Quantitative ultrasound predicts bone mineral density and failure load in human lumbar vertebrae

Abstract Background Quantitative ultrasound is in widespread clinical use for assessment of bone quality at peripheral skeletal sites, but has not yet been applied to those sites in the axial skeleton, such as the spine and hip, where osteoporotic fractures are common. Methods Ultrasound measurement...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical biomechanics (Bristol) 2007-07, Vol.22 (6), p.623-629
Hauptverfasser: Nicholson, P.H.F, Alkalay, R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 629
container_issue 6
container_start_page 623
container_title Clinical biomechanics (Bristol)
container_volume 22
creator Nicholson, P.H.F
Alkalay, R
description Abstract Background Quantitative ultrasound is in widespread clinical use for assessment of bone quality at peripheral skeletal sites, but has not yet been applied to those sites in the axial skeleton, such as the spine and hip, where osteoporotic fractures are common. Methods Ultrasound measurements were made in 11 cadaveric vertebrae and relationships with bone mineral density and failure load were investigated. An ultrasonic imaging system was used to measure speed of sound, broadband ultrasonic attenuation, and attenuation at a single frequency, through the vertebral body in the sagittal plane. Ultrasonic measurements were averaged over a region of interest centrally within the vertebral body, and were calculated with and without normalization for bone size. Vertebral bone mineral density was measured in antero-posterior and lateral projections using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Compressive mechanical testing was performed to determine vertebral failure load. Findings Bone mineral density correlated with failure load ( r = 0.74–0.78, all P < 0.01), and with quantitative ultrasound ( r = 0.63–0.82, P = 0.038–0.004), in line with previous studies. Of the ultrasonic measurements, those parameters not normalized for bone size gave the highest correlations with failure load, ranging from r = 0.71 ( P = 0.021) for speed of sound to r = 0.93 ( P < 0.001) for attenuation. When ultrasonic measurements were normalized for bone size, the correlations with both failure load and bone mineral density were lower. Interpretation These results confirm the feasibility of vertebral quantitative ultrasound in vitro, and indicate that ultrasound does provide information on both bone mineral density and failure load. The predictive performance of ultrasonic measurements for failure load was comparable to or greater than that of bone mineral density, suggesting that ultrasound has the potential to be at least as useful as mineral density in the assessment of vertebral bone. Normalizing ultrasonic measurements for bone size reduced the strength of correlations because both bone mineral density and bone strength reflect bone size to a certain extent.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2006.12.008
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70567861</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0268003306002580</els_id><sourcerecordid>19382862</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c527t-cf62e23ae1cb6e9d2129232b5ecf24f688ce598e2b7f5b5b358c0b7c5bbd834d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks2r1DAUxYMovvHpvyBx4671Jm3TdCPI4Bc8EFHXMUlveRnTdMzHwPz3tsyA4kZXd_M758A5l5AXDGoGTLw61Na7YNwyo72vOYCoGa8B5AOyY7IfKsZ79pDsgAtZATTNDXmS0gEAWt71j8kN69thaEHuyPfPRYfsss7uhLT4HHVaShjpMeLobE7ULAHp7AJG7emIIbl8pnolJu18iUj9okfqAr0vsw7Ul9noSE8YM5qo8Sl5NGmf8Nn13pJv795-3X-o7j69_7h_c1fZjve5spPgyBuNzBqBw8gZH3jDTYd24u0kpLTYDRK56afOdKbppAXT286YUTbt2NySlxffY1x-FkxZzS5Z9F4HXEpSPXSil4L9E2RDI7kUfAWHC2jjklLESR2jm3U8KwZq20Ed1B87qG0Hxbhad1i1z68hxcw4_lZei1-B_QXAtZOTw6iSdRjsWnpEm9W4uP-Kef2Xy0Y6q_0PPGM6LCWGtXTFVFoF6sv2ENs_gADgnYTmF73ltl0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19382862</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantitative ultrasound predicts bone mineral density and failure load in human lumbar vertebrae</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Nicholson, P.H.F ; Alkalay, R</creator><creatorcontrib>Nicholson, P.H.F ; Alkalay, R</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Quantitative ultrasound is in widespread clinical use for assessment of bone quality at peripheral skeletal sites, but has not yet been applied to those sites in the axial skeleton, such as the spine and hip, where osteoporotic fractures are common. Methods Ultrasound measurements were made in 11 cadaveric vertebrae and relationships with bone mineral density and failure load were investigated. An ultrasonic imaging system was used to measure speed of sound, broadband ultrasonic attenuation, and attenuation at a single frequency, through the vertebral body in the sagittal plane. Ultrasonic measurements were averaged over a region of interest centrally within the vertebral body, and were calculated with and without normalization for bone size. Vertebral bone mineral density was measured in antero-posterior and lateral projections using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Compressive mechanical testing was performed to determine vertebral failure load. Findings Bone mineral density correlated with failure load ( r = 0.74–0.78, all P &lt; 0.01), and with quantitative ultrasound ( r = 0.63–0.82, P = 0.038–0.004), in line with previous studies. Of the ultrasonic