Comparing mechanical fetal response during descent, crowning, and restitution among deliveries with and without shoulder dystocia
Objective Previous computer simulations of shoulder dystocia (SD) explored the effect of SD itself on the mechanical response of the fetus. Our objective was to perform a mechanical simulation study to explore the variations in fetal response during routine, unilateral SD (USD), and bilateral SD (BS...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2007-06, Vol.196 (6), p.539.e1-539.e5 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 539.e5 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 539.e1 |
container_title | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology |
container_volume | 196 |
creator | Allen, Robert H., PhD Cha, Stephanie L., BS Kranker, Lindsay M Johnson, Tara L., BS, BM Gurewitsch, Edith D., MD |
description | Objective Previous computer simulations of shoulder dystocia (SD) explored the effect of SD itself on the mechanical response of the fetus. Our objective was to perform a mechanical simulation study to explore the variations in fetal response during routine, unilateral SD (USD), and bilateral SD (BSD) deliveries. Study Design Using a biofidelic birthing simulator, we performed 30 experiments mimicking passage of the fetus through the pelvis. For routine deliveries, we engaged the fetal head and allowed it to progress through cardinal movements using typical uterine contraction forces. Deliveries stopped when the head restituted externally to left occiput anterior (LOA) position. The identical procedure was repeated for USD deliveries, except we obstructed the anterior shoulder on the symphysis pubis; for BSD, the posterior shoulder was also impacted on the sacral promontory. For each delivery we continuously measured head rotation, brachial plexus (BP) stretch and neck extension, selecting peak values for analysis. Maximum rotation, BP stretch, and extension were compared among groups using analysis of variance, with P < .05 considered significant. Results Among routine, USD, and BSD deliveries, mean peak BP stretch varied between 10% and 21%, rotation varied between 70° and 77°, and extension varied between 6% and 18%. Greatest stretch occurred in the posterior BP during descent in non-SD deliveries, whereas anterior BP stretch, rotation, and extension were similar among the 3 types of deliveries. Conclusion Quantifiable mechanical response occurs in routine and SD deliveries. Posterior BP stretch is significantly longer for routine deliveries than either USD or BSD deliveries. By itself, shoulder dystocia does not pose additional risk of brachial plexus stretch over routine deliveries. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.12.034 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70574006</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002937806024781</els_id><sourcerecordid>70574006</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-54dc8de18a39f36b94ce263dca2b67f7779017e845b99c97e275e736efaf52b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9r3DAQxUVpaLZpv0APxaeeYleSbcmCUihLmwYCOTR3IUvjRK4tbSU5YY_55pV3FwI99DL6w-89Zt4g9IHgimDCPo-VGv19RTFmFaEVrptXaEOw4CXrWPcabTDGtBQ1787R2xjH9UkFfYPOCW8b3nVsg563ft6pYN19MYN-UM5qNRUDpFwDxJ13EQqzHAADUYNLl4UO_snln8tCObNiyaYlWe8KNfsDONlHCBZi8WTTw4FaL35JRcx1MhAKs4_Ja6veobNBTRHen84LdPfj-932Z3lze3W9_XZT6gaLVLaN0Z0B0qlaDDXrRaOBstpoRXvGB865wIRD17S9EFpwoLwFXjMY1NDSvr5An462u-D_LLllOds8zjQpB36JkuOWNznJDNIjmKeMMcAgd8HOKuwlwXLNXY5yzV2uuUtCZc49iz6e3Jd-BvMiOQWdgS9HAPKIjxaCjNqC02BsAJ2k8fb__l__kevJHnb1G_YQR78El8OTRMYskL_WVa-LxwzT3ACp_wKEeaxM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70574006</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing mechanical fetal response during descent, crowning, and restitution among deliveries with and without shoulder dystocia</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Allen, Robert H., PhD ; Cha, Stephanie L., BS ; Kranker, Lindsay M ; Johnson, Tara L., BS, BM ; Gurewitsch, Edith D., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Allen, Robert H., PhD ; Cha, Stephanie L., BS ; Kranker, Lindsay M ; Johnson, Tara L., BS, BM ; Gurewitsch, Edith D., MD</creatorcontrib><description>Objective Previous computer simulations of shoulder dystocia (SD) explored the effect of SD itself on the mechanical response of the fetus. Our objective was to perform a mechanical simulation study to explore the variations in fetal response during routine, unilateral SD (USD), and bilateral SD (BSD) deliveries. Study Design Using a biofidelic birthing simulator, we performed 30 experiments mimicking passage of the fetus through the pelvis. For routine deliveries, we engaged the fetal head and allowed it to progress through cardinal movements using typical uterine contraction forces. Deliveries stopped when the head restituted externally to left occiput anterior (LOA) position. The identical procedure was repeated for USD deliveries, except we obstructed the anterior shoulder on the symphysis pubis; for BSD, the posterior shoulder was also impacted on the sacral promontory. For each delivery we continuously measured head rotation, brachial plexus (BP) stretch and neck extension, selecting peak values for analysis. Maximum rotation, BP stretch, and extension were compared among groups using analysis of variance, with P < .05 considered significant. Results Among routine, USD, and BSD deliveries, mean peak BP stretch varied between 10% and 21%, rotation varied between 70° and 77°, and extension varied between 6% and 18%. Greatest stretch occurred in the posterior BP during descent in non-SD deliveries, whereas anterior BP stretch, rotation, and extension were similar among the 3 types of deliveries. Conclusion Quantifiable mechanical response occurs in routine and SD deliveries. Posterior BP stretch is significantly longer for routine deliveries than either USD or BSD deliveries. By itself, shoulder dystocia does not pose additional risk of brachial plexus stretch over routine deliveries.