Concept and Clinical Evaluation of Carrier‐Mediated Anticancer Agents

Major advances in the use of carrier vehicles delivering pharmacologic agents and enzymes to sites of disease have occurred over the past 10 years. This review focuses on the concepts and clinical evaluation of carrier‐mediated anticancer agents that are administered i.v. or orally. The primary type...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The oncologist (Dayton, Ohio) Ohio), 2008-03, Vol.13 (3), p.248-260
1. Verfasser: Zamboni, William C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 260
container_issue 3
container_start_page 248
container_title The oncologist (Dayton, Ohio)
container_volume 13
creator Zamboni, William C.
description Major advances in the use of carrier vehicles delivering pharmacologic agents and enzymes to sites of disease have occurred over the past 10 years. This review focuses on the concepts and clinical evaluation of carrier‐mediated anticancer agents that are administered i.v. or orally. The primary types of carrier‐mediated anticancer agents are nanoparticles, nanosomes, which are nanoparticle‐sized liposomes, and conjugated agents. Nanosomes are further subdivided into stabilized and nonstabilized or conventional nanosomes. Nanospheres and dendrimers are subclasses of nanoparticles. Conjugated agents consist of polymer‐linked and pegylated agents. The theoretical advantages of carrier‐mediated drugs are greater solubility, longer duration of exposure, selective delivery of entrapped drug to the site of action, superior therapeutic index, and the potential to overcome resistance associated with the regular anticancer agent. The pharmacokinetic disposition of carrier‐mediated agents depends on the physiochemical characteristics of the carrier, such as size, surface charge, membrane lipid packing, steric stabilization, dose, and route of administration. The primary sites of accumulation of carrier‐mediated agents are the tumor, liver, and spleen, compared with noncarrier formulations. The drug that remains encapsulated in or linked to the carrier (e.g., the nanosome or nanoparticle) is an inactive prodrug, and thus the drug must be released from the carrier to be active. The factors affecting the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability of these agents remain unclear, but most likely include the reticuloendothelial system, which has also been called the mononuclear phagocyte system. Future studies need to evaluate the mechanism of clearance of carrier‐mediated agents and identify the factors associated with the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability of carrier agents in patients and specifically in tumors. Major advances in the use of carrier vehicles delivering pharmacologic agents and enzymes to sites of disease have occurred over the past 10 years. This review focuses on the concepts and clinical evaluation of carrier‐mediated anticancer agents that are administered i.v. or orally.
doi_str_mv 10.1634/theoncologist.2007-0180
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70441690</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20677017</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5028-7cad65df04df6c7b9e44b3d9d1a2b11bd73fcdad28864970bb7a86fe3f4f79c43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkL1OwzAUhS0EolB4BcjElnIdO7EzMFRRKUiFLiCxWY5_ilGaFDsBdeMReEaehFSthJhgumf4zrnSh9A5hhHOCL1sn01Tq6ZqFi60owSAxYA57KEjnNI8pjk87fcZOIkZTvMBOg7hBaCPJDlEA8wJ4ylJj9C06HfMqo1kraOicrVTsoomb7LqZOuaOmpsVEjvnfFfH593RjvZGh2N67YH-6aPxgtTt-EEHVhZBXO6u0P0eD15KG7i2Xx6W4xnsUoh4TFTUmeptkC1zRQrc0NpSXSusUxKjEvNiFVa6oTzjOYMypJJnllDLLUsV5QM0cV2d-Wb186EVixdUKaqZG2aLggGlOIshz_BBDLGALMeZFtQ-SYEb6xYebeUfi0wiI1s8Uu22MgWG9l982z3oiuXRv_0dnZ74GoLvLvKrP-7K-b3xRwSysk3dS-VAw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20677017</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Concept and Clinical Evaluation of Carrier‐Mediated Anticancer Agents</title><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Zamboni, William C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Zamboni, William C.</creatorcontrib><description>Major advances in the use of carrier vehicles delivering pharmacologic agents and enzymes to sites of disease have occurred over the past 10 years. This review focuses on the concepts and clinical evaluation of carrier‐mediated anticancer agents that are administered i.v. or orally. The primary types of carrier‐mediated anticancer agents are nanoparticles, nanosomes, which are nanoparticle‐sized liposomes, and conjugated agents. Nanosomes are further subdivided into stabilized and nonstabilized or conventional nanosomes. Nanospheres and dendrimers are subclasses of nanoparticles. Conjugated agents consist of polymer‐linked and pegylated agents. The theoretical advantages of carrier‐mediated drugs are greater solubility, longer duration of exposure, selective delivery of entrapped drug to the site of action, superior therapeutic index, and the potential to overcome resistance associated with the regular anticancer agent. The pharmacokinetic disposition of carrier‐mediated agents depends on the physiochemical characteristics of the carrier, such as size, surface charge, membrane lipid packing, steric stabilization, dose, and route of administration. The primary sites of accumulation of carrier‐mediated agents are the tumor, liver, and spleen, compared with noncarrier formulations. The drug that remains encapsulated in or linked to the carrier (e.g., the nanosome