Compliance with federal and state legislation by indoor tanning facilities in San Diego

Background: The prevalence rates of both skin cancers and indoor tanning among the US population are high and have increased substantially in recent years. Low compliance by indoor tanning facilities with safety regulations may place consumers at greater risk of skin and ocular damage. Objective: Th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 2001-01, Vol.44 (1), p.53-60
Hauptverfasser: Culley, Carla A., Mayer, Joni A., Eckhardt, Laura, Busic, April J., Eichenfield, Lawrence F., Sallis, James F., Quintana, P.J.E., Woodruff, Susan I.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 60
container_issue 1
container_start_page 53
container_title Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
container_volume 44
creator Culley, Carla A.
Mayer, Joni A.
Eckhardt, Laura
Busic, April J.
Eichenfield, Lawrence F.
Sallis, James F.
Quintana, P.J.E.
Woodruff, Susan I.
description Background: The prevalence rates of both skin cancers and indoor tanning among the US population are high and have increased substantially in recent years. Low compliance by indoor tanning facilities with safety regulations may place consumers at greater risk of skin and ocular damage. Objective: This study quantified the level of compliance by indoor tanning facilities with selected federal and state regulations and recommendations. Methods: Tanning facilities (N = 54) in San Diego County, California, were visited by a confederate posing as a prospective customer. Compliance with 13 regulations/recommendations were assessed by either direct query or observation of the presence/absence of signs and warning labels. Operators' responses to 5 risk-based questions also were noted. Results: No facility complied with all 13 regulations/recommendations. Compliance with 3 protective eyewear regulations was high (89%-100%). In contrast, compliance with maximum tanning frequency recommendations (approximately 6%) and parental consent regulations (approximately 43%) was disturbingly low. Conclusion: The investigators recommend instituting mandatory, comprehensive training for operators, as well as systematic compliance monitoring with enforcement of penalties for noncompliance. (J Am Acad Dermatol 2001;44:53-60.)
doi_str_mv 10.1067/mjd.2001.110063
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70549467</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0190962201927392</els_id><sourcerecordid>70549467</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-3a6c69dc520b2f5eef008ae9135aca6a6311ff6c204ec8a33cb70b6894abdac23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10EFrFDEUwPEgit1Wz94kIHib7ctkJpkcZatWKHhQ8RjeJG_WlExmTWaVfntTdtGTp3fIL4_Hn7FXArYClL6e7_22BRBbIQCUfMI2AoxulB70U7YBYaAxqm0v2GUp9wBgOqmfswshRDd0Wm_Y990yH2LA5Ij_DusPPpGnjJFj8rysuBKPtA8l4hqWxMcHHpJflsxXTCmkPZ_QhRjWQKW-8C-Y-E2g_fKCPZswFnp5nlfs24f3X3e3zd3nj5927-4aJ7VYG4nKKeNd38LYTj3RBDAgGSF7dKhQSSGmSbkWOnIDSulGDaMaTIejR9fKK_b2tPeQl59HKqudQ3EUIyZajsVq6DvTKV3h9Qm6vJSSabKHHGbMD1aAfWxpa0v72NKeWtYfr8-rj-NM_p8_x6vgzRlgcRinXCuG8tcNWvW9qsqcFNUMvwJlW1yg2tuHTG61fgn_PeEPvWOQAg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70549467</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Compliance with federal and state legislation by indoor tanning facilities in San Diego</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Culley, Carla A. ; Mayer, Joni A. ; Eckhardt, Laura ; Busic, April J. ; Eichenfield, Lawrence F. ; Sallis, James F. ; Quintana, P.J.E. ; Woodruff, Susan I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Culley, Carla A. ; Mayer, Joni A. ; Eckhardt, Laura ; Busic, April J. ; Eichenfield, Lawrence F. ; Sallis, James F. ; Quintana, P.J.E. ; Woodruff, Susan I.</creatorcontrib><description>Background: The prevalence rates of both skin cancers and indoor tanning among the US population are high and have increased substantially in recent years. Low compliance by indoor tanning facilities with safety regulations may place consumers at greater risk of skin and ocular damage. Objective: This study quantified the level of compliance by indoor tanning facilities with selected federal and state regulations and recommendations. Methods: Tanning facilities (N = 54) in San Diego County, California, were visited by a confederate posing as a prospective customer. Compliance with 13 regulations/recommendations were assessed by either direct query or observation of the presence/absence of signs and warning labels. Operators' responses to 5 risk-based questions also were noted. Results: No facility complied with all 13 regulations/recommendations. Compliance with 3 protective eyewear regulations was high (89%-100%). In contrast, compliance with maximum tanning frequency recommendations (approximately 6%) and parental consent regulations (approximately 43%) was disturbingly low. Conclusion: The investigators recommend instituting mandatory, comprehensive training for operators, as well as systematic compliance monitoring with enforcement of penalties for noncompliance. (J Am Acad Dermatol 2001;44:53-60.