Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of adjunctive hyperbaric oxygen therapy for diabetic foot ulcers
Background: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) has been proposed as an adjunct to standard methods of care for diabetic foot ulcers (DFU). Its use may decrease the risk of infection and lower extremity amputations (LEAs). As part of a Canadian assessment, we estimated the cost-effectiveness and budget...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of technology assessment in health care 2008-04, Vol.24 (2), p.178-183 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 183 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 178 |
container_title | International journal of technology assessment in health care |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Chuck, Anderson W. Hailey, David Jacobs, Philip Perry, Douglas C. |
description | Background: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) has been proposed as an adjunct to standard methods of care for diabetic foot ulcers (DFU). Its use may decrease the risk of infection and lower extremity amputations (LEAs). As part of a Canadian assessment, we estimated the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of HBOT in this application. Methods: We developed a decision model comparing adjunctive HBOT with standard care alone. The population was a 65-year-old cohort with DFU. The time horizon was 12 years taken from a Ministry of Health perspective. The health states were a healed wound with or without a minor LEA, an unhealed wound with no related surgery, and a major LEA. Efficacy data were based on outcomes reported in studies included in a literature review. Cost and capacity needs for treating DFU patients in Canada were estimated using prevalence data from the literature, and cost and utilization data from government records. Results: The 12-year cost for patients receiving HBOT was CND$40,695 compared with CND$49,786 for standard care alone. Outcomes were 3.64 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for those receiving HBOT and 3.01 QALYs for controls. Estimated cost to treat all prevalent DFU cases in Canada was CND$14.4–19.7 million/year over 4 years. If seven-person HBOT chambers were used, a further nineteen to thirty-five machines would be required nationally. Conclusions: Adjunctive HBOT for DFU is cost-effective compared with standard care. Additional HBOT capacity would be needed if it were to be adopted as the standard of care throughout Canada. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0266462308080252 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70498858</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0266462308080252</cupid><sourcerecordid>70498858</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-e3bb602bf7ee9630f60000b396ed62ea33605af5bec318c00c86af8e0317232d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1LxDAQhoMoun78AC8SPHirTpI2zR5l8QsED-q5JOlEu2ybmrTi_nuz7oKgiJlDCO8zb2Z4CTlmcM6AlRePwKXMJRegUvGCb5EJy0uWSZGrbTJZydlK3yP7Mc4BmIAp7JI9pvL04GxCcObjkKFzaIfmHTuMkequpmasX3CgTdtrO1DvqK7nY_fF0Ndlj8Ho0FjqP5Yv2NHhFYPul9T5QOtGGxyS5rwf6LiwGOIh2XF6EfFocx-Q5-urp9ltdv9wcze7vM9sDiyNIYyRwI0rEadSgJOQjhFTibXkqIWQUGhXGLSCKQtgldROIQhWcsFrcUDO1r598G8jxqFqm2hxsdAd-jFWJeRTpQr1LygESxMplsDTH-Dcj6FLS1ScgSg455AgtoZs8DEGdFUfmlaHZcWgWiVV_Uoq9ZxsjEfTYv3dsYkmAWJjqlsTmhTH99d_234C0qSdRg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>210352220</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of adjunctive hyperbaric oxygen therapy for diabetic foot ulcers</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Chuck, Anderson W. ; Hailey, David ; Jacobs, Philip ; Perry, Douglas C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chuck, Anderson W. ; Hailey, David ; Jacobs, Philip ; Perry, Douglas C.</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) has been proposed as an adjunct to standard methods of care for diabetic foot ulcers (DFU). Its use may decrease the risk of infection and lower extremity amputations (LEAs). As part of a Canadian assessment, we estimated the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of HBOT in this application. Methods: We developed a decision model comparing adjunctive HBOT with standard care alone. The population was a 65-year-old cohort with DFU. The time horizon was 12 years taken from a Ministry of Health perspective. The health states were a healed wound with or without a minor LEA, an unhealed wound with no related surgery, and a major LEA. Efficacy data were based on outcomes reported in studies included in a literature review. Cost and capacity needs for treating DFU patients in Canada were estimated using prevalence data from the literature, and cost and utilization data from government records. Results: The 12-year cost for patients receiving HBOT was CND$40,695 compared with CND$49,786 for standard care alone. Outcomes were 3.64 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for those receiving HBOT and 3.01 QALYs for controls. Estimated cost to treat all prevalent DFU cases in Canada was CND$14.4–19.7 million/year over 4 years. If seven-person HBOT chambers were used, a further nineteen to thirty-five machines would be required nationally. Conclusions: Adjunctive HBOT for DFU is cost-effective compared with standard care. Additional HBOT capacity would be needed if it were to be adopted as the standard of care throughout Canada.