Randomized controlled trial of concurrent hepatitis A and B vaccination

Hepatitis A and B viruses are threats to deployed military forces. The objective of this study was to determine the feasibility of concurrent vaccination against hepatitis A and B viruses. One hundred five healthy persons, 20 to 49 years of age and without serologic markers to hepatitis A or B virus...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Military medicine 2001-02, Vol.166 (2), p.95-101
Hauptverfasser: BRYAN, Joe P, MCCARDLE, Peggy, SOUTH-PAUL, Jeannette E, FOGARTY, John P, LEGTERS, Llewellyn J, PERINE, Peter L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 101
container_issue 2
container_start_page 95
container_title Military medicine
container_volume 166
creator BRYAN, Joe P
MCCARDLE, Peggy
SOUTH-PAUL, Jeannette E
FOGARTY, John P
LEGTERS, Llewellyn J
PERINE, Peter L
description Hepatitis A and B viruses are threats to deployed military forces. The objective of this study was to determine the feasibility of concurrent vaccination against hepatitis A and B viruses. One hundred five healthy persons, 20 to 49 years of age and without serologic markers to hepatitis A or B viruses, were randomized to receive an inactivated hepatitis A vaccine (HEP A; 25 units in 0.5 mL), recombinant hepatitis B vaccine (HEP B; 10 micrograms in 1.0 mL), or both (HEP A & B) concurrently in separate arms. Vaccines were administered intramuscularly at 0, 1, and 6 months. Sera obtained at 1, 2, 6, 7, and 12 months after the first dose were tested for quantitative antibody to hepatitis A virus (anti-HAV) and antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen. Local reactions (e.g., pain) were reported by less than half of the volunteers and were similar at the site of HEP A, whether given alone or concurrently. However, more persons complained of pain (usually mild) at the HEP B site when HEP B was given concurrently with HEP A compared with HEP B alone (43% vs. 15%, 34% vs. 9%, and 42% vs. 15% for doses 1, 2, and 3, respectively; p < 0.05 for each dose). Among persons immunized with HEP A alone or HEP A & B, the proportion with > or = 10 mIU/mL anti-HAV was 83% in both groups 1 month after dose 1 and 100% at months 2, 7, and 12. The geometric mean concentrations of anti-HAV increased from 21 mIU/mL at month 1 to 2,649 and 2,312 mIU/mL in the HEP A and HEP A & B groups, respectively, at month 7. The response to HEP B was similar whether administered alone or concurrently. Antibody responses were similar in those receiving HEP A or HEP B concurrently or alone, but more subjects reported pain (usually mild) at the HEP B site after concurrent vaccination than after HEP B alone. Further work should be conducted to approve HEP A for patients younger than 2 years of age and to develop combined HEP A and HEP B vaccines in the United States.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/milmed/166.2.95
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70630643</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70630643</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-73f8808f823db5744cebd09a66c4be3b92bddb12da6d235dbb8e2152ac68ba1d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1Lw0AQhhdRbK2evUlQ8JZ2P5LN7lGLVqEgiIK3Zb-CW5Js3U0E_fVuaehB5jDDzDMvwzsAXCI4R5CTReua1poFonSO57w8AlPECcwpIh_HYAohpnkBq3ICzmLcQIgKztApmCCEqxRoClavsjO-db_WZNp3ffBNk8o-ONlkvt719BCC7frs025l73oXs7ssLWX32bfU2nWp6btzcFLLJtqLMc_A--PD2_IpX7-snpd361wTxvu8IjVjkNUME6PKqii0VQZySakulCWKY2WMQthIajApjVLMYlRiqSlTEhkyA7d73W3wX4ONvWhd1LZpZGf9EEUFKYG0IAm8_gdu_BC6dJvAqIIFp-mGGVjsIR18jMHWYhtcK8OPQFDsDBZ7g0UyWGDBy7RxNcoOajc48KOjCbgZARm1bOogO-3igWO8wOlFfzHShIA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>217049682</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Randomized controlled trial of concurrent hepatitis A and B vaccination</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>BRYAN, Joe P ; MCCARDLE, Peggy ; SOUTH-PAUL, Jeannette E ; FOGARTY, John P ; LEGTERS, Llewellyn J ; PERINE, Peter L</creator><creatorcontrib>BRYAN, Joe P ; MCCARDLE, Peggy ; SOUTH-PAUL, Jeannette E ; FOGARTY, John P ; LEGTERS, Llewellyn J ; PERINE, Peter L</creatorcontrib><description>Hepatitis A and B viruses are threats to deployed military forces. The objective of this study was to determine the feasibility of concurrent vaccination against hepatitis A and B viruses. One hundred five healthy persons, 20 to 49 years of age and without serologic markers to hepatitis A or B viruses, were randomized to receive an inactivated hepatitis A