Performance of 2 microtiter canine Coombs' tests

Background: The Coombs' test, which detects immunoglobulin or complement on RBC surfaces, has long been the standard for laboratory confirmation of immune‐mediated hemolytic anemia (IMHA), a common cause of hemolytic anemia in the dog. This test, however, suffers from relatively low sensitivity...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Veterinary clinical pathology 2007-06, Vol.36 (2), p.179-183
Hauptverfasser: Overmann, J.A, Sharkey, L.C, Weiss, D.J, Borjesson, D.L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 183
container_issue 2
container_start_page 179
container_title Veterinary clinical pathology
container_volume 36
creator Overmann, J.A
Sharkey, L.C
Weiss, D.J
Borjesson, D.L
description Background: The Coombs' test, which detects immunoglobulin or complement on RBC surfaces, has long been the standard for laboratory confirmation of immune‐mediated hemolytic anemia (IMHA), a common cause of hemolytic anemia in the dog. This test, however, suffers from relatively low sensitivity. Optimization of test sensitivity would lead to fewer discrepancies between laboratory results and clinical diagnoses, and in some cases institution of appropriate therapy in a timely manner. Objectives: The objectives of this study were to 1) characterize the sensitivity and specificity of 2 canine Coombs' tests for the detection of IMHA, 2) document the efficacy of using multiple antisera dilutions beyond what is directed by manufacturers, and 3) evaluate the necessity of monovalent antisera in the test protocol. Methods: Sixty‐five canine whole‐blood samples submitted for Coombs' testing were evaluated. Patients were classified as IMHA positive or negative based on a set of predetermined criteria. IMHA classification was compared to Coombs' test results from 2 different Coombs' tests adapted to a microtiter‐plate format. One Coombs' test (VMRD Coombs' test) utilized a single polyvalent antiserum (VMRD, Inc, Pullman, WA, USA), while a second Coombs' test (University of Minnesota [U of MN] Coombs' test) used both polyvalent and monovalent antisera. Results: Sensitivity and specificity were 61% and 100% for the VMRD Coombs' test, and 82% and 95% for the U of MN Coombs' test. The use of multiple antisera dilutions resulted in 6 additional Coombs' positive test results. All positive Coombs' test results were positive by polyvalent antisera. Conclusions: When used in a microtiter‐plate format, the U of MN Coombs' test was a more sensitive test for the detection of IMHA in canine patients when compared to the VMRD Coombs' test. The use of multiple antisera dilutions increased test sensitivity. Sensitivity, however, was not increased by the use of monovalent antisera in the Coombs' test protocol.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1939-165X.2007.tb00205.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70544215</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70544215</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4349-d36d54480582458a7b7846818bb56dc03406dea0389ab6078212f1128be83afe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkF1P2zAUQC00BKXjL2zRHsZTsutvZw9IqNoKUsXQSoG3KydxUErTgJ1q5d_jKhU8zy-W7ONzrUPINwoZjevHMqM5z1Oq5EPGAHTWFwAMZLY9IKP3q09kBEzLVHHDjslJCEsALuPRETmmWjIOORsRuHG-7nxr16VLujphSduUvuub3vmktOtm7ZJJ17VFOEt6F_rwmRzWdhXc6X4fk8XvX7eTy3T2Z3o1uZilpeAiTyuuKimEAWmYkMbqQhuhDDVFIVVVAhegKmeBm9wWCrRhlNWUMlM4w23t-Jh8H7zPvnvZxMnYNqF0q5Vdu24TUEPUMyoj-HMA47dD8K7GZ9-01r8iBdz1wiXuouAuCu564b4XbuPjL_spm6J11cfTfaAInA_Av2blXv9DjXeTG6rzKEgHQRN6t30XWP-ESnMt8f56iqD-CnWXz3EW-a8DX9sO7aNvAi7mDCgHiDGZAP4GCBCQqw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70544215</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Performance of 2 microtiter canine Coombs' tests</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Overmann, J.A ; Sharkey, L.C ; Weiss, D.J ; Borjesson, D.L</creator><creatorcontrib>Overmann, J.A ; Sharkey, L.C ; Weiss, D.J ; Borjesson, D.L</creatorcontrib><description>Background: The Coombs' test, which detects immunoglobulin or complement on RBC surfaces, has long been the standard for laboratory confirmation of immune‐mediated hemolytic anemia (IMHA), a common cause of hemolytic anemia in the dog. This test, however, suffers