Compliance with federal and state legislation by indoor tanning facilities in San Diego
Background: The prevalence rates of both skin cancers and indoor tanning among the US population are high and have increased substantially in recent years. Low compliance by indoor tanning facilities with safety regulations may place consumers at greater risk of skin and ocular damage. Objective: Th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 2001-01, Vol.44 (1), p.53-60 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 60 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 53 |
container_title | Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Culley, Carla A. Mayer, Joni A. Eckhardt, Laura Busic, April J. Eichenfield, Lawrence F. Sallis, James F. Quintana, P.J.E. Woodruff, Susan I. |
description | Background: The prevalence rates of both skin cancers and indoor tanning among the US population are high and have increased substantially in recent years. Low compliance by indoor tanning facilities with safety regulations may place consumers at greater risk of skin and ocular damage. Objective: This study quantified the level of compliance by indoor tanning facilities with selected federal and state regulations and recommendations. Methods: Tanning facilities (N = 54) in San Diego County, California, were visited by a confederate posing as a prospective customer. Compliance with 13 regulations/recommendations were assessed by either direct query or observation of the presence/absence of signs and warning labels. Operators' responses to 5 risk-based questions also were noted. Results: No facility complied with all 13 regulations/recommendations. Compliance with 3 protective eyewear regulations was high (89%-100%). In contrast, compliance with maximum tanning frequency recommendations (approximately 6%) and parental consent regulations (approximately 43%) was disturbingly low. Conclusion: The investigators recommend instituting mandatory, comprehensive training for operators, as well as systematic compliance monitoring with enforcement of penalties for noncompliance. (J Am Acad Dermatol 2001;44:53-60.) |
doi_str_mv | 10.1067/mjd.2001.110063 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70549467</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0190962201927392</els_id><sourcerecordid>70549467</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-3a6c69dc520b2f5eef008ae9135aca6a6311ff6c204ec8a33cb70b6894abdac23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10EFrFDEUwPEgit1Wz94kIHib7ctkJpkcZatWKHhQ8RjeJG_WlExmTWaVfntTdtGTp3fIL4_Hn7FXArYClL6e7_22BRBbIQCUfMI2AoxulB70U7YBYaAxqm0v2GUp9wBgOqmfswshRDd0Wm_Y990yH2LA5Ij_DusPPpGnjJFj8rysuBKPtA8l4hqWxMcHHpJflsxXTCmkPZ_QhRjWQKW-8C-Y-E2g_fKCPZswFnp5nlfs24f3X3e3zd3nj5927-4aJ7VYG4nKKeNd38LYTj3RBDAgGSF7dKhQSSGmSbkWOnIDSulGDaMaTIejR9fKK_b2tPeQl59HKqudQ3EUIyZajsVq6DvTKV3h9Qm6vJSSabKHHGbMD1aAfWxpa0v72NKeWtYfr8-rj-NM_p8_x6vgzRlgcRinXCuG8tcNWvW9qsqcFNUMvwJlW1yg2tuHTG61fgn_PeEPvWOQAg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70549467</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Compliance with federal and state legislation by indoor tanning facilities in San Diego</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Culley, Carla A. ; Mayer, Joni A. ; Eckhardt, Laura ; Busic, April J. ; Eichenfield, Lawrence F. ; Sallis, James F. ; Quintana, P.J.E. ; Woodruff, Susan I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Culley, Carla A. ; Mayer, Joni A. ; Eckhardt, Laura ; Busic, April J. ; Eichenfield, Lawrence F. ; Sallis, James F. ; Quintana, P.J.E. ; Woodruff, Susan I.</creatorcontrib><description>Background: The prevalence rates of both skin cancers and indoor tanning among the US population are high and have increased substantially in recent years. Low compliance by indoor tanning facilities with safety regulations may place consumers at greater risk of skin and ocular damage. Objective: This study quantified the level of compliance by indoor tanning facilities with selected federal and state regulations and recommendations. Methods: Tanning facilities (N = 54) in San Diego County, California, were visited by a confederate posing as a prospective customer. Compliance with 13 regulations/recommendations were assessed by either direct query or observation of the presence/absence of signs and warning labels. Operators' responses to 5 risk-based questions also were noted. Results: No facility complied with all 13 regulations/recommendations. Compliance with 3 protective eyewear regulations was high (89%-100%). In contrast, compliance with maximum tanning frequency recommendations (approximately 6%) and parental consent regulations (approximately 43%) was disturbingly low. Conclusion: The investigators recommend instituting mandatory, comprehensive training for operators, as well as systematic compliance monitoring with enforcement of penalties for noncompliance. (J Am Acad Dermatol 2001;44:53-60.