Inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks in MADIT II: frequency, mechanisms, predictors, and survival impact

This study sought to identify the incidence and outcome related to inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks, that is, those for nonventricular arrhythmias. The MADIT (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial) II showed that prophylactic ICD implantation improve...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2008-04, Vol.51 (14), p.1357-1365
Hauptverfasser: Daubert, James P, Zareba, Wojciech, Cannom, David S, McNitt, Scott, Rosero, Spencer Z, Wang, Paul, Schuger, Claudio, Steinberg, Jonathan S, Higgins, Steven L, Wilber, David J, Klein, Helmut, Andrews, Mark L, Hall, W Jackson, Moss, Arthur J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1365
container_issue 14
container_start_page 1357
container_title Journal of the American College of Cardiology
container_volume 51
creator Daubert, James P
Zareba, Wojciech
Cannom, David S
McNitt, Scott
Rosero, Spencer Z
Wang, Paul
Schuger, Claudio
Steinberg, Jonathan S
Higgins, Steven L
Wilber, David J
Klein, Helmut
Andrews, Mark L
Hall, W Jackson
Moss, Arthur J
description This study sought to identify the incidence and outcome related to inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks, that is, those for nonventricular arrhythmias. The MADIT (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial) II showed that prophylactic ICD implantation improves survival in post-myocardial infarction patients with reduced ejection fraction. Inappropriate ICD shocks are common adverse consequences that may impair quality of life. Stored ICD electrograms from all shock episodes were adjudicated centrally. An inappropriate shock episode was defined as an episode during which 1 or more inappropriate shocks occurred; another inappropriate ICD episode occurring within 5 min was not counted. Programmed parameters for patients with and without inappropriate shocks were compared. One or more inappropriate shocks occurred in 83 (11.5%) of the 719 MADIT II ICD patients. Inappropriate shock episodes constituted 184 of the 590 total shock episodes (31.2%). Smoking, prior atrial fibrillation, diastolic hypertension, and antecedent appropriate shock predicted inappropriate shock occurrence. Atrial fibrillation was the most common trigger for inappropriate shock (44%), followed by supraventricular tachycardia (36%), and then abnormal sensing (20%). The stability detection algorithm was programmed less frequently in patients receiving inappropriate shocks (17% vs. 36%, p = 0.030), whereas other programming parameters did not differ significantly from those without inappropriate shocks. Importantly, patients with inappropriate shocks had a greater likelihood of all-cause mortality in follow-up (hazard ratio 2.29, p = 0.025). Inappropriate ICD shocks occurred commonly in the MADIT II study, and were associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.09.073
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70477354</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70477354</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-h188t-f1498e052b7c38398f3ac7b34ec67dffe6b365252a077d06f0994e58d307d9a43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkEtr3TAQhUVoaG7T_oEsiqDQVeyMLOvVXUhfhoRs0rWRpTFXN35Vsi9k1b9ehaSbrmYYvpk55xBywaBkwOTVoTxY58oKQJVgSlD8hOyYELrgwqg3ZJcnomBg1Bl5l9IBAKRm5i05Y5prVXO5I3-ayS5LnJcY7Io0jMtgp9V2A1Jnow_zEeOKsfDYhy6GYbDrHGnaz-4x0TDRu-uvzQNtmi-0j_h7w8k9XdIR3d5OIY3pki4RfXB5Kfd28jRt8RiOdnh-Zd36npz2dkj44bWek1_fvz3c_Cxu7380N9e3xZ5pvRY9q41GEFWnHNfc6J5bpzpeo5PK9z3KjktRicqCUh5kD8bUKLTnoLyxNT8nn1_uZq9ZZlrbMSSH2c-E85ZaBbXKaT2Dn_4DD_MWp6ytZQJkBdqAzNTHV2rrRvRtjm-08an9Fyz_C-skfL4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1506208906</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks in MADIT II: frequency, mechanisms, predictors, and survival impact</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Daubert, James P ; Zareba, Wojciech ; Cannom, David S ; McNitt, Scott ; Rosero, Spencer Z ; Wang, Paul ; Schuger, Claudio ; Steinberg, Jonathan S ; Higgins, Steven L ; Wilber, David J ; Klein, Helmut ; Andrews, Mark L ; Hall, W Jackson ; Moss, Arthur J</creator><creatorcontrib>Daubert, James P ; Zareba, Wojciech ; Cannom, David S ; McNitt, Scott ; Rosero, Spencer Z ; Wang, Paul ; Schuger, Claudio ; Steinberg, Jonathan S ; Higgins, Steven L ; Wilber, David J ; Klein, Helmut ; Andrews, Mark L ; Hall, W Jackson ; Moss, Arthur J ; MADIT II Investigators</creatorcontrib><description>This study sought to identify the incidence and outcome related to inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks, that is, those for nonventricular arrhythmias. The MADIT (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial) II showed that prophylactic ICD implantation improves survival in post-myocardial infarction