from relatively low sensitivity. Optimization of test sensitivity would lead to fewer discrepancies between laboratory results and clinical diagnoses, and in some cases institution of appropriate therapy in a timely manner. Objectives: The objectives of this study were to 1) characterize the sensitivity and specificity of 2 canine Coombs' tests for the detection of IMHA, 2) document the efficacy of using multiple antisera dilutions beyond what is directed by manufacturers, and 3) evaluate the necessity of monovalent antisera in the test protocol. Methods: Sixty‐five canine whole‐blood samples submitted for Coombs' testing were evaluated. Patients were classified as IMHA positive or negative based on a set of predetermined criteria. IMHA classification was compared to Coombs' test results from 2 different Coombs' tests adapted to a microtiter‐plate format. One Coombs' test (VMRD Coombs' test) utilized a single polyvalent antiserum (VMRD, Inc, Pullman, WA, USA), while a second Coombs' test (University of Minnesota [U of MN] Coombs' test) used both polyvalent and monovalent antisera. Results: Sensitivity and specificity were 61% and 100% for the VMRD Coombs' test, and 82% and 95% for the U of MN Coombs' test. The use of multiple antisera dilutions resulted in 6 additional Coombs' positive test results. All positive Coombs' test results were positive by polyvalent antisera. Conclusions: When used in a microtiter‐plate format, the U of MN Coombs' test was a more sensitive test for the detection of IMHA in canine patients when compared to the VMRD Coombs' test. The use of multiple antisera dilutions increased test sensitivity. Sensitivity, however, was not increased by the use of monovalent antisera in the Coombs' test protocol.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0275-6382</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-165X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-165X.2007.tb00205.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17523092</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Anemia, Hemolytic, Autoimmune - blood ; Anemia, Hemolytic, Autoimmune - diagnosis ; Anemia, Hemolytic, Autoimmune - veterinary ; Animals ; antiserum ; biomarkers ; Coombs Test - methods ; Coombs Test - veterinary ; Coombs' test ; detection ; diagnostic techniques ; dog ; dog diseases ; Dog Diseases - blood ; Dog Diseases - diagnosis ; Dogs ; hemolytic anemia ; immune-mediated hemolytic anemia ; microtitration ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; serodiagnosis ; test sensitivity ; test specificity ; titration</subject><ispartof>Veterinary clinical pathology, 2007-06, Vol.36 (2), p.179-183</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4349-d36d54480582458a7b7846818bb56dc03406dea0389ab6078212f1128be83afe3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4349-d36d54480582458a7b7846818bb56dc03406dea0389ab6078212f1128be83afe3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1939-165X.2007.tb00205.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1939-165X.2007.tb00205.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27922,27923,45572,45573</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17523092$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Overmann, J.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharkey, L.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiss, D.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borjesson, D.L</creatorcontrib><title>Performance of 2 microtiter canine Coombs' tests</title><title>Veterinary clinical pathology</title><addtitle>Vet Clin Pathol</addtitle><description>Background: The Coombs' test, which detects immunoglobulin or complement on RBC surfaces, has long been the standard for laboratory confirmation of immune‐mediated hemolytic anemia (IMHA), a common cause of hemolytic anemia in the dog. This test, however, suffers from relatively low sensitivity. Optimization of test sensitivity would lead to fewer discrepancies between laboratory results and clinical diagnoses, and in some cases institution of appropriate therapy in a timely manner. Objectives: The objectives of this study were to 1) characterize the sensitivity and specificity of 2 canine Coombs' tests for the detection of IMHA, 2) document the