Perioperative feasibility of imaging the heart and pleura in patients with aortic stenosis undergoing aortic valve replacement
The postoperative monitoring and treatment of the patient undergoing aortic valve replacement is a complex challenge. Echocardiography is the only method which provides dynamic and real-time bedside imaging of the heart. Focused assessed transthoracic echocardiography has been shown to provide a usa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of anaesthesiology 2007-07, Vol.24 (7), p.589-595 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 595 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 589 |
container_title | European journal of anaesthesiology |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Jakobsen, C.-J. Torp, P. Sloth, E. |
description | The postoperative monitoring and treatment of the patient undergoing aortic valve replacement is a complex challenge. Echocardiography is the only method which provides dynamic and real-time bedside imaging of the heart. Focused assessed transthoracic echocardiography has been shown to provide a usable window for cardiac imaging in a mixed ICU population. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of perioperative imaging of the heart and pleura according to the focused assessed transthoracic echocardiography protocol in patients scheduled for aortic valve replacement.
Thirty-five adult patients scheduled for aortic valve replacement were followed perioperatively with focused assessed transthoracic echocardiography examinations. A Vivid-7 echo-machine and a 2.5 MHz matrix transducer with second-harmonic imaging were used for data acquisition. The image quality for the cardiac window was graded 1-5 (1 = no image, 2 = poor and unusable image quality, 3 = usable image quality, 4 = good image quality and 5 = perfect image quality). A score >or=3 equalled an image quality judged to be of sufficient quality to be interpreted and thereby to contribute to clinical decision-making.
All patients had at least one usable window preoperatively. At least one usable window was obtained in 88% of patients on the first postoperative day, and in 97% at discharge. The image quality changed over time, with the poorest quality being observed on the first postoperative day. The apical view with the patient in the left lateral position provided the best cardiac window on all occasions. The presence of drains did not significantly affect the achievability of a satisfactory examination. The number of patients with pleural effusion was relatively high. On the first postoperative day, 10 subjects had unilateral and one subject had bilateral pleural effusions. At discharge, 14 patients had unilateral and four patients had bilateral effusions.
We conclude that the image quality of the heart and pleura, according to the focused assessed transthoracic echocardiography concept, is sufficient to undergo interpretation and thereby contribute to the perioperative clinical decision-making in patients with aortic stenosis. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0265021507000348 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70616431</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0265021507000348</cupid><sourcerecordid>1458873331</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c195t-83e5c4f714e7acb6660428eb194d617ae4c3dbd458d2f4e8cb037096c64cb5403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkUtPwzAQhC0EoqXwA7ggiwO3gB0_kh5RxUuqBBJwjhxnk7rKC9sp6oXfjqMWIcFpD_PN7GoWoXNKrimhyc0riaUgMRUkIYQwnh6gKWVSRDHj8hBNRzka9Qk6cW4dGBF8x2hCEy5jSuUUfb2ANV0PVnmzAVyCciY3tfFb3JXYNKoybYX9CvAKlPVYtQXuaxiswqbFfXBB6x3-NH6FVWe90dh5aDtnHB7aAmzVjQF7aaPqsMRCXysNTXCeoqNS1Q7O9nOG3u_v3haP0fL54Wlxu4w0nQsfpQyE5mVCOSRK51JKwuMUcjrnhaSJAq5ZkRdcpEVcckh1TlhC5lJLrnPBCZuhq11ub7uPAZzPGuM01LVqoRtclhBJJWc0gJd_wHU32DbclsU0rCWSyQBd7KEhb6DIehuKstvsp9YAsB2gVZNbU1TwG0NJNj4v-_c89g3IV4s4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>216600636</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perioperative feasibility of imaging the heart and pleura in patients with aortic stenosis undergoing aortic valve replacement</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Jakobsen, C.-J. ; Torp, P. ; Sloth, E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jakobsen, C.-J. ; Torp, P. ; Sloth, E.</creatorcontrib><description>The postoperative monitoring and treatment of the patient undergoing aortic valve replacement is a complex challenge. Echocardiography is the only method which provides dynamic and real-time bedside imaging of the heart. Focused assessed transthoracic echocardiography has been shown to provide a usable window for cardiac imaging in a mixed ICU population. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of perioperative imaging of the heart and pleura according to the focused assessed transthoracic echocardiography protocol in patients scheduled for aortic valve replacement.
Thirty-five adult patients scheduled for aortic valve replacement were followed perioperatively with focused assessed transthoracic echocardiography examinations. A Vivid-7 echo-machine and a 2.5 MHz matrix transducer with second-harmonic imaging were used for data acquisition. The image quality for the cardiac window was graded 1-5 (1 = no image, 2 = poor and unusable image quality, 3 = usable image quality, 4 = good image quality and 5 = perfect image quality). A score >or=3 equalled an image quality judged to be of sufficient quality to be interpreted and thereby to contribute to clinical decision-making.
