Interventional procedures in acute myocardial infarction
Background Acute myocardial infarction (MI) remains a leading cause of death in the United States. There is evidence that primary (direct) percutaneous intervention (PCI) may improve survival and reduce morbidity in patients with acute MI. Methods We present a concise, comprehensive, evidence-based...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American heart journal 2001-01, Vol.141 (1), p.15-25 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 25 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 15 |
container_title | The American heart journal |
container_volume | 141 |
creator | DeGeare, Vincent S. Dangas, George Stone, Gregg W. Grines, Cindy L. |
description | Background Acute myocardial infarction (MI) remains a leading cause of death in the United States. There is evidence that primary (direct) percutaneous intervention (PCI) may improve survival and reduce morbidity in patients with acute MI. Methods We present a concise, comprehensive, evidence-based literature review of modern techniques of primary PCI in patients with acute MI. A comparison to thrombolytic therapy, especially in selected patient subgroups is made. Rescue angioplasty is also addressed. Adjunctive pharmacology, economic implications, and feasibility of implementation are discussed. A brief discussion of experimental therapies is included. Results Primary PCI is an acceptable alternative to thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute MI and may result in superior outcomes in select patient populations, especially the elderly, patients with prior coronary artery bypass surgery, those with congestive heart failure, and those in cardiogenic shock. Conclusions Clinical trials support the use of primary PCI as first-line therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Patients in whom thrombolytic therapy is contraindicated or known to have reduced efficacy are also excellent candidates for this therapy. Ongoing advancements in equipment and adjunctive therapies continue to enhance delivery of this treatment as well as improve patient outcome. (Am Heart J 2001;141:15-24.) |
doi_str_mv | 10.1067/mhj.2001.112091 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70552105</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002870301443912</els_id><sourcerecordid>70552105</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-58a69abc0afa3e300f8a485542a2765cc9edfc8f744c940110b324c70beccfec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMotlbP3mRB8LbtJPuVPYr4USh40XPIzk4wZT9qslvovzeli548DcM88_LyMHbLYckhL1bt13YpAPiScwElP2NzDmUR50WanrM5AIhYFpDM2JX327DmQuaXbMY5T_JUijmT624gt6dusH2nm2jneqR6dOQj20Uax4Gi9tCjdrUNZ9sZ7fDIXrMLoxtPN9NcsM-X54-nt3jz_rp-etzEmBR8iDOp81JXCNrohBIAI3UqsywVWhR5hlhSbVCaUBjLFDiHKhEpFlARoiFMFuzhlBuafY_kB9Vaj9Q0uqN-9KqALBMcsgCuTiC63ntHRu2cbbU7KA7qKEsFWeooS51khY-7KXqsWqr_-MlOAO4nQHvUjXG6Q-t_OSm5lDJQ5YmioGFvySmPlrqg0TrCQdW9_bfCDzfDhUc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70552105</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interventional procedures in acute myocardial infarction</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>DeGeare, Vincent S. ; Dangas, George ; Stone, Gregg W. ; Grines, Cindy L.</creator><creatorcontrib>DeGeare, Vincent S. ; Dangas, George ; Stone, Gregg W. ; Grines, Cindy L.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Acute myocardial infarction (MI) remains a leading cause of death in the United States. There is evidence that primary (direct) percutaneous intervention (PCI) may improve survival and reduce morbidity in patients with acute MI. Methods We present a concise, comprehensive, evidence-based literature review of modern techniques of primary PCI in patients with acute MI. A comparison to thrombolytic therapy, especially in selected patient subgroups is made. Rescue angioplasty is also addressed. Adjunctive pharmacology, economic implications, and feasibility of implementation are discussed. A brief discussion of experimental therapies is included. Results Primary PCI is an acceptable alternative to thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute MI and may result in superior outcomes in select patient populations, especially the elderly, patients with prior coronary artery bypass surgery, those with congestive heart failure, and those in cardiogenic shock. Conclusions Clinical trials support the use of primary PCI as first-line therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Patients in whom thrombolytic therapy is contraindicated or known to have reduced efficacy are also excellent candidates for this therapy. Ongoing advancements in equipment and adjunctive therapies continue to enhance delivery of this treatment as well as improve patient outcome. (Am Heart J 2001;141:15-24.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-8703</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6744</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1067/mhj.2001.112091</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11136482</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AHJOA2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Diseases of the cardiovascular system ; Forecasting ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Myocardial Infarction - complications ; Myocardial Infarction - therapy ; Patient Selection ; Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) ; Thrombolytic Therapy</subject><ispartof>The American heart journal, 2001-01, Vol.141 (1), p.15-25</ispartof><rights>2001 Mosby, Inc.</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-58a69abc0afa3e300f8a485542a2765cc9edfc8f744c940110b324c70beccfec3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-58a69abc0afa3e300f8a485542a2765cc9edfc8f744c940110b324c70beccfec3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mhj.2001.112091$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4024,27923,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=881888$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11136482$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>DeGeare, Vincent S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dangas, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stone, Gregg W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grines, Cindy L.