The use of 16S and 16S–23S rDNA to easily detect and differentiate common Gram-negative orchard epiphytes

The identification of Gram-negative pathogenic and non-pathogenic bacteria commonly isolated from an orchard phylloplane may result in a time consuming and tedious process for the plant pathologist. The paper provides a simple “one-step” protocol that uses the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to ampl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of microbiological methods 2001-02, Vol.44 (1), p.69-77
Hauptverfasser: Jeng, R.S., Svircev, A.M., Myers, A.L., Beliaeva, L., Hunter, D.M., Hubbes, M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 77
container_issue 1
container_start_page 69
container_title Journal of microbiological methods
container_volume 44
creator Jeng, R.S.
Svircev, A.M.
Myers, A.L.
Beliaeva, L.
Hunter, D.M.
Hubbes, M.
description The identification of Gram-negative pathogenic and non-pathogenic bacteria commonly isolated from an orchard phylloplane may result in a time consuming and tedious process for the plant pathologist. The paper provides a simple “one-step” protocol that uses the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to amplify intergenic spacer regions between 16S and 23S genes and a portion of 16S gene in the prokaryotic rRNA genetic loci. Amplified 16S rDNA, and restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLP) following EcoRI digestion produced band patterns that readily distinguished between the plant pathogen Erwinia amylovora (causal agent of fire blight in pear and apple) and the orchard epiphyte Pantoea agglomerans (formerly E. herbicola). The amplified DNA patterns of 16S–23S spacer regions may be used to differentiate E. amylovora at the intraspecies level. Isolates of E. amylovora obtained from raspberries exhibited two major fragments while those obtained from apples showed three distinct amplified DNA bands. In addition, the size of the 16S–23S spacer region differs between Pseudomonas syringae and Pseudomonas fluorescens. The RFLP pattern generated by HaeIII digestion may be used to provide a rapid and accurate identification of these two common orchard epiphytes.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0167-7012(00)00230-X
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70648316</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S016770120000230X</els_id><sourcerecordid>17772133</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-14435a102aa53690a742911f4b2f37b41d3c6731ad83518a050ac4fe65c835c83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1uFDEQhS0EIpOBI4C8AZFFB5ftbvesUBQgQYpgMUHKzqpxVzOG_pnYnkizyx24ISeJ50dkmUVVSdZXz_Z7jL0BcQoCqo_z3ExhBMgPQpwIIZUobp6xCdRGFrUqZ8_Z5D9yxI5j_C0ElErXL9kRAFRVlpmwP9dL4utIfGw5VHOOQ7Od_-7_SjXn4fP3M55GThh9t-ENJXJpxzS-bSnQkDwm4m7s-3HgFwH7YqBfmPxdVgxuiaHhtPKr5SZRfMVetNhFen2YU_bz65fr88vi6sfFt_Ozq8JpKVMBWqsSQUjEUlUzgUbLGUCrF7JVZqGhUa4yCrDJ34QaRSnQ6Zaq0uWDXFP2fq-7CuPtmmKyvY-Oug4HGtfRGlHpWkH1JAjGGAlKZbDcgy6MMQZq7Sr4HsPGgrDbOOwuDrv12gphd3HYm7z39nDBetFT87h18D8D7w4ARoddG3BwPj5y2ZByllObsk97jrJvd56Cjc7T4KjxIUdim9E_8ZQHLq6k8Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17772133</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The use of 16S and 16S–23S rDNA to easily detect and differentiate common Gram-negative orchard epiphytes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Jeng, R.S. ; Svircev, A.M. ; Myers, A.L. ; Beliaeva, L. ; Hunter, D.M. ; Hubbes, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jeng, R.S. ; Svircev, A.M. ; Myers, A.L. ; Beliaeva, L. ; Hunter, D.M. ; Hubbes, M.</creatorcontrib><description>The identification of Gram-negative pathogenic and non-pathogenic bacteria commonly isolated from an orchard phylloplane may result in a time consuming and tedious process for the plant pathologist. The paper provides a simple “one-step” protocol that uses the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to amplify intergenic spacer regions between 16S and 23S genes and a portion of 16S gene in the prokaryotic rRNA genetic loci. Amplified 16S rDNA, and restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLP) following EcoRI digestion produced band patterns that readily distinguished between the plant pathogen Erwinia amylovora (causal agent of fire blight in pear and apple) and the orchard epiphyte Pantoea agglomerans (formerly E. herbicola). The amplified DNA patterns of 16S–23S spacer regions may be used to differentiate E. amylovora at the intraspecies level. Isolates of E. amylovora obtained from raspberries exhibited two major fragments while those obtained from apples showed three distinct amplified DNA bands. In addition, the size of the 16S–23S spacer region differs between Pseudomonas syringae and Pseudomonas fluorescens. The RFLP pattern generated by HaeIII digestion may be used to provide a rapid and accurate identification of these two common orchard epiphytes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-7012</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8359</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0167-7012(00)00230-X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11166101</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JMIMDQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Shannon: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Bacterial plant pathogens ; Biological and medical sciences ; DNA, Bacterial - analysis ; DNA, Ribosomal Spacer - analysis ; Electrophoresis, Agar Gel ; Erwinia - genetics ; Erwinia - isolation &amp; purification ; Erwinia amylovora ; Erwinia herbicola ; Fire blight ; Fruit - microbiology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Generalities. Techniques. Transmission, epidemiology, ecology. Antibacterial