patients with reduced ejection fraction. Inappropriate ICD shocks are common adverse consequences that may impair quality of life. Stored ICD electrograms from all shock episodes were adjudicated centrally. An inappropriate shock episode was defined as an episode during which 1 or more inappropriate shocks occurred; another inappropriate ICD episode occurring within 5 min was not counted. Programmed parameters for patients with and without inappropriate shocks were compared. One or more inappropriate shocks occurred in 83 (11.5%) of the 719 MADIT II ICD patients. Inappropriate shock episodes constituted 184 of the 590 total shock episodes (31.2%). Smoking, prior atrial fibrillation, diastolic hypertension, and antecedent appropriate shock predicted inappropriate shock occurrence. Atrial fibrillation was the most common trigger for inappropriate shock (44%), followed by supraventricular tachycardia (36%), and then abnormal sensing (20%). The stability detection algorithm was programmed less frequently in patients receiving inappropriate shocks (17% vs. 36%, p = 0.030), whereas other programming parameters did not differ significantly from those without inappropriate shocks. Importantly, patients with inappropriate shocks had a greater likelihood of all-cause mortality in follow-up (hazard ratio 2.29, p = 0.025). Inappropriate ICD shocks occurred commonly in the MADIT II study, and were associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-1097</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-3597</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.09.073</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18387436</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Limited</publisher><subject>Atrial Flutter - mortality ; Atrial Flutter - therapy ; Cardiac arrhythmia ; Cardiology ; Clinical Trials as Topic ; Defibrillators, Implantable - adverse effects ; Drug therapy ; Electric Countershock - adverse effects ; Electric Countershock - mortality ; Electric Countershock - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Equipment Failure ; Female ; Heart attacks ; Humans ; Incidence ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Mortality ; Myocardial Infarction - complications ; Myocardial Infarction - physiopathology ; Odds Ratio ; Prospective Studies ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Stroke Volume ; Tachycardia, Supraventricular - mortality ; Tachycardia, Supraventricular - therapy</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2008-04, Vol.51 (14), p.1357-1365</ispartof><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Apr 8, 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18387436$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Daubert, James P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zareba, Wojciech</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cannom, David S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNitt, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosero, Spencer Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuger, Claudio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinberg, Jonathan S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higgins, Steven L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilber, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, Helmut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrews, Mark L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, W Jackson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moss, Arthur J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MADIT II Investigators</creatorcontrib><title>Inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks in MADIT II: frequency, mechanisms, predictors, and survival impact</title><title>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</title><addtitle>J Am Coll Cardiol</addtitle><description>This study sought to identify the incidence and outcome related to inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks, that is, those for nonventricular arrhythmias. The MADIT (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial) II showed that prophylactic ICD implantation improves survival in post-myocardial infarction patients with reduced ejection fraction. Inappropriate ICD shocks are common adverse consequences that may impair quality of life. Stored ICD electrograms from all shock episodes were adjudicated centrally. An inappropriate shock episode was defined as an episode during which 1 or more inappropriate shocks occurred; another inappropriate ICD episode occurring within 5 min was not counted. Programmed parameters for patients with and without inappropriate shocks were compared. One or more inappropriate shocks occurred in 83 (11.5%) of the 719 MADIT II ICD patients. Inappropriate shock episodes constituted 184 of the 590 total shock episodes (31.2%). Smoking, prior atrial