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0190-9622</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6787</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1067/mjd.2001.110063</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11148477</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAADDB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Beauty Culture - legislation & jurisprudence ; Beauty Culture - standards ; Biological and medical sciences ; California ; Dermatology ; Eye Protective Devices ; Guideline Adherence ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Observer Variation ; Skin involvement in other diseases. Miscellaneous. General aspects ; Skin Neoplasms - prevention & control ; Ultraviolet Rays - adverse effects</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2001-01, Vol.44 (1), p.53-60</ispartof><rights>2001 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-3a6c69dc520b2f5eef008ae9135aca6a6311ff6c204ec8a33cb70b6894abdac23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-3a6c69dc520b2f5eef008ae9135aca6a6311ff6c204ec8a33cb70b6894abdac23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190962201927392$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,4010,27900,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=876556$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11148477$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Culley, Carla A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayer, Joni A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eckhardt, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Busic, April J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eichenfield, Lawrence F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sallis, James F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quintana, P.J.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodruff, Susan I.</creatorcontrib><title>Compliance with federal and state legislation by indoor tanning facilities in San Diego</title><title>Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology</title><addtitle>J Am Acad Dermatol</addtitle><description>Background: The prevalence rates of both skin cancers and indoor tanning among the US population are high and have increased substantially in recent years. Low compliance by indoor tanning facilities with safety regulations may place consumers at greater risk of skin and ocular damage. Objective: This study quantified the level of compliance by indoor tanning facilities with selected federal and state regulations and recommendations. Methods: Tanning facilities (N = 54) in San Diego County, California, were visited by a confederate posing as a prospective customer. Compliance with 13 regulations/recommendations were assessed by either direct query or observation of the presence/absence of signs and warning labels. Operators' responses to 5 risk-based questions also were noted. Results: No facility complied with all 13 regulations/recommendations. Compliance with 3 protective eyewear regulations was high (89%-100%). In contrast, compliance with maximum tanning frequency recommendations (approximately 6%) and parental consent regulations (approximately 43%) was disturbingly low. Conclusion: The investigators recommend instituting mandatory, comprehensive training for operators, as well as systematic compliance monitoring with enforcement of penalties for noncompliance. (J Am Acad Dermatol 2001;44:53-60.)</description><subject>Beauty Culture - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Beauty Culture - standards</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>California</subject><subject>Dermatology</subject><subject>Eye Protective Devices</subject><subject>Guideline Adherence</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Skin involvement in other diseases. Miscellaneous. General aspects</subject><subject>Skin Neoplasms - prevention & control</subject><subject>Ultraviolet Rays - adverse effects</subject><issn>0190-9622</issn><issn>1097-6787</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10EFrFDEUwPEgit1Wz94kIHib7ctkJpkcZatWKHhQ8RjeJG_WlExmTWaVfntTdtGTp3fIL4_Hn7FXArYClL6e7_22BRBbIQCUfMI2AoxulB70U7YBYaAxqm0v2GUp9wBgOqmfswshRDd0Wm_Y990yH2LA5Ij_DusPPpGnjJFj8rysuBKPtA8l4hqWxMcHHpJflsxXTCmkPZ_QhRjWQKW-8C-Y-E2g_fKCPZswFnp5nlfs24f3X3e3zd3nj5927-4aJ7VYG4nKKeNd38LYTj3RBDAgGSF7dKhQSSGmSbkWOnIDSulGDaMaTIejR9fKK_b2tPeQl59HKqudQ3EUIyZajsVq6DvTKV3h9Qm6vJSSabKHHGbMD1aAfWxpa0v72NKeWtYfr8-rj-NM_p8_x6vgzRlgcRinXCuG8tcNWvW9qsqcFNUMvwJlW1yg2tuHTG61fgn_PeEPvWOQAg</recordid><startdate>200101</startdate><enddate>200101</enddate><creator>Culley, Carla A.</creator><creator>Mayer, Joni A.</creator><creator>Eckhardt, Laura</creator><creator>Busic, April J.</creator><creator>Eichenfield, Lawrence F.</creator><creator>Sallis, James F.</creator><creator>Quintana, P.J.E.</creator><creator>Woodruff, Susan I.