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0266-4623</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-6348</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0266462308080252</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18400121</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Aged ; Amputation ; Amputation - economics ; Bibliographic data bases ; Cost control ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Decision Support Techniques ; Diabetes ; Diabetic Foot - therapy ; Foot diseases ; Humans ; Hyperbaric Oxygenation - economics ; Impact analysis ; Intervention ; Leg ulcers ; Life expectancy ; Literature reviews ; Models, Econometric ; Mortality ; Oxygen therapy ; Patients ; Quality-Adjusted Life Years ; Ratios ; Technology Assessment, Biomedical ; Wound healing</subject><ispartof>International journal of technology assessment in health care, 2008-04, Vol.24 (2), p.178-183</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008</rights><rights>Cambridge University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-e3bb602bf7ee9630f60000b396ed62ea33605af5bec318c00c86af8e0317232d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-e3bb602bf7ee9630f60000b396ed62ea33605af5bec318c00c86af8e0317232d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0266462308080252/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27924,27925,55628</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18400121$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chuck, Anderson W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hailey, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perry, Douglas C.</creatorcontrib><title>Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of adjunctive hyperbaric oxygen therapy for diabetic foot ulcers</title><title>International journal of technology assessment in health care</title><addtitle>Int J Technol Assess Health Care</addtitle><description>Background: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) has been proposed as an adjunct to standard methods of care for diabetic foot ulcers (DFU). Its use may decrease the risk of infection and lower extremity amputations (LEAs). As part of a Canadian assessment, we estimated the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of HBOT in this application. Methods: We developed a decision model comparing adjunctive HBOT with standard care alone. The population was a 65-year-old cohort with DFU. The time horizon was 12 years taken from a Ministry of Health perspective. The health states were a healed wound with or without a minor LEA, an unhealed wound with no related surgery, and a major LEA. Efficacy data were based on outcomes reported in studies included in a literature review. Cost and capacity needs for treating DFU patients in Canada were estimated using prevalence data from the literature, and cost and utilization data from government records. Results: The 12-year cost for patients receiving HBOT was CND$40,695 compared with CND$49,786 for standard care alone. Outcomes were 3.64 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for those receiving HBOT and 3.01 QALYs for controls. Estimated cost to treat all prevalent DFU cases in Canada was CND$14.4–19.7 million/year over 4 years. If seven-person HBOT chambers were used, a further nineteen to thirty-five machines would be required nationally. Conclusions: Adjunctive HBOT for DFU is cost-effective compared with standard care. Additional HBOT capacity would be needed if it were to be adopted as the standard of care throughout Canada.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Amputation</subject><subject>Amputation - economics</subject><subject>Bibliographic data bases</subject><subject>Cost control</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Decision Support Techniques</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diabetic Foot - therapy</subject><subject>Foot diseases</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hyperbaric Oxygenation - economics</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Leg ulcers</subject><subject>Life expectancy</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Models, Econometric</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Oxygen therapy</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Quality-Adjusted Life Years</subject><subject>Ratios</subject><subject>Technology Assessment, Biomedical</subject><subject>Wound healing</subject><issn>0266-4623</issn><issn>1471-6348</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1LxDAQhoMoun78AC8SPHirTpI2zR5l8QsED-q5JOlEu2ybmrTi_nuz7oKgiJlDCO8zb2Z4CTlmcM6AlRePwKXMJRegUvGCb5EJy0uWSZGrbTJZydlK3yP7Mc4BmIAp7JI9pvL04GxCcObjkKFzaIfmHTuMkequpmasX3CgTdtrO1DvqK7nY_fF0Ndlj8Ho0FjqP5Yv2NHhFYPul9T5QOtGGxyS5rwf6LiwGOIh2XF6EfFocx-Q5-urp9ltdv9wcze7vM9sDiyNIYyRwI0rEadSgJOQjhFTibXkqIWQUGhXGLSCKQtgldROIQhWcsFrcUDO1r598G8jxqFqm2hxsdAd-jFWJeRTpQr1LygESxMplsDTH-Dcj6FLS1ScgSg455AgtoZs8DEGdFUfmlaHZcWgWiVV_Uoq9ZxsjEfTYv3dsYkmAWJjqlsTmhTH99d_234C0qSdRg</recordid><startdate>200804</startdate><enddate>200804</enddate><creator>Chuck, Anderson W.</creator><creator>Hailey, David</creator><creator>Jacobs, Philip</creator><creator>Perry, Douglas C.