SF-36 PCS benefit-cost ratio of lumbar fusion comparison to other surgical interventions: a thought experiment

A retrospective review of prospectively collected data. To review systematically the SF-36 PCS outcomes of a large data set, including several randomized clinical trials for lumbar spine fusion at 1 and 2 years after surgery. We also present for comparison a review of typical changes in SF-36 PCS in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976) Pa. 1976), 2007-05, Vol.32 (11 Suppl), p.S20-S26
Hauptverfasser: Polly, Jr, David W, Glassman, Steven D, Schwender, James D, Shaffrey, Christopher I, Branch, Charles, Burkus, J Kenneth, Gornet, Matthew F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page S26
container_issue 11 Suppl
container_start_page S20
container_title Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)
container_volume 32
creator Polly, Jr, David W
Glassman, Steven D
Schwender, James D
Shaffrey, Christopher I
Branch, Charles
Burkus, J Kenneth
Gornet, Matthew F
description A retrospective review of prospectively collected data. To review systematically the SF-36 PCS outcomes of a large data set, including several randomized clinical trials for lumbar spine fusion at 1 and 2 years after surgery. We also present for comparison a review of typical changes in SF-36 PCS in other surgical interventions (total knee replacement, total hip replacement, and coronary artery bypass surgery) to define the average reimbursement costs per PCS improvement with each of these interventions. Data from 11 prospective multicenter studies (9 Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption, Randomized Prospective Clinical Trials, class 1 data) accounted for the lumbar spine fusion group (n = 1826). Data for total knee replacement, total hip replacement, and coronary artery bypass surgery were obtained from a comprehensive review of the literature. Comparisons of SF-36 PCS improvements were made at defined postoperative time points and with published study findings of other medical conditions. Reimbursement estimates (not including estimated physician and rehabilitation fees) for each surgical intervention were based on Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Medicare Provider Analysis and Review and All Payer Data (2002). Cost estimates were calculated for a minimal clinical important improvement (reimbursement dollars/mean PCS change *5.42 point PCS improvement). SF-36 PCS significantly improved at both 1 and 2 years following lumbar spine fusion surgery (P < 0.0001), and was comparable to the control surgical outcomes. With the use of data from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Medicare Provider Analysis and Review and All Payer Data, hospital reimbursement averaged $15.2-18.2K for lumbar spine fusion, $9.8-11.3K for total knee replacement, $9.6-11.3K for total hip replacement, and $9.8-11.3K for coronary artery bypass surgery. Calculations of reimbursement dollars to elicit minimum clinically important change in PCS of 5.42 points following surgery ranged from $6.1 to $7.3K for lumbar spine fusion, $5.7 to $6.6K for total knee arthroplasty, $3.9 to $4.5K for total hip replacement, and $18.2 to $22.5K for coronary artery bypass surgery. While the exact numbers may vary for each treatment based on the population studied and the cost estimates used, lumbar fusion cost per benefit achieved was very comparable to other well-accepted medical interventions (total hip replacement, total knee replacement, and coronary artery by
doi_str_mv 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318053d4e5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70508065</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70508065</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-41bdef0b4404d6980185fb0242aa2989ed5ab542b5e8dda98f0f2ea8cf0cf8e03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkMtKxDAUhoMoznh5A5Gs3FVPbp3UnQ7eYEBxdF2S9mSm0jZjkoq-vRUHBFfnh__C4SPkhME5g2J2cf28PAcLTKBgGpSoJaodMmWK64wxVeySKYicZ1yKfEIOYnwDgFywYp9M2EwWSmk-Jf3yNhM5fZovqcUeXZOyysdEg0mNp97RduisCdQNsfE9rXy3MaGJo0yjndYYaBzCqqlMS5s-YfjAfmz28ZIamtZ-WK0Txc8NhqYbnSOy50wb8Xh7D8nr7c3L_D5bPN49zK8WWcWVTJlktkYHVkqQdV5oYFo5C1xyY3ihC6yVsUpyq1DXtSm0A8fR6MpB5TSCOCRnv7ub4N8HjKnsmlhh25oe_RDLGSjQkKsxKH-DVfAxBnTlZvzUhK-SQfnDuRw5l_85j7XT7f5gO6z_Sluw4hvDc3vz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70508065</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>SF-36 PCS benefit-cost ratio of lumbar fusion comparison to other surgical interventions: a thought experiment</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Polly, Jr, David W ; Glassman, Steven D ; Schwender, James D ; Shaffrey, Christopher I ; Branch, Charles ; Burkus, J Kenneth ; Gornet, Matthew F</creator><creatorcontrib>Polly, Jr, David W ; Glassman, Steven D ; Schwender, James D ; Shaffrey, Christopher I ; Branch, Charles ; Burkus, J Kenneth ; Gornet, Matthew F ; Lumbar Spine Study Group</creatorcontrib><description>A retrospective review of prospectively collected data. To review systematically the SF-36 PCS outcomes of a large data set, including several randomized clinical trials for lumbar spine fusion at 1 and 2 years after surgery. We also present for comparison a review of typical changes in SF-36 PCS in other surgical interventions (total knee replacement, total hip replacement, and coronary artery bypass surgery) to define the average reimbursement costs per PCS improvement with each of these interventions. Data from 11 prospective multicenter studies (9 Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption, Randomized Prospective Clinical Trials, class 1 data) accounted for the lumbar spine fusion group (n = 1826). Data for total knee replacement, total hip replacement, and coronary artery bypass surgery were obtained from a comprehensive review of the literature. Comparisons of SF-36 PCS improvements were made at defined postoperative time points and with published study findings of other medical conditions. Reimbursement estimates (not including estimated physician and rehabilitation fees) for each surgical intervention were based on Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Medicare Provider Analysis and Review and All Payer Data (2002). Cost estimates were calculated for a minimal clinical important improvement (reimbursement dollars/mean PCS change *5.42 point PCS improvement). SF-36 PCS significantly improved at both 1 and 2 years following lumbar spine fusion surgery (P &lt; 0.0001), and was comparable to the control surgical outcomes. With the use of data from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Medicare Provider Analysis and Review and All Payer Data, hospital reimbursement averaged $15.2-18.2K for lumbar spine fusion, $9.8-11.3K for total knee replacement, $9.6-11.3K for total hip replacement, and $9.8-11.3K for coronary artery bypass surgery. Calculations of reimbursement dollars to elicit minimum clinically important change in PCS of 5.42 points following surgery ranged from $6.1 to $7.3K for lumbar spine fusion, $5.7 to $6.6K for total knee arthroplasty, $3.9 to $4.5K for total hip replacement, and $18.2 to $22.5K for coronary artery bypass surgery. While the exact numbers may vary for each treatment based on the population studied and the cost estimates used, lumbar fusion cost per benefit achieved was very comparable to other well-accepted medical interventions (total hip replacement, total knee replacement, and coronary artery bypass surgery).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0362-2436</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1159</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318053d4e5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17495582</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - economics ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - economics ; Coronary Artery Bypass - economics ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Humans ; Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery ; Multicenter Studies as Topic - economics ; Prospective Studies ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - economics ; Retrospective Studies ; Spinal Fusion - economics</subject><ispartof>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 2007-05, Vol.32 (11 Suppl), p.S20-S26</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-41bdef0b4404d6980185fb0242aa2989ed5ab542b5e8dda98f0f2ea8cf0cf8e03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17495582$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Polly, Jr, David W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glassman, Steven D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwender, James D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaffrey, Christopher I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Branch, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burkus, J Kenneth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gornet, Matthew F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lumbar Spine Study Group</creatorcontrib><title>SF-36 PCS benefit-cost ratio of lumbar fusion comparison to other surgical interventions: a thought experiment</title><title>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)</title><addtitle>Spine (Phila Pa 1976)</addtitle><description>A retrospective review of prospectively collected data. To review systematically the SF-36 PCS outcomes of a large data set, including several randomized clinical trials for lumbar spine fusion at 1 and 2 years after surgery. We also present for comparison a review of typical changes in SF-36 PCS in other surgical interventions (total knee replacement, total hip replacement, and coronary artery bypass surgery) to define the average reimbursement costs per PCS improvement with each