Diagnostic adequacy and accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology in neck lump assessment: results from a regional cancer network over a one year period

Aim: To establish the diagnostic accuracy and adequacy of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) within a regional cancer network, and to determine what service improvements may be required to allow successful implementation of an FNAC-based, ‘one-stop’ head and neck clinic, as proposed by the curre...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of laryngology and otology 2007-06, Vol.121 (6), p.571-579
Hauptverfasser: Howlett, D C, Harper, B, Quante, M, Berresford, A, Morley, M, Grant, J, Ramesar, K, Barnes, S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 579
container_issue 6
container_start_page 571
container_title Journal of laryngology and otology
container_volume 121
creator Howlett, D C
Harper, B
Quante, M
Berresford, A
Morley, M
Grant, J
Ramesar, K
Barnes, S
description Aim: To establish the diagnostic accuracy and adequacy of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) within a regional cancer network, and to determine what service improvements may be required to allow successful implementation of an FNAC-based, ‘one-stop’ head and neck clinic, as proposed by the current National Institute for Clinical Excellence guidelines. Materials and methods: The Sussex cancer network serves a population of 1 200 000 and contains five hospitals within three acute trusts. In 2004, an audit was undertaken retrospectively to examine the diagnostic adequacy and accuracy of head and neck FNAC across the network. Comparisons were then made with the results of subsequent relevant surgery. For the purposes of the audit, FNAC was subdivided into three main groups: salivary gland, thyroid gland and neck node. As part of the data analysis, we also noted the clinical source of the FNAC and whether it was performed blind or under image guidance. Results: In 2004, 712 FNAC procedures were undertaken in 647 patients, 276 of whom underwent subsequent surgery. Fine needle aspiration cytology was non-diagnostic in 52 per cent of patients in the neck node group, in 50 per cent in the salivary gland group and in 30 per cent in the thyroid group. With these non-diagnostic results removed, statistical analysis was performed on data from those patients who had undergone both FNAC and subsequent surgery. This gave a sensitivity of 89 per cent and a specificity of 57 per cent in the neck node group, a sensitivity of 64 per cent and specificity of 100 per cent in the salivary gland group, and a sensitivity of 62 per cent and specificity of 86 per cent in the thyroid group. Diagnostic problems with FNAC were noted, particularly in the differentiation of reactive nodal hyperplasia from lymphoma and in diagnosing follicular thyroid lesions. Ultrasound guidance was used in 50 per cent of the thyroid FNAC procedures but in only a minority of patients in the neck node and salivary gland groups. Conclusion: This audit demonstrated widespread diagnostic difficulties associated with head and neck FNAC in a large patient sample. It is likely that these problems will be mirrored in other cancer networks. In order for one-stop head and neck clinics to succeed, the non-diagnostic rate of FNAC in particular must be minimised. There are strategies to enable this, depending on local resources, including increased access to cytologists or cytology technicians, diagnostic ultrasou
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0022215106004944
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70502147</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0022215106004944</cupid><sourcerecordid>1788428821</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-858e9d5a8795900ae90d679eef3ea58acfb82db9e3a7424cb3613c738df0e4df3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctu1DAUhi0EotPCA7BBFhLdBezEiR12qIWC1Apx27CxztgnI3eSOLUTIK_C0-JoIkYCsbCso__7z5WQJ5y94IzLl58Zy_Ocl5xVjIlaiHtkw6VQWSkqdp9sFjlb9BNyGuMtY8nE8ofkhEteiLKQG_Lr0sGu93F0hoLFuwnMTKG3FIyZwhL4hjauR9oj2hYpxMEFGJ3vqZlH3_rdTF2fVLOn7dQNCYgYY4f9-IoGjFM7RtoE31FI4S75oKUGeoMhmcYfPuyp_54CoD5VmRECHTA4bx-RBw20ER-v_xn5-vbNl4t32fWHq_cXr68zIwo1ZqpUWNsSlKzLmjHAmtlK1ohNgVAqMM1W5XZbYwFS5MJsi4oXRhbKNgyFbYozcn7IOwR_N2EcdeeiwbaFHv0UtWQly7mQCXz2F3jrp5DmiTpPW8_z9BLED5AJPsaAjR6C6yDMmjO9XE3_c7XkebomnrYd2qNjPVMCnq8ARANtE9L-XDxySlZpoIXLDpyLI_78o0PY6wTIUldXH_XNt0v2SfEbXSa-WJuFbhuc3eFxpP-3-xsoJr-u</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>274822482</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diagnostic adequacy and accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology in neck lump assessment: results from a regional cancer network over a one year period</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Howlett, D C ; Harper, B ; Quante, M ; Berresford, A ; Morley, M ; Grant, J ; Ramesar, K ; Barnes, S</creator><creatorcontrib>Howlett, D C ; Harper, B ; Quante, M ; Berresford, A ; Morley, M ; Grant, J ; Ramesar, K ; Barnes, S</creatorcontrib><description>Aim: To establish the diagnostic accuracy and adequacy of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) within a regional cancer network, and to determine what service improvements may be required to allow successful implementation of an FNAC-based, ‘one-stop’ head and