fibrillation, diastolic hypertension, and antecedent appropriate shock predicted inappropriate shock occurrence. Atrial fibrillation was the most common trigger for inappropriate shock (44%), followed by supraventricular tachycardia (36%), and then abnormal sensing (20%). The stability detection algorithm was programmed less frequently in patients receiving inappropriate shocks (17% vs. 36%, p = 0.030), whereas other programming parameters did not differ significantly from those without inappropriate shocks. Importantly, patients with inappropriate shocks had a greater likelihood of all-cause mortality in follow-up (hazard ratio 2.29, p = 0.025). Inappropriate ICD shocks occurred commonly in the MADIT II study, and were associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality.</description><subject>Atrial Flutter - mortality</subject><subject>Atrial Flutter - therapy</subject><subject>Cardiac arrhythmia</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Defibrillators, Implantable - adverse effects</subject><subject>Drug therapy</subject><subject>Electric Countershock - adverse effects</subject><subject>Electric Countershock - mortality</subject><subject>Electric Countershock - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Equipment Failure</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart attacks</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Myocardial Infarction - complications</subject><subject>Myocardial Infarction - physiopathology</subject><subject>Odds Ratio</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Stroke Volume</subject><subject>Tachycardia, Supraventricular - mortality</subject><subject>Tachycardia, Supraventricular - therapy</subject><issn>0735-1097</issn><issn>1558-3597</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkEtr3TAQhUVoaG7T_oEsiqDQVeyMLOvVXUhfhoRs0rWRpTFXN35Vsi9k1b9ehaSbrmYYvpk55xBywaBkwOTVoTxY58oKQJVgSlD8hOyYELrgwqg3ZJcnomBg1Bl5l9IBAKRm5i05Y5prVXO5I3-ayS5LnJcY7Io0jMtgp9V2A1Jnow_zEeOKsfDYhy6GYbDrHGnaz-4x0TDRu-uvzQNtmi-0j_h7w8k9XdIR3d5OIY3pki4RfXB5Kfd28jRt8RiOdnh-Zd36npz2dkj44bWek1_fvz3c_Cxu7380N9e3xZ5pvRY9q41GEFWnHNfc6J5bpzpeo5PK9z3KjktRicqCUh5kD8bUKLTnoLyxNT8nn1_uZq9ZZlrbMSSH2c-E85ZaBbXKaT2Dn_4DD_MWp6ytZQJkBdqAzNTHV2rrRvRtjm-08an9Fyz_C-skfL4</recordid><startdate>20080408</startdate><enddate>20080408</enddate><creator>Daubert, James P</creator><creator>Zareba, Wojciech</creator><creator>Cannom, David S</creator><creator>McNitt, Scott</creator><creator>Rosero, Spencer Z</creator><creator>Wang, Paul</creator><creator>Schuger, Claudio</creator><creator>Steinberg, Jonathan S</creator><creator>Higgins, Steven L</creator><creator>Wilber, David J</creator><creator>Klein, Helmut</creator><creator>Andrews, Mark L</creator><creator>Hall, W Jackson</creator><creator>Moss, Arthur J</creator><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080408</creationdate><title>Inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks in MADIT II: frequency, mechanisms, predictors, and survival impact</title><author>Daubert, James P ; Zareba, Wojciech ; Cannom, David S ; McNitt, Scott ; Rosero, Spencer Z ; Wang, Paul ; Schuger, Claudio ; Steinberg, Jonathan S ; Higgins, Steven L ; Wilber, David J ; Klein, Helmut ; Andrews, Mark L ; Hall, W Jackson ; Moss, Arthur J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-h188t-f1498e052b7c38398f3ac7b34ec67dffe6b365252a077d06f0994e58d307d9a43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Atrial Flutter - mortality</topic><topic>Atrial Flutter - therapy</topic><topic>Cardiac arrhythmia</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Defibrillators, Implantable - adverse effects</topic><topic>Drug therapy</topic><topic>Electric Countershock - adverse effects</topic><topic>Electric Countershock - mortality</topic><topic>Electric Countershock - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Equipment Failure</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart attacks</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Myocardial Infarction - complications</topic><topic>Myocardial Infarction - physiopathology</topic><topic>Odds Ratio</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Stroke Volume</topic><topic>Tachycardia, Supraventricular - mortality</topic><topic>Tachycardia, Supraventricular - therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Daubert, James P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zareba, Wojciech</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cannom, David S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNitt, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosero, Spencer Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuger, Claudio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinberg, Jonathan S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higgins, Steven