Estimating Species Phylogeny from Gene-Tree Probabilities Despite Incomplete Lineage Sorting: An Example from Melanoplus Grasshoppers

Estimating phylogenetic relationships among closely related species can be extremely difficult when there is incongruence among gene trees and between the gene trees and the species tree. Here we show that incorporating a model of the stochastic loss of gene lineages by genetic drift into the phylog...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Systematic biology 2007-06, Vol.56 (3), p.400-411
Hauptverfasser: Carstens, Bryan C., Knowles, L. Lacey, Collins, Tim
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 411
container_issue 3
container_start_page 400
container_title Systematic biology
container_volume 56
creator Carstens, Bryan C.
Knowles, L. Lacey
Collins, Tim
description Estimating phylogenetic relationships among closely related species can be extremely difficult when there is incongruence among gene trees and between the gene trees and the species tree. Here we show that incorporating a model of the stochastic loss of gene lineages by genetic drift into the phylogenetic estimation procedure can provide a robust estimate of species relationships, despite widespread incomplete sorting of ancestral polymorphism. This approach is applied to a group of montane Melanoplus grasshoppers for which genealogical discordance among loci and incomplete lineage sorting obscures any obvious phylogenetic relationships among species. Unlike traditional treatments where gene trees estimated using standard phylogenetic methods are implicitly equated with the species tree, with the coalescent-based approach the species tree is modeled probabilistically from the estimated gene trees. The estimated species phylogeny (the ESP) is calculated for the grasshoppers from multiple gene trees reconstructed for nuclear loci and a mitochondrial gene. This empirical application is coupled with a simulation study to explore the performance of the coalescent-based approach. Specifically, we test the accuracy of the ESP given the data based on analyses of simulated data matching the multilocus data collected in Melanoplus (i.e., data were simulated for each locus with the same number of base pairs and locus-specific mutational models). The results of the study show that ESPs can be computed using the coalescent-based approach long before reciprocal monophyly has been achieved, and that these statistical estimates are accurate. This contrasts with analyses of the empirical data collected in Melanoplus and simulated data based on concatenation of multiple loci, for which the incomplete lineage sorting of recently diverged species posed significant problems. The strengths and potential challenges associated with incorporating an explicit model of gene-lineage coalescence into the phylogenetic procedure to obtain an ESP, as illustrated by application to Melanoplus, versus concatenation and consensus approaches are discussed. This study represents a fundamental shift in how species relationships are estimated—the relationship between the gene trees and the species phylogeny is modeled probabilistically rather than equating gene trees with a species tree.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/10635150701405560
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70521701</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>20143046</jstor_id><oup_id>10.1080/10635150701405560</oup_id><sourcerecordid>20143046</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-ccc5bec30227577d6fab05c115efaee52ef80f32bc57d483ff2d1a52dc2786b13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUFv1DAQhSMEomXhB3AAWRw4EfDYsR24VWW7LSyiqEVUvViOM9lmm8TBTqTuD-B_4yirIsGF04z0vvc0mpckz4G-BZrTd0AlFyCoopBRISR9kBwCVTLNubx6OO2SpxFQB8mTELaUAkgBj5MDUIJRQbPD5NcyDHVrhrrbkIsebY2BnN_sGrfBbkcq71qywg7TS49Izr0rTFE39TBhHzH09YDkrLOu7RuM67ru0GyQXDg_JX4gRx1Z3plJnbO-YGM61zdjICtvQrhxfY8-PE0eVaYJ-Gw_F8n3k-Xl8Wm6_ro6Oz5apzaj2ZBaa0WBllPGlFCqlJUpqLAAAiuDKBhWOa04K6xQZZbzqmIlGMFKy1QuC-CL5PWc23v3c8Qw6LYOFpt4FLoxaEUFg_jNCL76C9y60XfxNg3vM5UzFeMXCcyQ9S4Ej5Xuffyl32mgeipI_1NQ9LzcB49Fi-Ufx76RCLyZATf2_5X3Ysa3YXD-3sAiwGkmo57Oeh0GvLvXjb_VUnEl9OnVtYZP1_IbnPzQn_lvZuiyBg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>194782748</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Estimating Species Phylogeny from Gene-Tree Probabilities Despite Incomplete Lineage Sorting: An Example from Melanoplus Grasshoppers</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Carstens, Bryan C. ; Knowles, L. Lacey ; Collins, Tim</creator><contributor>Collins, Tim</contributor><creatorcontrib>Carstens, Bryan C. ; Knowles, L. Lacey ; Collins, Tim ; Collins, Tim</creatorcontrib><description>Estimating phylogenetic relationships among closely related species can be extremely difficult when there is incongruence among