All patients had at least one usable window preoperatively. At least one usable window was obtained in 88% of patients on the first postoperative day, and in 97% at discharge. The image quality changed over time, with the poorest quality being observed on the first postoperative day. The apical view with the patient in the left lateral position provided the best cardiac window on all occasions. The presence of drains did not significantly affect the achievability of a satisfactory examination. The number of patients with pleural effusion was relatively high. On the first postoperative day, 10 subjects had unilateral and one subject had bilateral pleural effusions. At discharge, 14 patients had unilateral and four patients had bilateral effusions.
We conclude that the image quality of the heart and pleura, according to the focused assessed transthoracic echocardiography concept, is sufficient to undergo interpretation and thereby contribute to the perioperative clinical decision-making in patients with aortic stenosis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0265-0215</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2346</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0265021507000348</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17462116</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aortic Valve - surgery ; Aortic Valve Stenosis - diagnostic imaging ; Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery ; Critical Care - methods ; Echocardiography - instrumentation ; Feasibility Studies ; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects ; Humans ; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted ; Perioperative Care - instrumentation ; Perioperative Care - methods ; Pleura - diagnostic imaging ; Pleural Effusion - diagnostic imaging ; Pleural Effusion - etiology ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>European journal of anaesthesiology, 2007-07, Vol.24 (7), p.589-595</ispartof><rights>Copyright © European Society of Anaesthesiology 2007</rights><rights>European Society of Anaesthesiology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27911,27912</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17462116$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jakobsen, C.-J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torp, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sloth, E.</creatorcontrib><title>Perioperative feasibility of imaging the heart and pleura in patients with aortic stenosis undergoing aortic valve replacement</title><title>European journal of anaesthesiology</title><addtitle>Eur J Anaesthesiol</addtitle><description>The postoperative monitoring and treatment of the patient undergoing aortic valve replacement is a complex challenge. Echocardiography is the only method which provides dynamic and real-time bedside imaging of the heart. Focused assessed transthoracic echocardiography has been shown to provide a usable window for cardiac imaging in a mixed ICU population. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of perioperative imaging of the heart and pleura according to the focused assessed transthoracic echocardiography protocol in patients scheduled for aortic valve replacement.
Thirty-five adult patients scheduled for aortic valve replacement were followed perioperatively with focused assessed transthoracic echocardiography examinations. A Vivid-7 echo-machine and a 2.5 MHz matrix transducer with second-harmonic imaging were used for data acquisition. The image quality for the cardiac window was graded 1-5 (1 = no image, 2 = poor and unusable image quality, 3 = usable image quality, 4 = good image quality and 5 = perfect image quality). A score >or=3 equalled an image quality judged to be of sufficient quality to be interpreted and thereby to contribute to clinical decision-making.
All patients had at least one usable window preoperatively. At least one usable window was obtained in 88% of patients on the first postoperative day, and in 97% at discharge. The image quality changed over time, with the poorest quality being observed on the first postoperative day. The apical view with the patient in the left lateral position provided the best cardiac window on all occasions. The presence of drains did not significantly affect the achievability of a satisfactory examination. The number of patients with pleural effusion was relatively high. On the first postoperative day, 10 subjects had unilateral and one subject had bilateral pleural effusions. At discharge, 14 patients had unilateral and four patients had bilateral effusions.