efficacy of using multiple antisera dilutions beyond what is directed by manufacturers, and 3) evaluate the necessity of monovalent antisera in the test protocol. Methods: Sixty‐five canine whole‐blood samples submitted for Coombs' testing were evaluated. Patients were classified as IMHA positive or negative based on a set of predetermined criteria. IMHA classification was compared to Coombs' test results from 2 different Coombs' tests adapted to a microtiter‐plate format. One Coombs' test (VMRD Coombs' test) utilized a single polyvalent antiserum (VMRD, Inc, Pullman, WA, USA), while a second Coombs' test (University of Minnesota [U of MN] Coombs' test) used both polyvalent and monovalent antisera. Results: Sensitivity and specificity were 61% and 100% for the VMRD Coombs' test, and 82% and 95% for the U of MN Coombs' test. The use of multiple antisera dilutions resulted in 6 additional Coombs' positive test results. All positive Coombs' test results were positive by polyvalent antisera. Conclusions: When used in a microtiter‐plate format, the U of MN Coombs' test was a more sensitive test for the detection of IMHA in canine patients when compared to the VMRD Coombs' test. The use of multiple antisera dilutions increased test sensitivity. Sensitivity, however, was not increased by the use of monovalent antisera in the Coombs' test protocol.</description><subject>Anemia, Hemolytic, Autoimmune - blood</subject><subject>Anemia, Hemolytic, Autoimmune - diagnosis</subject><subject>Anemia, Hemolytic, Autoimmune - veterinary</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>antiserum</subject><subject>biomarkers</subject><subject>Coombs Test - methods</subject><subject>Coombs Test - veterinary</subject><subject>Coombs' test</subject><subject>detection</subject><subject>diagnostic techniques</subject><subject>dog</subject><subject>dog diseases</subject><subject>Dog Diseases - blood</subject><subject>Dog Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>hemolytic anemia</subject><subject>immune-mediated hemolytic anemia</subject><subject>microtitration</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>serodiagnosis</subject><subject>test sensitivity</subject><subject>test specificity</subject><subject>titration</subject><issn>0275-6382</issn><issn>1939-165X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkF1P2zAUQC00BKXjL2zRHsZTsutvZw9IqNoKUsXQSoG3KydxUErTgJ1q5d_jKhU8zy-W7ONzrUPINwoZjevHMqM5z1Oq5EPGAHTWFwAMZLY9IKP3q09kBEzLVHHDjslJCEsALuPRETmmWjIOORsRuHG-7nxr16VLujphSduUvuub3vmktOtm7ZJJ17VFOEt6F_rwmRzWdhXc6X4fk8XvX7eTy3T2Z3o1uZilpeAiTyuuKimEAWmYkMbqQhuhDDVFIVVVAhegKmeBm9wWCrRhlNWUMlM4w23t-Jh8H7zPvnvZxMnYNqF0q5Vdu24TUEPUMyoj-HMA47dD8K7GZ9-01r8iBdz1wiXuouAuCu564b4XbuPjL_spm6J11cfTfaAInA_Av2blXv9DjXeTG6rzKEgHQRN6t30XWP-ESnMt8f56iqD-CnWXz3EW-a8DX9sO7aNvAi7mDCgHiDGZAP4GCBCQqw</recordid><startdate>200706</startdate><enddate>200706</enddate><creator>Overmann, J.A</creator><creator>Sharkey, L.C</creator><creator>Weiss, D.J</creator><creator>Borjesson, D.L</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200706</creationdate><title>Performance of 2 microtiter canine Coombs' tests</title><author>Overmann, J.A ; Sharkey, L.C ; Weiss, D.J ; Borjesson, D.L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4349-d36d54480582458a7b7846818bb56dc03406dea0389ab6078212f1128be83afe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Anemia, Hemolytic, Autoimmune - blood</topic><topic>Anemia, Hemolytic, Autoimmune - diagnosis</topic><topic>Anemia, Hemolytic, Autoimmune - veterinary</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>antiserum</topic><topic>biomarkers</topic><topic>Coombs Test - methods</topic><topic>Coombs Test - veterinary</topic><topic>Coombs' test</topic><topic>detection</topic><topic>diagnostic techniques</topic><topic>dog</topic><topic>dog diseases</topic><topic>Dog Diseases - blood</topic><topic>Dog Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>hemolytic anemia</topic><topic>immune-mediated hemolytic anemia</topic><topic>microtitration</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>serodiagnosis</topic><topic>test sensitivity</topic><topic>test specificity</topic><topic>titration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Overmann, J.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharkey, L.