of these interventions. Data from 11 prospective multicenter studies (9 Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption, Randomized Prospective Clinical Trials, class 1 data) accounted for the lumbar spine fusion group (n = 1826). Data for total knee replacement, total hip replacement, and coronary artery bypass surgery were obtained from a comprehensive review of the literature. Comparisons of SF-36 PCS improvements were made at defined postoperative time points and with published study findings of other medical conditions. Reimbursement estimates (not including estimated physician and rehabilitation fees) for each surgical intervention were based on Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Medicare Provider Analysis and Review and All Payer Data (2002). Cost estimates were calculated for a minimal clinical important improvement (reimbursement dollars/mean PCS change *5.42 point PCS improvement). SF-36 PCS significantly improved at both 1 and 2 years following lumbar spine fusion surgery (P &lt; 0.0001), and was comparable to the control surgical outcomes. With the use of data from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Medicare Provider Analysis and Review and All Payer Data, hospital reimbursement averaged $15.2-18.2K for lumbar spine fusion, $9.8-11.3K for total knee replacement, $9.6-11.3K for total hip replacement, and $9.8-11.3K for coronary artery bypass surgery. Calculations of reimbursement dollars to elicit minimum clinically important change in PCS of 5.42 points following surgery ranged from $6.1 to $7.3K for lumbar spine fusion, $5.7 to $6.6K for total knee arthroplasty, $3.9 to $4.5K for total hip replacement, and $18.2 to $22.5K for coronary artery bypass surgery. While the exact numbers may vary for each treatment based on the population studied and the cost estimates used, lumbar fusion cost per benefit achieved was very comparable to other well-accepted medical interventions (total hip replacement, total knee replacement, and coronary artery bypass surgery).</description><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - economics</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - economics</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Bypass - economics</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery</subject><subject>Multicenter Studies as Topic - economics</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - economics</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Spinal Fusion - economics</subject><issn>0362-2436</issn><issn>1528-1159</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkMtKxDAUhoMoznh5A5Gs3FVPbp3UnQ7eYEBxdF2S9mSm0jZjkoq-vRUHBFfnh__C4SPkhME5g2J2cf28PAcLTKBgGpSoJaodMmWK64wxVeySKYicZ1yKfEIOYnwDgFywYp9M2EwWSmk-Jf3yNhM5fZovqcUeXZOyysdEg0mNp97RduisCdQNsfE9rXy3MaGJo0yjndYYaBzCqqlMS5s-YfjAfmz28ZIamtZ-WK0Txc8NhqYbnSOy50wb8Xh7D8nr7c3L_D5bPN49zK8WWcWVTJlktkYHVkqQdV5oYFo5C1xyY3ihC6yVsUpyq1DXtSm0A8fR6MpB5TSCOCRnv7ub4N8HjKnsmlhh25oe_RDLGSjQkKsxKH-DVfAxBnTlZvzUhK-SQfnDuRw5l_85j7XT7f5gO6z_Sluw4hvDc3vz</recordid><startdate>20070515</startdate><enddate>20070515</enddate><creator>Polly, Jr, David W</creator><creator>Glassman, Steven D</creator><creator>Schwender, James D</creator><creator>Shaffrey, Christopher I</creator><creator>Branch, Charles</creator><creator>Burkus, J Kenneth</creator><creator>Gornet, Matthew F</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070515</creationdate><title>SF-36 PCS benefit-cost ratio of lumbar fusion comparison to other surgical interventions: a thought experiment</title><author>Polly, Jr, David W ; Glassman, Steven D ; Schwender, James D ; Shaffrey, Christopher I ; Branch, Charles ; Burkus, J Kenneth ; Gornet, Matthew F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-41bdef0b4404d6980185fb0242aa2989ed5ab542b5e8dda98f0f2ea8cf0cf8e03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - economics</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - economics</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Bypass - economics</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery</topic><topic>Multicenter Studies as Topic - economics</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - economics</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Spinal Fusion - economics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Polly, Jr, David W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glassman, Steven D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwender, James D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaffrey, Christopher I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Branch, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burkus, J Kenneth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gornet, Matthew F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lumbar Spine Study Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Polly, Jr, David