vaccine (HEP A; 25 units in 0.5 mL), recombinant hepatitis B vaccine (HEP B; 10 micrograms in 1.0 mL), or both (HEP A &amp; B) concurrently in separate arms. Vaccines were administered intramuscularly at 0, 1, and 6 months. Sera obtained at 1, 2, 6, 7, and 12 months after the first dose were tested for quantitative antibody to hepatitis A virus (anti-HAV) and antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen. Local reactions (e.g., pain) were reported by less than half of the volunteers and were similar at the site of HEP A, whether given alone or concurrently. However, more persons complained of pain (usually mild) at the HEP B site when HEP B was given concurrently with HEP A compared with HEP B alone (43% vs. 15%, 34% vs. 9%, and 42% vs. 15% for doses 1, 2, and 3, respectively; p &lt; 0.05 for each dose). Among persons immunized with HEP A alone or HEP A &amp; B, the proportion with &gt; or = 10 mIU/mL anti-HAV was 83% in both groups 1 month after dose 1 and 100% at months 2, 7, and 12. The geometric mean concentrations of anti-HAV increased from 21 mIU/mL at month 1 to 2,649 and 2,312 mIU/mL in the HEP A and HEP A &amp; B groups, respectively, at month 7. The response to HEP B was similar whether administered alone or concurrently. Antibody responses were similar in those receiving HEP A or HEP B concurrently or alone, but more subjects reported pain (usually mild) at the HEP B site after concurrent vaccination than after HEP B alone. Further work should be conducted to approve HEP A for patients younger than 2 years of age and to develop combined HEP A and HEP B vaccines in the United States.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0026-4075</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1930-613X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/milmed/166.2.95</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11272721</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MMEDA9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda, MD: Association of Military Surgeons</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Fever - etiology ; Hepatitis A Antibodies ; Hepatitis A Vaccines - administration &amp; dosage ; Hepatitis A Vaccines - adverse effects ; Hepatitis A Vaccines - immunology ; Hepatitis Antibodies - blood ; Hepatitis B Surface Antigens - blood ; Hepatitis B Vaccines - administration &amp; dosage ; Hepatitis B Vaccines - adverse effects ; Hepatitis B Vaccines - immunology ; Human viral diseases ; Humans ; Infectious diseases ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Military Medicine ; Military Personnel ; Pain - etiology ; Time Factors ; United States ; Vaccines, Combined ; Viral diseases ; Viral hepatitis</subject><ispartof>Military medicine, 2001-02, Vol.166 (2), p.95-101</ispartof><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Association of Military Surgeons of the United States Feb 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-73f8808f823db5744cebd09a66c4be3b92bddb12da6d235dbb8e2152ac68ba1d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=894219$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11272721$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>BRYAN, Joe P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCCARDLE, Peggy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SOUTH-PAUL, Jeannette E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FOGARTY, John P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LEGTERS, Llewellyn J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PERINE, Peter L</creatorcontrib><title>Randomized controlled trial of concurrent hepatitis A and B vaccination</title><title>Military medicine</title><addtitle>Mil Med</addtitle><description>Hepatitis A and B viruses are threats to deployed military forces. The objective of this study was to determine the feasibility of concurrent vaccination against hepatitis A and B viruses. One hundred five healthy persons, 20 to 49 years of age and without serologic markers to hepatitis A or B viruses, were randomized to receive an inactivated hepatitis A vaccine (HEP A; 25 units in 0.5 mL), recombinant hepatitis B vaccine (HEP B; 10 micrograms in 1.0 mL), or both (HEP A &amp; B) concurrently in separate arms. Vaccines were administered intramuscularly at 0, 1, and 6 months. Sera obtained at 1, 2, 6, 7, and 12 months after the first dose were tested for quantitative antibody to hepatitis A virus (anti-HAV) and antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen. Local reactions (e.g., pain) were