Performance of 2 microtiter canine Coombs' tests
Background: The Coombs' test, which detects immunoglobulin or complement on RBC surfaces, has long been the standard for laboratory confirmation of immune‐mediated hemolytic anemia (IMHA), a common cause of hemolytic anemia in the dog. This test, however, suffers from relatively low sensitivity...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Veterinary clinical pathology 2007-06, Vol.36 (2), p.179-183 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 183 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 179 |
container_title | Veterinary clinical pathology |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Overmann, J.A Sharkey, L.C Weiss, D.J Borjesson, D.L |
description | Background: The Coombs' test, which detects immunoglobulin or complement on RBC surfaces, has long been the standard for laboratory confirmation of immune‐mediated hemolytic anemia (IMHA), a common cause of hemolytic anemia in the dog. This test, however, suffers from relatively low sensitivity. Optimization of test sensitivity would lead to fewer discrepancies between laboratory results and clinical diagnoses, and in some cases institution of appropriate therapy in a timely manner. Objectives: The objectives of this study were to 1) characterize the sensitivity and specificity of 2 canine Coombs' tests for the detection of IMHA, 2) document the efficacy of using multiple antisera dilutions beyond what is directed by manufacturers, and 3) evaluate the necessity of monovalent antisera in the test protocol. Methods: Sixty‐five canine whole‐blood samples submitted for Coombs' testing were evaluated. Patients were classified as IMHA positive or negative based on a set of predetermined criteria. IMHA classification was compared to Coombs' test results from 2 different Coombs' tests adapted to a microtiter‐plate format. One Coombs' test (VMRD Coombs' test) utilized a single polyvalent antiserum (VMRD, Inc, Pullman, WA, USA), while a second Coombs' test (University of Minnesota [U of MN] Coombs' test) used both polyvalent and monovalent antisera. Results: Sensitivity and specificity were 61% and 100% for the VMRD Coombs' test, and 82% and 95% for the U of MN Coombs' test. The use of multiple antisera dilutions resulted in 6 additional Coombs' positive test results. All positive Coombs' test results were positive by polyvalent antisera. Conclusions: When used in a microtiter‐plate format, the U of MN Coombs' test was a more sensitive test for the detection of IMHA in canine patients when compared to the VMRD Coombs' test. The use of multiple antisera dilutions increased test sensitivity. Sensitivity, however, was not increased by the use of monovalent antisera in the Coombs' test protocol. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1939-165X.2007.tb00205.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70544215</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70544215</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4349-d36d54480582458a7b7846818bb56dc03406dea0389ab6078212f1128be83afe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkF1P2zAUQC00BKXjL2zRHsZTsutvZw9IqNoKUsXQSoG3KydxUErTgJ1q5d_jKhU8zy-W7ONzrUPINwoZjevHMqM5z1Oq5EPGAHTWFwAMZLY9IKP3q09kBEzLVHHDjslJCEsALuPRETmmWjIOORsRuHG-7nxr16VLujphSduUvuub3vmktOtm7ZJJ17VFOEt6F_rwmRzWdhXc6X4fk8XvX7eTy3T2Z3o1uZilpeAiTyuuKimEAWmYkMbqQhuhDDVFIVVVAhegKmeBm9wWCrRhlNWUMlM4w23t-Jh8H7zPvnvZxMnYNqF0q5Vdu24TUEPUMyoj-HMA47dD8K7GZ9-01r8iBdz1wiXuouAuCu564b4XbuPjL_spm6J11cfTfaAInA_Av2blXv9DjXeTG6rzKEgHQRN6t30XWP-ESnMt8f56iqD-CnWXz3EW-a8DX9sO7aNvAi7mDCgHiDGZAP4GCBCQqw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70544215</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Performance of 2 microtiter canine Coombs' tests</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Overmann, J.A ; Sharkey, L.C ; Weiss, D.J ; Borjesson, D.L</creator><creatorcontrib>Overmann, J.A ; Sharkey, L.C ; Weiss, D.J ; Borjesson, D.L</creatorcontrib><description>Background: The Coombs' test, which detects immunoglobulin or complement on RBC surfaces, has long been the standard for laboratory confirmation of immune‐mediated hemolytic anemia (IMHA), a common cause of hemolytic anemia in the dog. This test, however, suffers from relatively low