neck clinic, as proposed by the current National Institute for Clinical Excellence guidelines. Materials and methods: The Sussex cancer network serves a population of 1 200 000 and contains five hospitals within three acute trusts. In 2004, an audit was undertaken retrospectively to examine the diagnostic adequacy and accuracy of head and neck FNAC across the network. Comparisons were then made with the results of subsequent relevant surgery. For the purposes of the audit, FNAC was subdivided into three main groups: salivary gland, thyroid gland and neck node. As part of the data analysis, we also noted the clinical source of the FNAC and whether it was performed blind or under image guidance. Results: In 2004, 712 FNAC procedures were undertaken in 647 patients, 276 of whom underwent subsequent surgery. Fine needle aspiration cytology was non-diagnostic in 52 per cent of patients in the neck node group, in 50 per cent in the salivary gland group and in 30 per cent in the thyroid group. With these non-diagnostic results removed, statistical analysis was performed on data from those patients who had undergone both FNAC and subsequent surgery. This gave a sensitivity of 89 per cent and a specificity of 57 per cent in the neck node group, a sensitivity of 64 per cent and specificity of 100 per cent in the salivary gland group, and a sensitivity of 62 per cent and specificity of 86 per cent in the thyroid group. Diagnostic problems with FNAC were noted, particularly in the differentiation of reactive nodal hyperplasia from lymphoma and in diagnosing follicular thyroid lesions. Ultrasound guidance was used in 50 per cent of the thyroid FNAC procedures but in only a minority of patients in the neck node and salivary gland groups. Conclusion: This audit demonstrated widespread diagnostic difficulties associated with head and neck FNAC in a large patient sample. It is likely that these problems will be mirrored in other cancer networks. In order for one-stop head and neck clinics to succeed, the non-diagnostic rate of FNAC in particular must be minimised. There are strategies to enable this, depending on local resources, including increased access to cytologists or cytology technicians, diagnostic ultrasound, image guidance for FNAC and the use of ultrasound-guided core biopsy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2151</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-5460</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0022215106004944</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17134537</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JLOTAX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Biopsy, Fine-Needle - methods ; Biopsy, Fine-Needle - standards ; Cancer Care Facilities - organization &amp; administration ; Cytology ; Diagnostic Errors - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Great Britain ; Head and Neck Neoplasms ; Head and Neck Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Head and Neck Neoplasms - pathology ; Head and Neck Neoplasms - surgery ; Humans ; Main Articles ; Medical Audit ; Medical sciences ; Needle Biopsy ; Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology ; Retrospective Studies ; Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><ispartof>Journal of laryngology and otology, 2007-06, Vol.121 (6), p.571-579</ispartof><rights>2006 JLO (1984) Limited</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Cambridge University Press Jun 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-858e9d5a8795900ae90d679eef3ea58acfb82db9e3a7424cb3613c738df0e4df3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022215106004944/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,27901,27902,55603</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18767387$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17134537$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Howlett, D C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harper, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quante, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berresford, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morley, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grant, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramesar, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnes, S</creatorcontrib><title>Diagnostic adequacy and accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology in neck lump assessment: results from a regional cancer network over a one year period</title><title>Journal of laryngology and otology</title><addtitle>J. Laryngol. Otol</addtitle><description>Aim: To establish the diagnostic accuracy and adequacy of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) within a regional cancer network, and to determine what service improvements may be required to allow successful implementation of an FNAC-based, ‘one-stop’ head and neck clinic, as proposed by the current National Institute for Clinical Excellence guidelines. Materials and methods: The Sussex cancer network serves a population of 1 200 000 and contains five hospitals within three acute trusts. In 2004, an audit was undertaken retrospectively to examine the diagnostic adequacy and accuracy of head and neck FNAC across the network. Comparisons were then made with the results of