The role of immunomodulation in ABO-incompatible adult liver transplant recipients

Background: ABO‐incompatible (ABO‐i) liver transplantation (LT) is a high‐risk procedure due to the potential for antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR) and cell‐mediated rejection. The aim of the current report is to illustrate the results of a retrospective comparison study on the use of immunomodulati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical apheresis 2008, Vol.23 (2), p.55-62
Hauptverfasser: Urbani, Lucio, Mazzoni, Alessandro, Bianco, Irene, Grazzini, Tiziana, De Simone, Paolo, Catalano, Gabriele, Montin, Umberto, Petruccelli, Stefania, Morelli, Luca, Campani, Daniela, Pollina, Luca, Biancofiore, Gianni, Bindi, Lucia, Tascini, Carlo, Menichetti, Francesco, Scatena, Fabrizio, Filipponi, Franco
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 62
container_issue 2
container_start_page 55
container_title Journal of clinical apheresis
container_volume 23
creator Urbani, Lucio
Mazzoni, Alessandro
Bianco, Irene
Grazzini, Tiziana
De Simone, Paolo
Catalano, Gabriele
Montin, Umberto
Petruccelli, Stefania
Morelli, Luca
Campani, Daniela
Pollina, Luca
Biancofiore, Gianni
Bindi, Lucia
Tascini, Carlo
Menichetti, Francesco
Scatena, Fabrizio
Filipponi, Franco
description Background: ABO‐incompatible (ABO‐i) liver transplantation (LT) is a high‐risk procedure due to the potential for antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR) and cell‐mediated rejection. The aim of the current report is to illustrate the results of a retrospective comparison study on the use of immunomodulation with therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) associated to high‐dose immunoglobulins (IVIg) and extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) in ABO‐i adult LT patients. Patients and methods: Between January 1996 and December 2005, 19 patients underwent ABO‐i LT. The study was designed for a comparison between two groups of ABO‐i LT. Group 1 (control group) consisted of 11 patients treated with TPE only. Group 2 (study group) included eight patients treated with TPE and IVIg. Moreover, all Group 2 patients received acute rejection prophylaxis with ECP. Results: The graft survival at 6, 12, and 18 months was 63.6, 54.4, and 45.5% for Group 1 vs. 87.5, 87.5, and 87.5% for Group 2 (P ≤ 0.001). In Group 1 there were 3(27.3%) cases of AMR; 5 (45.4%) biopsy‐proven acute rejections (BPAR); 1 (9.1%) chronic rejection and 3 (27.3%) ischemic‐type biliary lesions (ITBL). In Group 2 there were no cases of AMR, BPAR, chronic rejection, or ITBL (P = 0.013). Conclusion: At median follow‐up of 568 days, TPE in combination with IVIg and ECP appears to protect the graft from AMR in ABO‐i liver transplantation. Continued patient enrollment will allow validation of these preliminary observations or the opportunity to devise newer AMR‐avoidance policies. J. Clin. Apheresis 2008. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jca.20156
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70482239</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70482239</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4276-1071fa147ff2d28a3b8484949d6ec01b7b893e848a46d78238faf211e25f49433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRS0EglJY8AMoKyQWAb8SO8tS0ZYKgQRFLC0nsYUhiYOdAP17DCmwYjXSzLlXowPAEYJnCEJ8_lzIMwxRkm6BEYIZjxGCaBuMICMkxjTJ9sC-988QwiwjyS7YQxzxNMFsBO5WTypytlKR1ZGp676xtS37SnbGNpFposnFbWyawtZtWOWBk-HaRZV5Uy7qnGx8W8mmi5wqTGtU0_kDsKNl5dXhZo7Bw-xyNV3E17fzq-nkOi4oZmmMIENaIsq0xiXmkuSccprRrExVAVHOcp4RFXaSpiXjmHAtNUZI4UQHjJAxOBl6W2dfe-U7URtfqCq8o2zvBYOUY0yyAJ4OYOGs905p0TpTS7cWCIovgSIIFN8CA3u8Ke3zWpV_5MZYAM4H4N1Uav1_k1hOJz-V8ZAwvlMfvwnpXkTKCEvE481cLG5m9xerJRUp-QSeQoi6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70482239</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The role of immunomodulation in ABO-incompatible adult liver transplant recipients</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Urbani, Lucio ; Mazzoni, Alessandro ; Bianco, Irene ; Grazzini, Tiziana ; De Simone, Paolo ; Catalano, Gabriele ; Montin, Umberto ; Petruccelli, Stefania ; Morelli, Luca ; Campani, Daniela ; Pollina, Luca ; Biancofiore, Gianni ; Bindi, Lucia ; Tascini, Carlo ; Menichetti, Francesco ; Scatena, Fabrizio ; Filipponi, Franco</creator><creatorcontrib>Urbani, Lucio ; Mazzoni, Alessandro ; Bianco, Irene ; Grazzini, Tiziana ; De Simone, Paolo ; Catalano, Gabriele ; Montin, Umberto ; Petruccelli, Stefania ; Morelli, Luca ; Campani, Daniela ; Pollina, Luca ; Biancofiore, Gianni ; Bindi, Lucia ; Tascini, Carlo ; Menichetti, Francesco ; Scatena, Fabrizio ; Filipponi, Franco</creatorcontrib><description>Background: ABO‐incompatible (ABO‐i) liver transplantation (LT) is