Appropriate utilization of hospital beds in internal medicine: evaluation in a tertiary care hospital

Aim  To assess the appropriateness of utilization of beds in the internal medicine department of a university hospital. Methods  The appropriateness of hospital stay was evaluated using the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol. A random sample of 402 days of stay was assessed. Results  One hundred an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of evaluation in clinical practice 2007-06, Vol.13 (3), p.408-411
Hauptverfasser: Dizdar, Ömer, Karadağ, Ömer, Kalyoncu, Umut, Kurt, Mevlüt, Ülger, Zekeriya, Şardan, Yeşm Çetinkaya, Ünal, Serhat
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 411
container_issue 3
container_start_page 408
container_title Journal of evaluation in clinical practice
container_volume 13
creator Dizdar, Ömer
Karadağ, Ömer
Kalyoncu, Umut
Kurt, Mevlüt
Ülger, Zekeriya
Şardan, Yeşm Çetinkaya
Ünal, Serhat
description Aim  To assess the appropriateness of utilization of beds in the internal medicine department of a university hospital. Methods  The appropriateness of hospital stay was evaluated using the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol. A random sample of 402 days of stay was assessed. Results  One hundred and thirty‐nine days of stay (34.6%) were classified as inappropriate. The inappropriate stays were mostly secondary to hospital‐related factors. The two major factors for inappropriate stays were ‘inappropriate timing/delay in diagnostic procedures/consultations’ (27%) and ‘delay in obtaining test results’ (27%). None of the factors including age, gender, residence and inpatient period was significantly related to inappropriate stay in univariate analysis. Conclusion  This study indicated that a significant portion of stays were inappropriate. Efforts to decrease particularly hospital‐related factors associated with inappropriate stay are needed.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00724.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70516699</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70516699</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4044-5e1b797166787bb89c3e8d58f660cba30ab34813a6e5db50d70508fe1c83d2443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEtr3DAURkVpaB7NXwhadWfnynq6dBNCnoQ8ICGQjZDta6Kpx55adjvJr68cD9NthUAX6XxX0iGEMkhZHMeLlHElk0xLnmYAKgXQmUjXn8je9uDzVEuVsCwXu2Q_hAUA4yD1F7LLtGTGgN4jeLJa9d2q925AOg6-8e9u8F1Lu5q-dmHlB9fQAqtAfRvngH0bN5ZY-dK3-J3ib9eMcyICjkZg8K5_o6XrcdvhK9mpXRPwcLMekKfzs8fTy-Tm7uLq9OQmKQUIkUhkhc41U0obXRQmLzmaSppaKSgLx8EVXBjGnUJZFRIqDRJMjaw0vMqE4Afk29w3_unXiGGwSx9KbBrXYjcGG_nYPM8jaGaw7LsQeqxtVLCM77YM7KTYLuxk0k4m7aTYfii26xg92twxFtHDv-DGaQR-zMAf3-Dbfze212f3sYjxZI77MOB6G3f9T6s019I-317Y85eHB52L3AL_CyWEmf0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70516699</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Appropriate utilization of hospital beds in internal medicine: evaluation in a tertiary care hospital</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Dizdar, Ömer ; Karadağ, Ömer ; Kalyoncu, Umut ; Kurt, Mevlüt ; Ülger, Zekeriya ; Şardan, Yeşm Çetinkaya ; Ünal, Serhat</creator><creatorcontrib>Dizdar, Ömer ; Karadağ, Ömer ; Kalyoncu, Umut ; Kurt, Mevlüt ; Ülger, Zekeriya ; Şardan, Yeşm Çetinkaya ; Ünal, Serhat</creatorcontrib><description>Aim  To assess the appropriateness of utilization of beds in the internal medicine department of a university hospital. Methods  The appropriateness of hospital stay was evaluated using the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol. A random sample of 402 days of stay was assessed. Results  One hundred and thirty‐nine days of stay (34.6%) were classified as inappropriate. The inappropriate stays were mostly secondary to hospital‐related factors. The two major factors for inappropriate stays were ‘inappropriate timing/delay in diagnostic procedures/consultations’ (27%) and ‘delay in obtaining test results’ (27%). None of the factors including age, gender, residence and inpatient period was significantly related to inappropriate stay in univariate analysis. Conclusion  This study indicated that a significant portion of stays were inappropriate. Efforts to decrease particularly hospital‐related factors associated with inappropriate stay are needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1356-1294</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2753</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00724.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17518807</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Efficiency, Organizational ; Female ; Hospital Bed Capacity ; Hospitals, University ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Turkey ; university hospital</subject><ispartof>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2007-06, Vol.13 (3), p.408-411</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4044-5e1b797166787bb89c3e8d58f660cba30ab34813a6e5db50d70508fe1c83d2443</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4044-5e1b797166787bb89c3e8d58f660cba30ab34813a6e5db50d70508fe1c83d2443</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2006.00724.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2753.2006.00724.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17518807$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dizdar, Ömer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karadağ, Ömer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalyoncu, Umut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurt, Mevlüt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ülger, Zekeriya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Şardan, Yeşm Çetinkaya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ünal, Serhat</creatorcontrib><title>Appropriate utilization of hospital beds in internal medicine: evaluation in a tertiary care hospital</title><title>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice</title><addtitle>J Eval Clin Pract</addtitle><description>Aim  To assess the appropriateness of utilization of beds in the internal medicine department of a university hospital. Methods  The appropriateness of hospital stay was evaluated using the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol. A random sample of 402 days of stay was assessed. Results  One hundred and thirty‐nine days of stay (34.6%) were classified as inappropriate. The inappropriate stays were mostly secondary to hospital‐related factors. The two major factors for inappropriate stays were ‘inappropriate timing/delay in diagnostic procedures/consultations’ (27%) and ‘delay in obtaining test results’ (27%). None of the factors including age, gender, residence and inpatient period was significantly related to inappropriate stay in univariate analysis. Conclusion  This study indicated that a significant portion of stays were inappropriate. Efforts to decrease particularly hospital‐related factors associated with inappropriate stay are needed.