Echo-planar magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging: Parametric map analysis and comparison with thallium SPECT

Magnetic resonance (MR) perfusion FLASH imaging has been used for assessing coronary artery disease (CAD). Echo‐planar MR techniques have advantages in speed and in making MR perfusion imaging results more clinically accessible through parametric maps, but have not been previously assessed. We imple...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of magnetic resonance imaging 2001-02, Vol.13 (2), p.192-200
Hauptverfasser: Panting, Jonathan R., Gatehouse, Peter D., Yang, Guang Z., Jerosch-Herold, Michael, Wilke, Norbert, Firmin, David N., Pennell, Dudley J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 200
container_issue 2
container_start_page 192
container_title Journal of magnetic resonance imaging
container_volume 13
creator Panting, Jonathan R.
Gatehouse, Peter D.
Yang, Guang Z.
Jerosch-Herold, Michael
Wilke, Norbert
Firmin, David N.
Pennell, Dudley J.
description Magnetic resonance (MR) perfusion FLASH imaging has been used for assessing coronary artery disease (CAD). Echo‐planar MR techniques have advantages in speed and in making MR perfusion imaging results more clinically accessible through parametric maps, but have not been previously assessed. We implemented a spin‐echo, echo‐planar MR technique and applied it at rest and during adenosine stress in 26 patients with CAD and abnormal thallium single‐photon‐emission computed tomography (SPECT), and analyzed the results by using a newly developed parametric map analysis of time to peak, peak intensity, and slope of contrast washin. The results were compared with the results of conventional visual analysis of the perfusion cine series. For detecting abnormal coronary territories, MR and SPECT were comparable for sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy (thallium, 70%, 78%, and 73%; MR, 79% 83%, and 80%; P = NS). There was good agreement between thallium and MR during stress (kappa = 0.49), but defects were larger by MR (2.4 vs. 3.1 segments for slope; P < 0.01). Additional segments were detected at rest by MR (58 for slope vs. 25 for thallium), which correlated with areas that became abnormal with stress in the thallium (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 63%). The parametric maps were easier and faster to interpret than review of the original first‐pass series of images (χ2 = 10.8; P < 0.04). The diagnostic performance of echo‐planar perfusion MR and SPECT was similar, and combining the results with parametric mapping was useful for interpretation and considerably improved data display for clinical interpretation. MR, however, was faster and yielded images of higher resolution with no radiation burden. In multislice mode, these new MR techniques may have clinical value. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2001;13:192–200. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/1522-2586(200102)13:2<192::AID-JMRI1029>3.0.CO;2-N
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70596368</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70596368</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4759-a7c2fdb1b024e509ee730b89c3eb796f45367390a3ca263d676c9a9c7a787e693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkV1v0zAUhiMEYmPwF5CvEFyk-COJ44CQplC2oq2tuqFdHjmOsxryhZ2o9N_jKqVcccGNbR2_5zk67xsEGcEzgjF9T2JKQxqnyVuKMcH0HWEZ_UgEzbLLxefw6-1m4aviE5vhWb76QMPlk-D81PTUv3HMQpJifha8cO47xliIKH4enBFCEpHS6DzYzdW2C_tattKiRj62ejAKWe26VrZKo2bfKWlLI2vUa1uNznQtMl5o2scMraWVjR6sb2lkjzyk3jvj_KNEqmt6aY0HoZ0ZtmjYyro2Y4Pu1vP8_mXwrJK106-O90Xw7cv8Pr8Ob1ZXi_zyJlQRj0UouaJVWZAC00jHWGjNGS5SoZguuEiqKGYJZwJLpiRNWJnwRAkpFJc85ToR7CJ4M3F72_0ctRugMU7p2i-su9EBx7FIWJJ64WYSKts5Z3UFvfV72j0QDIc44OAsHJyFKQ4gDPwhKICPA_7EAQww5Cv_tfTQ18fpY9Ho8i_y6L8XPEyCnan1_j9G_mPiqebJ4UQ2btC_TmRpf4B3jMfwsLyCW7re4OXdNUTsNwYptKk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70596368</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Echo-planar magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging: Parametric map analysis and comparison with thallium SPECT</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Backfiles (Open Access)</source><creator>Panting, Jonathan R. ; Gatehouse, Peter D. ; Yang, Guang Z. ; Jerosch-Herold, Michael ; Wilke, Norbert ; Firmin, David N. ; Pennell, Dudley J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Panting, Jonathan R. ; Gatehouse, Peter D. ; Yang, Guang Z. ; Jerosch-Herold, Michael ; Wilke, Norbert ; Firmin, David N. ; Pennell, Dudley J.