A randomized study of a multidisciplinary program to intervene on geriatric syndromes in vulnerable older people who live at home (Dutch EASYcare Study)

The effectiveness of community-based geriatric intervention models for vulnerable older adults is controversial. We evaluated a problem-based multidisciplinary intervention targeting vulnerable older adults at home that promised efficacy through better timing and increased commitment of patients and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences Biological sciences and medical sciences, 2008-03, Vol.63 (3), p.283-290
Hauptverfasser: Melis, René J F, van Eijken, Monique I J, Teerenstra, Steven, van Achterberg, Theo, Parker, Stuart G, Borm, George F, van de Lisdonk, Eloy H, Wensing, Michel, Rikkert, Marcel G M Olde
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 290
container_issue 3
container_start_page 283
container_title The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences
container_volume 63
creator Melis, René J F
van Eijken, Monique I J
Teerenstra, Steven
van Achterberg, Theo
Parker, Stuart G
Borm, George F
van de Lisdonk, Eloy H
Wensing, Michel
Rikkert, Marcel G M Olde
description The effectiveness of community-based geriatric intervention models for vulnerable older adults is controversial. We evaluated a problem-based multidisciplinary intervention targeting vulnerable older adults at home that promised efficacy through better timing and increased commitment of patients and primary care physicians. This study compared the effects of this new model to usual care. Primary care physicians referred older people for problems with cognition, nutrition, behavior, mood, or mobility. One hundred fifty-one participants (mean age 82.2 years, 74.8% women) were included in a pseudocluster randomized trial with 6-month follow-up for the primary outcomes. Eighty-five participants received the new intervention, and 66 usual care. In the intervention arm, geriatric nurses visited patients at home for geriatric assessment and management in cooperation with primary care physicians and geriatricians. Modified intention-to-treat analyses focused on differences between treatment arms in functional abilities (Groningen Activity Restriction Scale-3) and mental well-being (subscale mental health Medical Outcomes Study [MOS]-20), using a mixed linear model. After 3 months, treatment arms showed significant differences in favor of the new intervention. Functional abilities improved 2.2 points (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3-4.2) and well-being 5.8 points (95% CI, 0.1-11.4). After 6 months, the favorable effect increased for well-being (9.1; 95% CI, 2.4-15.9), but the effect on functional abilities was no longer significant (1.6; 95% CI, -0.7 to 3.9). This problem-based geriatric intervention improved functional abilities and mental well-being of vulnerable older people. Problem-based interventions can increase the effectiveness of primary care for this population.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/gerona/63.3.283
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70442071</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70442071</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p236t-928bc39ae43a6aa53990b03c74ccf9fa62e6fbab0c8f14a90451062dff722b473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0E1v1DAQBmALUdFSOHNDIw4VHLJ17MROjqtSPqRKPRQkOEUTZ9J15djBcbZafgk_F1e0F3wZj_Ro9M4w9qbkm5K38vyWYvB4ruRGbkQjn7GTUtdNUcv6x_P857otas7VMXu5LHf84dXiBTsuG5mZ1ifszxYi-iFM9jcNsKR1OEAYAWFaXbKDXYydnfUYDzDHcBtxghTA-kRxT54geMgZLKZoDSwHP8Qw0ZIB7FfnKWLvMnIDRZgpzLm53wVwdk-ACXYZw_uPazI7uNze_DQYCW4eQnx4xY5GdAu9fqyn7Puny28XX4qr689fL7ZXxSykSkUrmt7IFqmSqBBr2ba859LoypixHVEJUmOPPTfNWFbY8qouuRLDOGoh-krLU3b2b25e79dKS-qmvDQ5h57CunSaV5Xguszw3X_wLqzR52yd4I2StVYqo7ePaO0nGro52infrns6uPwLfLSF1A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>208635766</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A randomized study of a multidisciplinary program to intervene on geriatric syndromes in vulnerable older people who live at home (Dutch EASYcare Study)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Melis, René J F ; van Eijken, Monique I J ; Teerenstra, Steven ; van Achterberg, Theo ; Parker, Stuart G ; Borm, George F ; van de Lisdonk, Eloy H ; Wensing, Michel ; Rikkert, Marcel G M Olde</creator><creatorcontrib>Melis, René J F ; van Eijken, Monique I J ; Teerenstra, Steven ; van Achterberg, Theo ; Parker, Stuart G ; Borm, George F ; van de Lisdonk, Eloy H ; Wensing, Michel ; Rikkert, Marcel G M Olde</creatorcontrib><description>The effectiveness of community-based geriatric intervention models for vulnerable older adults is controversial. We evaluated a problem-based multidisciplinary intervention targeting vulnerable older adults at home that promised efficacy through better timing and increased commitment of patients and primary care physicians. This study compared the effects of this new model to usual care. Primary care physicians referred older people for problems with cognition, nutrition, behavior, mood, or mobility. One hundred fifty-one participants (mean age 82.2 years, 74.8% women) were included in a pseudocluster randomized trial with 6-month follow-up for the primary outcomes. Eighty-five participants received the new intervention, and 66 usual care. In the intervention arm, geriatric nurses visited patients at home for geriatric assessment and management in cooperation with primary care physicians and geriatricians. Modified intention-to-treat analyses focused on differences between treatment arms in functional abilities (Groningen Activity Restriction Scale-3) and mental well-being (subscale mental health Medical Outcomes Study [MOS]-20), using a mixed linear model. After 3 months, treatment arms showed significant differences in favor of the new intervention. Functional abilities improved 2.2 points (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3-4.2) and well-being 5.8 points (95% CI, 0.1-11.4). After 6 months, the favorable effect increased for well-being (9.1; 95% CI, 2.4-15.9), but the effect on functional abilities was no longer significant (1.6; 95% CI, -0.7 to 3.9). This problem-based geriatric intervention improved functional abilities and mental well-being of vulnerable older people. Problem-based interventions can increase the effectiveness of primary care for this population.