subsequent relevant surgery. For the purposes of the audit, FNAC was subdivided into three main groups: salivary gland, thyroid gland and neck node. As part of the data analysis, we also noted the clinical source of the FNAC and whether it was performed blind or under image guidance. Results: In 2004, 712 FNAC procedures were undertaken in 647 patients, 276 of whom underwent subsequent surgery. Fine needle aspiration cytology was non-diagnostic in 52 per cent of patients in the neck node group, in 50 per cent in the salivary gland group and in 30 per cent in the thyroid group. With these non-diagnostic results removed, statistical analysis was performed on data from those patients who had undergone both FNAC and subsequent surgery. This gave a sensitivity of 89 per cent and a specificity of 57 per cent in the neck node group, a sensitivity of 64 per cent and specificity of 100 per cent in the salivary gland group, and a sensitivity of 62 per cent and specificity of 86 per cent in the thyroid group. Diagnostic problems with FNAC were noted, particularly in the differentiation of reactive nodal hyperplasia from lymphoma and in diagnosing follicular thyroid lesions. Ultrasound guidance was used in 50 per cent of the thyroid FNAC procedures but in only a minority of patients in the neck node and salivary gland groups. Conclusion: This audit demonstrated widespread diagnostic difficulties associated with head and neck FNAC in a large patient sample. It is likely that these problems will be mirrored in other cancer networks. In order for one-stop head and neck clinics to succeed, the non-diagnostic rate of FNAC in particular must be minimised. There are strategies to enable this, depending on local resources, including increased access to cytologists or cytology technicians, diagnostic ultrasound, image guidance for FNAC and the use of ultrasound-guided core biopsy.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biopsy, Fine-Needle - methods</subject><subject>Biopsy, Fine-Needle - standards</subject><subject>Cancer Care Facilities - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Cytology</subject><subject>Diagnostic Errors - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Great Britain</subject><subject>Head and Neck Neoplasms</subject><subject>Head and Neck Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Head and Neck Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Head and Neck Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Main Articles</subject><subject>Medical Audit</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Needle Biopsy</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><issn>0022-2151</issn><issn>1748-5460</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kctu1DAUhi0EotPCA7BBFhLdBezEiR12qIWC1Apx27CxztgnI3eSOLUTIK_C0-JoIkYCsbCso__7z5WQJ5y94IzLl58Zy_Ocl5xVjIlaiHtkw6VQWSkqdp9sFjlb9BNyGuMtY8nE8ofkhEteiLKQG_Lr0sGu93F0hoLFuwnMTKG3FIyZwhL4hjauR9oj2hYpxMEFGJ3vqZlH3_rdTF2fVLOn7dQNCYgYY4f9-IoGjFM7RtoE31FI4S75oKUGeoMhmcYfPuyp_54CoD5VmRECHTA4bx-RBw20ER-v_xn5-vbNl4t32fWHq_cXr68zIwo1ZqpUWNsSlKzLmjHAmtlK1ohNgVAqMM1W5XZbYwFS5MJsi4oXRhbKNgyFbYozcn7IOwR_N2EcdeeiwbaFHv0UtWQly7mQCXz2F3jrp5DmiTpPW8_z9BLED5AJPsaAjR6C6yDMmjO9XE3_c7XkebomnrYd2qNjPVMCnq8ARANtE9L-XDxySlZpoIXLDpyLI_78o0PY6wTIUldXH_XNt0v2SfEbXSa-WJuFbhuc3eFxpP-3-xsoJr-u</recordid><startdate>20070601</startdate><enddate>20070601</enddate><creator>Howlett, D C</creator><creator>Harper, B</creator><creator>Quante, M</creator><creator>Berresford, A</creator><creator>Morley, M</creator><creator>Grant, J</creator><creator>Ramesar, K</creator><creator>Barnes, S</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070601</creationdate><title>Diagnostic adequacy and accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology in neck lump assessment: results from a regional cancer network over a one year period</title><author>Howlett, D C ; Harper, B ; Quante, M ; Berresford, A ; Morley, M ; Grant, J ; Ramesar, K ; Barnes, S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-858e9d5a8795900ae90d679eef3ea58acfb82db9e3a7424cb3613c738df0e4df3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biopsy, Fine-Needle - methods</topic><topic>Biopsy, Fine-Needle - standards</topic><topic>Cancer Care Facilities - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Cytology</topic><topic>Diagnostic Errors - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Great Britain</topic><topic>Head and Neck Neoplasms</topic><topic>Head and Neck Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Head and Neck Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Head and Neck Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Main Articles</topic><topic>Medical Audit</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Needle Biopsy</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Howlett, D C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harper, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quante, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berresford, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morley, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grant, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramesar, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnes, S</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of laryngology and