reported by less than half of the volunteers and were similar at the site of HEP A, whether given alone or concurrently. However, more persons complained of pain (usually mild) at the HEP B site when HEP B was given concurrently with HEP A compared with HEP B alone (43% vs. 15%, 34% vs. 9%, and 42% vs. 15% for doses 1, 2, and 3, respectively; p &lt; 0.05 for each dose). Among persons immunized with HEP A alone or HEP A &amp; B, the proportion with &gt; or = 10 mIU/mL anti-HAV was 83% in both groups 1 month after dose 1 and 100% at months 2, 7, and 12. The geometric mean concentrations of anti-HAV increased from 21 mIU/mL at month 1 to 2,649 and 2,312 mIU/mL in the HEP A and HEP A &amp; B groups, respectively, at month 7. The response to HEP B was similar whether administered alone or concurrently. Antibody responses were similar in those receiving HEP A or HEP B concurrently or alone, but more subjects reported pain (usually mild) at the HEP B site after concurrent vaccination than after HEP B alone. Further work should be conducted to approve HEP A for patients younger than 2 years of age and to develop combined HEP A and HEP B vaccines in the United States.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fever - etiology</subject><subject>Hepatitis A Antibodies</subject><subject>Hepatitis A Vaccines - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Hepatitis A Vaccines - adverse effects</subject><subject>Hepatitis A Vaccines - immunology</subject><subject>Hepatitis Antibodies - blood</subject><subject>Hepatitis B Surface Antigens - blood</subject><subject>Hepatitis B Vaccines - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Hepatitis B Vaccines - adverse effects</subject><subject>Hepatitis B Vaccines - immunology</subject><subject>Human viral diseases</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Military Medicine</subject><subject>Military Personnel</subject><subject>Pain - etiology</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Vaccines, Combined</subject><subject>Viral diseases</subject><subject>Viral hepatitis</subject><issn>0026-4075</issn><issn>1930-613X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1Lw0AQhhdRbK2evUlQ8JZ2P5LN7lGLVqEgiIK3Zb-CW5Js3U0E_fVuaehB5jDDzDMvwzsAXCI4R5CTReua1poFonSO57w8AlPECcwpIh_HYAohpnkBq3ICzmLcQIgKztApmCCEqxRoClavsjO-db_WZNp3ffBNk8o-ONlkvt719BCC7frs025l73oXs7ssLWX32bfU2nWp6btzcFLLJtqLMc_A--PD2_IpX7-snpd361wTxvu8IjVjkNUME6PKqii0VQZySakulCWKY2WMQthIajApjVLMYlRiqSlTEhkyA7d73W3wX4ONvWhd1LZpZGf9EEUFKYG0IAm8_gdu_BC6dJvAqIIFp-mGGVjsIR18jMHWYhtcK8OPQFDsDBZ7g0UyWGDBy7RxNcoOajc48KOjCbgZARm1bOogO-3igWO8wOlFfzHShIA</recordid><startdate>20010201</startdate><enddate>20010201</enddate><creator>BRYAN, Joe P</creator><creator>MCCARDLE, Peggy</creator><creator>SOUTH-PAUL, Jeannette E</creator><creator>FOGARTY, John P</creator><creator>LEGTERS, Llewellyn J</creator><creator>PERINE, Peter L</creator><general>Association of Military Surgeons</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010201</creationdate><title>Randomized controlled trial of concurrent hepatitis A and B vaccination</title><author>BRYAN, Joe P ; MCCARDLE, Peggy ; SOUTH-PAUL, Jeannette E ; FOGARTY, John P ; LEGTERS, Llewellyn J ; PERINE, Peter L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-73f8808f823db5744cebd09a66c4be3b92bddb12da6d235dbb8e2152ac68ba1d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fever - etiology</topic><topic>Hepatitis A Antibodies</topic><topic>Hepatitis A Vaccines - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Hepatitis A Vaccines - adverse effects</topic><topic>Hepatitis A Vaccines - immunology</topic><topic>Hepatitis Antibodies - blood</topic><topic>Hepatitis B Surface Antigens - blood</topic><topic>Hepatitis B Vaccines - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Hepatitis B Vaccines - adverse effects</topic><topic>Hepatitis B Vaccines - immunology</topic><topic>Human viral diseases</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Military Medicine</topic><topic>Military Personnel</topic><topic>Pain - etiology</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Vaccines, Combined</topic><topic>Viral diseases</topic><topic>Viral hepatitis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BRYAN, Joe P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCCARDLE, Peggy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SOUTH-PAUL, Jeannette E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FOGARTY, John P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LEGTERS, Llewellyn