The Targeting of Somatic Hypermutation Closely Resembles That of Meiotic Mutation

We have compared the microsequence specificity of mutations introduced during somatic hypermutation (SH) and those introduced meiotically during neutral evolution. We have minimized the effects of selection by studying nonproductive (hence unselected) Ig V region genes for somatic mutations and proc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of immunology (1950) 2001-01, Vol.166 (2), p.892-899
Hauptverfasser: Oprea, Mihaela, Cowell, Lindsay G, Kepler, Thomas B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 899
container_issue 2
container_start_page 892
container_title The Journal of immunology (1950)
container_volume 166
creator Oprea, Mihaela
Cowell, Lindsay G
Kepler, Thomas B
description We have compared the microsequence specificity of mutations introduced during somatic hypermutation (SH) and those introduced meiotically during neutral evolution. We have minimized the effects of selection by studying nonproductive (hence unselected) Ig V region genes for somatic mutations and processed pseudogenes for meiotic mutations. We find that the two sets of patterns are very similar: the mutabilities of nucleotide triplets are positively correlated between the somatic and meiotic sets. The major differences that do exist fall into three distinct categories: 1) The mutability is sharply higher at CG dinucleotides under meiotic but not somatic mutation. 2) The complementary triplets AGC and GCT are much more mutable under somatic than under meiotic mutation. 3) Triplets of the form WAN (W = T or A) are uniformly more mutable under somatic than under meiotic mutation. Nevertheless, the relative mutabilities both within this set and within the SAN (S = G or C) triplets are highly correlated with those under meiotic mutation. We also find that the somatic triplet specificity is strongly symmetric under strand exchange for A/T triplets as well as for G/C triplets in spite of the strong predominance of A over T mutations. Thus, we suggest that somatic mutation has at least two distinct components: one that specifically targets AGC/GCT triplets and another that acts as true catalysis of meiotic mutation.
doi_str_mv 10.4049/jimmunol.166.2.892
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70565048</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70565048</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-286d61cae85feefc57daaf84597ba3dafc94cace0f78200994d7cc7a59d825803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEURYMotlb_gAuZlbupL2k-ZpZS1AoVUes6pJk37ZSkqZMZSv-9U1rp0tXjwrn3wSHklsKQA88fVpX37Tq4IZVyyIZZzs5InwoBqZQgz0kfgLGUKql65CrGFQBIYPyS9CilXEgp-uRjtsRkZuoFNtV6kYQy-QreNJVNJrsN1r5tuhDWydiFiG6XfGJEP3cYk9nSNHv-Dauw59-O6DW5KI2LeHO8A_L9_DQbT9Lp-8vr-HGaWg6iSVkmC0mtwUyUiKUVqjCmzLjI1dyMClPanFtjEUqVMYA854WyVhmRFxkTGYwG5P6wu6nDT4ux0b6KFp0zawxt1AqEFMCzf0GqlGCdjQ5kB9DWIcYaS72pK2_qnaag98b1n3HdGddMd8a70t1xvZ17LE6Vo-LT-2W1WG6rGnX0xrkOp3q73Z6WfgHmAY0f</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17752566</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Targeting of Somatic Hypermutation Closely Resembles That of Meiotic Mutation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Oprea, Mihaela ; Cowell, Lindsay G ; Kepler, Thomas B</creator><creatorcontrib>Oprea, Mihaela ; Cowell, Lindsay G ; Kepler, Thomas B</creatorcontrib><description>We have compared the microsequence specificity of mutations introduced during somatic hypermutation (SH) and those introduced meiotically during neutral evolution. We have minimized the effects of selection by studying nonproductive (hence unselected) Ig V region genes for somatic mutations and processed pseudogenes for meiotic mutations. We find that the two sets of patterns are very similar: the mutabilities of nucleotide triplets are positively correlated between the somatic and meiotic sets. The major differences that do exist fall into three distinct categories: 1) The mutability is sharply higher at CG dinucleotides under meiotic but not somatic mutation. 2) The complementary triplets AGC and GCT are much more mutable under somatic than under meiotic mutation. 