sensitivity. Optimization of test sensitivity would lead to fewer discrepancies between laboratory results and clinical diagnoses, and in some cases institution of appropriate therapy in a timely manner. Objectives: The objectives of this study were to 1) characterize the sensitivity and specificity of 2 canine Coombs' tests for the detection of IMHA, 2) document the efficacy of using multiple antisera dilutions beyond what is directed by manufacturers, and 3) evaluate the necessity of monovalent antisera in the test protocol. Methods: Sixty‐five canine whole‐blood samples submitted for Coombs' testing were evaluated. Patients were classified as IMHA positive or negative based on a set of predetermined criteria. IMHA classification was compared to Coombs' test results from 2 different Coombs' tests adapted to a microtiter‐plate format. One Coombs' test (VMRD Coombs' test) utilized a single polyvalent antiserum (VMRD, Inc, Pullman, WA, USA), while a second Coombs' test (University of Minnesota [U of MN] Coombs' test) used both polyvalent and monovalent antisera. Results: Sensitivity and specificity were 61% and 100% for the VMRD Coombs' test, and 82% and 95% for the U of MN Coombs' test. The use of multiple antisera dilutions resulted in 6 additional Coombs' positive test results. All positive Coombs' test results were positive by polyvalent antisera. Conclusions: When used in a microtiter‐plate format, the U of MN Coombs' test was a more sensitive test for the detection of IMHA in canine patients when compared to the VMRD Coombs' test. The use of multiple antisera dilutions increased test sensitivity. Sensitivity, however, was not increased by the use of monovalent antisera in the Coombs' test protocol.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0275-6382</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-165X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-165X.2007.tb00205.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17523092</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Anemia, Hemolytic, Autoimmune - blood ; Anemia, Hemolytic, Autoimmune - diagnosis ; Anemia, Hemolytic, Autoimmune - veterinary ; Animals ; antiserum ; biomarkers ; Coombs Test - methods ; Coombs Test - veterinary ; Coombs' test ; detection ; diagnostic techniques ; dog ; dog diseases ; Dog Diseases - blood ; Dog Diseases - diagnosis ; Dogs ; hemolytic anemia ; immune-mediated hemolytic anemia ; microtitration ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; serodiagnosis ; test sensitivity ; test specificity ; titration</subject><ispartof>Veterinary clinical pathology, 2007-06, Vol.36 (2), p.179-183</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4349-d36d54480582458a7b7846818bb56dc03406dea0389ab6078212f1128be83afe3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4349-d36d54480582458a7b7846818bb56dc03406dea0389ab6078212f1128be83afe3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1939-165X.2007.tb00205.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1939-165X.2007.tb00205.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27922,27923,45572,45573</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17523092$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Overmann, J.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharkey, L.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiss, D.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borjesson, D.L</creatorcontrib><title>Performance of 2 microtiter canine Coombs' tests</title><title>Veterinary clinical pathology</title><addtitle>Vet Clin Pathol</addtitle><description>Background: The Coombs' test, which detects immunoglobulin or complement on RBC surfaces, has long been the standard for laboratory confirmation of immune‐mediated hemolytic anemia (IMHA), a common cause of hemolytic anemia in the dog. This test, however, suffers from relatively low sensitivity. Optimization of test sensitivity would lead to fewer discrepancies between laboratory results and clinical diagnoses, and in some cases institution of appropriate therapy in a timely manner. Objectives: The objectives of this study were to 1) characterize the sensitivity and specificity of 2 canine Coombs' tests for the detection of IMHA, 2) document the efficacy of using