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0190-9622</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6787</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1067/mjd.2001.110063</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11148477</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAADDB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Beauty Culture - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; Beauty Culture - standards ; Biological and medical sciences ; California ; Dermatology ; Eye Protective Devices ; Guideline Adherence ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Observer Variation ; Skin involvement in other diseases. Miscellaneous. General aspects ; Skin Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control ; Ultraviolet Rays - adverse effects</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2001-01, Vol.44 (1), p.53-60</ispartof><rights>2001 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-3a6c69dc520b2f5eef008ae9135aca6a6311ff6c204ec8a33cb70b6894abdac23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-3a6c69dc520b2f5eef008ae9135aca6a6311ff6c204ec8a33cb70b6894abdac23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190962201927392$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,4010,27900,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=876556$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11148477$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Culley, Carla A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayer, Joni A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eckhardt, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Busic, April J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eichenfield, Lawrence F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sallis, James F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quintana, P.J.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodruff, Susan I.</creatorcontrib><title>Compliance with federal and state legislation by indoor tanning facilities in San Diego</title><title>Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology</title><addtitle>J Am Acad Dermatol</addtitle><description>Background: The prevalence rates of both skin cancers and indoor tanning among the US population are high and have increased substantially in recent years. Low compliance by indoor tanning facilities with safety regulations may place consumers at greater risk of skin and ocular damage. Objective: This study quantified the level of compliance by indoor tanning facilities with selected federal and state regulations and recommendations. Methods: Tanning facilities (N = 54) in San Diego County, California, were visited by a confederate posing as a prospective customer. Compliance with 13 regulations/recommendations were assessed by either direct query or observation of the presence/absence of signs and warning labels. Operators' responses to 5 risk-based questions also were noted. Results: No facility complied with all 13 regulations/recommendations. Compliance with 3 protective eyewear regulations was high (89%-100%). In contrast, compliance with maximum tanning frequency recommendations (approximately 6%) and parental consent regulations (approximately 43%) was disturbingly low. Conclusion: The investigators recommend instituting mandatory, comprehensive training for operators, as well as systematic compliance monitoring with enforcement of penalties for noncompliance. (J Am Acad Dermatol 2001;44:53-60.)</description><subject>Beauty Culture - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Beauty Culture - standards</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>California</subject><subject>Dermatology</subject><subject>Eye Protective Devices</subject><subject>Guideline Adherence</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Skin involvement in other diseases. Miscellaneous. General aspects</subject><subject>Skin Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Ultraviolet Rays - adverse effects</subject><issn>0190-9622</issn><issn>1097-6787</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10EFrFDEUwPEgit1Wz94kIHib7ctkJpkcZatWKHhQ8RjeJG_WlExmTWaVfntTdtGTp3fIL4_Hn7FXArYClL6e7_22BRBbIQCUfMI2AoxulB70U7YBYaAxqm0v2GUp9wBgOqmfswshRDd0Wm_Y990yH2LA5Ij_DusPPpGnjJFj8rysuBKPtA8l4hqWxMcHHpJflsxXTCmkPZ_QhRjWQKW-8C-Y-E2g_fKCPZswFnp5nlfs24f3X3e3zd3nj5927-4aJ7VYG4nKKeNd38LYTj3RBDAgGSF7dKhQSSGmSbkWOnIDSulGDaMaTIejR9fKK_b2tPeQl59HKqudQ3EUIyZajsVq6DvTKV3h9Qm6vJSSabKHHGbMD1aAfWxpa0v72NKeWtYfr8-rj-NM_p8_x6vgzRlgcRinXCuG8tcNWvW9qsqcFNUMvwJlW1yg2tuHTG61fgn_PeEPvWOQAg</recordid><startdate>200101</startdate><enddate>200101</enddate><creator>Culley, Carla A.</creator><creator>Mayer, Joni A.</creator><creator>Eckhardt, Laura</creator><creator>Busic, April J.</creator><creator>Eichenfield, Lawrence F.</creator><creator>Sallis, James F.</creator><creator>Quintana, P.J.E.</creator><creator>Woodruff, Susan I.