The legal challenge to ERISA preemptions
Managed care, once celebrated as a vehicle to halt the increasing cost of health care, has come under increasing fire from patients and health care providers, accused of cutting costs and managing care at the expense of patients. The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) has been a...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Employee benefits journal 2001-03, Vol.26 (1), p.25-29 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Magazinearticle |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 29 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 25 |
| container_title | Employee benefits journal |
| container_volume | 26 |
| creator | Hrehor, K M Renick, O |
| description | Managed care, once celebrated as a vehicle to halt the increasing cost of health care, has come under increasing fire from patients and health care providers, accused of cutting costs and managing care at the expense of patients. The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) has been a shield for managed care organizations (MCOs), buffeting them from liability for quality-of-care issues. Lawsuits and legislation are chipping away at the protective shield of ERISA as MCOs find themselves more liable for their decisions and for the care provided by physicians with whom the MCO contracts and provides financial incentives for controlling cost of medical care. |
| format | Magazinearticle |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70644609</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70644609</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p122t-3336b02e86a7c006aae15da3fd98e9816f25ac7f789456b082e2a10327bd9c3f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1z01Lw0AUheFZKLZW_4JkJW4Cd-4k87EspWqhIGhdh5vkpo1MkjGTLPz3Fqyrs3k48F6JJSgt0wxyWIjbGL8AwKKUN2IhJRrMJS7F0-HEiecj-aQ6kffcHzmZhmT7vvtYJ2Fk7sLUDn28E9cN-cj3l12Jz-ftYfOa7t9edpv1Pg0ScUqVUroEZKvJVACaiGVek2pqZ9lZqRvMqTKNsS7Lz9IiI0lQaMraVapRK_H49xvG4XvmOBVdGyv2nnoe5lgY0FmmwZ3hwwXOZcd1Eca2o_Gn-G9TvxGZR3g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><pqid>70644609</pqid></control><display><type>magazinearticle</type><title>The legal challenge to ERISA preemptions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Hrehor, K M ; Renick, O</creator><creatorcontrib>Hrehor, K M ; Renick, O</creatorcontrib><description>Managed care, once celebrated as a vehicle to halt the increasing cost of health care, has come under increasing fire from patients and health care providers, accused of cutting costs and managing care at the expense of patients. The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) has been a shield for managed care organizations (MCOs), buffeting them from liability for quality-of-care issues. Lawsuits and legislation are chipping away at the protective shield of ERISA as MCOs find themselves more liable for their decisions and for the care provided by physicians with whom the MCO contracts and provides financial incentives for controlling cost of medical care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-4050</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11272512</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Employee Retirement Income Security Act - legislation & jurisprudence ; Health administration ; Health Maintenance Organizations - legislation & jurisprudence ; Health Maintenance Organizations - organization & administration ; Humans ; Liability, Legal ; Patient Advocacy - legislation & jurisprudence ; Quality of Health Care - legislation & jurisprudence ; United States</subject><ispartof>Employee benefits journal, 2001-03, Vol.26 (1), p.25-29</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11272512$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hrehor, K M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renick, O</creatorcontrib><title>The legal challenge to ERISA preemptions</title><title>Employee benefits journal</title><addtitle>Empl Benefits J</addtitle><description>Managed care, once celebrated as a vehicle to halt the increasing cost of health care, has come under increasing fire from patients and health care providers, accused of cutting costs and managing care at the expense of patients. The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) has been a shield for managed care organizations (MCOs), buffeting them from liability for quality-of-care issues. Lawsuits and legislation are chipping away at the protective shield of ERISA as MCOs find themselves more liable for their decisions and for the care provided by physicians with whom the MCO contracts and provides financial incentives for controlling cost of medical care.</description><subject>Employee Retirement Income Security Act - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Health administration</subject><subject>Health Maintenance Organizations - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Health Maintenance Organizations - organization & administration</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Liability, Legal</subject><subject>Patient Advocacy - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0361-4050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1z01Lw0AUheFZKLZW_4JkJW4Cd-4k87EspWqhIGhdh5vkpo1MkjGTLPz3Fqyrs3k48F6JJSgt0wxyWIjbGL8AwKKUN2IhJRrMJS7F0-HEiecj-aQ6kffcHzmZhmT7vvtYJ2Fk7sLUDn28E9cN-cj3l12Jz-ftYfOa7t9edpv1Pg0ScUqVUroEZKvJVACaiGVek2pqZ9lZqRvMqTKNsS7Lz9IiI0lQaMraVapRK_H49xvG4XvmOBVdGyv2nnoe5lgY0FmmwZ3hwwXOZcd1Eca2o_Gn-G9TvxGZR3g</recordid><startdate>200103</startdate><enddate>200103</enddate><creator>Hrehor, K M</creator><creator>Renick, O</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200103</creationdate><title>The legal challenge to ERISA preemptions</title><author>Hrehor, K M ; Renick, O</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p122t-3336b02e86a7c006aae15da3fd98e9816f25ac7f789456b082e2a10327bd9c3f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><prefilter>magazinearticle</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Employee Retirement Income Security Act - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Health administration</topic><topic>Health Maintenance Organizations - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Health Maintenance Organizations - organization & administration</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Liability, Legal</topic><topic>Patient Advocacy - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hrehor, K M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renick, O</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Employee benefits journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hrehor, K M</au><au>Renick, O</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The legal challenge to ERISA preemptions</atitle><jtitle>Employee benefits journal</jtitle><addtitle>Empl Benefits J</addtitle><date>2001-03</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>25</spage><epage>29</epage><pages>25-29</pages><issn>0361-4050</issn><abstract>Managed care, once celebrated as a vehicle to halt the increasing cost of health care, has come under increasing fire from patients and health care providers, accused of cutting costs and managing care at the expense of patients. The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) has been a shield for managed care organizations (MCOs), buffeting them from liability for quality-of-care issues. Lawsuits and legislation are chipping away at the protective shield of ERISA as MCOs find themselves more liable for their decisions and for the care provided by physicians with whom the MCO contracts and provides financial incentives for controlling cost of medical care.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>11272512</pmid><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0361-4050 |
| ispartof | Employee benefits journal, 2001-03, Vol.26 (1), p.25-29 |
| issn | 0361-4050 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70644609 |
| source | MEDLINE; Business Source Complete |
| subjects | Employee Retirement Income Security Act - legislation & jurisprudence Health administration Health Maintenance Organizations - legislation & jurisprudence Health Maintenance Organizations - organization & administration Humans Liability, Legal Patient Advocacy - legislation & jurisprudence Quality of Health Care - legislation & jurisprudence United States |
| title | The legal challenge to ERISA preemptions |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T00%3A41%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20legal%20challenge%20to%20ERISA%20preemptions&rft.jtitle=Employee%20benefits%20journal&rft.au=Hrehor,%20K%20M&rft.date=2001-03&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=25&rft.epage=29&rft.pages=25-29&rft.issn=0361-4050&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E70644609%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70644609&rft_id=info:pmid/11272512&rfr_iscdi=true |