Serial position effects in short-term visual memory : A SIMPLE explanation?

A version of Sternberg's (1966) short-term visual memory recognition paradigm with pictures of unfamiliar faces as stimuli was used in three experiments to assess the applicability of the distinctiveness-based SIMPLE model proposed by Brown, Neath, and Chater (2002). Initial simulations indicat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Memory & cognition 2007, Vol.35 (1), p.176-190
Hauptverfasser: HAY, Dennis C, SMYTH, Mary M, HITCH, Graham J, HORTON, Neil J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 190
container_issue 1
container_start_page 176
container_title Memory & cognition
container_volume 35
creator HAY, Dennis C
SMYTH, Mary M
HITCH, Graham J
HORTON, Neil J
description A version of Sternberg's (1966) short-term visual memory recognition paradigm with pictures of unfamiliar faces as stimuli was used in three experiments to assess the applicability of the distinctiveness-based SIMPLE model proposed by Brown, Neath, and Chater (2002). Initial simulations indicated that the amount of recency predicted increased as the parameter measuring the psychological distinctiveness of the stimulus material (c) increased and that the amount of primacy was dependent on the extent of proactive interference from previously presented stimuli. The data from Experiment 1, in which memory lists of four and five faces varying in visual similarity were used, confirmed the predicted extended recency effect. However, changes in visual similarity were not found to produce changes in c. In Experiments 2 and 3, the conditions that influence the magnitude of c were explored. These revealed that both the familiarity of the stimulus class before testing and changes in familiarity, due to perceptual learning, influenced distinctiveness, as indexed by the parameter c. Overall, the empirical data from all three experiments were well fit by SIMPLE.
doi_str_mv 10.3758/BF03195953
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70556198</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1272101821</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-8c932459650f37baaa8aa403687422913925c50821158a5205ddc2fd2789b7293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0MtKAzEUBuAgiq3VjQ8gQdCFMJrrJHEjtbRarChUwd2QZjI4MjeTGbFvb0oHCq7O5juH__wAnGJ0TQWXN_czRLHiitM9MMSckogrFu-DIUIKRRyRjwE48v4LIcS5ig_BAAtOqVR4CJ6W1uW6gE3t8zavK2izzJrWw7yC_rN2bdRaV8Kf3HdBlbas3RrewjFczp9fF1Nof5tCV3qzencMDjJdeHvSzxF4n03fJo_R4uVhPhkvIsOwaiNpFCUsBOEoo2KltZZaM0RjKRghClNFuOFIEoy51JwgnqaGZCkRUq0EUXQELrd3G1d_d9a3SZl7Y4sQxNadT0R4M8ZKBnj-D37VnatCtoRgwVgcYEBXW2Rc7b2zWdK4vNRunWCUbPpNdv0GfNZf7FalTXe0LzSAix5ob3SROV2Z3O-cFITFBNM_-d5-hA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>217446055</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Serial position effects in short-term visual memory : A SIMPLE explanation?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>HAY, Dennis C ; SMYTH, Mary M ; HITCH, Graham J ; HORTON, Neil J</creator><creatorcontrib>HAY, Dennis C ; SMYTH, Mary M ; HITCH, Graham J ; HORTON, Neil J</creatorcontrib><description>A version of Sternberg's (1966) short-term visual memory recognition paradigm with pictures of unfamiliar faces as stimuli was used in three experiments to assess the applicability of the distinctiveness-based SIMPLE model proposed by Brown, Neath, and Chater (2002). Initial simulations indicated that the amount of recency predicted increased as the parameter measuring the psychological distinctiveness of the stimulus material (c) increased and that the amount of primacy was dependent on the extent of proactive interference from previously presented stimuli. The data from Experiment 1, in which memory lists of four and five faces varying in visual similarity were used, confirmed the predicted extended recency effect. However, changes in visual similarity were not found to produce changes in c. In Experiments 2 and 3, the conditions that influence the magnitude of c were explored. These revealed that both the familiarity of the stimulus class before testing and changes in familiarity, due to perceptual learning, influenced distinctiveness, as indexed by the parameter c. Overall, the empirical data from all three experiments were well fit by SIMPLE.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-502X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-5946</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3758/BF03195953</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17533891</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MYCGAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Austin, TX: Psychonomic Society</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Experimental psychology ; Experiments ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Learning. Memory ; Male ; Memory ; Memory, Short-Term ; Models, Psychological ; Pattern recognition ; Perception ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Sensory perception ; Simulation ; Space Perception ; Vision ; Visual Perception ; Visual task performance</subject><ispartof>Memory &amp; cognition, 2007, Vol.35 (1), p.176-190</ispartof><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science &amp; Business Media Jan 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-8c932459650f37baaa8aa403687422913925c50821158a5205ddc2fd2789b7293</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-8c932459650f37baaa8aa403687422913925c50821158a5205ddc2fd2789b7293</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4022,27922,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18724621$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17533891$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>HAY, Dennis C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SMYTH, Mary M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HITCH, Graham J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HORTON, Neil J</creatorcontrib><title>Serial position effects in short-term visual memory : A SIMPLE explanation?