or nanoparticle) is an inactive prodrug, and thus the drug must be released from the carrier to be active. The factors affecting the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability of these agents remain unclear, but most likely include the reticuloendothelial system, which has also been called the mononuclear phagocyte system. Future studies need to evaluate the mechanism of clearance of carrier‐mediated agents and identify the factors associated with the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability of carrier agents in patients and specifically in tumors. Major advances in the use of carrier vehicles delivering pharmacologic agents and enzymes to sites of disease have occurred over the past 10 years. This review focuses on the concepts and clinical evaluation of carrier‐mediated anticancer agents that are administered i.v. or orally.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1083-7159</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1549-490X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2007-0180</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18378535</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Durham, NC, USA: AlphaMed Press</publisher><subject>Albumins ; Antineoplastic Agents - administration &amp; dosage ; Carrier‐mediated anticancer agents ; Conjugates ; Dendrimers - administration &amp; dosage ; Efficacy ; Humans ; Nanocapsules - administration &amp; dosage ; Nanoparticles ; Nanoparticles - administration &amp; dosage ; Nanosomes ; Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Toxicity</subject><ispartof>The oncologist (Dayton, Ohio), 2008-03, Vol.13 (3), p.248-260</ispartof><rights>2008 AlphaMed Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5028-7cad65df04df6c7b9e44b3d9d1a2b11bd73fcdad28864970bb7a86fe3f4f79c43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5028-7cad65df04df6c7b9e44b3d9d1a2b11bd73fcdad28864970bb7a86fe3f4f79c43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1634%2Ftheoncologist.2007-0180$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1634%2Ftheoncologist.2007-0180$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18378535$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zamboni, William C.</creatorcontrib><title>Concept and Clinical Evaluation of Carrier‐Mediated Anticancer Agents</title><title>The oncologist (Dayton, Ohio)</title><addtitle>Oncologist</addtitle><description>Major advances in the use of carrier vehicles delivering pharmacologic agents and enzymes to sites of disease have occurred over the past 10 years. This review focuses on the concepts and clinical evaluation of carrier‐mediated anticancer agents that are administered i.v. or orally. The primary types of carrier‐mediated anticancer agents are nanoparticles, nanosomes, which are nanoparticle‐sized liposomes, and conjugated agents. Nanosomes are further subdivided into stabilized and nonstabilized or conventional nanosomes. Nanospheres and dendrimers are subclasses of nanoparticles. Conjugated agents consist of polymer‐linked and pegylated agents. The theoretical advantages of carrier‐mediated drugs are greater solubility, longer duration of exposure, selective delivery of entrapped drug to the site of action, superior therapeutic index, and the potential to overcome resistance associated with the regular anticancer agent. The pharmacokinetic disposition of carrier‐mediated agents depends on the physiochemical characteristics of the carrier, such as size, surface charge, membrane lipid packing, steric stabilization, dose, and route of administration. The primary sites of accumulation of carrier‐mediated agents are the tumor, liver, and spleen, compared with noncarrier formulations. The drug that remains encapsulated in or linked to the carrier (e.g., the nanosome or nanoparticle) is an inactive prodrug, and thus the drug must be released from the carrier to be active. The factors affecting the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability of these agents remain unclear, but most likely include the reticuloendothelial system, which has also been called the mononuclear phagocyte system. Future studies need to evaluate the mechanism of clearance of carrier‐mediated agents and identify the factors associated with the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability of carrier agents in patients and specifically in tumors. Major advances in the use of carrier vehicles delivering pharmacologic agents and enzymes to sites of disease have occurred over the past 10 years. This review focuses on the concepts and clinical evaluation of carrier‐mediated anticancer agents that are administered i.v. or orally.</description><subject>Albumins</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Carrier‐mediated anticancer agents</subject><subject>Conjugates</subject><subject>Dendrimers - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Efficacy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Nanocapsules - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Nanoparticles</subject><subject>Nanoparticles - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Nanosomes</subject><subject>Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><issn>1083-7159</issn><issn>1549-490X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkL1OwzAUhS0EolB4BcjElnIdO7EzMFRRKUiFLiCxWY5_ilGaFDsBdeMReEaehFSthJhgumf4zrnSh9A5hhHOCL1sn01Tq6ZqFi60owSAxYA57KEjnNI8pjk87fcZOIkZTvMBOg7hBaCPJDlEA8wJ4ylJj9C06HfMqo1kraOicrVTsoomb7LqZOuaOmpsVEjvnfFfH593RjvZGh2N67YH-6aPxgtTt-EEHVhZBXO6u0P0eD15KG7i2Xx6W4xnsUoh4TFTUmeptkC1zRQrc0NpSXSusUxKjEvNiFVa6oTzjOYMypJJnllDLLUsV5QM0cV2d-Wb186EVixdUKaqZG2aLggGlOIshz_BBDLGALMeZFtQ-SYEb6xYebeUfi0wiI1s8Uu22MgWG9l982z3oiuXRv_0dnZ74GoLvLvKrP-7K-b3xRwSysk3dS-VAw</recordid><startdate>200803</startdate><enddate>200803</enddate><creator>Zamboni, William C.