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiss, D.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borjesson, D.L</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Veterinary clinical pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Overmann, J.A</au><au>Sharkey, L.C</au><au>Weiss, D.J</au><au>Borjesson, D.L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Performance of 2 microtiter canine Coombs' tests</atitle><jtitle>Veterinary clinical pathology</jtitle><addtitle>Vet Clin Pathol</addtitle><date>2007-06</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>179</spage><epage>183</epage><pages>179-183</pages><issn>0275-6382</issn><eissn>1939-165X</eissn><abstract>Background: The Coombs' test, which detects immunoglobulin or complement on RBC surfaces, has long been the standard for laboratory confirmation of immune‐mediated hemolytic anemia (IMHA), a common cause of hemolytic anemia in the dog. This test, however, suffers from relatively low sensitivity. Optimization of test sensitivity would lead to fewer discrepancies between laboratory results and clinical diagnoses, and in some cases institution of appropriate therapy in a timely manner. Objectives: The objectives of this study were to 1) characterize the sensitivity and specificity of 2 canine Coombs' tests for the detection of IMHA, 2) document the efficacy of using multiple antisera dilutions beyond what is directed by manufacturers, and 3) evaluate the necessity of monovalent antisera in the test protocol. Methods: Sixty‐five canine whole‐blood samples submitted for Coombs' testing were evaluated. Patients were classified as IMHA positive or negative based on a set of predetermined criteria. IMHA classification was compared to Coombs' test results from 2 different Coombs' tests adapted to a microtiter‐plate format. One Coombs' test (VMRD Coombs' test) utilized a single polyvalent antiserum (VMRD, Inc, Pullman, WA, USA), while a second Coombs' test (University of Minnesota [U of MN] Coombs' test) used both polyvalent and monovalent antisera. Results: Sensitivity and specificity were 61% and 100% for the VMRD Coombs' test, and 82% and 95% for the U of MN Coombs' test. The use of multiple antisera dilutions resulted in 6 additional Coombs' positive test results. All positive Coombs' test results were positive by polyvalent antisera. Conclusions: When used in a microtiter‐plate format, the U of MN Coombs' test was a more sensitive test for the detection of IMHA in canine patients when compared to the VMRD Coombs' test. The use of multiple antisera dilutions increased test sensitivity. Sensitivity, however, was not increased by the use of monovalent antisera in the Coombs' test protocol.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>17523092</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1939-165X.2007.tb00205.x</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0275-6382
ispartof Veterinary clinical pathology, 2007-06, Vol.36 (2), p.179-183
issn 0275-6382
1939-165X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70544215
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Anemia, Hemolytic, Autoimmune - blood
Anemia, Hemolytic, Autoimmune - diagnosis
Anemia, Hemolytic, Autoimmune - veterinary
Animals
antiserum
biomarkers
Coombs Test - methods
Coombs Test - veterinary
Coombs' test
detection
diagnostic techniques
dog
dog diseases
Dog Diseases - blood
Dog Diseases - diagnosis
Dogs
hemolytic anemia
immune-mediated hemolytic anemia
microtitration
Sensitivity and Specificity
serodiagnosis
test sensitivity
test specificity
titration
title Performance of 2 microtiter canine Coombs' tests
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T17%3A39%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Performance%20of%202%20microtiter%20canine%20Coombs'%20tests&rft.jtitle=Veterinary%20clinical%20pathology&rft.au=Overmann,%20J.A&rft.date=2007-06&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=179&rft.epage=183&rft.pages=179-183&rft.issn=0275-6382&rft.eissn=1939-165X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1939-165X.2007.tb00205.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70544215%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70544215&rft_id=info:pmid/17523092&rfr_iscdi=true