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9378</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6868</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.12.034</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17547886</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>birth trauma ; Brachial Plexus - physiology ; brachial plexus stretch ; Computer Simulation ; Delivery, Obstetric - instrumentation ; Dystocia - physiopathology ; Female ; Fetus - physiology ; Humans ; injury prevention ; Labor Presentation ; laboratory model ; Manikins ; Models, Biological ; Neck - physiology ; Obstetrics and Gynecology ; Parturition - physiology ; Pregnancy ; routine delivery ; Shoulder - physiology ; shoulder dystocia</subject><ispartof>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2007-06, Vol.196 (6), p.539.e1-539.e5</ispartof><rights>Mosby, Inc.</rights><rights>2007 Mosby, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-54dc8de18a39f36b94ce263dca2b67f7779017e845b99c97e275e736efaf52b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-54dc8de18a39f36b94ce263dca2b67f7779017e845b99c97e275e736efaf52b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002937806024781$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17547886$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Allen, Robert H., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cha, Stephanie L., BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kranker, Lindsay M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Tara L., BS, BM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gurewitsch, Edith D., MD</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing mechanical fetal response during descent, crowning, and restitution among deliveries with and without shoulder dystocia</title><title>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</title><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>Objective Previous computer simulations of shoulder dystocia (SD) explored the effect of SD itself on the mechanical response of the fetus. Our objective was to perform a mechanical simulation study to explore the variations in fetal response during routine, unilateral SD (USD), and bilateral SD (BSD) deliveries. Study Design Using a biofidelic birthing simulator, we performed 30 experiments mimicking passage of the fetus through the pelvis. For routine deliveries, we engaged the fetal head and allowed it to progress through cardinal movements using typical uterine contraction forces. Deliveries stopped when the head restituted externally to left occiput anterior (LOA) position. The identical procedure was repeated for USD deliveries, except we obstructed the anterior shoulder on the symphysis pubis; for BSD, the posterior shoulder was also impacted on the sacral promontory. For each delivery we continuously measured head rotation, brachial plexus (BP) stretch and neck extension, selecting peak values for analysis. Maximum rotation, BP stretch, and extension were compared among groups using analysis of variance, with P < .05 considered significant. Results Among routine, USD, and BSD deliveries, mean peak BP stretch varied between 10% and 21%, rotation varied between 70° and 77°, and extension varied between 6% and 18%. Greatest stretch occurred in the posterior BP during descent in non-SD deliveries, whereas anterior BP stretch, rotation, and extension were similar among the 3 types of deliveries. Conclusion Quantifiable mechanical response occurs in routine and SD deliveries. Posterior BP stretch is significantly longer for routine deliveries than either USD or BSD deliveries. By itself, shoulder dystocia does not pose additional risk of brachial plexus stretch over routine deliveries.</description><subject>birth trauma</subject><subject>Brachial Plexus - physiology</subject><subject>brachial plexus stretch</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Delivery, Obstetric - instrumentation</subject><subject>Dystocia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fetus - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>injury prevention</subject><subject>Labor Presentation</subject><subject>laboratory model</subject><subject>Manikins</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Neck - physiology</subject><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology</subject><subject>Parturition - physiology</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>routine delivery</subject><subject>Shoulder - physiology</subject><subject>shoulder dystocia</subject><issn>0002-9378</issn><issn>1097-6868</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9r3DAQxUVpaLZpv0APxaeeYleSbcmCUihLmwYCOTR3IUvjRK4tbSU5YY_55pV3FwI99DL6w-89Zt4g9IHgimDCPo-VGv19RTFmFaEVrptXaEOw4CXrWPcabTDGtBQ1787R2xjH9UkFfYPOCW8b3nVsg563ft6pYN19MYN-UM5qNRUDpFwDxJ13EQqzHAADUYNLl4UO_snln8tCObNiyaYlWe8KNfsDONlHCBZi8WTTw4FaL35JRcx1MhAKs4_Ja6veobNBTRHen84LdPfj-932Z3lze3W9_XZT6gaLVLaN0Z0B0qlaDDXrRaOBstpoRXvGB865wIRD17S9EFpwoLwFXjMY1NDSvr5An462u-D_LLllOds8zjQpB36JkuOWNznJDNIjmKeMMcAgd8HOKuwlwXLNXY5yzV2uuUtCZc49iz6e3Jd-BvMiOQWdgS9HAPKIjxaCjNqC02BsAJ2k8fb__l__kevJHnb1G_YQR78El8OTRMYskL_WVa-LxwzT3ACp_wKEeaxM</recordid><startdate>20070601</startdate><enddate>20070601</enddate><creator>Allen, Robert H., PhD</creator><creator>Cha, Stephanie L., BS</creator><creator>Kranker, Lindsay M</creator><creator>Johnson, Tara L., BS, BM</creator><creator>Gurewitsch, Edith D., MD</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070601</creationdate><title>Comparing