otology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Howlett, D C</au><au>Harper, B</au><au>Quante, M</au><au>Berresford, A</au><au>Morley, M</au><au>Grant, J</au><au>Ramesar, K</au><au>Barnes, S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diagnostic adequacy and accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology in neck lump assessment: results from a regional cancer network over a one year period</atitle><jtitle>Journal of laryngology and otology</jtitle><addtitle>J. Laryngol. Otol</addtitle><date>2007-06-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>121</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>571</spage><epage>579</epage><pages>571-579</pages><issn>0022-2151</issn><eissn>1748-5460</eissn><coden>JLOTAX</coden><abstract>Aim: To establish the diagnostic accuracy and adequacy of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) within a regional cancer network, and to determine what service improvements may be required to allow successful implementation of an FNAC-based, ‘one-stop’ head and neck clinic, as proposed by the current National Institute for Clinical Excellence guidelines. Materials and methods: The Sussex cancer network serves a population of 1 200 000 and contains five hospitals within three acute trusts. In 2004, an audit was undertaken retrospectively to examine the diagnostic adequacy and accuracy of head and neck FNAC across the network. Comparisons were then made with the results of subsequent relevant surgery. For the purposes of the audit, FNAC was subdivided into three main groups: salivary gland, thyroid gland and neck node. As part of the data analysis, we also noted the clinical source of the FNAC and whether it was performed blind or under image guidance. Results: In 2004, 712 FNAC procedures were undertaken in 647 patients, 276 of whom underwent subsequent surgery. Fine needle aspiration cytology was non-diagnostic in 52 per cent of patients in the neck node group, in 50 per cent in the salivary gland group and in 30 per cent in the thyroid group. With these non-diagnostic results removed, statistical analysis was performed on data from those patients who had undergone both FNAC and subsequent surgery. This gave a sensitivity of 89 per cent and a specificity of 57 per cent in the neck node group, a sensitivity of 64 per cent and specificity of 100 per cent in the salivary gland group, and a sensitivity of 62 per cent and specificity of 86 per cent in the thyroid group. Diagnostic problems with FNAC were noted, particularly in the differentiation of reactive nodal hyperplasia from lymphoma and in diagnosing follicular thyroid lesions. Ultrasound guidance was used in 50 per cent of the thyroid FNAC procedures but in only a minority of patients in the neck node and salivary gland groups. Conclusion: This audit demonstrated widespread diagnostic difficulties associated with head and neck FNAC in a large patient sample. It is likely that these problems will be mirrored in other cancer networks. In order for one-stop head and neck clinics to succeed, the non-diagnostic rate of FNAC in particular must be minimised. There are strategies to enable this, depending on local resources, including increased access to cytologists or cytology technicians, diagnostic ultrasound, image guidance for FNAC and the use of ultrasound-guided core biopsy.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>17134537</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0022215106004944</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-2151
ispartof Journal of laryngology and otology, 2007-06, Vol.121 (6), p.571-579
issn 0022-2151
1748-5460
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70502147
source MEDLINE; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Biopsy, Fine-Needle - methods
Biopsy, Fine-Needle - standards
Cancer Care Facilities - organization & administration
Cytology
Diagnostic Errors - statistics & numerical data
Great Britain
Head and Neck Neoplasms
Head and Neck Neoplasms - diagnosis
Head and Neck Neoplasms - pathology
Head and Neck Neoplasms - surgery
Humans
Main Articles
Medical Audit
Medical sciences
Needle Biopsy
Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology
Retrospective Studies
Sensitivity and Specificity
title Diagnostic adequacy and accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology in neck lump assessment: results from a regional cancer network over a one year period
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T23%3A41%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diagnostic%20adequacy%20and%20accuracy%20of%20fine%20needle%20aspiration%20cytology%20in%20neck%20lump%20assessment:%20results%20from%20a%20regional%20cancer%20network%20over%20a%20one%20year%20period&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20laryngology%20and%20otology&rft.au=Howlett,%20D%20C&rft.date=2007-06-01&rft.volume=121&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=571&rft.epage=579&rft.pages=571-579&rft.issn=0022-2151&rft.eissn=1748-5460&rft.coden=JLOTAX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0022215106004944&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1788428821%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=274822482&rft_id=info:pmid/17134537&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0022215106004944&rfr_iscdi=true