measurements, those parameters not normalized for bone size gave the highest correlations with failure load, ranging from r = 0.71 ( P = 0.021) for speed of sound to r = 0.93 ( P &lt; 0.001) for attenuation. When ultrasonic measurements were normalized for bone size, the correlations with both failure load and bone mineral density were lower. Interpretation These results confirm the feasibility of vertebral quantitative ultrasound in vitro, and indicate that ultrasound does provide information on both bone mineral density and failure load. The predictive performance of ultrasonic measurements for failure load was comparable to or greater than that of bone mineral density, suggesting that ultrasound has the potential to be at least as useful as mineral density in the assessment of vertebral bone. Normalizing ultrasonic measurements for bone size reduced the strength of correlations because both bone mineral density and bone strength reflect bone size to a certain extent.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-0033</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1271</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2006.12.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17499408</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Bone and Bones - diagnostic imaging ; Bone Density ; Failure load ; Humans ; Lumbar Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging ; Lumbar Vertebrae - physiology ; Osteoporosis ; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation ; Ultrasonography ; Ultrasound ; Vertebra</subject><ispartof>Clinical biomechanics (Bristol), 2007-07, Vol.22 (6), p.623-629</ispartof><rights>2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c527t-cf62e23ae1cb6e9d2129232b5ecf24f688ce598e2b7f5b5b358c0b7c5bbd834d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c527t-cf62e23ae1cb6e9d2129232b5ecf24f688ce598e2b7f5b5b358c0b7c5bbd834d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268003306002580$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17499408$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nicholson, P.H.F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alkalay, R</creatorcontrib><title>Quantitative ultrasound predicts bone mineral density and failure load in human lumbar vertebrae</title><title>Clinical biomechanics (Bristol)</title><addtitle>Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Quantitative ultrasound is in widespread clinical use for assessment of bone quality at peripheral skeletal sites, but has not yet been applied to those sites in the axial skeleton, such as the spine and hip, where osteoporotic fractures are common. Methods Ultrasound measurements were made in 11 cadaveric vertebrae and relationships with bone mineral density and failure load were investigated. An ultrasonic imaging system was used to measure speed of sound, broadband ultrasonic attenuation, and attenuation at a single frequency, through the vertebral body in the sagittal plane. Ultrasonic measurements were averaged over a region of interest centrally within the vertebral body, and were calculated with and without normalization for bone size. Vertebral bone mineral density was measured in antero-posterior and lateral projections using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Compressive mechanical testing was performed to determine vertebral failure load. Findings Bone mineral density correlated with failure load ( r = 0.74–0.78, all P &lt; 0.01), and with quantitative ultrasound ( r = 0.63–0.82, P = 0.038–0.004), in line with previous studies. Of the ultrasonic measurements, those parameters not normalized for bone size gave the highest correlations with failure load, ranging from r = 0.71 ( P = 0.021) for speed of sound to r = 0.93 ( P &lt; 0.001) for attenuation. When ultrasonic measurements were normalized for bone size, the correlations with both failure load and bone mineral density were lower. Interpretation These results confirm the feasibility of vertebral quantitative ultrasound in vitro, and indicate that ultrasound does provide information on both bone mineral density and failure load. The predictive performance of ultrasonic measurements for failure load was comparable to or greater than that of bone mineral density, suggesting that ultrasound has the potential to be at least as useful as mineral density in the assessment of vertebral bone. Normalizing ultrasonic measurements for bone size reduced the strength of correlations because both bone mineral density and bone strength reflect bone size to a certain extent.</description><subject>Bone and Bones - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Bone Density</subject><subject>Failure load</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lumbar Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Lumbar Vertebrae - physiology</subject><subject>Osteoporosis</subject><subject>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><subject>Vertebra</subject><issn>0268-0033</issn><issn>1879-1271</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks2r1DAUxYMovvHpvyBx4671Jm3TdCPI4Bc8EFHXMUlveRnTdMzHwPz3tsyA4kZXd_M758A5l5AXDGoGTLw61Na7YNwyo72vOYCoGa8B5AOyY7IfKsZ79pDsgAtZATTNDXmS0gEAWt71j8kN69thaEHuyPfPRYfsss7uhLT4HHVaShjpMeLobE7ULAHp7AJG7emIIbl8pnolJu18iUj9okfqAr0vsw7Ul9noSE8YM5qo8Sl5NGmf8Nn13pJv795-3X-o7j69_7h_c1fZjve5spPgyBuNzBqBw8gZH3jDTYd24u0kpLTYDRK56afOdKbppAXT286YUTbt2NySlxffY1x-FkxZzS5Z9F4HXEpSPXSil4L9E2RDI7kUfAWHC2jjklLESR2jm3U8KwZq20Ed1B87qG0Hxbhad1i1z68hxcw4_lZei1-B_QXAtZOTw6iSdRjsWnpEm9W4uP-Kef2Xy0Y6q_0PPGM6LCWGtXTFVFoF6sv2ENs_gADgnYTmF73ltl0</recordid><startdate>20070701</startdate><enddate>20070701</enddate><creator>Nicholson, P.H.F</creator><creator>Alkalay, R</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070701</creationdate><title>Quantitative