</creatorcontrib><description>Magnetic resonance (MR) perfusion FLASH imaging has been used for assessing coronary artery disease (CAD). Echo‐planar MR techniques have advantages in speed and in making MR perfusion imaging results more clinically accessible through parametric maps, but have not been previously assessed. We implemented a spin‐echo, echo‐planar MR technique and applied it at rest and during adenosine stress in 26 patients with CAD and abnormal thallium single‐photon‐emission computed tomography (SPECT), and analyzed the results by using a newly developed parametric map analysis of time to peak, peak intensity, and slope of contrast washin. The results were compared with the results of conventional visual analysis of the perfusion cine series. For detecting abnormal coronary territories, MR and SPECT were comparable for sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy (thallium, 70%, 78%, and 73%; MR, 79% 83%, and 80%; P = NS). There was good agreement between thallium and MR during stress (kappa = 0.49), but defects were larger by MR (2.4 vs. 3.1 segments for slope; P &lt; 0.01). Additional segments were detected at rest by MR (58 for slope vs. 25 for thallium), which correlated with areas that became abnormal with stress in the thallium (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 63%). The parametric maps were easier and faster to interpret than review of the original first‐pass series of images (χ2 = 10.8; P &lt; 0.04). The diagnostic performance of echo‐planar perfusion MR and SPECT was similar, and combining the results with parametric mapping was useful for interpretation and considerably improved data display for clinical interpretation. MR, however, was faster and yielded images of higher resolution with no radiation burden. In multislice mode, these new MR techniques may have clinical value. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2001;13:192–200. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-1807</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-2586</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/1522-2586(200102)13:2&lt;192::AID-JMRI1029&gt;3.0.CO;2-N</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11169824</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Coronary Angiography ; Coronary Circulation - physiology ; coronary disease ; Coronary Disease - diagnosis ; Coronary Disease - physiopathology ; Echo-Planar Imaging ; Exercise Test ; Female ; Humans ; Image Enhancement ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted ; magnetic resonance imaging ; Male ; Middle Aged ; perfusion ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Thallium Radioisotopes ; Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon</subject><ispartof>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging, 2001-02, Vol.13 (2), p.192-200</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4759-a7c2fdb1b024e509ee730b89c3eb796f45367390a3ca263d676c9a9c7a787e693</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F1522-2586%28200102%2913%3A2%3C192%3A%3AAID-JMRI1029%3E3.0.CO%3B2-N$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F1522-2586%28200102%2913%3A2%3C192%3A%3AAID-JMRI1029%3E3.0.CO%3B2-N$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11169824$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Panting, Jonathan R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gatehouse, Peter D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Guang Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jerosch-Herold, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilke, Norbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Firmin, David N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pennell, Dudley J.</creatorcontrib><title>Echo-planar magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging: Parametric map analysis and comparison with thallium SPECT</title><title>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</title><addtitle>J. Magn. Reson. Imaging</addtitle><description>Magnetic resonance (MR) perfusion FLASH imaging has been used for assessing coronary artery disease (CAD). Echo‐planar MR techniques have advantages in speed and in making MR perfusion imaging results more clinically accessible through parametric maps, but have not been previously assessed. We implemented a spin‐echo, echo‐planar MR technique and applied it at rest and during adenosine stress in 26 patients