A randomized study of a multidisciplinary program to intervene on geriatric syndromes in vulnerable older people who live at home (Dutch EASYcare Study)
The effectiveness of community-based geriatric intervention models for vulnerable older adults is controversial. We evaluated a problem-based multidisciplinary intervention targeting vulnerable older adults at home that promised efficacy through better timing and increased commitment of patients and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences Biological sciences and medical sciences, 2008-03, Vol.63 (3), p.283-290 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 290 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 283 |
container_title | The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences |
container_volume | 63 |
creator | Melis, René J F van Eijken, Monique I J Teerenstra, Steven van Achterberg, Theo Parker, Stuart G Borm, George F van de Lisdonk, Eloy H Wensing, Michel Rikkert, Marcel G M Olde |
description | The effectiveness of community-based geriatric intervention models for vulnerable older adults is controversial. We evaluated a problem-based multidisciplinary intervention targeting vulnerable older adults at home that promised efficacy through better timing and increased commitment of patients and primary care physicians. This study compared the effects of this new model to usual care.
Primary care physicians referred older people for problems with cognition, nutrition, behavior, mood, or mobility. One hundred fifty-one participants (mean age 82.2 years, 74.8% women) were included in a pseudocluster randomized trial with 6-month follow-up for the primary outcomes. Eighty-five participants received the new intervention, and 66 usual care. In the intervention arm, geriatric nurses visited patients at home for geriatric assessment and management in cooperation with primary care physicians and geriatricians. Modified intention-to-treat analyses focused on differences between treatment arms in functional abilities (Groningen Activity Restriction Scale-3) and mental well-being (subscale mental health Medical Outcomes Study [MOS]-20), using a mixed linear model.
After 3 months, treatment arms showed significant differences in favor of the new intervention. Functional abilities improved 2.2 points (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3-4.2) and well-being 5.8 points (95% CI, 0.1-11.4). After 6 months, the favorable effect increased for well-being (9.1; 95% CI, 2.4-15.9), but the effect on functional abilities was no longer significant (1.6; 95% CI, -0.7 to 3.9).
This problem-based geriatric intervention improved functional abilities and mental well-being of vulnerable older people. Problem-based interventions can increase the effectiveness of primary care for this population. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/gerona/63.3.283 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70442071</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70442071</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p236t-928bc39ae43a6aa53990b03c74ccf9fa62e6fbab0c8f14a90451062dff722b473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0E1v1DAQBmALUdFSOHNDIw4VHLJ17MROjqtSPqRKPRQkOEUTZ9J15djBcbZafgk_F1e0F3wZj_Ro9M4w9qbkm5K38vyWYvB4ruRGbkQjn7GTUtdNUcv6x_P857otas7VMXu5LHf84dXiBTsuG5mZ1ifszxYi-iFM9jcNsKR1OEAYAWFaXbKDXYydnfUYDzDHcBtxghTA-kRxT54geMgZLKZoDSwHP8Qw0ZIB7FfnKWLvMnIDRZgpzLm53wVwdk-ACXYZw_uPazI7uNze_DQYCW4eQnx4xY5GdAu9fqyn7Puny28XX4qr689fL7ZXxSykSkUrmt7IFqmSqBBr2ba859LoypixHVEJUmOPPTfNWFbY8qouuRLDOGoh-krLU3b2b25e79dKS-qmvDQ5h57CunSaV5Xguszw3X_wLqzR52yd4I2StVYqo7ePaO0nGro52infrns6uPwLfLSF1A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>208635766</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A randomized study of a multidisciplinary program to intervene on geriatric syndromes in vulnerable older people who live at home (Dutch EASYcare Study)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Melis, René J F ; van Eijken, Monique I J ; Teerenstra, Steven ; van Achterberg, Theo ; Parker, Stuart G ; Borm, George F ; van de Lisdonk, Eloy H ; Wensing, Michel ; Rikkert, Marcel G M Olde</creator><creatorcontrib>Melis, René J F ; van Eijken, Monique I J ; Teerenstra, Steven ; van Achterberg, Theo ; Parker, Stuart G ; Borm, George F ; van de Lisdonk, Eloy H ; Wensing, Michel ; Rikkert, Marcel G M Olde</creatorcontrib><description>The effectiveness of community-based geriatric intervention models for vulnerable older adults is controversial. We evaluated a problem-based multidisciplinary intervention targeting vulnerable older adults at home that promised efficacy through better timing and increased commitment of patients and primary care physicians. This study compared the effects of this new model to usual care.
Primary care physicians referred older people for problems with cognition, nutrition, behavior, mood, or mobility. One hundred fifty-one participants (mean age 82.2 years, 74.8% women) were included in a pseudocluster randomized trial with 6-month follow-up for the primary outcomes. Eighty-five participants received the new intervention, and 66 usual care. In the intervention arm, geriatric nurses visited patients at home for geriatric assessment and management in cooperation with primary care physicians and geriatricians. Modified intention-to-treat analyses focused on differences between treatment arms in functional abilities (Groningen Activity Restriction Scale-3) and mental well-being (subscale mental health Medical Outcomes Study [MOS]-20), using a mixed linear model.
