When Prosocials Act Like Proselfs in a Commons Dilemma

Past research has shown that people with prosocial orientations exercise restraint when collectively shared resources are close to being depleted, whereas people with proself orientations tend to maintain high levels of consumption. This research seeks to extend this important finding by examining w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Personality & social psychology bulletin 2007-05, Vol.33 (5), p.750-758
Hauptverfasser: Brucks, Wernher M., Van Lange, Paul A. M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 758
container_issue 5
container_start_page 750
container_title Personality & social psychology bulletin
container_volume 33
creator Brucks, Wernher M.
Van Lange, Paul A. M.
description Past research has shown that people with prosocial orientations exercise restraint when collectively shared resources are close to being depleted, whereas people with proself orientations tend to maintain high levels of consumption. This research seeks to extend this important finding by examining whether the presence of noise in social-ecological interaction may modify the effects of social values in a commons dilemma. Participants were taking resources from a gradually declining pool. For half of the participants, the intended consumption was subject to incidental increases in consumption (negative noise). Consistent with hypotheses, noise exerted detrimental effects on cooperation when resources became scarce, yet these effects were only observed for prosocials, not for proselfs. These results indicate that noise in social-ecological interaction plays an important role in common-pool management. It tends to undermine cooperation among those who are otherwise inclined to save resources .
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0146167206298569
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70459871</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0146167206298569</sage_id><sourcerecordid>57058820</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a457t-511fe94b0cbaef7986969adcd586b912859b18920bb78fc394c3c417f035a3083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkLtLA0EQhxdRTIz2VnJY2J3O7HvLkPiCgBaK5bK32dOL94i3ucL_3osJBAJiNTDzzW-Yj5BzhGtEpW4AuUSpKEhqtJDmgAxRCJoqztghGa7H6Xo-ICcxLgCAS06PyQAV50CBD4l8-wh18tw2sfGFK2My9qtkVnyG314o85gUdeKSSVNVTR2TaVGGqnKn5Cjv6XC2rSPyenf7MnlIZ0_3j5PxLHVcqFUqEPNgeAY-cyFXRksjjZv7udAyM0i1MBlqQyHLlM49M9wzz1HlwIRjoNmIXG1yl23z1YW4slURfShLV4emi1YBF0Yr_BcUCoTWFHrwcg9cNF1b909YiswYxXp5IwIbyPcSYhtyu2yLyrXfFsGuzdt98_3KxTa3y6ow3y1sVfdAugGiew-7o38G_gBWuYdz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>213997374</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>When Prosocials Act Like Proselfs in a Commons Dilemma</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Brucks, Wernher M. ; Van Lange, Paul A. M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Brucks, Wernher M. ; Van Lange, Paul A. M.</creatorcontrib><description>Past research has shown that people with prosocial orientations exercise restraint when collectively shared resources are close to being depleted, whereas people with proself orientations tend to maintain high levels of consumption. This research seeks to extend this important finding by examining whether the presence of noise in social-ecological interaction may modify the effects of social values in a commons dilemma. Participants were taking resources from a gradually declining pool. For half of the participants, the intended consumption was subject to incidental increases in consumption (negative noise). Consistent with hypotheses, noise exerted detrimental effects on cooperation when resources became scarce, yet these effects were only observed for prosocials, not for proselfs. These results indicate that noise in social-ecological interaction plays an important role in common-pool management. It tends to undermine cooperation among those who are otherwise inclined to save resources .</description><identifier>ISSN: 0146-1672</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-7433</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0146167206298569</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17440204</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analysis of Variance ; Commons dilemma ; Consumption ; Cooperative Behavior ; Cooperative behaviour ; Ecology ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Motivation ; Netherlands ; Noise ; Psychological aspects ; Resource Allocation ; Social Behavior ; Social interaction ; Social psychology ; Social Values</subject><ispartof>Personality &amp; social psychology bulletin, 2007-05, Vol.33 (5), p.750-758</ispartof><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. May 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a457t-511fe94b0cbaef7986969adcd586b912859b18920bb78fc394c3c417f035a3083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a457t-511fe94b0cbaef7986969adcd586b912859b18920bb78fc394c3c417f035a3083</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0146167206298569$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0146167206298569$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,30976,30977,33751,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17440204$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brucks, Wernher M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Lange, Paul A. M.