Different definitions of patient outcome: Consequences for performance analysis in trauma

Summary Background Death during acute care hospitalisation is commonly used as a principal outcome indicator in injury research. This endpoint excludes post-hospital trauma-related deaths, which are substantial according to recent US studies. Two additional ways of defining outcome in trauma victims...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Injury 2008-05, Vol.39 (5), p.612-622
Hauptverfasser: Skaga, Nils O, Eken, Torsten, Jones, J. Mary, Steen, Petter A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 622
container_issue 5
container_start_page 612
container_title Injury
container_volume 39
creator Skaga, Nils O
Eken, Torsten
Jones, J. Mary
Steen, Petter A
description Summary Background Death during acute care hospitalisation is commonly used as a principal outcome indicator in injury research. This endpoint excludes post-hospital trauma-related deaths, which are substantial according to recent US studies. Two additional ways of defining outcome in trauma victims are also used; by end of somatic care , and at 30 days after injury . Our primary aim was to analyse how the different definitions of trauma outcome influence performance analyses. Secondly, we wanted to evaluate whether 30 days mortality after injury, which is widely used in other parts of biomedicine and recommended by the United Nations for use in transport statistics, is a suitable endpoint in trauma research. Materials and methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the hospital based trauma registry at Ulleval University Hospital (UUH) in Oslo, Norway. Outcome measure was mortality at discharge from UUH , i.e., by “end of acute care”, at end of somatic care defined as discharge from final acute care hospital, and at 30 days after injury . Analyses were performed according to conventional TRISS methodology. Results 3332 of 3446 patients from the years 2000–2004 were included. Of these, 323 (9.7%) died within 30 days of injury or during somatic care more than 30 days after injury. Mortality varied with outcome definition, with 264 deaths (81.7% of total deaths) before discharge from UUH , 318 (98.4%) before end of somatic care , and 308 (95.4%) within 30 days after injury . TRISS-based trauma system performance evaluation for blunt trauma showed significantly better outcome than predicted with discharge from UUH as outcome definition, whereas for category 30 days after injury , performance was clearly less favourable. Performance for penetrating trauma was not affected, since all deaths occurred before 30 days, and nearly all before discharge from UUH. Conclusions A substantial number of in-hospital deaths following blunt trauma occurs after discharge from the primary institution, i.e., unnoticed when “end of acute care” is used as outcome definition. Consequently, outcome definition influenced performance when comparing our institution to an acknowledged standard. We recommend mortality occurring within 30 days of injury as endpoint in trauma research.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.injury.2007.11.426
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70476445</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0020138307004895</els_id><sourcerecordid>70476445</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-f219a56f43c3099ad0c8a088f2761e10c7b4d334a54d09c7afe486fe50dd82703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxS0EokvhGyDkC70ljP8kdjggoS0FpEocWg6cLNcZSw5JvNgJ0n57HO0KpF44jTR-82b8e4S8ZlAzYO27oQ7zsKZjzQFUzVgtefuE7JhWXQW8VU_JDoBDxYQWF-RFzgMAUyDEc3LBtFCqg25HflwH7zHhvNAefZjDEuKcafT0YJewteO6uDjhe7ovD_hrxdlhpj4mesBUymRLg9rZjsccMg0zXZJdJ_uSPPN2zPjqXC_J95tP9_sv1e23z1_3H28rJ2WzVJ6zzjatl8IJ6Drbg9MWtPZctQwZOPUgeyGkbWQPnVPWo9Stxwb6XvPyn0tydfI9pFiuy4uZQnY4jnbGuGajQKq2rCpCeRK6FHNO6M0hhcmmo2FgNqRmMCekZkNqGDMFaRl7c_ZfHybs_w2dGRbB27PAZmdHnwqQkP_qOPBGNJ0qug8nHRYavwMmk13YaPYhoVtMH8P_Lnls4MaSWNn5E4-Yh7imkkI2zGRuwNxt8W_pgwKQumvEHwFzrIA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70476445</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Different definitions of patient outcome: Consequences for performance analysis in trauma</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Skaga, Nils O ; Eken, Torsten ; Jones, J. Mary ; Steen, Petter A</creator><creatorcontrib>Skaga, Nils O ; Eken, Torsten ; Jones, J. Mary ; Steen, Petter A</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Background Death during acute care hospitalisation is commonly used as a principal outcome indicator in injury research. This endpoint excludes post-hospital trauma-related deaths, which are substantial according to recent US studies. Two additional ways of defining outcome in trauma victims are also used; by end of somatic care , and at 30 days after injury . Our primary aim was to analyse how the