a high‐risk procedure due to the potential for antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR) and cell‐mediated rejection. The aim of the current report is to illustrate the results of a retrospective comparison study on the use of immunomodulation with therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) associated to high‐dose immunoglobulins (IVIg) and extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) in ABO‐i adult LT patients. Patients and methods: Between January 1996 and December 2005, 19 patients underwent ABO‐i LT. The study was designed for a comparison between two groups of ABO‐i LT. Group 1 (control group) consisted of 11 patients treated with TPE only. Group 2 (study group) included eight patients treated with TPE and IVIg. Moreover, all Group 2 patients received acute rejection prophylaxis with ECP. Results: The graft survival at 6, 12, and 18 months was 63.6, 54.4, and 45.5% for Group 1 vs. 87.5, 87.5, and 87.5% for Group 2 (P ≤ 0.001). In Group 1 there were 3(27.3%) cases of AMR; 5 (45.4%) biopsy‐proven acute rejections (BPAR); 1 (9.1%) chronic rejection and 3 (27.3%) ischemic‐type biliary lesions (ITBL). In Group 2 there were no cases of AMR, BPAR, chronic rejection, or ITBL (P = 0.013). Conclusion: At median follow‐up of 568 days, TPE in combination with IVIg and ECP appears to protect the graft from AMR in ABO‐i liver transplantation. Continued patient enrollment will allow validation of these preliminary observations or the opportunity to devise newer AMR‐avoidance policies. J. Clin. Apheresis 2008. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0733-2459</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-1101</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jca.20156</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18186527</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>ABO Blood-Group System ; ABO-incompatible ; Adult ; antibody-mediated rejection ; Blood Group Incompatibility ; Combined Modality Therapy ; ECP ; Female ; Graft Rejection - therapy ; Humans ; Immunoglobulins - therapeutic use ; Immunologic Factors ; IVIG ; Liver Transplantation ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Photopheresis ; Plasmapheresis ; Retrospective Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical apheresis, 2008, Vol.23 (2), p.55-62</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</rights><rights>(c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4276-1071fa147ff2d28a3b8484949d6ec01b7b893e848a46d78238faf211e25f49433</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4276-1071fa147ff2d28a3b8484949d6ec01b7b893e848a46d78238faf211e25f49433</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjca.20156$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjca.20156$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,4024,27923,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18186527$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Urbani, Lucio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazzoni, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bianco, Irene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grazzini, Tiziana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Simone, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Catalano, Gabriele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montin, Umberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petruccelli, Stefania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morelli, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campani, Daniela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pollina, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biancofiore, Gianni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bindi, Lucia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tascini, Carlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menichetti, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scatena, Fabrizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filipponi, Franco</creatorcontrib><title>The role of immunomodulation in ABO-incompatible adult liver transplant recipients</title><title>Journal of clinical apheresis</title><addtitle>J. Clin. Apheresis</addtitle><description>Background: ABO‐incompatible (ABO‐i) liver transplantation (LT) is a high‐risk procedure due to the potential for antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR) and cell‐mediated rejection. The aim of the current report is to illustrate the results of a retrospective comparison study on the use of immunomodulation with therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) associated to high‐dose immunoglobulins (IVIg) and extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) in