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1079-5006</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-535X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/gerona/63.3.283</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18375877</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aging - pathology ; Female ; Frail Elderly ; Geriatric Assessment - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Geriatrics ; Geriatrics - methods ; Health care ; Health Services for the Aged - standards ; Home Care Services - standards ; Humans ; Interdisciplinary Communication ; Male ; Models, Theoretical ; Netherlands ; Older people ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) ; Patient Care Team ; Primary care ; Primary Health Care - methods ; Primary Health Care - standards ; Quality of life ; Studies ; Syndrome</subject><ispartof>The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, 2008-03, Vol.63 (3), p.283-290</ispartof><rights>Copyright Gerontological Society of America, Incorporated Mar 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18375877$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Melis, René J F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Eijken, Monique I J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teerenstra, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Achterberg, Theo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, Stuart G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borm, George F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van de Lisdonk, Eloy H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wensing, Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rikkert, Marcel G M Olde</creatorcontrib><title>A randomized study of a multidisciplinary program to intervene on geriatric syndromes in vulnerable older people who live at home (Dutch EASYcare Study)</title><title>The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences</title><addtitle>J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci</addtitle><description>The effectiveness of community-based geriatric intervention models for vulnerable older adults is controversial. We evaluated a problem-based multidisciplinary intervention targeting vulnerable older adults at home that promised efficacy through better timing and increased commitment of patients and primary care physicians. This study compared the effects of this new model to usual care. Primary care physicians referred older people for problems with cognition, nutrition, behavior, mood, or mobility. One hundred fifty-one participants (mean age 82.2 years, 74.8% women) were included in a pseudocluster randomized trial with 6-month follow-up for the primary outcomes. Eighty-five participants received the new intervention, and 66 usual care. In the intervention arm, geriatric nurses visited patients at home for geriatric assessment and management in cooperation with primary care physicians and geriatricians. Modified intention-to-treat analyses focused on differences between treatment arms in functional abilities (Groningen Activity Restriction Scale-3) and mental well-being (subscale mental health Medical Outcomes Study [MOS]-20), using a mixed linear model. After 3 months, treatment arms showed significant differences in favor of the new intervention. Functional abilities improved 2.2 points (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3-4.2) and well-being 5.8 points (95% CI, 0.1-11.4). After 6 months, the favorable effect increased for well-being (9.1; 95% CI, 2.4-15.9), but the effect on functional abilities was no longer significant (1.6; 95% CI, -0.7 to 3.9). This problem-based geriatric intervention improved functional abilities and mental well-being of vulnerable older people. Problem-based interventions can increase the effectiveness of primary care for this population.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Aging - pathology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Frail Elderly</subject><subject>Geriatric Assessment - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Geriatrics</subject><subject>Geriatrics - methods</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health Services for the Aged - standards</subject><subject>Home Care Services - standards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary Communication</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>Patient Care Team</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Primary Health Care - methods</subject><subject>Primary Health Care - standards</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Syndrome</subject><issn>1079-5006</issn><issn>1758-535X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0E1v1DAQBmALUdFSOHNDIw4VHLJ17MROjqtSPqRKPRQkOEUTZ9J15djBcbZafgk_F1e0F3wZj_Ro9M4w9qbkm5K38vyWYvB4ruRGbkQjn7GTUtdNUcv6x_P857otas7VMXu5LHf84dXiBTsuG5mZ1ifszxYi-iFM9jcNsKR1OEAYAWFaXbKDXYydnfUYDzDHcBtxghTA-kRxT54geMgZLKZoDSwHP8Qw0ZIB7FfnKWLvMnIDRZgpzLm53wVwdk-ACXYZw_uPazI7uNze_DQYCW4eQnx4xY5GdAu9fqyn7Puny28XX4qr689fL7ZXxSykSkUrmt7IFqmSqBBr2ba859LoypixHVEJUmOPPTfNWFbY8qouuRLDOGoh-krLU3b2b25e79dKS-qmvDQ5h57CunSaV5Xguszw3X_wLqzR52yd4I2StVYqo7ePaO0nGro52infrns6uPwLfLSF1A</recordid><startdate>20080301</startdate><enddate>20080301</enddate><creator>Melis, René J F</creator><creator>van Eijken, Monique I J</creator><creator>Teerenstra, Steven</creator><creator>van Achterberg, Theo</creator><creator>Parker, Stuart G</creator><creator>Borm, George F</creator><creator>van de Lisdonk, Eloy H</creator><creator>Wensing, Michel</creator><creator>Rikkert, Marcel G M Olde</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080301</creationdate><title>A randomized study of a multidisciplinary program to intervene on geriatric syndromes in vulnerable older people who live at home (Dutch EASYcare Study)</title><author>Melis, René J F ; van Eijken, Monique I J ; Teerenstra, Steven ; van Achterberg, Theo ; Parker, Stuart G ; Borm, George F ; van de Lisdonk, Eloy H ; Wensing, Michel ; Rikkert, Marcel G M Olde</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p236t-928bc39ae43a6aa53990b03c74ccf9fa62e6fbab0c8f14a90451062dff722b473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Aging - pathology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Frail Elderly</topic><topic>Geriatric Assessment - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Geriatrics</topic><topic>Geriatrics - methods</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health Services for the Aged - standards</topic><topic>Home Care Services - standards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary Communication</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>Patient Care Team</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Primary Health Care - methods</topic><topic>Primary Health Care - standards</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Syndrome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Melis, René J F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Eijken, Monique I J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teerenstra, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Achterberg, Theo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, Stuart G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borm, George F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van de Lisdonk, Eloy H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wensing, Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rikkert, Marcel G M Olde</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Melis, René J F</au><au>van Eijken, Monique I J</au><au>Teerenstra, Steven</au><au>van Achterberg, Theo</au><au>Parker, Stuart G</au><au>Borm, George F</au><au>van de Lisdonk, Eloy H</au><au>Wensing, Michel</au><au>Rikkert, Marcel G M Olde</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A randomized study of a multidisciplinary program to intervene on geriatric syndromes in vulnerable older people who live at home (Dutch EASYcare Study)</atitle><jtitle>The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences</jtitle><addtitle>J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci</addtitle><date>2008-03-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>283</spage><epage>290</epage><pages>283-290</pages><issn>1079-5006</issn><eissn>1758-535X</eissn><abstract>The effectiveness of community-based geriatric intervention models for vulnerable older adults is controversial. We evaluated a problem-based multidisciplinary intervention targeting vulnerable older adults at home that promised efficacy through better timing and increased commitment of patients and primary care physicians. This study compared the effects of this new model to usual care. Primary care physicians referred older people for problems with cognition, nutrition, behavior, mood, or mobility. One hundred fifty-one participants (mean age 82.2 years, 74.8% women) were included in a pseudocluster randomized trial with 6-month follow-up for the primary outcomes. Eighty-five participants received the new intervention, and 66 usual care. In the intervention arm, geriatric nurses visited patients at home for geriatric assessment and management in cooperation with primary care physicians and geriatricians. Modified intention-to-treat analyses focused on differences between treatment arms in functional abilities (Groningen Activity Restriction Scale-3) and mental well-being (subscale mental health Medical Outcomes Study [MOS]-20), using a mixed linear model. After 3 months, treatment arms showed significant differences in favor of the new intervention. Functional abilities improved 2.2 points (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3-4.2) and well-being 5.8 points (95% CI, 0.1-11.4). After 6 months, the favorable effect increased for well-being (9.1; 95% CI, 2.4-15.9), but the effect on functional abilities was no longer significant (1.6; 95% CI, -0.7 to 3.9). This problem-based geriatric intervention improved functional abilities and mental well-being of vulnerable older people. Problem-based interventions can increase the effectiveness of primary care for this population.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>18375877</pmid><doi>10.1093/gerona/63.3.283</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1079-5006
ispartof The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, 2008-03, Vol.63 (3), p.283-290
issn 1079-5006
1758-535X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70442071
source MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Aging - pathology
Female
Frail Elderly
Geriatric Assessment - statistics & numerical data
Geriatrics
Geriatrics - methods
Health care
Health Services for the Aged - standards
Home Care Services - standards
Humans
Interdisciplinary Communication
Male
Models, Theoretical
Netherlands
Older people
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Patient Care Team
Primary care
Primary Health Care - methods
Primary Health Care - standards
Quality of life
Studies
Syndrome
title A randomized study of a multidisciplinary program to intervene on geriatric syndromes in vulnerable older people who live at home (Dutch EASYcare Study)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T07%3A30%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20randomized%20study%20of%20a%20multidisciplinary%20program%20to%20intervene%20on%20geriatric%20syndromes%20in%20vulnerable%20older%20people%20who%20live%20at%20home%20(Dutch%20EASYcare%20Study)&rft.jtitle=The%20journals%20of%20gerontology.%20Series%20A,%20Biological%20sciences%20and%20medical%20sciences&rft.au=Melis,%20Ren%C3%A9%20J%20F&rft.date=2008-03-01&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=283&rft.epage=290&rft.pages=283-290&rft.issn=1079-5006&rft.eissn=1758-535X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/gerona/63.3.283&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E70442071%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=208635766&rft_id=info:pmid/18375877&rfr_iscdi=true