substances, control ; Gram-Negative Bacteria - genetics ; Gram-Negative Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification ; Pantoea agglomerans ; Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection ; Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length ; Pseudomonas - genetics ; Pseudomonas - isolation &amp; purification ; Pseudomonas fluorescens ; Pseudomonas syringae ; Pseudomonasfluorescens ; RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - analysis ; RNA, Ribosomal, 23S - analysis ; rRNA 23S ; Sequence Analysis, DNA</subject><ispartof>Journal of microbiological methods, 2001-02, Vol.44 (1), p.69-77</ispartof><rights>2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-14435a102aa53690a742911f4b2f37b41d3c6731ad83518a050ac4fe65c835c83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-14435a102aa53690a742911f4b2f37b41d3c6731ad83518a050ac4fe65c835c83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016770120000230X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14225915$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11166101$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jeng, R.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Svircev, A.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Myers, A.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beliaeva, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunter, D.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hubbes, M.</creatorcontrib><title>The use of 16S and 16S–23S rDNA to easily detect and differentiate common Gram-negative orchard epiphytes</title><title>Journal of microbiological methods</title><addtitle>J Microbiol Methods</addtitle><description>The identification of Gram-negative pathogenic and non-pathogenic bacteria commonly isolated from an orchard phylloplane may result in a time consuming and tedious process for the plant pathologist. The paper provides a simple “one-step” protocol that uses the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to amplify intergenic spacer regions between 16S and 23S genes and a portion of 16S gene in the prokaryotic rRNA genetic loci. Amplified 16S rDNA, and restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLP) following EcoRI digestion produced band patterns that readily distinguished between the plant pathogen Erwinia amylovora (causal agent of fire blight in pear and apple) and the orchard epiphyte Pantoea agglomerans (formerly E. herbicola). The amplified DNA patterns of 16S–23S spacer regions may be used to differentiate E. amylovora at the intraspecies level. Isolates of E. amylovora obtained from raspberries exhibited two major fragments while those obtained from apples showed three distinct amplified DNA bands. In addition, the size of the 16S–23S spacer region differs between Pseudomonas syringae and Pseudomonas fluorescens. The RFLP pattern generated by HaeIII digestion may be used to provide a rapid and accurate identification of these two common orchard epiphytes.</description><subject>Bacterial plant pathogens</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>DNA, Bacterial - analysis</subject><subject>DNA, Ribosomal Spacer - analysis</subject><subject>Electrophoresis, Agar Gel</subject><subject>Erwinia - genetics</subject><subject>Erwinia - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Erwinia amylovora</subject><subject>Erwinia herbicola</subject><subject>Fire blight</subject><subject>Fruit - microbiology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Generalities. Techniques. Transmission, epidemiology, ecology. Antibacterial substances, control</subject><subject>Gram-Negative Bacteria - genetics</subject><subject>Gram-Negative Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Pantoea agglomerans</subject><subject>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><subject>Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length</subject><subject>Pseudomonas - genetics</subject><subject>Pseudomonas - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Pseudomonas fluorescens</subject><subject>Pseudomonas syringae</subject><subject>Pseudomonasfluorescens</subject><subject>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - analysis</subject><subject>RNA, Ribosomal, 23S - analysis</subject><subject>rRNA 23S</subject><subject>Sequence Analysis, DNA</subject><issn>0167-7012</issn><issn>1872-8359</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1uFDEQhS0EIpOBI4C8AZFFB5ftbvesUBQgQYpgMUHKzqpxVzOG_pnYnkizyx24ISeJ50dkmUVVSdZXz_Z7jL0BcQoCqo_z3ExhBMgPQpwIIZUobp6xCdRGFrUqZ8_Z5D9yxI5j_C0ElErXL9kRAFRVlpmwP9dL4utIfGw5VHOOQ7Od_-7_SjXn4fP3M55GThh9t-ENJXJpxzS-bSnQkDwm4m7s-3HgFwH7YqBfmPxdVgxuiaHhtPKr5SZRfMVetNhFen2YU_bz65fr88vi6sfFt_Ozq8JpKVMBWqsSQUjEUlUzgUbLGUCrF7JVZqGhUa4yCrDJ34QaRSnQ6Zaq0uWDXFP2fq-7CuPtmmKyvY-Oug4HGtfRGlHpWkH1JAjGGAlKZbDcgy6MMQZq7Sr4HsPGgrDbOOwuDrv12gphd3HYm7z39nDBetFT87h18D8D7w4ARoddG3BwPj5y2ZByllObsk97jrJvd56Cjc7T4KjxIUdim9E_8ZQHLq6k8Q</recordid><startdate>20010201</startdate><enddate>20010201</enddate><creator>Jeng, R.S.</creator><creator>Svircev, A.M.</creator><creator>Myers, A.L.</creator><creator>Beliaeva, L.</creator><creator>Hunter, D.M.</creator><creator>Hubbes, M.