When Prosocials Act Like Proselfs in a Commons Dilemma
Past research has shown that people with prosocial orientations exercise restraint when collectively shared resources are close to being depleted, whereas people with proself orientations tend to maintain high levels of consumption. This research seeks to extend this important finding by examining w...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Personality & social psychology bulletin 2007-05, Vol.33 (5), p.750-758 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 758 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 750 |
container_title | Personality & social psychology bulletin |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Brucks, Wernher M. Van Lange, Paul A. M. |
description | Past research has shown that people with prosocial orientations exercise restraint when collectively shared resources are close to being depleted, whereas people with proself orientations tend to maintain high levels of consumption. This research seeks to extend this important finding by examining whether the presence of noise in social-ecological interaction may modify the effects of social values in a commons dilemma. Participants were taking resources from a gradually declining pool. For half of the participants, the intended consumption was subject to incidental increases in consumption (negative noise). Consistent with hypotheses, noise exerted detrimental effects on cooperation when resources became scarce, yet these effects were only observed for prosocials, not for proselfs. These results indicate that noise in social-ecological interaction plays an important role in common-pool management. It tends to undermine cooperation among those who are otherwise inclined to save resources
. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0146167206298569 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70459871</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0146167206298569</sage_id><sourcerecordid>57058820</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a457t-511fe94b0cbaef7986969adcd586b912859b18920bb78fc394c3c417f035a3083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkLtLA0EQhxdRTIz2VnJY2J3O7HvLkPiCgBaK5bK32dOL94i3ucL_3osJBAJiNTDzzW-Yj5BzhGtEpW4AuUSpKEhqtJDmgAxRCJoqztghGa7H6Xo-ICcxLgCAS06PyQAV50CBD4l8-wh18tw2sfGFK2My9qtkVnyG314o85gUdeKSSVNVTR2TaVGGqnKn5Cjv6XC2rSPyenf7MnlIZ0_3j5PxLHVcqFUqEPNgeAY-cyFXRksjjZv7udAyM0i1MBlqQyHLlM49M9wzz1HlwIRjoNmIXG1yl23z1YW4slURfShLV4emi1YBF0Yr_BcUCoTWFHrwcg9cNF1b909YiswYxXp5IwIbyPcSYhtyu2yLyrXfFsGuzdt98_3KxTa3y6ow3y1sVfdAugGiew-7o38G_gBWuYdz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>213997374</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>When Prosocials Act Like Proselfs in a Commons Dilemma</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Brucks, Wernher M. ; Van Lange, Paul A. M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Brucks, Wernher M. ; Van Lange, Paul A. M.</creatorcontrib><description>Past research has shown that people with prosocial orientations exercise restraint when collectively shared resources are close to being depleted, whereas people with proself orientations tend to maintain high levels of consumption. This research seeks to extend this important finding by examining whether the presence of noise in social-ecological interaction may modify the effects of social values in a commons dilemma. Participants were taking resources from a gradually declining pool. For half of the participants, the intended consumption was subject to incidental increases in consumption (negative noise). Consistent with hypotheses, noise exerted detrimental effects on cooperation when resources became scarce, yet these effects were only observed for prosocials, not for proselfs. These results indicate that noise in social-ecological interaction plays an important role in common-pool management. It tends to undermine cooperation among those who are otherwise inclined to save resources
.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0146-1672</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-7433</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0146167206298569</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17440204</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analysis of Variance ; Commons dilemma ; Consumption ; Cooperative Behavior ; Cooperative behaviour ; Ecology ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Motivation ; Netherlands ; Noise ; Psychological aspects ; Resource Allocation ; Social Behavior ; Social interaction ; Social psychology ; Social Values</subject><ispartof>Personality & social psychology bulletin, 2007-05, Vol.33 (5), p.750-758</ispartof><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. May 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a457t-511fe94b0cbaef7986969adcd586b912859b18920bb78fc394c3c417f035a3083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a457t-511fe94b0cbaef7986969adcd586b912859b18920bb78fc394c3c417f035a3083</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0146167206298569$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0146167206298569$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,30976,30977,33751,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17440204$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brucks, Wernher M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Lange, Paul A. M.</creatorcontrib><title>When Prosocials Act Like Proselfs in a Commons Dilemma</title><title>Personality & social psychology bulletin</title><addtitle>Pers Soc Psychol Bull</addtitle><description>Past research has shown that people with prosocial orientations exercise restraint when collectively shared resources are close to being depleted, whereas people with proself orientations tend to maintain high levels of consumption. This research seeks to extend this important finding by examining whether the presence of noise in social-ecological interaction may modify the effects of social values in a commons dilemma. Participants were taking resources from a gradually declining pool. For half of the participants, the intended consumption was subject to incidental increases in consumption (negative noise). Consistent with hypotheses, noise exerted detrimental effects on cooperation when resources became scarce, yet these effects were only observed for prosocials, not for proselfs. These results indicate that noise in social-ecological interaction plays an important role in common-pool management. It tends to undermine cooperation among those who are otherwise inclined to save resources