3) Triplets of the form WAN (W = T or A) are uniformly more mutable under somatic than under meiotic mutation. Nevertheless, the relative mutabilities both within this set and within the SAN (S = G or C) triplets are highly correlated with those under meiotic mutation. We also find that the somatic triplet specificity is strongly symmetric under strand exchange for A/T triplets as well as for G/C triplets in spite of the strong predominance of A over T mutations. Thus, we suggest that somatic mutation has at least two distinct components: one that specifically targets AGC/GCT triplets and another that acts as true catalysis of meiotic mutation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1767</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-6606</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.166.2.892</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11145665</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Am Assoc Immnol</publisher><subject>Base Sequence ; Binomial Distribution ; Computational Biology - methods ; Computational Biology - statistics &amp; numerical data ; DNA Mutational Analysis - methods ; DNA Mutational Analysis - statistics &amp; numerical data ; DNA, Complementary - genetics ; Evolution, Molecular ; Germ-Line Mutation ; Humans ; Immunoglobulin Variable Region - genetics ; Meiosis - genetics ; Meiosis - immunology ; Models, Immunological ; Mutation ; Pseudogenes - genetics ; Sequence Homology, Nucleic Acid ; somatic hypermutation ; Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><ispartof>The Journal of immunology (1950), 2001-01, Vol.166 (2), p.892-899</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-286d61cae85feefc57daaf84597ba3dafc94cace0f78200994d7cc7a59d825803</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-286d61cae85feefc57daaf84597ba3dafc94cace0f78200994d7cc7a59d825803</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11145665$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oprea, Mihaela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cowell, Lindsay G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kepler, Thomas B</creatorcontrib><title>The Targeting of Somatic Hypermutation Closely Resembles That of Meiotic Mutation</title><title>The Journal of immunology (1950)</title><addtitle>J Immunol</addtitle><description>We have compared the microsequence specificity of mutations introduced during somatic hypermutation (SH) and those introduced meiotically during neutral evolution. We have minimized the effects of selection by studying nonproductive (hence unselected) Ig V region genes for somatic mutations and processed pseudogenes for meiotic mutations. We find that the two sets of patterns are very similar: the mutabilities of nucleotide triplets are positively correlated between the somatic and meiotic sets. The major differences that do exist fall into three distinct categories: 1) The mutability is sharply higher at CG dinucleotides under meiotic but not somatic mutation. 2) The complementary triplets AGC and GCT are much more mutable under somatic than under meiotic mutation. 3) Triplets of the form WAN (W = T or A) are uniformly more mutable under somatic than under meiotic mutation. Nevertheless, the relative mutabilities both within this set and within the SAN (S = G or C) triplets are highly correlated with those under meiotic mutation. We also find that the somatic triplet specificity is strongly symmetric under strand exchange for A/T triplets as well as for G/C triplets in spite of the strong predominance of A over T mutations. Thus, we suggest that somatic mutation has at least two distinct components: one that specifically targets AGC/GCT triplets and another that acts as true catalysis of meiotic mutation.</description><subject>Base Sequence</subject><subject>Binomial Distribution</subject><subject>Computational Biology - methods</subject><subject>Computational Biology - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>DNA Mutational Analysis - methods</subject><subject>DNA Mutational Analysis - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>DNA, Complementary - genetics</subject><subject>Evolution, Molecular</subject><subject>Germ-Line Mutation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin Variable Region - genetics</subject><subject>Meiosis - genetics</subject><subject>Meiosis - immunology</subject><subject>Models, Immunological</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Pseudogenes - genetics</subject><subject>Sequence Homology, Nucleic Acid</subject><subject>somatic hypermutation</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><issn>0022-1767</issn><issn>1550-6606</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEURYMotlb_gAuZlbupL2k-ZpZS1AoVUes6pJk37ZSkqZMZSv-9U1rp0tXjwrn3wSHklsKQA88fVpX37Tq4IZVyyIZZzs5InwoBqZQgz0kfgLGUKql65CrGFQBIYPyS9CilXEgp-uRjtsRkZuoFNtV6kYQy-QreNJVNJrsN1r5tuhDWydiFiG6XfGJEP3cYk9nSNHv-Dauw59-O6DW5KI2LeHO8A_L9_DQbT9Lp-8vr-HGaWg6iSVkmC0mtwUyUiKUVqjCmzLjI1dyMClPanFtjEUqVMYA854WyVhmRFxkTGYwG5P6wu6nDT4ux0b6KFp0zawxt1AqEFMCzf0GqlGCdjQ5kB9DWIcYaS72pK2_qnaag98b1n3HdGddMd8a70t1xvZ17LE6Vo-LT-2W1WG6rGnX0xrkOp3q73Z6WfgHmAY0f</recordid><startdate>20010115</startdate><enddate>20010115</enddate><creator>Oprea, Mihaela</creator><creator>Cowell, Lindsay G</creator><creator>Kepler, Thomas B</creator><general>Am Assoc Immnol</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010115</creationdate><title>The Targeting of Somatic Hypermutation Closely Resembles That of Meiotic Mutation</title><author>Oprea, Mihaela ; Cowell, Lindsay G ; Kepler, Thomas