those organizations' individual needs and flaws. The authors warn that adopting the chain-based view of innovation requires new measures of what can be delivered by each link in the chain. The approach also entails new roles for employees "external scouts" and "internal evangelists," for example. Indeed, in their search for new hires, companies should seek out those candidates who can help address particular weaknesses in the innovation value chain. |
format | Magazinearticle |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70653695</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1276349661</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g295t-f0bdc0abb448329a6de710fe75d6e945af868df27bcbe436b348cef64ff548213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9z0tLw0AUBeBZKG2t_QMuJCtdBeY9N0spvqDgpq7DPO7YSDKpmaTgvzdg3Xo3Z_NxOPeCrChlpgTK-JJc5fxJ59MGFmTJjAKqlVyRm_0Biyal_mTHpk_FybYTFv5gm3RNLqNtM27OuSbvT4_77Uu5e3t-3T7syg9eqbGM1AVPrXNSguCV1QENoxGNChorqWwEDSFy47xDKbQTEjxGLWNUEjgTa3L323sc-q8J81h3TfbYtjZhP-XazEuFrtQM7_-FnBsQmgqY5e1ZTq7DUB-HprPDd_33t_gB49lRjw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><pqid>227836038</pqid></control><display><type>magazinearticle</type><title>The innovation value chain</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Hansen, Morten T ; Birkinshaw, Julian</creator><creatorcontrib>Hansen, Morten T ; Birkinshaw, Julian</creatorcontrib><description>The challenges of coming up with fresh ideas and realizing profits from them are different for every company. One firm may excel at finding good ideas but may have weak systems for bringing them to market. Another organization may have a terrific process for funding and rolling out new products and services but a shortage of concepts to develop. In this article, Hansen and Birkinshaw caution executives against using the latest and greatest innovation approaches and tools without understanding the unique deficiencies in their companies' innovation systems. They offer a framework for evaluating innovation performance: the innovation value chain. It comprises the three main phases of innovation (idea generation, conversion, and diffusion) as well as the critical activities performed during those phases (looking for ideas inside your unit; looking for them in other units; looking for them externally; selecting ideas; funding them; and promoting and spreading ideas companywide). Using this framework, managers get an end-to-end view of their innovation efforts. They can pinpoint their weakest links and tailor innovation best practices appropriately to strengthen those links. Companies typically succumb to one of three broad "weakest-link" scenarios. They are idea poor, conversion poor, or diffusion poor. The article looks at the ways smart companies - including Intuit, P&G, Sara Lee, Shell, and Siemens- modify the best innovation practices and apply them to address those organizations' individual needs and flaws. The authors warn that adopting the chain-based view of innovation requires new measures of what can be delivered by each link in the chain. The approach also entails new roles for employees "external scouts" and "internal evangelists," for example. Indeed, in their search for new hires, companies should seek out those candidates who can help address particular weaknesses in the innovation value chain.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-8012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17580654</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Harvard Business Review</publisher><subject>Commerce - organization & administration ; Decision Making, Organizational ; Economic Competition ; Health administration ; Humans ; Innovations ; Manycompanies ; Methods ; Models, Organizational ; Organizational behavior ; Organizational Innovation ; Product Line Management ; United States ; Value analysis ; Value chain</subject><ispartof>Harvard business review, 2007-06, Vol.85 (6), p.121-142</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2007 Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation. All rights reserved.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17580654$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hansen, Morten T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birkinshaw, Julian</creatorcontrib><title>The innovation value chain</title><title>Harvard business review</title><addtitle>Harv Bus Rev</addtitle><description>The challenges of coming up with fresh ideas and realizing profits from them are different for every company. One firm may excel at finding good ideas but may have weak systems for bringing them to market. Another organization may have a terrific process for funding and rolling out new products and services but a shortage of concepts to develop. In this article, Hansen and Birkinshaw caution executives against using the latest and greatest innovation approaches and tools without understanding the unique deficiencies in their companies' innovation systems. They offer a framework for evaluating innovation performance: the innovation value chain. It comprises the three main phases of innovation (idea generation, conversion, and diffusion) as well as the critical activities performed during those phases (looking for ideas inside your unit; looking for them in other units; looking for them externally; selecting ideas; funding them; and promoting and spreading ideas companywide). Using this framework, managers get an end-to-end view of their innovation efforts. They can pinpoint their weakest links and tailor innovation best practices appropriately to strengthen those links. Companies typically succumb to one of three broad "weakest-link" scenarios. They are idea poor, conversion poor, or diffusion poor. The article looks at the ways smart companies - including Intuit, P&G, Sara Lee, Shell, and Siemens- modify the best innovation practices and apply them to address those organizations' individual needs and flaws. The authors warn that adopting the chain-based view of innovation requires new measures of what can be delivered by each link in the chain. The approach also entails new roles for employees "external scouts" and "internal evangelists," for example. Indeed, in their search for new hires, companies should seek out those candidates who can help address particular weaknesses in the innovation value chain.