with CAD and abnormal thallium single‐photon‐emission computed tomography (SPECT), and analyzed the results by using a newly developed parametric map analysis of time to peak, peak intensity, and slope of contrast washin. The results were compared with the results of conventional visual analysis of the perfusion cine series. For detecting abnormal coronary territories, MR and SPECT were comparable for sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy (thallium, 70%, 78%, and 73%; MR, 79% 83%, and 80%; P = NS). There was good agreement between thallium and MR during stress (kappa = 0.49), but defects were larger by MR (2.4 vs. 3.1 segments for slope; P &lt; 0.01). Additional segments were detected at rest by MR (58 for slope vs. 25 for thallium), which correlated with areas that became abnormal with stress in the thallium (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 63%). The parametric maps were easier and faster to interpret than review of the original first‐pass series of images (χ2 = 10.8; P &lt; 0.04). The diagnostic performance of echo‐planar perfusion MR and SPECT was similar, and combining the results with parametric mapping was useful for interpretation and considerably improved data display for clinical interpretation. MR, however, was faster and yielded images of higher resolution with no radiation burden. In multislice mode, these new MR techniques may have clinical value. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2001;13:192–200. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Coronary Angiography</subject><subject>Coronary Circulation - physiology</subject><subject>coronary disease</subject><subject>Coronary Disease - diagnosis</subject><subject>Coronary Disease - physiopathology</subject><subject>Echo-Planar Imaging</subject><subject>Exercise Test</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Enhancement</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>perfusion</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Thallium Radioisotopes</subject><subject>Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon</subject><issn>1053-1807</issn><issn>1522-2586</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkV1v0zAUhiMEYmPwF5CvEFyk-COJ44CQplC2oq2tuqFdHjmOsxryhZ2o9N_jKqVcccGNbR2_5zk67xsEGcEzgjF9T2JKQxqnyVuKMcH0HWEZ_UgEzbLLxefw6-1m4aviE5vhWb76QMPlk-D81PTUv3HMQpJifha8cO47xliIKH4enBFCEpHS6DzYzdW2C_tattKiRj62ejAKWe26VrZKo2bfKWlLI2vUa1uNznQtMl5o2scMraWVjR6sb2lkjzyk3jvj_KNEqmt6aY0HoZ0ZtmjYyro2Y4Pu1vP8_mXwrJK106-O90Xw7cv8Pr8Ob1ZXi_zyJlQRj0UouaJVWZAC00jHWGjNGS5SoZguuEiqKGYJZwJLpiRNWJnwRAkpFJc85ToR7CJ4M3F72_0ctRugMU7p2i-su9EBx7FIWJJ64WYSKts5Z3UFvfV72j0QDIc44OAsHJyFKQ4gDPwhKICPA_7EAQww5Cv_tfTQ18fpY9Ho8i_y6L8XPEyCnan1_j9G_mPiqebJ4UQ2btC_TmRpf4B3jMfwsLyCW7re4OXdNUTsNwYptKk</recordid><startdate>200102</startdate><enddate>200102</enddate><creator>Panting, Jonathan R.</creator><creator>Gatehouse, Peter D.</creator><creator>Yang, Guang Z.</creator><creator>Jerosch-Herold, Michael</creator><creator>Wilke, Norbert</creator><creator>Firmin, David N.</creator><creator>Pennell, Dudley J.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200102</creationdate><title>Echo-planar magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging: Parametric map analysis and comparison with thallium SPECT</title><author>Panting, Jonathan R. ; Gatehouse, Peter D. ; Yang, Guang Z. ; Jerosch-Herold, Michael ; Wilke, Norbert ; Firmin, David N. ; Pennell, Dudley J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4759-a7c2fdb1b024e509ee730b89c3eb796f45367390a3ca263d676c9a9c7a787e693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Coronary Angiography</topic><topic>Coronary Circulation - physiology</topic><topic>coronary disease</topic><topic>Coronary Disease - diagnosis</topic><topic>Coronary Disease - physiopathology</topic><topic>Echo-Planar Imaging</topic><topic>Exercise Test</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Enhancement</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>perfusion</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Thallium Radioisotopes</topic><topic>Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Panting, Jonathan R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gatehouse, Peter D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Guang Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jerosch-Herold, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilke, Norbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Firmin, David N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pennell, Dudley J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Panting, Jonathan R.