ultrasound predicts bone mineral density and failure load in human lumbar vertebrae</title><author>Nicholson, P.H.F ; Alkalay, R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c527t-cf62e23ae1cb6e9d2129232b5ecf24f688ce598e2b7f5b5b358c0b7c5bbd834d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Bone and Bones - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Bone Density</topic><topic>Failure load</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lumbar Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Lumbar Vertebrae - physiology</topic><topic>Osteoporosis</topic><topic>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><topic>Vertebra</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nicholson, P.H.F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alkalay, R</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical biomechanics (Bristol)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nicholson, P.H.F</au><au>Alkalay, R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantitative ultrasound predicts bone mineral density and failure load in human lumbar vertebrae</atitle><jtitle>Clinical biomechanics (Bristol)</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)</addtitle><date>2007-07-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>623</spage><epage>629</epage><pages>623-629</pages><issn>0268-0033</issn><eissn>1879-1271</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Quantitative ultrasound is in widespread clinical use for assessment of bone quality at peripheral skeletal sites, but has not yet been applied to those sites in the axial skeleton, such as the spine and hip, where osteoporotic fractures are common. Methods Ultrasound measurements were made in 11 cadaveric vertebrae and relationships with bone mineral density and failure load were investigated. An ultrasonic imaging system was used to measure speed of sound, broadband ultrasonic attenuation, and attenuation at a single frequency, through the vertebral body in the sagittal plane. Ultrasonic measurements were averaged over a region of interest centrally within the vertebral body, and were calculated with and without normalization for bone size. Vertebral bone mineral density was measured in antero-posterior and lateral projections using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Compressive mechanical testing was performed to determine vertebral failure load. Findings Bone mineral density correlated with failure load ( r = 0.74–0.78, all P &lt; 0.01), and with quantitative ultrasound ( r = 0.63–0.82, P = 0.038–0.004), in line with previous studies. Of the ultrasonic measurements, those parameters not normalized for bone size gave the highest correlations with failure load, ranging from r = 0.71 ( P = 0.021) for speed of sound to r = 0.93 ( P &lt; 0.001) for attenuation. When ultrasonic measurements were normalized for bone size, the correlations with both failure load and bone mineral density were lower. Interpretation These results confirm the feasibility of vertebral quantitative ultrasound in vitro, and indicate that ultrasound does provide information on both bone mineral density and failure load. The predictive performance of ultrasonic measurements for failure load was comparable to or greater than that of bone mineral density, suggesting that ultrasound has the potential to be at least as useful as mineral density in the assessment of vertebral bone. Normalizing ultrasonic measurements for bone size reduced the strength of correlations because both bone mineral density and bone strength reflect bone size to a certain extent.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>17499408</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2006.12.008</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0268-0033
ispartof Clinical biomechanics (Bristol), 2007-07, Vol.22 (6), p.623-629
issn 0268-0033
1879-1271
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70567861
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Bone and Bones - diagnostic imaging
Bone Density
Failure load
Humans
Lumbar Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging
Lumbar Vertebrae - physiology
Osteoporosis
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Ultrasonography
Ultrasound
Vertebra
title Quantitative ultrasound predicts bone mineral density and failure load in human lumbar vertebrae
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T13%3A29%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantitative%20ultrasound%20predicts%20bone%20mineral%20density%20and%20failure%20load%20in%20human%20lumbar%20vertebrae&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20biomechanics%20(Bristol)&rft.au=Nicholson,%20P.H.F&rft.date=2007-07-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=623&rft.epage=629&rft.pages=623-629&rft.issn=0268-0033&rft.eissn=1879-1271&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2006.12.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19382862%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19382862&rft_id=info:pmid/17499408&rft_els_id=S0268003306002580&rfr_iscdi=true