</description><subject>Commerce - organization & administration</subject><subject>Decision Making, Organizational</subject><subject>Economic Competition</subject><subject>Health administration</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Manycompanies</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Models, Organizational</subject><subject>Organizational behavior</subject><subject>Organizational Innovation</subject><subject>Product Line Management</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Value analysis</subject><subject>Value chain</subject><issn>0017-8012</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9z0tLw0AUBeBZKG2t_QMuJCtdBeY9N0spvqDgpq7DPO7YSDKpmaTgvzdg3Xo3Z_NxOPeCrChlpgTK-JJc5fxJ59MGFmTJjAKqlVyRm_0Biyal_mTHpk_FybYTFv5gm3RNLqNtM27OuSbvT4_77Uu5e3t-3T7syg9eqbGM1AVPrXNSguCV1QENoxGNChorqWwEDSFy47xDKbQTEjxGLWNUEjgTa3L323sc-q8J81h3TfbYtjZhP-XazEuFrtQM7_-FnBsQmgqY5e1ZTq7DUB-HprPDd_33t_gB49lRjw</recordid><startdate>200706</startdate><enddate>200706</enddate><creator>Hansen, Morten T</creator><creator>Birkinshaw, Julian</creator><general>Harvard Business Review</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200706</creationdate><title>The innovation value chain</title><author>Hansen, Morten T ; Birkinshaw, Julian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g295t-f0bdc0abb448329a6de710fe75d6e945af868df27bcbe436b348cef64ff548213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><prefilter>magazinearticle</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Commerce - organization & administration</topic><topic>Decision Making, Organizational</topic><topic>Economic Competition</topic><topic>Health administration</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Manycompanies</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Models, Organizational</topic><topic>Organizational behavior</topic><topic>Organizational Innovation</topic><topic>Product Line Management</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Value analysis</topic><topic>Value chain</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hansen, Morten T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birkinshaw, Julian</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Harvard business review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hansen, Morten T</au><au>Birkinshaw, Julian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The innovation value chain</atitle><jtitle>Harvard business review</jtitle><addtitle>Harv Bus Rev</addtitle><date>2007-06</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>85</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>121</spage><epage>142</epage><pages>121-142</pages><issn>0017-8012</issn><abstract>The challenges of coming up with fresh ideas and realizing profits from them are different for every company. One firm may excel at finding good ideas but may have weak systems for bringing them to market. Another organization may have a terrific process for funding and rolling out new products and services but a shortage of concepts to develop. In this article, Hansen and Birkinshaw caution executives against using the latest and greatest innovation approaches and tools without understanding the unique deficiencies in their companies' innovation systems. They offer a framework for evaluating innovation performance: the innovation value chain. It comprises the three main phases of innovation (idea generation, conversion, and diffusion) as well as the critical activities performed during those phases (looking for ideas inside your unit; looking for them in other units; looking for them externally; selecting ideas; funding them; and promoting and spreading ideas companywide). Using this framework, managers get an end-to-end view of their innovation efforts. They can pinpoint their weakest links and tailor innovation best practices appropriately to strengthen those links. Companies typically succumb to one of three broad "weakest-link" scenarios. They are idea poor, conversion poor, or diffusion poor. The article looks at the ways smart companies - including Intuit, P&G, Sara Lee, Shell, and Siemens- modify the best innovation practices and apply them to address those organizations' individual needs and flaws. The authors warn that adopting the chain-based view of innovation requires new measures of what can be delivered by each link in the chain. The approach also entails new roles for employees "external scouts" and "internal evangelists," for example. Indeed, in their search for new hires, companies should seek out those candidates who can help address particular weaknesses in the innovation value chain.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Harvard Business Review</pub><pmid>17580654</pmid><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0017-8012 |
ispartof | Harvard business review, 2007-06, Vol.85 (6), p.121-142 |
issn | 0017-8012 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70653695 |
source | MEDLINE; Business Source Complete |
subjects | Commerce - organization & administration Decision Making, Organizational Economic Competition Health administration Humans Innovations Manycompanies Methods Models, Organizational Organizational behavior Organizational Innovation Product Line Management United States Value analysis Value chain |
title | The innovation value chain |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T14%3A21%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20innovation%20value%20chain&rft.jtitle=Harvard%20business%20review&rft.au=Hansen,%20Morten%20T&rft.date=2007-06&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=121&rft.epage=142&rft.pages=121-142&rft.issn=0017-8012&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1276349661%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=227836038&rft_id=info:pmid/17580654&rfr_iscdi=true |