mechanical fetal response during descent, crowning, and restitution among deliveries with and without shoulder dystocia</title><author>Allen, Robert H., PhD ; Cha, Stephanie L., BS ; Kranker, Lindsay M ; Johnson, Tara L., BS, BM ; Gurewitsch, Edith D., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-54dc8de18a39f36b94ce263dca2b67f7779017e845b99c97e275e736efaf52b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>birth trauma</topic><topic>Brachial Plexus - physiology</topic><topic>brachial plexus stretch</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Delivery, Obstetric - instrumentation</topic><topic>Dystocia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fetus - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>injury prevention</topic><topic>Labor Presentation</topic><topic>laboratory model</topic><topic>Manikins</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Neck - physiology</topic><topic>Obstetrics and Gynecology</topic><topic>Parturition - physiology</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>routine delivery</topic><topic>Shoulder - physiology</topic><topic>shoulder dystocia</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Allen, Robert H., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cha, Stephanie L., BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kranker, Lindsay M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Tara L., BS, BM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gurewitsch, Edith D., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Allen, Robert H., PhD</au><au>Cha, Stephanie L., BS</au><au>Kranker, Lindsay M</au><au>Johnson, Tara L., BS, BM</au><au>Gurewitsch, Edith D., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing mechanical fetal response during descent, crowning, and restitution among deliveries with and without shoulder dystocia</atitle><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>2007-06-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>196</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>539.e1</spage><epage>539.e5</epage><pages>539.e1-539.e5</pages><issn>0002-9378</issn><eissn>1097-6868</eissn><abstract>Objective Previous computer simulations of shoulder dystocia (SD) explored the effect of SD itself on the mechanical response of the fetus. Our objective was to perform a mechanical simulation study to explore the variations in fetal response during routine, unilateral SD (USD), and bilateral SD (BSD) deliveries. Study Design Using a biofidelic birthing simulator, we performed 30 experiments mimicking passage of the fetus through the pelvis. For routine deliveries, we engaged the fetal head and allowed it to progress through cardinal movements using typical uterine contraction forces. Deliveries stopped when the head restituted externally to left occiput anterior (LOA) position. The identical procedure was repeated for USD deliveries, except we obstructed the anterior shoulder on the symphysis pubis; for BSD, the posterior shoulder was also impacted on the sacral promontory. For each delivery we continuously measured head rotation, brachial plexus (BP) stretch and neck extension, selecting peak values for analysis. Maximum rotation, BP stretch, and extension were compared among groups using analysis of variance, with P < .05 considered significant. Results Among routine, USD, and BSD deliveries, mean peak BP stretch varied between 10% and 21%, rotation varied between 70° and 77°, and extension varied between 6% and 18%. Greatest stretch occurred in the posterior BP during descent in non-SD deliveries, whereas anterior BP stretch, rotation, and extension were similar among the 3 types of deliveries. Conclusion Quantifiable mechanical response occurs in routine and SD deliveries. Posterior BP stretch is significantly longer for routine deliveries than either USD or BSD deliveries. By itself, shoulder dystocia does not pose additional risk of brachial plexus stretch over routine deliveries.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>17547886</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajog.2006.12.034</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9378 |
ispartof | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2007-06, Vol.196 (6), p.539.e1-539.e5 |
issn | 0002-9378 1097-6868 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70574006 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | birth trauma Brachial Plexus - physiology brachial plexus stretch Computer Simulation Delivery, Obstetric - instrumentation Dystocia - physiopathology Female Fetus - physiology Humans injury prevention Labor Presentation laboratory model Manikins Models, Biological Neck - physiology Obstetrics and Gynecology Parturition - physiology Pregnancy routine delivery Shoulder - physiology shoulder dystocia |
title | Comparing mechanical fetal response during descent, crowning, and restitution among deliveries with and without shoulder dystocia |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T20%3A56%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20mechanical%20fetal%20response%20during%20descent,%20crowning,%20and%20restitution%20among%20deliveries%20with%20and%20without%20shoulder%20dystocia&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynecology&rft.au=Allen,%20Robert%20H.,%20PhD&rft.date=2007-06-01&rft.volume=196&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=539.e1&rft.epage=539.e5&rft.pages=539.e1-539.e5&rft.issn=0002-9378&rft.eissn=1097-6868&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajog.2006.12.034&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70574006%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70574006&rft_id=info:pmid/17547886&rft_els_id=S0002937806024781&rfr_iscdi=true |