multiple antisera dilutions beyond what is directed by manufacturers, and 3) evaluate the necessity of monovalent antisera in the test protocol. Methods: Sixty‐five canine whole‐blood samples submitted for Coombs' testing were evaluated. Patients were classified as IMHA positive or negative based on a set of predetermined criteria. IMHA classification was compared to Coombs' test results from 2 different Coombs' tests adapted to a microtiter‐plate format. One Coombs' test (VMRD Coombs' test) utilized a single polyvalent antiserum (VMRD, Inc, Pullman, WA, USA), while a second Coombs' test (University of Minnesota [U of MN] Coombs' test) used both polyvalent and monovalent antisera. Results: Sensitivity and specificity were 61% and 100% for the VMRD Coombs' test, and 82% and 95% for the U of MN Coombs' test. The use of multiple antisera dilutions resulted in 6 additional Coombs' positive test results. All positive Coombs' test results were positive by polyvalent antisera. Conclusions: When used in a microtiter‐plate format, the U of MN Coombs' test was a more sensitive test for the detection of IMHA in canine patients when compared to the VMRD Coombs' test. The use of multiple antisera dilutions increased test sensitivity. Sensitivity, however, was not increased by the use of monovalent antisera in the Coombs' test protocol.</description><subject>Anemia, Hemolytic, Autoimmune - blood</subject><subject>Anemia, Hemolytic, Autoimmune - diagnosis</subject><subject>Anemia, Hemolytic, Autoimmune - veterinary</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>antiserum</subject><subject>biomarkers</subject><subject>Coombs Test - methods</subject><subject>Coombs Test - veterinary</subject><subject>Coombs' test</subject><subject>detection</subject><subject>diagnostic techniques</subject><subject>dog</subject><subject>dog diseases</subject><subject>Dog Diseases - blood</subject><subject>Dog Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>hemolytic anemia</subject><subject>immune-mediated hemolytic anemia</subject><subject>microtitration</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>serodiagnosis</subject><subject>test sensitivity</subject><subject>test specificity</subject><subject>titration</subject><issn>0275-6382</issn><issn>1939-165X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkF1P2zAUQC00BKXjL2zRHsZTsutvZw9IqNoKUsXQSoG3KydxUErTgJ1q5d_jKhU8zy-W7ONzrUPINwoZjevHMqM5z1Oq5EPGAHTWFwAMZLY9IKP3q09kBEzLVHHDjslJCEsALuPRETmmWjIOORsRuHG-7nxr16VLujphSduUvuub3vmktOtm7ZJJ17VFOEt6F_rwmRzWdhXc6X4fk8XvX7eTy3T2Z3o1uZilpeAiTyuuKimEAWmYkMbqQhuhDDVFIVVVAhegKmeBm9wWCrRhlNWUMlM4w23t-Jh8H7zPvnvZxMnYNqF0q5Vdu24TUEPUMyoj-HMA47dD8K7GZ9-01r8iBdz1wiXuouAuCu564b4XbuPjL_spm6J11cfTfaAInA_Av2blXv9DjXeTG6rzKEgHQRN6t30XWP-ESnMt8f56iqD-CnWXz3EW-a8DX9sO7aNvAi7mDCgHiDGZAP4GCBCQqw</recordid><startdate>200706</startdate><enddate>200706</enddate><creator>Overmann, J.A</creator><creator>Sharkey, L.C</creator><creator>Weiss, D.J</creator><creator>Borjesson, D.L</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200706</creationdate><title>Performance of 2 microtiter canine Coombs' tests</title><author>Overmann, J.A ; Sharkey, L.C ; Weiss, D.J ; Borjesson, D.L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4349-d36d54480582458a7b7846818bb56dc03406dea0389ab6078212f1128be83afe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Anemia, Hemolytic, Autoimmune - blood</topic><topic>Anemia, Hemolytic, Autoimmune - diagnosis</topic><topic>Anemia, Hemolytic, Autoimmune - veterinary</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>antiserum</topic><topic>biomarkers</topic><topic>Coombs Test - methods</topic><topic>Coombs Test - veterinary</topic><topic>Coombs' test</topic><topic>detection</topic><topic>diagnostic techniques</topic><topic>dog</topic><topic>dog diseases</topic><topic>Dog Diseases - blood</topic><topic>Dog Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>hemolytic anemia</topic><topic>immune-mediated hemolytic anemia</topic><topic>microtitration</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>serodiagnosis</topic><topic>test sensitivity</topic><topic>test specificity</topic><topic>titration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Overmann, J.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharkey, L.