J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PERINE, Peter L</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Military medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BRYAN, Joe P</au><au>MCCARDLE, Peggy</au><au>SOUTH-PAUL, Jeannette E</au><au>FOGARTY, John P</au><au>LEGTERS, Llewellyn J</au><au>PERINE, Peter L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Randomized controlled trial of concurrent hepatitis A and B vaccination</atitle><jtitle>Military medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Mil Med</addtitle><date>2001-02-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>166</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>95</spage><epage>101</epage><pages>95-101</pages><issn>0026-4075</issn><eissn>1930-613X</eissn><coden>MMEDA9</coden><abstract>Hepatitis A and B viruses are threats to deployed military forces. The objective of this study was to determine the feasibility of concurrent vaccination against hepatitis A and B viruses. One hundred five healthy persons, 20 to 49 years of age and without serologic markers to hepatitis A or B viruses, were randomized to receive an inactivated hepatitis A vaccine (HEP A; 25 units in 0.5 mL), recombinant hepatitis B vaccine (HEP B; 10 micrograms in 1.0 mL), or both (HEP A &amp; B) concurrently in separate arms. Vaccines were administered intramuscularly at 0, 1, and 6 months. Sera obtained at 1, 2, 6, 7, and 12 months after the first dose were tested for quantitative antibody to hepatitis A virus (anti-HAV) and antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen. Local reactions (e.g., pain) were reported by less than half of the volunteers and were similar at the site of HEP A, whether given alone or concurrently. However, more persons complained of pain (usually mild) at the HEP B site when HEP B was given concurrently with HEP A compared with HEP B alone (43% vs. 15%, 34% vs. 9%, and 42% vs. 15% for doses 1, 2, and 3, respectively; p &lt; 0.05 for each dose). Among persons immunized with HEP A alone or HEP A &amp; B, the proportion with &gt; or = 10 mIU/mL anti-HAV was 83% in both groups 1 month after dose 1 and 100% at months 2, 7, and 12. The geometric mean concentrations of anti-HAV increased from 21 mIU/mL at month 1 to 2,649 and 2,312 mIU/mL in the HEP A and HEP A &amp; B groups, respectively, at month 7. The response to HEP B was similar whether administered alone or concurrently. Antibody responses were similar in those receiving HEP A or HEP B concurrently or alone, but more subjects reported pain (usually mild) at the HEP B site after concurrent vaccination than after HEP B alone. Further work should be conducted to approve HEP A for patients younger than 2 years of age and to develop combined HEP A and HEP B vaccines in the United States.</abstract><cop>Bethesda, MD</cop><pub>Association of Military Surgeons</pub><pmid>11272721</pmid><doi>10.1093/milmed/166.2.95</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0026-4075
ispartof Military medicine, 2001-02, Vol.166 (2), p.95-101
issn 0026-4075
1930-613X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70630643
source MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Feasibility Studies
Female
Fever - etiology
Hepatitis A Antibodies
Hepatitis A Vaccines - administration & dosage
Hepatitis A Vaccines - adverse effects
Hepatitis A Vaccines - immunology
Hepatitis Antibodies - blood
Hepatitis B Surface Antigens - blood
Hepatitis B Vaccines - administration & dosage
Hepatitis B Vaccines - adverse effects
Hepatitis B Vaccines - immunology
Human viral diseases
Humans
Infectious diseases
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Military Medicine
Military Personnel
Pain - etiology
Time Factors
United States
Vaccines, Combined
Viral diseases
Viral hepatitis
title Randomized controlled trial of concurrent hepatitis A and B vaccination
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T03%3A34%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Randomized%20controlled%20trial%20of%20concurrent%20hepatitis%20A%20and%20B%20vaccination&rft.jtitle=Military%20medicine&rft.au=BRYAN,%20Joe%20P&rft.date=2001-02-01&rft.volume=166&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=95&rft.epage=101&rft.pages=95-101&rft.issn=0026-4075&rft.eissn=1930-613X&rft.coden=MMEDA9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/milmed/166.2.95&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70630643%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=217049682&rft_id=info:pmid/11272721&rfr_iscdi=true