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010201</creationdate><title>The use of 16S and 16S–23S rDNA to easily detect and differentiate common Gram-negative orchard epiphytes</title><author>Jeng, R.S. ; Svircev, A.M. ; Myers, A.L. ; Beliaeva, L. ; Hunter, D.M. ; Hubbes, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-14435a102aa53690a742911f4b2f37b41d3c6731ad83518a050ac4fe65c835c83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Bacterial plant pathogens</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>DNA, Bacterial - analysis</topic><topic>DNA, Ribosomal Spacer - analysis</topic><topic>Electrophoresis, Agar Gel</topic><topic>Erwinia - genetics</topic><topic>Erwinia - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Erwinia amylovora</topic><topic>Erwinia herbicola</topic><topic>Fire blight</topic><topic>Fruit - microbiology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Generalities. Techniques. Transmission, epidemiology, ecology. Antibacterial substances, control</topic><topic>Gram-Negative Bacteria - genetics</topic><topic>Gram-Negative Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Pantoea agglomerans</topic><topic>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction</topic><topic>Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length</topic><topic>Pseudomonas - genetics</topic><topic>Pseudomonas - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Pseudomonas fluorescens</topic><topic>Pseudomonas syringae</topic><topic>Pseudomonasfluorescens</topic><topic>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - analysis</topic><topic>RNA, Ribosomal, 23S - analysis</topic><topic>rRNA 23S</topic><topic>Sequence Analysis, DNA</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jeng, R.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Svircev, A.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Myers, A.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beliaeva, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunter, D.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hubbes, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of microbiological methods</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jeng, R.S.</au><au>Svircev, A.M.</au><au>Myers, A.L.</au><au>Beliaeva, L.</au><au>Hunter, D.M.</au><au>Hubbes, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The use of 16S and 16S–23S rDNA to easily detect and differentiate common Gram-negative orchard epiphytes</atitle><jtitle>Journal of microbiological methods</jtitle><addtitle>J Microbiol Methods</addtitle><date>2001-02-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>69</spage><epage>77</epage><pages>69-77</pages><issn>0167-7012</issn><eissn>1872-8359</eissn><coden>JMIMDQ</coden><abstract>The identification of Gram-negative pathogenic and non-pathogenic bacteria commonly isolated from an orchard phylloplane may result in a time consuming and tedious process for the plant pathologist. The paper provides a simple “one-step” protocol that uses the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to amplify intergenic spacer regions between 16S and 23S genes and a portion of 16S gene in the prokaryotic rRNA genetic loci. Amplified 16S rDNA, and restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLP) following EcoRI digestion produced band patterns that readily distinguished between the plant pathogen Erwinia amylovora (causal agent of fire blight in pear and apple) and the orchard epiphyte Pantoea agglomerans (formerly E. herbicola). The amplified DNA patterns of 16S–23S spacer regions may be used to differentiate E. amylovora at the intraspecies level. Isolates of E. amylovora obtained from raspberries exhibited two major fragments while those obtained from apples showed three distinct amplified DNA bands. In addition, the size of the 16S–23S spacer region differs between Pseudomonas syringae and Pseudomonas fluorescens. The RFLP pattern generated by HaeIII digestion may be used to provide a rapid and accurate identification of these two common orchard epiphytes.</abstract><cop>Shannon</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>11166101</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0167-7012(00)00230-X</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-7012
ispartof Journal of microbiological methods, 2001-02, Vol.44 (1), p.69-77
issn 0167-7012
1872-8359
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70648316
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Bacterial plant pathogens
Biological and medical sciences
DNA, Bacterial - analysis
DNA, Ribosomal Spacer - analysis
Electrophoresis, Agar Gel
Erwinia - genetics
Erwinia - isolation & purification
Erwinia amylovora
Erwinia herbicola
Fire blight
Fruit - microbiology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Generalities. Techniques. Transmission, epidemiology, ecology. Antibacterial substances, control
Gram-Negative Bacteria - genetics
Gram-Negative Bacteria - isolation & purification
Pantoea agglomerans
Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection
Polymerase Chain Reaction
Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length
Pseudomonas - genetics
Pseudomonas - isolation & purification
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas syringae
Pseudomonasfluorescens
RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - analysis
RNA, Ribosomal, 23S - analysis
rRNA 23S
Sequence Analysis, DNA
title The use of 16S and 16S–23S rDNA to easily detect and differentiate common Gram-negative orchard epiphytes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T12%3A47%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20use%20of%2016S%20and%2016S%E2%80%9323S%20rDNA%20to%20easily%20detect%20and%20differentiate%20common%20Gram-negative%20orchard%20epiphytes&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20microbiological%20methods&rft.au=Jeng,%20R.S.&rft.date=2001-02-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=69&rft.epage=77&rft.pages=69-77&rft.issn=0167-7012&rft.eissn=1872-8359&rft.coden=JMIMDQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0167-7012(00)00230-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17772133%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17772133&rft_id=info:pmid/11166101&rft_els_id=S016770120000230X&rfr_iscdi=true