</creator><general>AlphaMed Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200803</creationdate><title>Concept and Clinical Evaluation of Carrier‐Mediated Anticancer Agents</title><author>Zamboni, William C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5028-7cad65df04df6c7b9e44b3d9d1a2b11bd73fcdad28864970bb7a86fe3f4f79c43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Albumins</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Carrier‐mediated anticancer agents</topic><topic>Conjugates</topic><topic>Dendrimers - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Efficacy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Nanocapsules - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Nanoparticles</topic><topic>Nanoparticles - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Nanosomes</topic><topic>Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zamboni, William C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The oncologist (Dayton, Ohio)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zamboni, William C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Concept and Clinical Evaluation of Carrier‐Mediated Anticancer Agents</atitle><jtitle>The oncologist (Dayton, Ohio)</jtitle><addtitle>Oncologist</addtitle><date>2008-03</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>248</spage><epage>260</epage><pages>248-260</pages><issn>1083-7159</issn><eissn>1549-490X</eissn><abstract>Major advances in the use of carrier vehicles delivering pharmacologic agents and enzymes to sites of disease have occurred over the past 10 years. This review focuses on the concepts and clinical evaluation of carrier‐mediated anticancer agents that are administered i.v. or orally. The primary types of carrier‐mediated anticancer agents are nanoparticles, nanosomes, which are nanoparticle‐sized liposomes, and conjugated agents. Nanosomes are further subdivided into stabilized and nonstabilized or conventional nanosomes. Nanospheres and dendrimers are subclasses of nanoparticles. Conjugated agents consist of polymer‐linked and pegylated agents. The theoretical advantages of carrier‐mediated drugs are greater solubility, longer duration of exposure, selective delivery of entrapped drug to the site of action, superior therapeutic index, and the potential to overcome resistance associated with the regular anticancer agent. The pharmacokinetic disposition of carrier‐mediated agents depends on the physiochemical characteristics of the carrier, such as size, surface charge, membrane lipid packing, steric stabilization, dose, and route of administration. The primary sites of accumulation of carrier‐mediated agents are the tumor, liver, and spleen, compared with noncarrier formulations. The drug that remains encapsulated in or linked to the carrier (e.g., the nanosome or nanoparticle) is an inactive prodrug, and thus the drug must be released from the carrier to be active. The factors affecting the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability of these agents remain unclear, but most likely include the reticuloendothelial system, which has also been called the mononuclear phagocyte system. Future studies need to evaluate the mechanism of clearance of carrier‐mediated agents and identify the factors associated with the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability of carrier agents in patients and specifically in tumors. Major advances in the use of carrier vehicles delivering pharmacologic agents and enzymes to sites of disease have occurred over the past 10 years. This review focuses on the concepts and clinical evaluation of carrier‐mediated anticancer agents that are administered i.v. or orally.</abstract><cop>Durham, NC, USA</cop><pub>AlphaMed Press</pub><pmid>18378535</pmid><doi>10.1634/theoncologist.2007-0180</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1083-7159
ispartof The oncologist (Dayton, Ohio), 2008-03, Vol.13 (3), p.248-260
issn 1083-7159
1549-490X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70441690
source Oxford Journals Open Access Collection; MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Albumins
Antineoplastic Agents - administration & dosage
Carrier‐mediated anticancer agents
Conjugates
Dendrimers - administration & dosage
Efficacy
Humans
Nanocapsules - administration & dosage
Nanoparticles
Nanoparticles - administration & dosage
Nanosomes
Neoplasms - drug therapy
Toxicity
title Concept and Clinical Evaluation of Carrier‐Mediated Anticancer Agents
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T21%3A27%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Concept%20and%20Clinical%20Evaluation%20of%20Carrier%E2%80%90Mediated%20Anticancer%20Agents&rft.jtitle=The%20oncologist%20(Dayton,%20Ohio)&rft.au=Zamboni,%20William%20C.&rft.date=2008-03&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=248&rft.epage=260&rft.pages=248-260&rft.issn=1083-7159&rft.eissn=1549-490X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1634/theoncologist.2007-0180&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20677017%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20677017&rft_id=info:pmid/18378535&rfr_iscdi=true