</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200101</creationdate><title>Compliance with federal and state legislation by indoor tanning facilities in San Diego</title><author>Culley, Carla A. ; Mayer, Joni A. ; Eckhardt, Laura ; Busic, April J. ; Eichenfield, Lawrence F. ; Sallis, James F. ; Quintana, P.J.E. ; Woodruff, Susan I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-3a6c69dc520b2f5eef008ae9135aca6a6311ff6c204ec8a33cb70b6894abdac23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Beauty Culture - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Beauty Culture - standards</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>California</topic><topic>Dermatology</topic><topic>Eye Protective Devices</topic><topic>Guideline Adherence</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Skin involvement in other diseases. Miscellaneous. General aspects</topic><topic>Skin Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Ultraviolet Rays - adverse effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Culley, Carla A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayer, Joni A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eckhardt, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Busic, April J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eichenfield, Lawrence F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sallis, James F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quintana, P.J.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodruff, Susan I.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Culley, Carla A.</au><au>Mayer, Joni A.</au><au>Eckhardt, Laura</au><au>Busic, April J.</au><au>Eichenfield, Lawrence F.</au><au>Sallis, James F.</au><au>Quintana, P.J.E.</au><au>Woodruff, Susan I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Compliance with federal and state legislation by indoor tanning facilities in San Diego</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Acad Dermatol</addtitle><date>2001-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>53</spage><epage>60</epage><pages>53-60</pages><issn>0190-9622</issn><eissn>1097-6787</eissn><coden>JAADDB</coden><abstract>Background: The prevalence rates of both skin cancers and indoor tanning among the US population are high and have increased substantially in recent years. Low compliance by indoor tanning facilities with safety regulations may place consumers at greater risk of skin and ocular damage. Objective: This study quantified the level of compliance by indoor tanning facilities with selected federal and state regulations and recommendations. Methods: Tanning facilities (N = 54) in San Diego County, California, were visited by a confederate posing as a prospective customer. Compliance with 13 regulations/recommendations were assessed by either direct query or observation of the presence/absence of signs and warning labels. Operators' responses to 5 risk-based questions also were noted. Results: No facility complied with all 13 regulations/recommendations. Compliance with 3 protective eyewear regulations was high (89%-100%). In contrast, compliance with maximum tanning frequency recommendations (approximately 6%) and parental consent regulations (approximately 43%) was disturbingly low. Conclusion: The investigators recommend instituting mandatory, comprehensive training for operators, as well as systematic compliance monitoring with enforcement of penalties for noncompliance. (J Am Acad Dermatol 2001;44:53-60.)</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>11148477</pmid><doi>10.1067/mjd.2001.110063</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0190-9622
ispartof Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2001-01, Vol.44 (1), p.53-60
issn 0190-9622
1097-6787
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70549467
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Beauty Culture - legislation & jurisprudence
Beauty Culture - standards
Biological and medical sciences
California
Dermatology
Eye Protective Devices
Guideline Adherence
Humans
Medical sciences
Observer Variation
Skin involvement in other diseases. Miscellaneous. General aspects
Skin Neoplasms - prevention & control
Ultraviolet Rays - adverse effects
title Compliance with federal and state legislation by indoor tanning facilities in San Diego
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T18%3A12%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Compliance%20with%20federal%20and%20state%20legislation%20by%20indoor%20tanning%20facilities%20in%20San%20Diego&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Academy%20of%20Dermatology&rft.au=Culley,%20Carla%20A.&rft.date=2001-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=53&rft.epage=60&rft.pages=53-60&rft.issn=0190-9622&rft.eissn=1097-6787&rft.coden=JAADDB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1067/mjd.2001.110063&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70549467%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70549467&rft_id=info:pmid/11148477&rft_els_id=S0190962201927392&rfr_iscdi=true