</title><title>Memory &amp; cognition</title><addtitle>Mem Cognit</addtitle><description>A version of Sternberg's (1966) short-term visual memory recognition paradigm with pictures of unfamiliar faces as stimuli was used in three experiments to assess the applicability of the distinctiveness-based SIMPLE model proposed by Brown, Neath, and Chater (2002). Initial simulations indicated that the amount of recency predicted increased as the parameter measuring the psychological distinctiveness of the stimulus material (c) increased and that the amount of primacy was dependent on the extent of proactive interference from previously presented stimuli. The data from Experiment 1, in which memory lists of four and five faces varying in visual similarity were used, confirmed the predicted extended recency effect. However, changes in visual similarity were not found to produce changes in c. In Experiments 2 and 3, the conditions that influence the magnitude of c were explored. These revealed that both the familiarity of the stimulus class before testing and changes in familiarity, due to perceptual learning, influenced distinctiveness, as indexed by the parameter c. Overall, the empirical data from all three experiments were well fit by SIMPLE.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Experimental psychology</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Learning. Memory</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Memory, Short-Term</subject><subject>Models, Psychological</subject><subject>Pattern recognition</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Sensory perception</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Space Perception</subject><subject>Vision</subject><subject>Visual Perception</subject><subject>Visual task performance</subject><issn>0090-502X</issn><issn>1532-5946</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0MtKAzEUBuAgiq3VjQ8gQdCFMJrrJHEjtbRarChUwd2QZjI4MjeTGbFvb0oHCq7O5juH__wAnGJ0TQWXN_czRLHiitM9MMSckogrFu-DIUIKRRyRjwE48v4LIcS5ig_BAAtOqVR4CJ6W1uW6gE3t8zavK2izzJrWw7yC_rN2bdRaV8Kf3HdBlbas3RrewjFczp9fF1Nof5tCV3qzencMDjJdeHvSzxF4n03fJo_R4uVhPhkvIsOwaiNpFCUsBOEoo2KltZZaM0RjKRghClNFuOFIEoy51JwgnqaGZCkRUq0EUXQELrd3G1d_d9a3SZl7Y4sQxNadT0R4M8ZKBnj-D37VnatCtoRgwVgcYEBXW2Rc7b2zWdK4vNRunWCUbPpNdv0GfNZf7FalTXe0LzSAix5ob3SROV2Z3O-cFITFBNM_-d5-hA</recordid><startdate>2007</startdate><enddate>2007</enddate><creator>HAY, Dennis C</creator><creator>SMYTH, Mary M</creator><creator>HITCH, Graham J</creator><creator>HORTON, Neil J</creator><general>Psychonomic Society</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2007</creationdate><title>Serial position effects in short-term visual memory : A SIMPLE explanation?</title><author>HAY, Dennis C ; SMYTH, Mary M ; HITCH, Graham J ; HORTON, Neil J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-8c932459650f37baaa8aa403687422913925c50821158a5205ddc2fd2789b7293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Experimental psychology</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Learning. Memory</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Memory, Short-Term</topic><topic>Models, Psychological</topic><topic>Pattern recognition</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Sensory perception</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Space Perception</topic><topic>Vision</topic><topic>Visual Perception</topic><topic>Visual task performance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>HAY, Dennis C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SMYTH, Mary M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HITCH, Graham J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HORTON, Neil J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>Memory &amp; cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>HAY, Dennis C</au><au>SMYTH, Mary M</au><au>HITCH, Graham J</au><au>HORTON, Neil J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Serial position effects in short-term visual memory : A SIMPLE explanation?</atitle><jtitle>Memory &amp; cognition</jtitle><addtitle>Mem Cognit</addtitle><date>2007</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>176</spage><epage>190</epage><pages>176-190</pages><issn>0090-502X</issn><eissn>1532-5946</eissn><coden>MYCGAO</coden><abstract>A version of Sternberg's (1966) short-term visual memory recognition paradigm with pictures of unfamiliar faces as stimuli was used in three experiments to assess the applicability of the distinctiveness-based SIMPLE model proposed by Brown, Neath, and Chater (2002). Initial simulations indicated that the amount of recency predicted increased as the parameter measuring the psychological distinctiveness of the stimulus material (c) increased and that the amount of primacy was dependent on the extent of proactive interference from previously presented stimuli. The data from Experiment 1, in which memory lists of four and five faces varying in visual similarity were used, confirmed the predicted extended recency effect. However, changes in visual similarity were not found to produce changes in c. In Experiments 2 and 3, the conditions that influence the magnitude of c were explored. These revealed that both the familiarity of the stimulus class before testing and changes in familiarity, due to perceptual learning, influenced distinctiveness, as indexed by the parameter c. Overall, the empirical data from all three experiments were well fit by SIMPLE.</abstract><cop>Austin, TX</cop><pub>Psychonomic Society</pub><pmid>17533891</pmid><doi>10.3758/BF03195953</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0090-502X
ispartof Memory & cognition, 2007, Vol.35 (1), p.176-190
issn 0090-502X
1532-5946
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70556198
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Experimental psychology
Experiments
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Human
Humans
Learning. Memory
Male
Memory
Memory, Short-Term
Models, Psychological
Pattern recognition
Perception
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Sensory perception
Simulation
Space Perception
Vision
Visual Perception
Visual task performance
title Serial position effects in short-term visual memory : A SIMPLE explanation?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T18%3A52%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Serial%20position%20effects%20in%20short-term%20visual%20memory%20:%20A%20SIMPLE%20explanation?&rft.jtitle=Memory%20&%20cognition&rft.au=HAY,%20Dennis%20C&rft.date=2007&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=176&rft.epage=190&rft.pages=176-190&rft.issn=0090-502X&rft.eissn=1532-5946&rft.coden=MYCGAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.3758/BF03195953&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1272101821%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=217446055&rft_id=info:pmid/17533891&rfr_iscdi=true