gene trees and between the gene trees and the species tree. Here we show that incorporating a model of the stochastic loss of gene lineages by genetic drift into the phylogenetic estimation procedure can provide a robust estimate of species relationships, despite widespread incomplete sorting of ancestral polymorphism. This approach is applied to a group of montane Melanoplus grasshoppers for which genealogical discordance among loci and incomplete lineage sorting obscures any obvious phylogenetic relationships among species. Unlike traditional treatments where gene trees estimated using standard phylogenetic methods are implicitly equated with the species tree, with the coalescent-based approach the species tree is modeled probabilistically from the estimated gene trees. The estimated species phylogeny (the ESP) is calculated for the grasshoppers from multiple gene trees reconstructed for nuclear loci and a mitochondrial gene. This empirical application is coupled with a simulation study to explore the performance of the coalescent-based approach. Specifically, we test the accuracy of the ESP given the data based on analyses of simulated data matching the multilocus data collected in Melanoplus (i.e., data were simulated for each locus with the same number of base pairs and locus-specific mutational models). The results of the study show that ESPs can be computed using the coalescent-based approach long before reciprocal monophyly has been achieved, and that these statistical estimates are accurate. This contrasts with analyses of the empirical data collected in Melanoplus and simulated data based on concatenation of multiple loci, for which the incomplete lineage sorting of recently diverged species posed significant problems. The strengths and potential challenges associated with incorporating an explicit model of gene-lineage coalescence into the phylogenetic procedure to obtain an ESP, as illustrated by application to Melanoplus, versus concatenation and consensus approaches are discussed. This study represents a fundamental shift in how species relationships are estimated—the relationship between the gene trees and the species phylogeny is modeled probabilistically rather than equating gene trees with a species tree.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1063-5157</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1076-836X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10635150701405560</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17520504</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Society of Systematic Zoology</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Animals ; Biological taxonomies ; Coalescent ; Computer Simulation ; Datasets ; Estimate reliability ; Evolution ; gene trees ; Genetic loci ; Genetic Speciation ; Genetic Variation ; Grasshoppers ; Grasshoppers - classification ; Grasshoppers - genetics ; incomplete lineage sorting ; Likelihood Functions ; Models, Genetic ; Monophyly ; Phylogenetics ; Phylogeny ; Probability ; Software packages ; species phylogeny ; Species Specificity ; Topology ; Trees</subject><ispartof>Systematic biology, 2007-06, Vol.56 (3), p.400-411</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2007 Society of Systematic Biologists</rights><rights>2007 Society of Systematic Biologists 2007</rights><rights>Copyright Society of Systematic Biologists Jun 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-ccc5bec30227577d6fab05c115efaee52ef80f32bc57d483ff2d1a52dc2786b13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-ccc5bec30227577d6fab05c115efaee52ef80f32bc57d483ff2d1a52dc2786b13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20143046$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/20143046$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17520504$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Collins, Tim</contributor><creatorcontrib>Carstens, Bryan C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knowles, L. Lacey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, Tim</creatorcontrib><title>Estimating Species Phylogeny from Gene-Tree Probabilities Despite Incomplete Lineage Sorting: An Example from Melanoplus Grasshoppers</title><title>Systematic biology</title><addtitle>Syst Biol</addtitle><description>Estimating phylogenetic relationships among closely related species can be extremely difficult when there is incongruence among gene trees and between the gene trees and the species tree. Here we show that incorporating a model of the stochastic loss of gene lineages by genetic drift into the phylogenetic estimation procedure can provide a robust estimate of species relationships, despite widespread incomplete sorting of ancestral polymorphism. This approach is applied to a group of montane Melanoplus grasshoppers for which genealogical discordance