After 3 months, treatment arms showed significant differences in favor of the new intervention. Functional abilities improved 2.2 points (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3-4.2) and well-being 5.8 points (95% CI, 0.1-11.4). After 6 months, the favorable effect increased for well-being (9.1; 95% CI, 2.4-15.9), but the effect on functional abilities was no longer significant (1.6; 95% CI, -0.7 to 3.9).
This problem-based geriatric intervention improved functional abilities and mental well-being of vulnerable older people. Problem-based interventions can increase the effectiveness of primary care for this population.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1079-5006</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-535X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/gerona/63.3.283</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18375877</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aging - pathology ; Female ; Frail Elderly ; Geriatric Assessment - statistics & numerical data ; Geriatrics ; Geriatrics - methods ; Health care ; Health Services for the Aged - standards ; Home Care Services - standards ; Humans ; Interdisciplinary Communication ; Male ; Models, Theoretical ; Netherlands ; Older people ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) ; Patient Care Team ; Primary care ; Primary Health Care - methods ; Primary Health Care - standards ; Quality of life ; Studies ; Syndrome</subject><ispartof>The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, 2008-03, Vol.63 (3), p.283-290</ispartof><rights>Copyright Gerontological Society of America, Incorporated Mar 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18375877$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Melis, René J F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Eijken, Monique I J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teerenstra, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Achterberg, Theo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, Stuart G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borm, George F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van de Lisdonk, Eloy H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wensing, Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rikkert, Marcel G M Olde</creatorcontrib><title>A randomized study of a multidisciplinary program to intervene on geriatric syndromes in vulnerable older people who live at home (Dutch EASYcare Study)</title><title>The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences</title><addtitle>J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci</addtitle><description>The effectiveness of community-based geriatric intervention models for vulnerable older adults is controversial. We evaluated a problem-based multidisciplinary intervention targeting vulnerable older adults at home that promised efficacy through better timing and increased commitment of patients and primary care physicians. This study compared the effects of this new model to usual care.
Primary care physicians referred older people for problems with cognition, nutrition, behavior, mood, or mobility. One hundred fifty-one participants (mean age 82.2 years, 74.8% women) were included in a pseudocluster randomized trial with 6-month follow-up for the primary outcomes. Eighty-five participants received the new intervention, and 66 usual care. In the intervention arm, geriatric nurses visited patients at home for geriatric assessment and management in cooperation with primary care physicians and geriatricians. Modified intention-to-treat analyses focused on differences between treatment arms in functional abilities (Groningen Activity Restriction Scale-3) and mental well-being (subscale mental health Medical Outcomes Study [MOS]-20), using a mixed linear model.
After 3 months, treatment arms showed significant differences in favor of the new intervention. Functional abilities improved 2.2 points (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3-4.2) and well-being 5.8 points (95% CI, 0.1-11.4). After 6 months, the favorable effect increased for well-being (9.1; 95% CI, 2.4-15.9), but the effect on functional abilities was no longer significant (1.6; 95% CI, -0.7 to 3.9).
This problem-based geriatric intervention improved functional abilities and mental well-being of vulnerable older people. Problem-based interventions can increase the effectiveness of primary care for this population.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Aging - pathology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Frail Elderly</subject><subject>Geriatric Assessment - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Geriatrics</subject><subject>Geriatrics - methods</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health Services for the Aged - standards</subject><subject>Home Care Services - standards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary Communication</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>Patient Care Team</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Primary Health Care - methods</subject><subject>Primary Health Care - standards</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Syndrome</subject><issn>1079-5006</issn><issn>1758-535X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0E1v1DAQBmALUdFSOHNDIw4VHLJ17MROjqtSPqRKPRQkOEUTZ9J15djBcbZafgk_F1e0F3wZj_Ro9M4w9qbkm5K38vyWYvB4ruRGbkQjn7GTUtdNUcv6x_P857otas7VMXu5LHf84dXiBTsuG5mZ1ifszxYi-iFM9jcNsKR1OEAYAWFaXbKDXYydnfUYDzDHcBtxghTA-kRxT54geMgZLKZoDSwHP8Qw0ZIB7FfnKWLvMnIDRZgpzLm53wVwdk-ACXYZw_uPazI7uNze_DQYCW4eQnx4xY5GdAu9fqyn7Puny28XX4qr689fL7ZXxSykSkUrmt7IFqmSqBBr2ba859LoypixHVEJUmOPPTfNWFbY8qouuRLDOGoh-krLU3b2b25e79dKS-qmvDQ5h57CunSaV5Xguszw3X_wLqzR52yd4I2StVYqo7ePaO0nGro52infrns6uPwLfLSF1A</recordid><startdate>20080301</startdate><enddate>20080301</enddate><creator>Melis, René J F</creator><creator>van Eijken, Monique I J</creator><creator>Teerenstra, Steven</creator><creator>van Achterberg, Theo</creator><creator>Parker, Stuart G</creator><creator>Borm, George F</creator><creator>van de Lisdonk, Eloy H</creator><creator>Wensing, Michel</creator><creator>Rikkert, Marcel G M Olde</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080301</creationdate><title>A randomized study of a multidisciplinary