different definitions of trauma outcome influence performance analyses. Secondly, we wanted to evaluate whether 30 days mortality after injury, which is widely used in other parts of biomedicine and recommended by the United Nations for use in transport statistics, is a suitable endpoint in trauma research. Materials and methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the hospital based trauma registry at Ulleval University Hospital (UUH) in Oslo, Norway. Outcome measure was mortality at discharge from UUH , i.e., by “end of acute care”, at end of somatic care defined as discharge from final acute care hospital, and at 30 days after injury . Analyses were performed according to conventional TRISS methodology. Results 3332 of 3446 patients from the years 2000–2004 were included. Of these, 323 (9.7%) died within 30 days of injury or during somatic care more than 30 days after injury. Mortality varied with outcome definition, with 264 deaths (81.7% of total deaths) before discharge from UUH , 318 (98.4%) before end of somatic care , and 308 (95.4%) within 30 days after injury . TRISS-based trauma system performance evaluation for blunt trauma showed significantly better outcome than predicted with discharge from UUH as outcome definition, whereas for category 30 days after injury , performance was clearly less favourable. Performance for penetrating trauma was not affected, since all deaths occurred before 30 days, and nearly all before discharge from UUH. Conclusions A substantial number of in-hospital deaths following blunt trauma occurs after discharge from the primary institution, i.e., unnoticed when “end of acute care” is used as outcome definition. Consequently, outcome definition influenced performance when comparing our institution to an acknowledged standard. We recommend mortality occurring within 30 days of injury as endpoint in trauma research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-1383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0267</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2007.11.426</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18377909</identifier><identifier>CODEN: INJUBF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>30-day mortality ; Adult ; Aged ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Diseases of the osteoarticular system ; End of acute care ; Female ; General anesthesia. Technics. Complications. Neuromuscular blocking. Premedication. Surgical preparation. Sedation ; Humans ; Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Norway ; Orthopedics ; Outcome ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - standards ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Probability of survival ; Prognosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival prediction ; Survival Rate ; Trauma ; Trauma Severity Indices ; Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents ; Treatment Outcome ; TRISS methodology ; Validation ; Wounds, Nonpenetrating - mortality ; Wounds, Penetrating - mortality</subject><ispartof>Injury, 2008-05, Vol.39 (5), p.612-622</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2007 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-f219a56f43c3099ad0c8a088f2761e10c7b4d334a54d09c7afe486fe50dd82703</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-f219a56f43c3099ad0c8a088f2761e10c7b4d334a54d09c7afe486fe50dd82703</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138307004895$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20253597$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18377909$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Skaga, Nils O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eken, Torsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, J. Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steen, Petter A</creatorcontrib><title>Different definitions of patient outcome: Consequences for performance analysis in trauma</title><title>Injury</title><addtitle>Injury</addtitle><description>Summary Background Death during acute care hospitalisation is commonly used as a principal outcome indicator in injury research. This endpoint excludes post-hospital trauma-related deaths, which are substantial according to recent US studies. Two additional ways of defining outcome in trauma victims are also used; by end of somatic care , and at 30 days after injury . Our primary aim was to analyse how the different definitions of trauma outcome influence performance analyses. Secondly, we wanted to evaluate whether 30 days mortality after injury, which is widely used in other parts of biomedicine and recommended by the United Nations for use in transport statistics, is a suitable endpoint in trauma research. Materials and methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the hospital based trauma registry at Ulleval University