B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-286d61cae85feefc57daaf84597ba3dafc94cace0f78200994d7cc7a59d825803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Base Sequence</topic><topic>Binomial Distribution</topic><topic>Computational Biology - methods</topic><topic>Computational Biology - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>DNA Mutational Analysis - methods</topic><topic>DNA Mutational Analysis - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>DNA, Complementary - genetics</topic><topic>Evolution, Molecular</topic><topic>Germ-Line Mutation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin Variable Region - genetics</topic><topic>Meiosis - genetics</topic><topic>Meiosis - immunology</topic><topic>Models, Immunological</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Pseudogenes - genetics</topic><topic>Sequence Homology, Nucleic Acid</topic><topic>somatic hypermutation</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oprea, Mihaela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cowell, Lindsay G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kepler, Thomas B</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of immunology (1950)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oprea, Mihaela</au><au>Cowell, Lindsay G</au><au>Kepler, Thomas B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Targeting of Somatic Hypermutation Closely Resembles That of Meiotic Mutation</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of immunology (1950)</jtitle><addtitle>J Immunol</addtitle><date>2001-01-15</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>166</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>892</spage><epage>899</epage><pages>892-899</pages><issn>0022-1767</issn><eissn>1550-6606</eissn><abstract>We have compared the microsequence specificity of mutations introduced during somatic hypermutation (SH) and those introduced meiotically during neutral evolution. We have minimized the effects of selection by studying nonproductive (hence unselected) Ig V region genes for somatic mutations and processed pseudogenes for meiotic mutations. We find that the two sets of patterns are very similar: the mutabilities of nucleotide triplets are positively correlated between the somatic and meiotic sets. The major differences that do exist fall into three distinct categories: 1) The mutability is sharply higher at CG dinucleotides under meiotic but not somatic mutation. 2) The complementary triplets AGC and GCT are much more mutable under somatic than under meiotic mutation. 3) Triplets of the form WAN (W = T or A) are uniformly more mutable under somatic than under meiotic mutation. Nevertheless, the relative mutabilities both within this set and within the SAN (S = G or C) triplets are highly correlated with those under meiotic mutation. We also find that the somatic triplet specificity is strongly symmetric under strand exchange for A/T triplets as well as for G/C triplets in spite of the strong predominance of A over T mutations. Thus, we suggest that somatic mutation has at least two distinct components: one that specifically targets AGC/GCT triplets and another that acts as true catalysis of meiotic mutation.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Am Assoc Immnol</pub><pmid>11145665</pmid><doi>10.4049/jimmunol.166.2.892</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1767
ispartof The Journal of immunology (1950), 2001-01, Vol.166 (2), p.892-899
issn 0022-1767
1550-6606
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70565048
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Base Sequence
Binomial Distribution
Computational Biology - methods
Computational Biology - statistics & numerical data
DNA Mutational Analysis - methods
DNA Mutational Analysis - statistics & numerical data
DNA, Complementary - genetics
Evolution, Molecular
Germ-Line Mutation
Humans
Immunoglobulin Variable Region - genetics
Meiosis - genetics
Meiosis - immunology
Models, Immunological
Mutation
Pseudogenes - genetics
Sequence Homology, Nucleic Acid
somatic hypermutation
Statistics, Nonparametric
title The Targeting of Somatic Hypermutation Closely Resembles That of Meiotic Mutation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T19%3A42%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Targeting%20of%20Somatic%20Hypermutation%20Closely%20Resembles%20That%20of%20Meiotic%20Mutation&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20immunology%20(1950)&rft.au=Oprea,%20Mihaela&rft.date=2001-01-15&rft.volume=166&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=892&rft.epage=899&rft.pages=892-899&rft.issn=0022-1767&rft.eissn=1550-6606&rft_id=info:doi/10.4049/jimmunol.166.2.892&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70565048%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17752566&rft_id=info:pmid/11145665&rfr_iscdi=true