ABO‐i adult LT patients. Patients and methods: Between January 1996 and December 2005, 19 patients underwent ABO‐i LT. The study was designed for a comparison between two groups of ABO‐i LT. Group 1 (control group) consisted of 11 patients treated with TPE only. Group 2 (study group) included eight patients treated with TPE and IVIg. Moreover, all Group 2 patients received acute rejection prophylaxis with ECP. Results: The graft survival at 6, 12, and 18 months was 63.6, 54.4, and 45.5% for Group 1 vs. 87.5, 87.5, and 87.5% for Group 2 (P ≤ 0.001). In Group 1 there were 3(27.3%) cases of AMR; 5 (45.4%) biopsy‐proven acute rejections (BPAR); 1 (9.1%) chronic rejection and 3 (27.3%) ischemic‐type biliary lesions (ITBL). In Group 2 there were no cases of AMR, BPAR, chronic rejection, or ITBL (P = 0.013). Conclusion: At median follow‐up of 568 days, TPE in combination with IVIg and ECP appears to protect the graft from AMR in ABO‐i liver transplantation. Continued patient enrollment will allow validation of these preliminary observations or the opportunity to devise newer AMR‐avoidance policies. J. Clin. Apheresis 2008. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><subject>ABO Blood-Group System</subject><subject>ABO-incompatible</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>antibody-mediated rejection</subject><subject>Blood Group Incompatibility</subject><subject>Combined Modality Therapy</subject><subject>ECP</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Graft Rejection - therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunoglobulins - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Immunologic Factors</subject><subject>IVIG</subject><subject>Liver Transplantation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Photopheresis</subject><subject>Plasmapheresis</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><issn>0733-2459</issn><issn>1098-1101</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRS0EglJY8AMoKyQWAb8SO8tS0ZYKgQRFLC0nsYUhiYOdAP17DCmwYjXSzLlXowPAEYJnCEJ8_lzIMwxRkm6BEYIZjxGCaBuMICMkxjTJ9sC-988QwiwjyS7YQxzxNMFsBO5WTypytlKR1ZGp676xtS37SnbGNpFposnFbWyawtZtWOWBk-HaRZV5Uy7qnGx8W8mmi5wqTGtU0_kDsKNl5dXhZo7Bw-xyNV3E17fzq-nkOi4oZmmMIENaIsq0xiXmkuSccprRrExVAVHOcp4RFXaSpiXjmHAtNUZI4UQHjJAxOBl6W2dfe-U7URtfqCq8o2zvBYOUY0yyAJ4OYOGs905p0TpTS7cWCIovgSIIFN8CA3u8Ke3zWpV_5MZYAM4H4N1Uav1_k1hOJz-V8ZAwvlMfvwnpXkTKCEvE481cLG5m9xerJRUp-QSeQoi6</recordid><startdate>2008</startdate><enddate>2008</enddate><creator>Urbani, Lucio</creator><creator>Mazzoni, Alessandro</creator><creator>Bianco, Irene</creator><creator>Grazzini, Tiziana</creator><creator>De Simone, Paolo</creator><creator>Catalano, Gabriele</creator><creator>Montin, Umberto</creator><creator>Petruccelli, Stefania</creator><creator>Morelli, Luca</creator><creator>Campani, Daniela</creator><creator>Pollina, Luca</creator><creator>Biancofiore, Gianni</creator><creator>Bindi, Lucia</creator><creator>Tascini, Carlo</creator><creator>Menichetti, Francesco</creator><creator>Scatena, Fabrizio</creator><creator>Filipponi, Franco</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2008</creationdate><title>The role of immunomodulation in ABO-incompatible adult liver transplant recipients</title><author>Urbani, Lucio ; Mazzoni, Alessandro ; Bianco, Irene ; Grazzini, Tiziana ; De Simone, Paolo ; Catalano, Gabriele ; Montin, Umberto ; Petruccelli, Stefania ; Morelli, Luca ; Campani, Daniela ; Pollina, Luca ; Biancofiore, Gianni ; Bindi, Lucia ; Tascini, Carlo ; Menichetti, Francesco ; Scatena, Fabrizio ; Filipponi, Franco</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4276-1071fa147ff2d28a3b8484949d6ec01b7b893e848a46d78238faf211e25f49433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>ABO Blood-Group System</topic><topic>ABO-incompatible</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>antibody-mediated rejection</topic><topic>Blood Group Incompatibility</topic><topic>Combined Modality Therapy</topic><topic>ECP</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Graft Rejection - therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunoglobulins - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Immunologic Factors</topic><topic>IVIG</topic><topic>Liver