Hospital (UUH) in Oslo, Norway. Outcome measure was mortality at discharge from UUH , i.e., by “end of acute care”, at end of somatic care defined as discharge from final acute care hospital, and at 30 days after injury . Analyses were performed according to conventional TRISS methodology. Results 3332 of 3446 patients from the years 2000–2004 were included. Of these, 323 (9.7%) died within 30 days of injury or during somatic care more than 30 days after injury. Mortality varied with outcome definition, with 264 deaths (81.7% of total deaths) before discharge from UUH , 318 (98.4%) before end of somatic care , and 308 (95.4%) within 30 days after injury . TRISS-based trauma system performance evaluation for blunt trauma showed significantly better outcome than predicted with discharge from UUH as outcome definition, whereas for category 30 days after injury , performance was clearly less favourable. Performance for penetrating trauma was not affected, since all deaths occurred before 30 days, and nearly all before discharge from UUH. Conclusions A substantial number of in-hospital deaths following blunt trauma occurs after discharge from the primary institution, i.e., unnoticed when “end of acute care” is used as outcome definition. Consequently, outcome definition influenced performance when comparing our institution to an acknowledged standard. We recommend mortality occurring within 30 days of injury as endpoint in trauma research.</description><subject>30-day mortality</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</subject><subject>End of acute care</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General anesthesia. Technics. Complications. Neuromuscular blocking. Premedication. Surgical preparation. Sedation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Norway</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Outcome</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - standards</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Probability of survival</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Survival prediction</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Trauma</subject><subject>Trauma Severity Indices</subject><subject>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>TRISS methodology</subject><subject>Validation</subject><subject>Wounds, Nonpenetrating - mortality</subject><subject>Wounds, Penetrating - mortality</subject><issn>0020-1383</issn><issn>1879-0267</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxS0EokvhGyDkC70ljP8kdjggoS0FpEocWg6cLNcZSw5JvNgJ0n57HO0KpF44jTR-82b8e4S8ZlAzYO27oQ7zsKZjzQFUzVgtefuE7JhWXQW8VU_JDoBDxYQWF-RFzgMAUyDEc3LBtFCqg25HflwH7zHhvNAefZjDEuKcafT0YJewteO6uDjhe7ovD_hrxdlhpj4mesBUymRLg9rZjsccMg0zXZJdJ_uSPPN2zPjqXC_J95tP9_sv1e23z1_3H28rJ2WzVJ6zzjatl8IJ6Drbg9MWtPZctQwZOPUgeyGkbWQPnVPWo9Stxwb6XvPyn0tydfI9pFiuy4uZQnY4jnbGuGajQKq2rCpCeRK6FHNO6M0hhcmmo2FgNqRmMCekZkNqGDMFaRl7c_ZfHybs_w2dGRbB27PAZmdHnwqQkP_qOPBGNJ0qug8nHRYavwMmk13YaPYhoVtMH8P_Lnls4MaSWNn5E4-Yh7imkkI2zGRuwNxt8W_pgwKQumvEHwFzrIA</recordid><startdate>20080501</startdate><enddate>20080501</enddate><creator>Skaga, Nils O</creator><creator>Eken, Torsten</creator><creator>Jones, J. Mary</creator><creator>Steen, Petter A</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080501</creationdate><title>Different definitions of patient outcome: Consequences for performance analysis in trauma</title><author>Skaga, Nils O ; Eken, Torsten ; Jones, J. Mary ; Steen, Petter A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-f219a56f43c3099ad0c8a088f2761e10c7b4d334a54d09c7afe486fe50dd82703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>30-day mortality</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</topic><topic>End of acute care</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General anesthesia. Technics. Complications. Neuromuscular blocking. Premedication. Surgical preparation. Sedation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Norway</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Outcome</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - standards</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Probability of survival</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Survival prediction</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Trauma</topic><topic>Trauma Severity Indices</topic><topic>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>TRISS methodology</topic><topic>Validation</topic><topic>Wounds, Nonpenetrating - mortality</topic><topic>Wounds, Penetrating - mortality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Skaga, Nils O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eken, Torsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, J. Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steen, Petter A</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Injury</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Skaga, Nils O</au><au>Eken, Torsten</au><au>Jones, J. Mary</au><au>Steen, Petter A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Different definitions of patient outcome: Consequences for performance analysis in trauma</atitle><jtitle>Injury</jtitle><addtitle>Injury</addtitle><date>2008-05-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>612</spage><epage>622</epage><pages>612-622</pages><issn>0020-1383</issn><eissn>1879-0267</eissn><coden>INJUBF</coden><abstract>Summary Background Death during acute care hospitalisation is commonly used as a principal outcome indicator in injury research. This endpoint excludes post-hospital trauma-related deaths, which are substantial according to recent US studies. Two additional ways of defining outcome in trauma victims are also used; by end of somatic care , and at 30 days after injury . Our primary aim was to analyse how the different definitions of trauma outcome influence performance analyses. Secondly, we wanted to evaluate whether 30 days mortality after injury, which is widely used in other parts of biomedicine and recommended by the United Nations for use in transport statistics, is a suitable endpoint in trauma research. Materials and methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the hospital based trauma registry at Ulleval University Hospital (UUH) in Oslo, Norway. Outcome measure was mortality at discharge from UUH , i.e., by “end of acute care”, at end of somatic care defined as discharge from final acute care hospital, and at 30 days after injury . Analyses were performed according to conventional TRISS methodology. Results 3332 of 3446 patients from the years 2000–2004 were included. Of these, 323 (9.7%) died within 30 days of injury or during somatic care more than 30 days after injury. Mortality varied with outcome definition, with 264 deaths (81.7% of total deaths) before discharge from UUH , 318 (98.4%) before end of somatic care , and 308 (95.4%) within 30 days after injury . TRISS-based trauma system performance evaluation for blunt trauma showed significantly better outcome than predicted with discharge from UUH as outcome definition, whereas for category 30 days after injury , performance was clearly less favourable. Performance for penetrating trauma was not affected, since all deaths occurred before 30 days, and nearly all before discharge from UUH. Conclusions A substantial number of in-hospital deaths following blunt trauma occurs after discharge from the primary institution, i.e., unnoticed when “end of acute care” is used as outcome definition. Consequently, outcome definition influenced performance when comparing our institution to an acknowledged standard. We recommend mortality occurring within 30 days of injury as endpoint in trauma research.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>18377909</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.injury.2007.11.426</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-1383
ispartof Injury, 2008-05, Vol.39 (5), p.612-622
issn 0020-1383
1879-0267
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70476445
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects 30-day mortality
Adult
Aged
Anesthesia
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Biological and medical sciences
Diseases of the osteoarticular system
End of acute care
Female
General anesthesia. Technics. Complications. Neuromuscular blocking. Premedication. Surgical preparation. Sedation
Humans
Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Norway
Orthopedics
Outcome
Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - standards
Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - statistics & numerical data
Probability of survival
Prognosis
Retrospective Studies
Survival prediction
Survival Rate
Trauma
Trauma Severity Indices
Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents
Treatment Outcome
TRISS methodology
Validation
Wounds, Nonpenetrating - mortality
Wounds, Penetrating - mortality
title Different definitions of patient outcome: Consequences for performance analysis in trauma
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T03%3A45%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Different%20definitions%20of%20patient%20outcome:%20Consequences%20for%20performance%20analysis%20in%20trauma&rft.jtitle=Injury&rft.au=Skaga,%20Nils%20O&rft.date=2008-05-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=612&rft.epage=622&rft.pages=612-622&rft.issn=0020-1383&rft.eissn=1879-0267&rft.coden=INJUBF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.injury.2007.11.426&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70476445%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70476445&rft_id=info:pmid/18377909&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0020138307004895&rfr_iscdi=true