Computational Models of Facial Attractiveness Judgments

We designed two computational models to replicate human facial attractiveness ratings. The primary model used partial least squares (PLS) to identify image factors associated with facial attractiveness from facial images and attractiveness ratings of those images. For comparison we also made a model...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Perception (London) 2008-01, Vol.37 (1), p.126-142
Hauptverfasser: Bronstad, P Matthew, Langlois, Judith H, Russell, Richard
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 142
container_issue 1
container_start_page 126
container_title Perception (London)
container_volume 37
creator Bronstad, P Matthew
Langlois, Judith H
Russell, Richard
description We designed two computational models to replicate human facial attractiveness ratings. The primary model used partial least squares (PLS) to identify image factors associated with facial attractiveness from facial images and attractiveness ratings of those images. For comparison we also made a model similar to previous models of facial attractiveness, in that it used manually derived measurements between features as inputs, though we took the additional step of dimensionality reduction via principal component analysis (PCA) and weighting of PCA dimensions via a perceptron. Strikingly, both models produced estimates of facial attractiveness that were indistinguishable from human ratings. Because PLS extracts a small number of image factors from the facial images that covary with attractiveness ratings of the images, it is possible to determine the information used by the model. The image factors that the model discovered correspond to two of the main contemporary hypotheses of averageness judgments: facial attractiveness and sexual dimorphism. In contrast, facial symmetry was not important to the model, and an explicit feature-based measurement of symmetry was not correlated with human judgments of facial attractiveness. This provides novel evidence for the importance of averageness and sexual dimorphism, but not symmetry, in human judgments of facial attractiveness.
doi_str_mv 10.1068/p5805
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70500206</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1068_p5805</sage_id><sourcerecordid>70500206</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-bf65bf49360d740c93d0dfc8f90957796371a5ab5fef93bc9eeaa6bb184dbc473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0EtLw0AUhuFBFFtr_4IEQXfRM5lbZinFeqHiRtdhriUlycTMRPDfG21BcHXg8PAtXoSWGG4w8PK2ZyWwIzTHlJc5LQg5RnMggHMAzmfoLMYdAKaSkVM0wyWRsmDFHIlVaPsxqVSHTjXZS7CuiVnw2VqZenrcpTQok-pP17kYs-fRblvXpXiOTrxqolse7gK9r-_fVo_55vXhaXW3yQ0hJOXac6Y9lYSDFRSMJBasN6WXIJkQkhOBFVOaeecl0UY6pxTXGpfUakMFWaDr_W4_hI_RxVS1dTSuaVTnwhgrAQygAD7Bqz00Q4hxcL7qh7pVw1eFofopVP0WmtzFYXDUrbN_6pBkApd7ENXWVbswDlOY-G_lG7iJax4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70500206</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Computational Models of Facial Attractiveness Judgments</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Bronstad, P Matthew ; Langlois, Judith H ; Russell, Richard</creator><creatorcontrib>Bronstad, P Matthew ; Langlois, Judith H ; Russell, Richard</creatorcontrib><description>We designed two computational models to replicate human facial attractiveness ratings. The primary model used partial least squares (PLS) to identify image factors associated with facial attractiveness from facial images and attractiveness ratings of those images. For comparison we also made a model similar to previous models of facial attractiveness, in that it used manually derived measurements between features as inputs, though we took the additional step of dimensionality reduction via principal component analysis (PCA) and weighting of PCA dimensions via a perceptron. Strikingly, both models produced estimates of facial attractiveness that were indistinguishable from human ratings. Because PLS extracts a small number of image factors from the facial images that covary with attractiveness ratings of the images, it is possible to determine the information used by the model. The image factors that the model discovered correspond to two of the main contemporary hypotheses of averageness judgments: facial attractiveness and sexual dimorphism. In contrast, facial symmetry was not important to the model, and an explicit feature-based measurement of symmetry was not correlated with human judgments of facial attractiveness. This provides novel evidence for the importance of averageness and sexual dimorphism, but not symmetry, in human judgments of facial attractiveness.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-0066</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-4233</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1068/p5805</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18399252</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adult ; Beauty ; Computer Simulation ; Esthetics ; Face ; Female ; Form Perception - physiology ; Humans ; Judgment ; Male ; Models, Anatomic ; Psychophysics ; Sex Characteristics</subject><ispartof>Perception (London), 2008-01, Vol.37 (1), p.126-142</ispartof><rights>2008 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-bf65bf49360d740c93d0dfc8f90957796371a5ab5fef93bc9eeaa6bb184dbc473</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-bf65bf49360d740c93d0dfc8f90957796371a5ab5fef93bc9eeaa6bb184dbc473</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1068/p5805$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/p5805$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,21800,27902,27903,27904,43599,43600</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18399252$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bronstad, P Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langlois, Judith H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russell, Richard</creatorcontrib><title>Computational Models of Facial Attractiveness Judgments</title><title>Perception (London)</title><addtitle>Perception</addtitle><description>We designed two computational models to replicate human facial attractiveness ratings. The primary model used partial least squares (PLS) to identify image factors