Transplantation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Photopheresis</topic><topic>Plasmapheresis</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Urbani, Lucio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazzoni, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bianco, Irene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grazzini, Tiziana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Simone, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Catalano, Gabriele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montin, Umberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petruccelli, Stefania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morelli, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campani, Daniela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pollina, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biancofiore, Gianni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bindi, Lucia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tascini, Carlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menichetti, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scatena, Fabrizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filipponi, Franco</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical apheresis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Urbani, Lucio</au><au>Mazzoni, Alessandro</au><au>Bianco, Irene</au><au>Grazzini, Tiziana</au><au>De Simone, Paolo</au><au>Catalano, Gabriele</au><au>Montin, Umberto</au><au>Petruccelli, Stefania</au><au>Morelli, Luca</au><au>Campani, Daniela</au><au>Pollina, Luca</au><au>Biancofiore, Gianni</au><au>Bindi, Lucia</au><au>Tascini, Carlo</au><au>Menichetti, Francesco</au><au>Scatena, Fabrizio</au><au>Filipponi, Franco</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The role of immunomodulation in ABO-incompatible adult liver transplant recipients</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical apheresis</jtitle><addtitle>J. Clin. Apheresis</addtitle><date>2008</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>55</spage><epage>62</epage><pages>55-62</pages><issn>0733-2459</issn><eissn>1098-1101</eissn><abstract>Background: ABO‐incompatible (ABO‐i) liver transplantation (LT) is a high‐risk procedure due to the potential for antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR) and cell‐mediated rejection. The aim of the current report is to illustrate the results of a retrospective comparison study on the use of immunomodulation with therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) associated to high‐dose immunoglobulins (IVIg) and extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) in ABO‐i adult LT patients. Patients and methods: Between January 1996 and December 2005, 19 patients underwent ABO‐i LT. The study was designed for a comparison between two groups of ABO‐i LT. Group 1 (control group) consisted of 11 patients treated with TPE only. Group 2 (study group) included eight patients treated with TPE and IVIg. Moreover, all Group 2 patients received acute rejection prophylaxis with ECP. Results: The graft survival at 6, 12, and 18 months was 63.6, 54.4, and 45.5% for Group 1 vs. 87.5, 87.5, and 87.5% for Group 2 (P ≤ 0.001). In Group 1 there were 3(27.3%) cases of AMR; 5 (45.4%) biopsy‐proven acute rejections (BPAR); 1 (9.1%) chronic rejection and 3 (27.3%) ischemic‐type biliary lesions (ITBL). In Group 2 there were no cases of AMR, BPAR, chronic rejection, or ITBL (P = 0.013). Conclusion: At median follow‐up of 568 days, TPE in combination with IVIg and ECP appears to protect the graft from AMR in ABO‐i liver transplantation. Continued patient enrollment will allow validation of these preliminary observations or the opportunity to devise newer AMR‐avoidance policies. J. Clin. Apheresis 2008. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>18186527</pmid><doi>10.1002/jca.20156</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0733-2459
ispartof Journal of clinical apheresis, 2008, Vol.23 (2), p.55-62
issn 0733-2459
1098-1101
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70482239
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE
subjects ABO Blood-Group System
ABO-incompatible
Adult
antibody-mediated rejection
Blood Group Incompatibility
Combined Modality Therapy
ECP
Female
Graft Rejection - therapy
Humans
Immunoglobulins - therapeutic use
Immunologic Factors
IVIG
Liver Transplantation
Male
Middle Aged
Photopheresis
Plasmapheresis
Retrospective Studies
title The role of immunomodulation in ABO-incompatible adult liver transplant recipients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T14%3A47%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20role%20of%20immunomodulation%20in%20ABO-incompatible%20adult%20liver%20transplant%20recipients&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20apheresis&rft.au=Urbani,%20Lucio&rft.date=2008&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=55&rft.epage=62&rft.pages=55-62&rft.issn=0733-2459&rft.eissn=1098-1101&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jca.20156&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70482239%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70482239&rft_id=info:pmid/18186527&rfr_iscdi=true