</creatorcontrib><title>When Prosocials Act Like Proselfs in a Commons Dilemma</title><title>Personality &amp; social psychology bulletin</title><addtitle>Pers Soc Psychol Bull</addtitle><description>Past research has shown that people with prosocial orientations exercise restraint when collectively shared resources are close to being depleted, whereas people with proself orientations tend to maintain high levels of consumption. This research seeks to extend this important finding by examining whether the presence of noise in social-ecological interaction may modify the effects of social values in a commons dilemma. Participants were taking resources from a gradually declining pool. For half of the participants, the intended consumption was subject to incidental increases in consumption (negative noise). Consistent with hypotheses, noise exerted detrimental effects on cooperation when resources became scarce, yet these effects were only observed for prosocials, not for proselfs. These results indicate that noise in social-ecological interaction plays an important role in common-pool management. It tends to undermine cooperation among those who are otherwise inclined to save resources .</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Commons dilemma</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Cooperative Behavior</subject><subject>Cooperative behaviour</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Resource Allocation</subject><subject>Social Behavior</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Social Values</subject><issn>0146-1672</issn><issn>1552-7433</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkLtLA0EQhxdRTIz2VnJY2J3O7HvLkPiCgBaK5bK32dOL94i3ucL_3osJBAJiNTDzzW-Yj5BzhGtEpW4AuUSpKEhqtJDmgAxRCJoqztghGa7H6Xo-ICcxLgCAS06PyQAV50CBD4l8-wh18tw2sfGFK2My9qtkVnyG314o85gUdeKSSVNVTR2TaVGGqnKn5Cjv6XC2rSPyenf7MnlIZ0_3j5PxLHVcqFUqEPNgeAY-cyFXRksjjZv7udAyM0i1MBlqQyHLlM49M9wzz1HlwIRjoNmIXG1yl23z1YW4slURfShLV4emi1YBF0Yr_BcUCoTWFHrwcg9cNF1b909YiswYxXp5IwIbyPcSYhtyu2yLyrXfFsGuzdt98_3KxTa3y6ow3y1sVfdAugGiew-7o38G_gBWuYdz</recordid><startdate>20070501</startdate><enddate>20070501</enddate><creator>Brucks, Wernher M.</creator><creator>Van Lange, Paul A. M.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070501</creationdate><title>When Prosocials Act Like Proselfs in a Commons Dilemma</title><author>Brucks, Wernher M. ; Van Lange, Paul A. M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a457t-511fe94b0cbaef7986969adcd586b912859b18920bb78fc394c3c417f035a3083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Commons dilemma</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Cooperative Behavior</topic><topic>Cooperative behaviour</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Resource Allocation</topic><topic>Social Behavior</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Social Values</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brucks, Wernher M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Lange, Paul A. M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Personality &amp; social psychology bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brucks, Wernher M.</au><au>Van Lange, Paul A. M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>When Prosocials Act Like Proselfs in a Commons Dilemma</atitle><jtitle>Personality &amp; social psychology bulletin</jtitle><addtitle>Pers Soc Psychol Bull</addtitle><date>2007-05-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>750</spage><epage>758</epage><pages>750-758</pages><issn>0146-1672</issn><eissn>1552-7433</eissn><abstract>Past research has shown that people with prosocial orientations exercise restraint when collectively shared resources are close to being depleted, whereas people with proself orientations tend to maintain high levels of consumption. This research seeks to extend this important finding by examining whether the presence of noise in social-ecological interaction may modify the effects of social values in a commons dilemma. Participants were taking resources from a gradually declining pool. For half of the participants, the intended consumption was subject to incidental increases in consumption (negative noise). Consistent with hypotheses, noise exerted detrimental effects on cooperation when resources became scarce, yet these effects were only observed for prosocials, not for proselfs. These results indicate that noise in social-ecological interaction plays an important role in common-pool management. It tends to undermine cooperation among those who are otherwise inclined to save resources .</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>17440204</pmid><doi>10.1177/0146167206298569</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0146-1672
ispartof Personality & social psychology bulletin, 2007-05, Vol.33 (5), p.750-758
issn 0146-1672
1552-7433
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70459871
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Complete A-Z List; MEDLINE; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Adult
Analysis of Variance
Commons dilemma
Consumption
Cooperative Behavior
Cooperative behaviour
Ecology
Female
Humans
Male
Motivation
Netherlands
Noise
Psychological aspects
Resource Allocation
Social Behavior
Social interaction
Social psychology
Social Values
title When Prosocials Act Like Proselfs in a Commons Dilemma
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T01%3A45%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=When%20Prosocials%20Act%20Like%20Proselfs%20in%20a%20Commons%20Dilemma&rft.jtitle=Personality%20&%20social%20psychology%20bulletin&rft.au=Brucks,%20Wernher%20M.&rft.date=2007-05-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=750&rft.epage=758&rft.pages=750-758&rft.issn=0146-1672&rft.eissn=1552-7433&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0146167206298569&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57058820%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=213997374&rft_id=info:pmid/17440204&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0146167206298569&rfr_iscdi=true