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200804</creationdate><title>Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of adjunctive hyperbaric oxygen therapy for diabetic foot ulcers</title><author>Chuck, Anderson W. ; Hailey, David ; Jacobs, Philip ; Perry, Douglas C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-e3bb602bf7ee9630f60000b396ed62ea33605af5bec318c00c86af8e0317232d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Amputation</topic><topic>Amputation - economics</topic><topic>Bibliographic data bases</topic><topic>Cost control</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Decision Support Techniques</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diabetic Foot - therapy</topic><topic>Foot diseases</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hyperbaric Oxygenation - economics</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Leg ulcers</topic><topic>Life expectancy</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Models, Econometric</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Oxygen therapy</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Quality-Adjusted Life Years</topic><topic>Ratios</topic><topic>Technology Assessment, Biomedical</topic><topic>Wound healing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chuck, Anderson W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hailey, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perry, Douglas C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of technology assessment in health care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chuck, Anderson W.</au><au>Hailey, David</au><au>Jacobs, Philip</au><au>Perry, Douglas C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of adjunctive hyperbaric oxygen therapy for diabetic foot ulcers</atitle><jtitle>International journal of technology assessment in health care</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Technol Assess Health Care</addtitle><date>2008-04</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>178</spage><epage>183</epage><pages>178-183</pages><issn>0266-4623</issn><eissn>1471-6348</eissn><abstract>Background: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) has been proposed as an adjunct to standard methods of care for diabetic foot ulcers (DFU). Its use may decrease the risk of infection and lower extremity amputations (LEAs). As part of a Canadian assessment, we estimated the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of HBOT in this application. Methods: We developed a decision model comparing adjunctive HBOT with standard care alone. The population was a 65-year-old cohort with DFU. The time horizon was 12 years taken from a Ministry of Health perspective. The health states were a healed wound with or without a minor LEA, an unhealed wound with no related surgery, and a major LEA. Efficacy data were based on outcomes reported in studies included in a literature review. Cost and capacity needs for treating DFU patients in Canada were estimated using prevalence data from the literature, and cost and utilization data from government records. Results: The 12-year cost for patients receiving HBOT was CND$40,695 compared with CND$49,786 for standard care alone. Outcomes were 3.64 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for those receiving HBOT and 3.01 QALYs for controls. Estimated cost to treat all prevalent DFU cases in Canada was CND$14.4–19.7 million/year over 4 years. If seven-person HBOT chambers were used, a further nineteen to thirty-five machines would be required nationally. Conclusions: Adjunctive HBOT for DFU is cost-effective compared with standard care. Additional HBOT capacity would be needed if it were to be adopted as the standard of care throughout Canada.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>18400121</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0266462308080252</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0266-4623 |
ispartof | International journal of technology assessment in health care, 2008-04, Vol.24 (2), p.178-183 |
issn | 0266-4623 1471-6348 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70498858 |
source | MEDLINE; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Aged Amputation Amputation - economics Bibliographic data bases Cost control Cost-Benefit Analysis Decision Support Techniques Diabetes Diabetic Foot - therapy Foot diseases Humans Hyperbaric Oxygenation - economics Impact analysis Intervention Leg ulcers Life expectancy Literature reviews Models, Econometric Mortality Oxygen therapy Patients Quality-Adjusted Life Years Ratios Technology Assessment, Biomedical Wound healing |
title | Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of adjunctive hyperbaric oxygen therapy for diabetic foot ulcers |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T21%3A53%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cost-effectiveness%20and%20budget%20impact%20of%20adjunctive%20hyperbaric%20oxygen%20therapy%20for%20diabetic%20foot%20ulcers&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20technology%20assessment%20in%20health%20care&rft.au=Chuck,%20Anderson%20W.&rft.date=2008-04&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=178&rft.epage=183&rft.pages=178-183&rft.issn=0266-4623&rft.eissn=1471-6348&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0266462308080252&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70498858%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=210352220&rft_id=info:pmid/18400121&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0266462308080252&rfr_iscdi=true |