among loci and incomplete lineage sorting obscures any obvious phylogenetic relationships among species. Unlike traditional treatments where gene trees estimated using standard phylogenetic methods are implicitly equated with the species tree, with the coalescent-based approach the species tree is modeled probabilistically from the estimated gene trees. The estimated species phylogeny (the ESP) is calculated for the grasshoppers from multiple gene trees reconstructed for nuclear loci and a mitochondrial gene. This empirical application is coupled with a simulation study to explore the performance of the coalescent-based approach. Specifically, we test the accuracy of the ESP given the data based on analyses of simulated data matching the multilocus data collected in Melanoplus (i.e., data were simulated for each locus with the same number of base pairs and locus-specific mutational models). The results of the study show that ESPs can be computed using the coalescent-based approach long before reciprocal monophyly has been achieved, and that these statistical estimates are accurate. This contrasts with analyses of the empirical data collected in Melanoplus and simulated data based on concatenation of multiple loci, for which the incomplete lineage sorting of recently diverged species posed significant problems. The strengths and potential challenges associated with incorporating an explicit model of gene-lineage coalescence into the phylogenetic procedure to obtain an ESP, as illustrated by application to Melanoplus, versus concatenation and consensus approaches are discussed. This study represents a fundamental shift in how species relationships are estimated—the relationship between the gene trees and the species phylogeny is modeled probabilistically rather than equating gene trees with a species tree.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological taxonomies</subject><subject>Coalescent</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Estimate reliability</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>gene trees</subject><subject>Genetic loci</subject><subject>Genetic Speciation</subject><subject>Genetic Variation</subject><subject>Grasshoppers</subject><subject>Grasshoppers - classification</subject><subject>Grasshoppers - genetics</subject><subject>incomplete lineage sorting</subject><subject>Likelihood Functions</subject><subject>Models, Genetic</subject><subject>Monophyly</subject><subject>Phylogenetics</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Software packages</subject><subject>species phylogeny</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><subject>Topology</subject><subject>Trees</subject><issn>1063-5157</issn><issn>1076-836X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUFv1DAQhSMEomXhB3AAWRw4EfDYsR24VWW7LSyiqEVUvViOM9lmm8TBTqTuD-B_4yirIsGF04z0vvc0mpckz4G-BZrTd0AlFyCoopBRISR9kBwCVTLNubx6OO2SpxFQB8mTELaUAkgBj5MDUIJRQbPD5NcyDHVrhrrbkIsebY2BnN_sGrfBbkcq71qywg7TS49Izr0rTFE39TBhHzH09YDkrLOu7RuM67ru0GyQXDg_JX4gRx1Z3plJnbO-YGM61zdjICtvQrhxfY8-PE0eVaYJ-Gw_F8n3k-Xl8Wm6_ro6Oz5apzaj2ZBaa0WBllPGlFCqlJUpqLAAAiuDKBhWOa04K6xQZZbzqmIlGMFKy1QuC-CL5PWc23v3c8Qw6LYOFpt4FLoxaEUFg_jNCL76C9y60XfxNg3vM5UzFeMXCcyQ9S4Ej5Xuffyl32mgeipI_1NQ9LzcB49Fi-Ufx76RCLyZATf2_5X3Ysa3YXD-3sAiwGkmo57Oeh0GvLvXjb_VUnEl9OnVtYZP1_IbnPzQn_lvZuiyBg</recordid><startdate>200706</startdate><enddate>200706</enddate><creator>Carstens, Bryan C.</creator><creator>Knowles, L. Lacey</creator><creator>Collins, Tim</creator><general>Society of Systematic Zoology</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200706</creationdate><title>Estimating Species Phylogeny from Gene-Tree Probabilities Despite Incomplete Lineage Sorting: An Example from Melanoplus Grasshoppers</title><author>Carstens, Bryan C. ; Knowles, L. Lacey ; Collins, Tim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-ccc5bec30227577d6fab05c115efaee52ef80f32bc57d483ff2d1a52dc2786b13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological taxonomies</topic><topic>Coalescent</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Estimate reliability</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>gene trees</topic><topic>Genetic loci</topic><topic>Genetic Speciation</topic><topic>Genetic Variation</topic><topic>Grasshoppers</topic><topic>Grasshoppers - classification</topic><topic>Grasshoppers - genetics</topic><topic>incomplete lineage sorting</topic><topic>Likelihood Functions</topic><topic>Models, Genetic</topic><topic>Monophyly</topic><topic>Phylogenetics</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Software packages</topic><topic>species phylogeny</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><topic>Topology</topic><topic>Trees</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carstens, Bryan C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knowles, L. Lacey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, Tim</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Systematic biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carstens, Bryan C.