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiss, D.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borjesson, D.L</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Veterinary clinical pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Overmann, J.A</au><au>Sharkey, L.C</au><au>Weiss, D.J</au><au>Borjesson, D.L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Performance of 2 microtiter canine Coombs' tests</atitle><jtitle>Veterinary clinical pathology</jtitle><addtitle>Vet Clin Pathol</addtitle><date>2007-06</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>179</spage><epage>183</epage><pages>179-183</pages><issn>0275-6382</issn><eissn>1939-165X</eissn><abstract>Background: The Coombs' test, which detects immunoglobulin or complement on RBC surfaces, has long been the standard for laboratory confirmation of immune‐mediated hemolytic anemia (IMHA), a common cause of hemolytic anemia in the dog. This test, however, suffers from relatively low sensitivity. Optimization of test sensitivity would lead to fewer discrepancies between laboratory results and clinical diagnoses, and in some cases institution of appropriate therapy in a timely manner. Objectives: The objectives of this study were to 1) characterize the sensitivity and specificity of 2 canine Coombs' tests for the detection of IMHA, 2) document the efficacy of using multiple antisera dilutions beyond what is directed by manufacturers, and 3) evaluate the necessity of monovalent antisera in the test protocol. Methods: Sixty‐five canine whole‐blood samples submitted for Coombs' testing were evaluated. Patients were classified as IMHA positive or negative based on a set of predetermined criteria. IMHA classification was compared to Coombs' test results from 2 different Coombs' tests adapted to a microtiter‐plate format. One Coombs' test (VMRD Coombs' test) utilized a single polyvalent antiserum (VMRD, Inc, Pullman, WA, USA), while a second Coombs' test (University of Minnesota [U of MN] Coombs' test) used both polyvalent and monovalent antisera. Results: Sensitivity and specificity were 61% and 100% for the VMRD Coombs' test, and 82% and 95% for the U of MN Coombs' test. The use of multiple antisera dilutions resulted in 6 additional Coombs' positive test results. All positive Coombs' test results were positive by polyvalent antisera. Conclusions: When used in a microtiter‐plate format, the U of MN Coombs' test was a more sensitive test for the detection of IMHA in canine patients when compared to the VMRD Coombs' test. The use of multiple antisera dilutions increased test sensitivity. Sensitivity, however, was not increased by the use of monovalent antisera in the Coombs' test protocol.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>17523092</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1939-165X.2007.tb00205.x</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0275-6382 |
ispartof | Veterinary clinical pathology, 2007-06, Vol.36 (2), p.179-183 |
issn | 0275-6382 1939-165X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70544215 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Anemia, Hemolytic, Autoimmune - blood Anemia, Hemolytic, Autoimmune - diagnosis Anemia, Hemolytic, Autoimmune - veterinary Animals antiserum biomarkers Coombs Test - methods Coombs Test - veterinary Coombs' test detection diagnostic techniques dog dog diseases Dog Diseases - blood Dog Diseases - diagnosis Dogs hemolytic anemia immune-mediated hemolytic anemia microtitration Sensitivity and Specificity serodiagnosis test sensitivity test specificity titration |
title | Performance of 2 microtiter canine Coombs' tests |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T17%3A39%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Performance%20of%202%20microtiter%20canine%20Coombs'%20tests&rft.jtitle=Veterinary%20clinical%20pathology&rft.au=Overmann,%20J.A&rft.date=2007-06&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=179&rft.epage=183&rft.pages=179-183&rft.issn=0275-6382&rft.eissn=1939-165X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1939-165X.2007.tb00205.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70544215%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70544215&rft_id=info:pmid/17523092&rfr_iscdi=true |