L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilber, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, Helmut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrews, Mark L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, W Jackson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moss, Arthur J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MADIT II Investigators</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Daubert, James P</au><au>Zareba, Wojciech</au><au>Cannom, David S</au><au>McNitt, Scott</au><au>Rosero, Spencer Z</au><au>Wang, Paul</au><au>Schuger, Claudio</au><au>Steinberg, Jonathan S</au><au>Higgins, Steven L</au><au>Wilber, David J</au><au>Klein, Helmut</au><au>Andrews, Mark L</au><au>Hall, W Jackson</au><au>Moss, Arthur J</au><aucorp>MADIT II Investigators</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks in MADIT II: frequency, mechanisms, predictors, and survival impact</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Coll Cardiol</addtitle><date>2008-04-08</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>14</issue><spage>1357</spage><epage>1365</epage><pages>1357-1365</pages><issn>0735-1097</issn><eissn>1558-3597</eissn><abstract>This study sought to identify the incidence and outcome related to inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks, that is, those for nonventricular arrhythmias. The MADIT (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial) II showed that prophylactic ICD implantation improves survival in post-myocardial infarction patients with reduced ejection fraction. Inappropriate ICD shocks are common adverse consequences that may impair quality of life. Stored ICD electrograms from all shock episodes were adjudicated centrally. An inappropriate shock episode was defined as an episode during which 1 or more inappropriate shocks occurred; another inappropriate ICD episode occurring within 5 min was not counted. Programmed parameters for patients with and without inappropriate shocks were compared. One or more inappropriate shocks occurred in 83 (11.5%) of the 719 MADIT II ICD patients. Inappropriate shock episodes constituted 184 of the 590 total shock episodes (31.2%). Smoking, prior atrial fibrillation, diastolic hypertension, and antecedent appropriate shock predicted inappropriate shock occurrence. Atrial fibrillation was the most common trigger for inappropriate shock (44%), followed by supraventricular tachycardia (36%), and then abnormal sensing (20%). The stability detection algorithm was programmed less frequently in patients receiving inappropriate shocks (17% vs. 36%, p = 0.030), whereas other programming parameters did not differ significantly from those without inappropriate shocks. Importantly, patients with inappropriate shocks had a greater likelihood of all-cause mortality in follow-up (hazard ratio 2.29, p = 0.025). Inappropriate ICD shocks occurred commonly in the MADIT II study, and were associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Limited</pub><pmid>18387436</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jacc.2007.09.073</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0735-1097
ispartof Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2008-04, Vol.51 (14), p.1357-1365
issn 0735-1097
1558-3597
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70477354
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Atrial Flutter - mortality
Atrial Flutter - therapy
Cardiac arrhythmia
Cardiology
Clinical Trials as Topic
Defibrillators, Implantable - adverse effects
Drug therapy
Electric Countershock - adverse effects
Electric Countershock - mortality
Electric Countershock - statistics & numerical data
Equipment Failure
Female
Heart attacks
Humans
Incidence
Male
Middle Aged
Mortality
Myocardial Infarction - complications
Myocardial Infarction - physiopathology
Odds Ratio
Prospective Studies
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Stroke Volume
Tachycardia, Supraventricular - mortality
Tachycardia, Supraventricular - therapy
title Inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks in MADIT II: frequency, mechanisms, predictors, and survival impact
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T00%3A00%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inappropriate%20implantable%20cardioverter-defibrillator%20shocks%20in%20MADIT%20II:%20frequency,%20mechanisms,%20predictors,%20and%20survival%20impact&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20College%20of%20Cardiology&rft.au=Daubert,%20James%20P&rft.aucorp=MADIT%20II%20Investigators&rft.date=2008-04-08&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=14&rft.spage=1357&rft.epage=1365&rft.pages=1357-1365&rft.issn=0735-1097&rft.eissn=1558-3597&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2007.09.073&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E70477354%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1506208906&rft_id=info:pmid/18387436&rfr_iscdi=true