W</au><au>Glassman, Steven D</au><au>Schwender, James D</au><au>Shaffrey, Christopher I</au><au>Branch, Charles</au><au>Burkus, J Kenneth</au><au>Gornet, Matthew F</au><aucorp>Lumbar Spine Study Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>SF-36 PCS benefit-cost ratio of lumbar fusion comparison to other surgical interventions: a thought experiment</atitle><jtitle>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)</jtitle><addtitle>Spine (Phila Pa 1976)</addtitle><date>2007-05-15</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>11 Suppl</issue><spage>S20</spage><epage>S26</epage><pages>S20-S26</pages><issn>0362-2436</issn><eissn>1528-1159</eissn><abstract>A retrospective review of prospectively collected data. To review systematically the SF-36 PCS outcomes of a large data set, including several randomized clinical trials for lumbar spine fusion at 1 and 2 years after surgery. We also present for comparison a review of typical changes in SF-36 PCS in other surgical interventions (total knee replacement, total hip replacement, and coronary artery bypass surgery) to define the average reimbursement costs per PCS improvement with each of these interventions. Data from 11 prospective multicenter studies (9 Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption, Randomized Prospective Clinical Trials, class 1 data) accounted for the lumbar spine fusion group (n = 1826). Data for total knee replacement, total hip replacement, and coronary artery bypass surgery were obtained from a comprehensive review of the literature. Comparisons of SF-36 PCS improvements were made at defined postoperative time points and with published study findings of other medical conditions. Reimbursement estimates (not including estimated physician and rehabilitation fees) for each surgical intervention were based on Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Medicare Provider Analysis and Review and All Payer Data (2002). Cost estimates were calculated for a minimal clinical important improvement (reimbursement dollars/mean PCS change *5.42 point PCS improvement). SF-36 PCS significantly improved at both 1 and 2 years following lumbar spine fusion surgery (P &lt; 0.0001), and was comparable to the control surgical outcomes. With the use of data from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Medicare Provider Analysis and Review and All Payer Data, hospital reimbursement averaged $15.2-18.2K for lumbar spine fusion, $9.8-11.3K for total knee replacement, $9.6-11.3K for total hip replacement, and $9.8-11.3K for coronary artery bypass surgery. Calculations of reimbursement dollars to elicit minimum clinically important change in PCS of 5.42 points following surgery ranged from $6.1 to $7.3K for lumbar spine fusion, $5.7 to $6.6K for total knee arthroplasty, $3.9 to $4.5K for total hip replacement, and $18.2 to $22.5K for coronary artery bypass surgery. While the exact numbers may vary for each treatment based on the population studied and the cost estimates used, lumbar fusion cost per benefit achieved was very comparable to other well-accepted medical interventions (total hip replacement, total knee replacement, and coronary artery bypass surgery).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>17495582</pmid><doi>10.1097/BRS.0b013e318053d4e5</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0362-2436
ispartof Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 2007-05, Vol.32 (11 Suppl), p.S20-S26
issn 0362-2436
1528-1159
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70508065
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - economics
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - economics
Coronary Artery Bypass - economics
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Humans
Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery
Multicenter Studies as Topic - economics
Prospective Studies
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - economics
Retrospective Studies
Spinal Fusion - economics
title SF-36 PCS benefit-cost ratio of lumbar fusion comparison to other surgical interventions: a thought experiment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T05%3A17%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=SF-36%20PCS%20benefit-cost%20ratio%20of%20lumbar%20fusion%20comparison%20to%20other%20surgical%20interventions:%20a%20thought%20experiment&rft.jtitle=Spine%20(Philadelphia,%20Pa.%201976)&rft.au=Polly,%20Jr,%20David%20W&rft.aucorp=Lumbar%20Spine%20Study%20Group&rft.date=2007-05-15&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=11%20Suppl&rft.spage=S20&rft.epage=S26&rft.pages=S20-S26&rft.issn=0362-2436&rft.eissn=1528-1159&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318053d4e5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70508065%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70508065&rft_id=info:pmid/17495582&rfr_iscdi=true