program to intervene on geriatric syndromes in vulnerable older people who live at home (Dutch EASYcare Study)</title><author>Melis, René J F ; van Eijken, Monique I J ; Teerenstra, Steven ; van Achterberg, Theo ; Parker, Stuart G ; Borm, George F ; van de Lisdonk, Eloy H ; Wensing, Michel ; Rikkert, Marcel G M Olde</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p236t-928bc39ae43a6aa53990b03c74ccf9fa62e6fbab0c8f14a90451062dff722b473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Aging - pathology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Frail Elderly</topic><topic>Geriatric Assessment - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Geriatrics</topic><topic>Geriatrics - methods</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health Services for the Aged - standards</topic><topic>Home Care Services - standards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary Communication</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>Patient Care Team</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Primary Health Care - methods</topic><topic>Primary Health Care - standards</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Syndrome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Melis, René J F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Eijken, Monique I J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teerenstra, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Achterberg, Theo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, Stuart G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borm, George F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van de Lisdonk, Eloy H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wensing, Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rikkert, Marcel G M Olde</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Melis, René J F</au><au>van Eijken, Monique I J</au><au>Teerenstra, Steven</au><au>van Achterberg, Theo</au><au>Parker, Stuart G</au><au>Borm, George F</au><au>van de Lisdonk, Eloy H</au><au>Wensing, Michel</au><au>Rikkert, Marcel G M Olde</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A randomized study of a multidisciplinary program to intervene on geriatric syndromes in vulnerable older people who live at home (Dutch EASYcare Study)</atitle><jtitle>The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences</jtitle><addtitle>J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci</addtitle><date>2008-03-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>283</spage><epage>290</epage><pages>283-290</pages><issn>1079-5006</issn><eissn>1758-535X</eissn><abstract>The effectiveness of community-based geriatric intervention models for vulnerable older adults is controversial. We evaluated a problem-based multidisciplinary intervention targeting vulnerable older adults at home that promised efficacy through better timing and increased commitment of patients and primary care physicians. This study compared the effects of this new model to usual care.
Primary care physicians referred older people for problems with cognition, nutrition, behavior, mood, or mobility. One hundred fifty-one participants (mean age 82.2 years, 74.8% women) were included in a pseudocluster randomized trial with 6-month follow-up for the primary outcomes. Eighty-five participants received the new intervention, and 66 usual care. In the intervention arm, geriatric nurses visited patients at home for geriatric assessment and management in cooperation with primary care physicians and geriatricians. Modified intention-to-treat analyses focused on differences between treatment arms in functional abilities (Groningen Activity Restriction Scale-3) and mental well-being (subscale mental health Medical Outcomes Study [MOS]-20), using a mixed linear model.
After 3 months, treatment arms showed significant differences in favor of the new intervention. Functional abilities improved 2.2 points (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3-4.2) and well-being 5.8 points (95% CI, 0.1-11.4). After 6 months, the favorable effect increased for well-being (9.1; 95% CI, 2.4-15.9), but the effect on functional abilities was no longer significant (1.6; 95% CI, -0.7 to 3.9).
This problem-based geriatric intervention improved functional abilities and mental well-being of vulnerable older people. Problem-based interventions can increase the effectiveness of primary care for this population.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>18375877</pmid><doi>10.1093/gerona/63.3.283</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1079-5006 |
ispartof | The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, 2008-03, Vol.63 (3), p.283-290 |
issn | 1079-5006 1758-535X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70442071 |
source | MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Aging - pathology Female Frail Elderly Geriatric Assessment - statistics & numerical data Geriatrics Geriatrics - methods Health care Health Services for the Aged - standards Home Care Services - standards Humans Interdisciplinary Communication Male Models, Theoretical Netherlands Older people Outcome Assessment (Health Care) Patient Care Team Primary care Primary Health Care - methods Primary Health Care - standards Quality of life Studies Syndrome |
title | A randomized study of a multidisciplinary program to intervene on geriatric syndromes in vulnerable older people who live at home (Dutch EASYcare Study) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T07%3A30%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20randomized%20study%20of%20a%20multidisciplinary%20program%20to%20intervene%20on%20geriatric%20syndromes%20in%20vulnerable%20older%20people%20who%20live%20at%20home%20(Dutch%20EASYcare%20Study)&rft.jtitle=The%20journals%20of%20gerontology.%20Series%20A,%20Biological%20sciences%20and%20medical%20sciences&rft.au=Melis,%20Ren%C3%A9%20J%20F&rft.date=2008-03-01&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=283&rft.epage=290&rft.pages=283-290&rft.issn=1079-5006&rft.eissn=1758-535X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/gerona/63.3.283&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E70442071%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=208635766&rft_id=info:pmid/18375877&rfr_iscdi=true |