</creatorcontrib><title>Interventional procedures in acute myocardial infarction</title><title>The American heart journal</title><addtitle>Am Heart J</addtitle><description>Background Acute myocardial infarction (MI) remains a leading cause of death in the United States. There is evidence that primary (direct) percutaneous intervention (PCI) may improve survival and reduce morbidity in patients with acute MI. Methods We present a concise, comprehensive, evidence-based literature review of modern techniques of primary PCI in patients with acute MI. A comparison to thrombolytic therapy, especially in selected patient subgroups is made. Rescue angioplasty is also addressed. Adjunctive pharmacology, economic implications, and feasibility of implementation are discussed. A brief discussion of experimental therapies is included. Results Primary PCI is an acceptable alternative to thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute MI and may result in superior outcomes in select patient populations, especially the elderly, patients with prior coronary artery bypass surgery, those with congestive heart failure, and those in cardiogenic shock. Conclusions Clinical trials support the use of primary PCI as first-line therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Patients in whom thrombolytic therapy is contraindicated or known to have reduced efficacy are also excellent candidates for this therapy. Ongoing advancements in equipment and adjunctive therapies continue to enhance delivery of this treatment as well as improve patient outcome. (Am Heart J 2001;141:15-24.)</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Diseases of the cardiovascular system</subject><subject>Forecasting</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Myocardial Infarction - complications</subject><subject>Myocardial Infarction - therapy</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</subject><subject>Thrombolytic Therapy</subject><issn>0002-8703</issn><issn>1097-6744</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMotlbP3mRB8LbtJPuVPYr4USh40XPIzk4wZT9qslvovzeli548DcM88_LyMHbLYckhL1bt13YpAPiScwElP2NzDmUR50WanrM5AIhYFpDM2JX327DmQuaXbMY5T_JUijmT624gt6dusH2nm2jneqR6dOQj20Uax4Gi9tCjdrUNZ9sZ7fDIXrMLoxtPN9NcsM-X54-nt3jz_rp-etzEmBR8iDOp81JXCNrohBIAI3UqsywVWhR5hlhSbVCaUBjLFDiHKhEpFlARoiFMFuzhlBuafY_kB9Vaj9Q0uqN-9KqALBMcsgCuTiC63ntHRu2cbbU7KA7qKEsFWeooS51khY-7KXqsWqr_-MlOAO4nQHvUjXG6Q-t_OSm5lDJQ5YmioGFvySmPlrqg0TrCQdW9_bfCDzfDhUc</recordid><startdate>200101</startdate><enddate>200101</enddate><creator>DeGeare, Vincent S.</creator><creator>Dangas, George</creator><creator>Stone, Gregg W.</creator><creator>Grines, Cindy L.</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200101</creationdate><title>Interventional procedures in acute myocardial infarction</title><author>DeGeare, Vincent S. ; Dangas, George ; Stone, Gregg W. ; Grines, Cindy L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-58a69abc0afa3e300f8a485542a2765cc9edfc8f744c940110b324c70beccfec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Diseases of the cardiovascular system</topic><topic>Forecasting</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Myocardial Infarction - complications</topic><topic>Myocardial Infarction - therapy</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</topic><topic>Thrombolytic Therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DeGeare, Vincent S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dangas, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stone, Gregg W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grines, Cindy L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American heart journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DeGeare, Vincent S.</au><au>Dangas, George</au><au>Stone, Gregg W.</au><au>Grines, Cindy L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interventional procedures in acute myocardial infarction</atitle><jtitle>The American heart journal</jtitle><addtitle>Am Heart J</addtitle><date>2001-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>141</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>15</spage><epage>25</epage><pages>15-25</pages><issn>0002-8703</issn><eissn>1097-6744</eissn><coden>AHJOA2</coden><abstract>Background Acute myocardial infarction (MI) remains a leading cause of death in the United States. There is evidence that primary (direct) percutaneous intervention (PCI) may improve survival and reduce morbidity in patients with acute MI. Methods We present a concise, comprehensive, evidence-based literature review of modern techniques of primary PCI in patients with acute MI. A comparison to thrombolytic therapy, especially in selected patient subgroups is made. Rescue angioplasty is also addressed. Adjunctive pharmacology, economic implications, and feasibility of implementation are discussed. A brief discussion of experimental therapies is included. Results Primary PCI is an acceptable alternative to thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute MI and may result in superior outcomes in select patient populations, especially the elderly, patients with prior coronary artery bypass surgery, those with congestive heart failure, and those in cardiogenic shock. Conclusions Clinical trials support the use of primary PCI as first-line therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Patients in whom thrombolytic therapy is contraindicated or known to have reduced efficacy are also excellent candidates for this therapy. Ongoing advancements in equipment and adjunctive therapies continue to enhance delivery of this treatment as well as improve patient outcome. (Am Heart J 2001;141:15-24.)</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>11136482</pmid><doi>10.1067/mhj.2001.112091</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-8703 |
ispartof | The American heart journal, 2001-01, Vol.141 (1), p.15-25 |
issn | 0002-8703 1097-6744 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70552105 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Aged Biological and medical sciences Diseases of the cardiovascular system Forecasting Humans Medical sciences Myocardial Infarction - complications Myocardial Infarction - therapy Patient Selection Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) Thrombolytic Therapy |
title | Interventional procedures in acute myocardial infarction |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T05%3A05%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interventional%20procedures%20in%20acute%20myocardial%20infarction&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20heart%20journal&rft.au=DeGeare,%20Vincent%20S.&rft.date=2001-01&rft.volume=141&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=15&rft.epage=25&rft.pages=15-25&rft.issn=0002-8703&rft.eissn=1097-6744&rft.coden=AHJOA2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1067/mhj.2001.112091&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70552105%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70552105&rft_id=info:pmid/11136482&rft_els_id=S0002870301443912&rfr_iscdi=true |