.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Commons dilemma</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Cooperative Behavior</subject><subject>Cooperative behaviour</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Resource Allocation</subject><subject>Social Behavior</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Social Values</subject><issn>0146-1672</issn><issn>1552-7433</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkLtLA0EQhxdRTIz2VnJY2J3O7HvLkPiCgBaK5bK32dOL94i3ucL_3osJBAJiNTDzzW-Yj5BzhGtEpW4AuUSpKEhqtJDmgAxRCJoqztghGa7H6Xo-ICcxLgCAS06PyQAV50CBD4l8-wh18tw2sfGFK2My9qtkVnyG314o85gUdeKSSVNVTR2TaVGGqnKn5Cjv6XC2rSPyenf7MnlIZ0_3j5PxLHVcqFUqEPNgeAY-cyFXRksjjZv7udAyM0i1MBlqQyHLlM49M9wzz1HlwIRjoNmIXG1yl23z1YW4slURfShLV4emi1YBF0Yr_BcUCoTWFHrwcg9cNF1b909YiswYxXp5IwIbyPcSYhtyu2yLyrXfFsGuzdt98_3KxTa3y6ow3y1sVfdAugGiew-7o38G_gBWuYdz</recordid><startdate>20070501</startdate><enddate>20070501</enddate><creator>Brucks, Wernher M.</creator><creator>Van Lange, Paul A. M.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070501</creationdate><title>When Prosocials Act Like Proselfs in a Commons Dilemma</title><author>Brucks, Wernher M. ; Van Lange, Paul A. M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a457t-511fe94b0cbaef7986969adcd586b912859b18920bb78fc394c3c417f035a3083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Commons dilemma</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Cooperative Behavior</topic><topic>Cooperative behaviour</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Resource Allocation</topic><topic>Social Behavior</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Social Values</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brucks, Wernher M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Lange, Paul A. M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Personality & social psychology bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brucks, Wernher M.</au><au>Van Lange, Paul A. M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>When Prosocials Act Like Proselfs in a Commons Dilemma</atitle><jtitle>Personality & social psychology bulletin</jtitle><addtitle>Pers Soc Psychol Bull</addtitle><date>2007-05-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>750</spage><epage>758</epage><pages>750-758</pages><issn>0146-1672</issn><eissn>1552-7433</eissn><abstract>Past research has shown that people with prosocial orientations exercise restraint when collectively shared resources are close to being depleted, whereas people with proself orientations tend to maintain high levels of consumption. This research seeks to extend this important finding by examining whether the presence of noise in social-ecological interaction may modify the effects of social values in a commons dilemma. Participants were taking resources from a gradually declining pool. For half of the participants, the intended consumption was subject to incidental increases in consumption (negative noise). Consistent with hypotheses, noise exerted detrimental effects on cooperation when resources became scarce, yet these effects were only observed for prosocials, not for proselfs. These results indicate that noise in social-ecological interaction plays an important role in common-pool management. It tends to undermine cooperation among those who are otherwise inclined to save resources
.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>17440204</pmid><doi>10.1177/0146167206298569</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0146-1672 |
ispartof | Personality & social psychology bulletin, 2007-05, Vol.33 (5), p.750-758 |
issn | 0146-1672 1552-7433 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70459871 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Complete A-Z List; MEDLINE; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Adult Analysis of Variance Commons dilemma Consumption Cooperative Behavior Cooperative behaviour Ecology Female Humans Male Motivation Netherlands Noise Psychological aspects Resource Allocation Social Behavior Social interaction Social psychology Social Values |
title | When Prosocials Act Like Proselfs in a Commons Dilemma |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T01%3A45%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=When%20Prosocials%20Act%20Like%20Proselfs%20in%20a%20Commons%20Dilemma&rft.jtitle=Personality%20&%20social%20psychology%20bulletin&rft.au=Brucks,%20Wernher%20M.&rft.date=2007-05-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=750&rft.epage=758&rft.pages=750-758&rft.issn=0146-1672&rft.eissn=1552-7433&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0146167206298569&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57058820%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=213997374&rft_id=info:pmid/17440204&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0146167206298569&rfr_iscdi=true |