</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200101</creationdate><title>Compliance with federal and state legislation by indoor tanning facilities in San Diego</title><author>Culley, Carla A. ; Mayer, Joni A. ; Eckhardt, Laura ; Busic, April J. ; Eichenfield, Lawrence F. ; Sallis, James F. ; Quintana, P.J.E. ; Woodruff, Susan I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-3a6c69dc520b2f5eef008ae9135aca6a6311ff6c204ec8a33cb70b6894abdac23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Beauty Culture - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Beauty Culture - standards</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>California</topic><topic>Dermatology</topic><topic>Eye Protective Devices</topic><topic>Guideline Adherence</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Skin involvement in other diseases. Miscellaneous. General aspects</topic><topic>Skin Neoplasms - prevention & control</topic><topic>Ultraviolet Rays - adverse effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Culley, Carla A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayer, Joni A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eckhardt, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Busic, April J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eichenfield, Lawrence F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sallis, James F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quintana, P.J.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodruff, Susan I.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Culley, Carla A.</au><au>Mayer, Joni A.</au><au>Eckhardt, Laura</au><au>Busic, April J.</au><au>Eichenfield, Lawrence F.</au><au>Sallis, James F.</au><au>Quintana, P.J.E.</au><au>Woodruff, Susan I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Compliance with federal and state legislation by indoor tanning facilities in San Diego</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Acad Dermatol</addtitle><date>2001-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>53</spage><epage>60</epage><pages>53-60</pages><issn>0190-9622</issn><eissn>1097-6787</eissn><coden>JAADDB</coden><abstract>Background: The prevalence rates of both skin cancers and indoor tanning among the US population are high and have increased substantially in recent years. Low compliance by indoor tanning facilities with safety regulations may place consumers at greater risk of skin and ocular damage. Objective: This study quantified the level of compliance by indoor tanning facilities with selected federal and state regulations and recommendations. Methods: Tanning facilities (N = 54) in San Diego County, California, were visited by a confederate posing as a prospective customer. Compliance with 13 regulations/recommendations were assessed by either direct query or observation of the presence/absence of signs and warning labels. Operators' responses to 5 risk-based questions also were noted. Results: No facility complied with all 13 regulations/recommendations. Compliance with 3 protective eyewear regulations was high (89%-100%). In contrast, compliance with maximum tanning frequency recommendations (approximately 6%) and parental consent regulations (approximately 43%) was disturbingly low. Conclusion: The investigators recommend instituting mandatory, comprehensive training for operators, as well as systematic compliance monitoring with enforcement of penalties for noncompliance. (J Am Acad Dermatol 2001;44:53-60.)</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>11148477</pmid><doi>10.1067/mjd.2001.110063</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0190-9622 |
ispartof | Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2001-01, Vol.44 (1), p.53-60 |
issn | 0190-9622 1097-6787 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70549467 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Beauty Culture - legislation & jurisprudence Beauty Culture - standards Biological and medical sciences California Dermatology Eye Protective Devices Guideline Adherence Humans Medical sciences Observer Variation Skin involvement in other diseases. Miscellaneous. General aspects Skin Neoplasms - prevention & control Ultraviolet Rays - adverse effects |
title | Compliance with federal and state legislation by indoor tanning facilities in San Diego |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T18%3A12%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Compliance%20with%20federal%20and%20state%20legislation%20by%20indoor%20tanning%20facilities%20in%20San%20Diego&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Academy%20of%20Dermatology&rft.au=Culley,%20Carla%20A.&rft.date=2001-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=53&rft.epage=60&rft.pages=53-60&rft.issn=0190-9622&rft.eissn=1097-6787&rft.coden=JAADDB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1067/mjd.2001.110063&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70549467%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70549467&rft_id=info:pmid/11148477&rft_els_id=S0190962201927392&rfr_iscdi=true |