associated with facial attractiveness from facial images and attractiveness ratings of those images. For comparison we also made a model similar to previous models of facial attractiveness, in that it used manually derived measurements between features as inputs, though we took the additional step of dimensionality reduction via principal component analysis (PCA) and weighting of PCA dimensions via a perceptron. Strikingly, both models produced estimates of facial attractiveness that were indistinguishable from human ratings. Because PLS extracts a small number of image factors from the facial images that covary with attractiveness ratings of the images, it is possible to determine the information used by the model. The image factors that the model discovered correspond to two of the main contemporary hypotheses of averageness judgments: facial attractiveness and sexual dimorphism. In contrast, facial symmetry was not important to the model, and an explicit feature-based measurement of symmetry was not correlated with human judgments of facial attractiveness. This provides novel evidence for the importance of averageness and sexual dimorphism, but not symmetry, in human judgments of facial attractiveness.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Beauty</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Esthetics</subject><subject>Face</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Form Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Judgment</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Models, Anatomic</subject><subject>Psychophysics</subject><subject>Sex Characteristics</subject><issn>0301-0066</issn><issn>1468-4233</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0EtLw0AUhuFBFFtr_4IEQXfRM5lbZinFeqHiRtdhriUlycTMRPDfG21BcHXg8PAtXoSWGG4w8PK2ZyWwIzTHlJc5LQg5RnMggHMAzmfoLMYdAKaSkVM0wyWRsmDFHIlVaPsxqVSHTjXZS7CuiVnw2VqZenrcpTQok-pP17kYs-fRblvXpXiOTrxqolse7gK9r-_fVo_55vXhaXW3yQ0hJOXac6Y9lYSDFRSMJBasN6WXIJkQkhOBFVOaeecl0UY6pxTXGpfUakMFWaDr_W4_hI_RxVS1dTSuaVTnwhgrAQygAD7Bqz00Q4hxcL7qh7pVw1eFofopVP0WmtzFYXDUrbN_6pBkApd7ENXWVbswDlOY-G_lG7iJax4</recordid><startdate>200801</startdate><enddate>200801</enddate><creator>Bronstad, P Matthew</creator><creator>Langlois, Judith H</creator><creator>Russell, Richard</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200801</creationdate><title>Computational Models of Facial Attractiveness Judgments</title><author>Bronstad, P Matthew ; Langlois, Judith H ; Russell, Richard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-bf65bf49360d740c93d0dfc8f90957796371a5ab5fef93bc9eeaa6bb184dbc473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Beauty</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Esthetics</topic><topic>Face</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Form Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Judgment</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Models, Anatomic</topic><topic>Psychophysics</topic><topic>Sex Characteristics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bronstad, P Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langlois, Judith H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russell, Richard</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Perception (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bronstad, P Matthew</au><au>Langlois, Judith H</au><au>Russell, Richard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Computational Models of Facial Attractiveness Judgments</atitle><jtitle>Perception (London)</jtitle><addtitle>Perception</addtitle><date>2008-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>126</spage><epage>142</epage><pages>126-142</pages><issn>0301-0066</issn><eissn>1468-4233</eissn><abstract>We designed two computational models to replicate human facial attractiveness ratings. The primary model used partial least squares (PLS) to identify image factors associated with facial attractiveness from facial images and attractiveness ratings of those images. For comparison we also made a model similar to previous models of facial attractiveness, in that it used manually derived measurements between features as inputs, though we took the additional step of dimensionality reduction via principal component analysis (PCA) and weighting of PCA dimensions via a perceptron. Strikingly, both models produced estimates of facial attractiveness that were indistinguishable from human ratings. Because PLS extracts a small number of image factors from the facial images that covary with attractiveness ratings of the images, it is possible to determine the information used by the model. The image factors that the model discovered correspond to two of the main contemporary hypotheses of averageness judgments: facial attractiveness and sexual dimorphism. In contrast, facial symmetry was not important to the model, and an explicit feature-based measurement of symmetry was not correlated with human judgments of facial attractiveness. This provides novel evidence for the importance of averageness and sexual dimorphism, but not symmetry, in human judgments of facial attractiveness.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>18399252</pmid><doi>10.1068/p5805</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-0066
ispartof Perception (London), 2008-01, Vol.37 (1), p.126-142
issn 0301-0066
1468-4233
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70500206
source SAGE Complete A-Z List; MEDLINE
subjects Adult
Beauty
Computer Simulation
Esthetics
Face
Female
Form Perception - physiology
Humans
Judgment
Male
Models, Anatomic
Psychophysics
Sex Characteristics
title Computational Models of Facial Attractiveness Judgments
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T07%3A52%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Computational%20Models%20of%20Facial%20Attractiveness%20Judgments&rft.jtitle=Perception%20(London)&rft.au=Bronstad,%20P%20Matthew&rft.date=2008-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=126&rft.epage=142&rft.pages=126-142&rft.issn=0301-0066&rft.eissn=1468-4233&rft_id=info:doi/10.1068/p5805&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70500206%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70500206&rft_id=info:pmid/18399252&rft_sage_id=10.1068_p5805&rfr_iscdi=true