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Efficiency, Organizational</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospital Bed Capacity</subject><subject>Hospitals, University</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Turkey</subject><subject>university hospital</subject><issn>1356-1294</issn><issn>1365-2753</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEtr3DAURkVpaB7NXwhadWfnynq6dBNCnoQ8ICGQjZDta6Kpx55adjvJr68cD9NthUAX6XxX0iGEMkhZHMeLlHElk0xLnmYAKgXQmUjXn8je9uDzVEuVsCwXu2Q_hAUA4yD1F7LLtGTGgN4jeLJa9d2q925AOg6-8e9u8F1Lu5q-dmHlB9fQAqtAfRvngH0bN5ZY-dK3-J3ib9eMcyICjkZg8K5_o6XrcdvhK9mpXRPwcLMekKfzs8fTy-Tm7uLq9OQmKQUIkUhkhc41U0obXRQmLzmaSppaKSgLx8EVXBjGnUJZFRIqDRJMjaw0vMqE4Afk29w3_unXiGGwSx9KbBrXYjcGG_nYPM8jaGaw7LsQeqxtVLCM77YM7KTYLuxk0k4m7aTYfii26xg92twxFtHDv-DGaQR-zMAf3-Dbfze212f3sYjxZI77MOB6G3f9T6s019I-317Y85eHB52L3AL_CyWEmf0</recordid><startdate>200706</startdate><enddate>200706</enddate><creator>Dizdar, Ömer</creator><creator>Karadağ, Ömer</creator><creator>Kalyoncu, Umut</creator><creator>Kurt, Mevlüt</creator><creator>Ülger, Zekeriya</creator><creator>Şardan, Yeşm Çetinkaya</creator><creator>Ünal, Serhat</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200706</creationdate><title>Appropriate utilization of hospital beds in internal medicine: evaluation in a tertiary care hospital</title><author>Dizdar, Ömer ; Karadağ, Ömer ; Kalyoncu, Umut ; Kurt, Mevlüt ; Ülger, Zekeriya ; Şardan, Yeşm Çetinkaya ; Ünal, Serhat</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4044-5e1b797166787bb89c3e8d58f660cba30ab34813a6e5db50d70508fe1c83d2443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Efficiency, Organizational</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospital Bed Capacity</topic><topic>Hospitals, University</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Turkey</topic><topic>university hospital</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dizdar, Ömer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karadağ, Ömer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalyoncu, Umut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurt, Mevlüt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ülger, Zekeriya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Şardan, Yeşm Çetinkaya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ünal, Serhat</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dizdar, Ömer</au><au>Karadağ, Ömer</au><au>Kalyoncu, Umut</au><au>Kurt, Mevlüt</au><au>Ülger, Zekeriya</au><au>Şardan, Yeşm Çetinkaya</au><au>Ünal, Serhat</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Appropriate utilization of hospital beds in internal medicine: evaluation in a tertiary care hospital</atitle><jtitle>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice</jtitle><addtitle>J Eval Clin Pract</addtitle><date>2007-06</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>408</spage><epage>411</epage><pages>408-411</pages><issn>1356-1294</issn><eissn>1365-2753</eissn><abstract>Aim  To assess the appropriateness of utilization of beds in the internal medicine department of a university hospital. Methods  The appropriateness of hospital stay was evaluated using the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol. A random sample of 402 days of stay was assessed. Results  One hundred and thirty‐nine days of stay (34.6%) were classified as inappropriate. The inappropriate stays were mostly secondary to hospital‐related factors. The two major factors for inappropriate stays were ‘inappropriate timing/delay in diagnostic procedures/consultations’ (27%) and ‘delay in obtaining test results’ (27%). None of the factors including age, gender, residence and inpatient period was significantly related to inappropriate stay in univariate analysis. Conclusion  This study indicated that a significant portion of stays were inappropriate. Efforts to decrease particularly hospital‐related factors associated with inappropriate stay are needed.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>17518807</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00724.x</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1356-1294
ispartof Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2007-06, Vol.13 (3), p.408-411
issn 1356-1294
1365-2753
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70516699
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol
Cross-Sectional Studies
Efficiency, Organizational
Female
Hospital Bed Capacity
Hospitals, University
Humans
Internal Medicine
Male
Middle Aged
Turkey
university hospital
title Appropriate utilization of hospital beds in internal medicine: evaluation in a tertiary care hospital
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T09%3A22%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Appropriate%20utilization%20of%20hospital%20beds%20in%20internal%20medicine:%20evaluation%20in%20a%20tertiary%20care%20hospital&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20evaluation%20in%20clinical%20practice&rft.au=Dizdar,%20%C3%96mer&rft.date=2007-06&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=408&rft.epage=411&rft.pages=408-411&rft.issn=1356-1294&rft.eissn=1365-2753&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00724.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70516699%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70516699&rft_id=info:pmid/17518807&rfr_iscdi=true