</au><au>Gatehouse, Peter D.</au><au>Yang, Guang Z.</au><au>Jerosch-Herold, Michael</au><au>Wilke, Norbert</au><au>Firmin, David N.</au><au>Pennell, Dudley J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Echo-planar magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging: Parametric map analysis and comparison with thallium SPECT</atitle><jtitle>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</jtitle><addtitle>J. Magn. Reson. Imaging</addtitle><date>2001-02</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>192</spage><epage>200</epage><pages>192-200</pages><issn>1053-1807</issn><eissn>1522-2586</eissn><abstract>Magnetic resonance (MR) perfusion FLASH imaging has been used for assessing coronary artery disease (CAD). Echo‐planar MR techniques have advantages in speed and in making MR perfusion imaging results more clinically accessible through parametric maps, but have not been previously assessed. We implemented a spin‐echo, echo‐planar MR technique and applied it at rest and during adenosine stress in 26 patients with CAD and abnormal thallium single‐photon‐emission computed tomography (SPECT), and analyzed the results by using a newly developed parametric map analysis of time to peak, peak intensity, and slope of contrast washin. The results were compared with the results of conventional visual analysis of the perfusion cine series. For detecting abnormal coronary territories, MR and SPECT were comparable for sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy (thallium, 70%, 78%, and 73%; MR, 79% 83%, and 80%; P = NS). There was good agreement between thallium and MR during stress (kappa = 0.49), but defects were larger by MR (2.4 vs. 3.1 segments for slope; P &lt; 0.01). Additional segments were detected at rest by MR (58 for slope vs. 25 for thallium), which correlated with areas that became abnormal with stress in the thallium (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 63%). The parametric maps were easier and faster to interpret than review of the original first‐pass series of images (χ2 = 10.8; P &lt; 0.04). The diagnostic performance of echo‐planar perfusion MR and SPECT was similar, and combining the results with parametric mapping was useful for interpretation and considerably improved data display for clinical interpretation. MR, however, was faster and yielded images of higher resolution with no radiation burden. In multislice mode, these new MR techniques may have clinical value. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2001;13:192–200. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>11169824</pmid><doi>10.1002/1522-2586(200102)13:2&lt;192::AID-JMRI1029&gt;3.0.CO;2-N</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1053-1807
ispartof Journal of magnetic resonance imaging, 2001-02, Vol.13 (2), p.192-200
issn 1053-1807
1522-2586
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70596368
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals; Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Backfiles (Open Access)
subjects Aged
Coronary Angiography
Coronary Circulation - physiology
coronary disease
Coronary Disease - diagnosis
Coronary Disease - physiopathology
Echo-Planar Imaging
Exercise Test
Female
Humans
Image Enhancement
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
magnetic resonance imaging
Male
Middle Aged
perfusion
Sensitivity and Specificity
Thallium Radioisotopes
Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon
title Echo-planar magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging: Parametric map analysis and comparison with thallium SPECT
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T09%3A18%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Echo-planar%20magnetic%20resonance%20myocardial%20perfusion%20imaging:%20Parametric%20map%20analysis%20and%20comparison%20with%20thallium%20SPECT&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging&rft.au=Panting,%20Jonathan%20R.&rft.date=2001-02&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=192&rft.epage=200&rft.pages=192-200&rft.issn=1053-1807&rft.eissn=1522-2586&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/1522-2586(200102)13:2%3C192::AID-JMRI1029%3E3.0.CO;2-N&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70596368%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70596368&rft_id=info:pmid/11169824&rfr_iscdi=true