We conclude that the image quality of the heart and pleura, according to the focused assessed transthoracic echocardiography concept, is sufficient to undergo interpretation and thereby contribute to the perioperative clinical decision-making in patients with aortic stenosis.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aortic Valve - surgery</subject><subject>Aortic Valve Stenosis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery</subject><subject>Critical Care - methods</subject><subject>Echocardiography - instrumentation</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Perioperative Care - instrumentation</subject><subject>Perioperative Care - methods</subject><subject>Pleura - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Pleural Effusion - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Pleural Effusion - etiology</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0265-0215</issn><issn>1365-2346</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNplkUtPwzAQhC0EoqXwA7ggiwO3gB0_kh5RxUuqBBJwjhxnk7rKC9sp6oXfjqMWIcFpD_PN7GoWoXNKrimhyc0riaUgMRUkIYQwnh6gKWVSRDHj8hBNRzka9Qk6cW4dGBF8x2hCEy5jSuUUfb2ANV0PVnmzAVyCciY3tfFb3JXYNKoybYX9CvAKlPVYtQXuaxiswqbFfXBB6x3-NH6FVWe90dh5aDtnHB7aAmzVjQF7aaPqsMRCXysNTXCeoqNS1Q7O9nOG3u_v3haP0fL54Wlxu4w0nQsfpQyE5mVCOSRK51JKwuMUcjrnhaSJAq5ZkRdcpEVcckh1TlhC5lJLrnPBCZuhq11ub7uPAZzPGuM01LVqoRtclhBJJWc0gJd_wHU32DbclsU0rCWSyQBd7KEhb6DIehuKstvsp9YAsB2gVZNbU1TwG0NJNj4v-_c89g3IV4s4</recordid><startdate>200707</startdate><enddate>200707</enddate><creator>Jakobsen, C.-J.</creator><creator>Torp, P.</creator><creator>Sloth, E.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200707</creationdate><title>Perioperative feasibility of imaging the heart and pleura in patients with aortic stenosis undergoing aortic valve replacement</title><author>Jakobsen, C.-J. ; Torp, P. ; Sloth, E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c195t-83e5c4f714e7acb6660428eb194d617ae4c3dbd458d2f4e8cb037096c64cb5403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aortic Valve - surgery</topic><topic>Aortic Valve Stenosis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery</topic><topic>Critical Care - methods</topic><topic>Echocardiography - instrumentation</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Perioperative Care - instrumentation</topic><topic>Perioperative Care - methods</topic><topic>Pleura - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Pleural Effusion - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Pleural Effusion - etiology</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jakobsen, C.-J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torp, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sloth, E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of anaesthesiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jakobsen, C.-J.</au><au>Torp, P.</au><au>Sloth, E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Perioperative feasibility of imaging the heart and pleura in patients with aortic stenosis undergoing aortic valve replacement</atitle><jtitle>European journal of anaesthesiology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Anaesthesiol</addtitle><date>2007-07</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>589</spage><epage>595</epage><pages>589-595</pages><issn>0265-0215</issn><eissn>1365-2346</eissn><abstract>The postoperative monitoring and treatment of the patient undergoing aortic valve replacement is a complex challenge. Echocardiography is the only method which provides dynamic and real-time bedside imaging of the heart. Focused assessed transthoracic echocardiography has been shown to provide a usable window for cardiac imaging in a mixed ICU population. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of perioperative imaging of the heart and pleura according to the focused assessed transthoracic echocardiography protocol in patients scheduled for aortic valve replacement.
Thirty-five adult patients scheduled for aortic valve replacement were followed perioperatively with focused assessed transthoracic echocardiography examinations. A Vivid-7 echo-machine and a 2.5 MHz matrix transducer with second-harmonic imaging were used for data acquisition. The image quality for the cardiac window was graded 1-5 (1 = no image, 2 = poor and unusable image quality, 3 = usable image quality, 4 = good image quality and 5 = perfect image quality). A score >or=3 equalled an image quality judged to be of sufficient quality to be interpreted and thereby to contribute to clinical decision-making.
All patients had at least one usable window preoperatively. At least one usable window was obtained in 88% of patients on the first postoperative day, and in 97% at discharge. The image quality changed over time, with the poorest quality being observed on the first postoperative day. The apical view with the patient in the left lateral position provided the best cardiac window on all occasions. The presence of drains did not significantly affect the achievability of a satisfactory examination. The number of patients with pleural effusion was relatively high. On the first postoperative day, 10 subjects had unilateral and one subject had bilateral pleural effusions. At discharge, 14 patients had unilateral and four patients had bilateral effusions.
We conclude that the image quality of the heart and pleura, according to the focused assessed transthoracic echocardiography concept, is sufficient to undergo interpretation and thereby contribute to the perioperative clinical decision-making in patients with aortic stenosis.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>17462116</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0265021507000348</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0265-0215 |
ispartof | European journal of anaesthesiology, 2007-07, Vol.24 (7), p.589-595 |
issn | 0265-0215 1365-2346 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70616431 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Adult Aortic Valve - surgery Aortic Valve Stenosis - diagnostic imaging Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery Critical Care - methods Echocardiography - instrumentation Feasibility Studies Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects Humans Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted Perioperative Care - instrumentation Perioperative Care - methods Pleura - diagnostic imaging Pleural Effusion - diagnostic imaging Pleural Effusion - etiology Time Factors Treatment Outcome |
title | Perioperative feasibility of imaging the heart and pleura in patients with aortic stenosis undergoing aortic valve replacement |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T00%3A20%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perioperative%20feasibility%20of%20imaging%20the%20heart%20and%20pleura%20in%20patients%20with%20aortic%20stenosis%20undergoing%20aortic%20valve%20replacement&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20anaesthesiology&rft.au=Jakobsen,%20C.-J.&rft.date=2007-07&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=589&rft.epage=595&rft.pages=589-595&rft.issn=0265-0215&rft.eissn=1365-2346&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0265021507000348&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1458873331%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=216600636&rft_id=info:pmid/17462116&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0265021507000348&rfr_iscdi=true |