</au><au>Knowles, L. Lacey</au><au>Collins, Tim</au><au>Collins, Tim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Estimating Species Phylogeny from Gene-Tree Probabilities Despite Incomplete Lineage Sorting: An Example from Melanoplus Grasshoppers</atitle><jtitle>Systematic biology</jtitle><addtitle>Syst Biol</addtitle><date>2007-06</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>400</spage><epage>411</epage><pages>400-411</pages><issn>1063-5157</issn><eissn>1076-836X</eissn><abstract>Estimating phylogenetic relationships among closely related species can be extremely difficult when there is incongruence among gene trees and between the gene trees and the species tree. Here we show that incorporating a model of the stochastic loss of gene lineages by genetic drift into the phylogenetic estimation procedure can provide a robust estimate of species relationships, despite widespread incomplete sorting of ancestral polymorphism. This approach is applied to a group of montane Melanoplus grasshoppers for which genealogical discordance among loci and incomplete lineage sorting obscures any obvious phylogenetic relationships among species. Unlike traditional treatments where gene trees estimated using standard phylogenetic methods are implicitly equated with the species tree, with the coalescent-based approach the species tree is modeled probabilistically from the estimated gene trees. The estimated species phylogeny (the ESP) is calculated for the grasshoppers from multiple gene trees reconstructed for nuclear loci and a mitochondrial gene. This empirical application is coupled with a simulation study to explore the performance of the coalescent-based approach. Specifically, we test the accuracy of the ESP given the data based on analyses of simulated data matching the multilocus data collected in Melanoplus (i.e., data were simulated for each locus with the same number of base pairs and locus-specific mutational models). The results of the study show that ESPs can be computed using the coalescent-based approach long before reciprocal monophyly has been achieved, and that these statistical estimates are accurate. This contrasts with analyses of the empirical data collected in Melanoplus and simulated data based on concatenation of multiple loci, for which the incomplete lineage sorting of recently diverged species posed significant problems. The strengths and potential challenges associated with incorporating an explicit model of gene-lineage coalescence into the phylogenetic procedure to obtain an ESP, as illustrated by application to Melanoplus, versus concatenation and consensus approaches are discussed. This study represents a fundamental shift in how species relationships are estimated—the relationship between the gene trees and the species phylogeny is modeled probabilistically rather than equating gene trees with a species tree.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Society of Systematic Zoology</pub><pmid>17520504</pmid><doi>10.1080/10635150701405560</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1063-5157
ispartof Systematic biology, 2007-06, Vol.56 (3), p.400-411
issn 1063-5157
1076-836X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70521701
source MEDLINE; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Accuracy
Animals
Biological taxonomies
Coalescent
Computer Simulation
Datasets
Estimate reliability
Evolution
gene trees
Genetic loci
Genetic Speciation
Genetic Variation
Grasshoppers
Grasshoppers - classification
Grasshoppers - genetics
incomplete lineage sorting
Likelihood Functions
Models, Genetic
Monophyly
Phylogenetics
Phylogeny
Probability
Software packages
species phylogeny
Species Specificity
Topology
Trees
title Estimating Species Phylogeny from Gene-Tree Probabilities Despite Incomplete Lineage Sorting: An Example from Melanoplus Grasshoppers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T02%3A49%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Estimating%20Species%20Phylogeny%20from%20Gene-Tree%20Probabilities%20Despite%20Incomplete%20Lineage%20Sorting:%20An%20Example%20from%20Melanoplus%20Grasshoppers&rft.jtitle=Systematic%20biology&rft.au=Carstens,%20Bryan%20C.&rft.date=2007-06&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=400&rft.epage=411&rft.pages=400-411&rft.issn=1063-5157&rft.eissn=1076-836X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10635150701405560&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E20143046%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=194782748&rft_id=info:pmid/17520504&rft_jstor_id=20143046&rft_oup_id=10.1080/10635150701405560&rfr_iscdi=true