Interexaminer Difference in Infarct Volume Measurements on MRI : A Source of Variance in Stroke Research

The measurement of ischemic lesion volume on diffusion- (DWI) and perfusion-weighted MRI (PWI) is examiner dependent. We sought to quantify the variance imposed by measurement error in DWI and PWI lesion volume measurements in ischemic stroke. Fifty-eight consecutive patients with DWI and PWI within...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Stroke (1970) 2008-04, Vol.39 (4), p.1171-1176
Hauptverfasser: AY, Hakan, ARSAVA, E. Murat, VANGEL, Mark, ONER, Banu, MINGWANG ZHU, WU, Ona, SINGHAL, Aneesh, KOROSHETZ, Walter J, SORENSEN, A. Gregory
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1176
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1171
container_title Stroke (1970)
container_volume 39
creator AY, Hakan
ARSAVA, E. Murat
VANGEL, Mark
ONER, Banu
MINGWANG ZHU
WU, Ona
SINGHAL, Aneesh
KOROSHETZ, Walter J
SORENSEN, A. Gregory
description The measurement of ischemic lesion volume on diffusion- (DWI) and perfusion-weighted MRI (PWI) is examiner dependent. We sought to quantify the variance imposed by measurement error in DWI and PWI lesion volume measurements in ischemic stroke. Fifty-eight consecutive patients with DWI and PWI within 12 hours of symptom onset and follow-up MRI on >or= day-5 were studied. Two radiologists blinded to each other measured lesion volumes by manual outlining on each image. Interexaminer reliability was evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and relative paired difference or RPD (ratio of difference between 2 measurements to their mean). The ratio of between-examiner variability to between-subject variability (variance ratio) was calculated for each imaging parameter. The correlation (ICC) between examiners ranged from 0.93 to 0.99. The median RPD was 10.0% for DWI, 14.1% for mean transit time, 18.9% for cerebral blood flow, 21.0% for cerebral blood volume, 16.8% for DWI/MTT mismatch, and 6.3% for chronic T2-weighted images. There was negative correlation between RPD and lesion volume in all but chronic T2-weighted images. The variance ratio ranged between 0.02 and 0.10. Despite high correlation between volume measurements of abnormal regions on DWI and PWI by different examiners, substantial differences in individual measurements can still occur. The magnitude of variance from measurement error is primarily determined by the type of imaging and lesion volume. Minimizing this source of variance will better enable imaging to deliver on its promise of smaller sample size.
doi_str_mv 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.502104
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70434257</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70434257</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-fbe7002989cdbe6fce7b320c1e169581525037f755e3e161c5f0c7278e470873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkVtLAzEQhYMoWqv_QCQv-rZ1ctvs-lbqrVgR2uLrksYJru5Fk13Qf2-kiz76NMzwncPMHEJOGEwYS9nFar18vL-e3k0nDPREAWcgd8iIKS4TmfJsl4wARJ5wmecH5DCEVwDgIlP75IBlPOdC6xF5mTcdevw0ddmgp1elc7FtLNKyofPGGW87-tRWfY30AU3oPdbYdIG2DX1YzuklndJV2_soaB19Mr40g3jV-fYN6RIDRpOXI7LnTBXweKhjsr65Xs_uksXj7Xw2XSRWKNYlboM6rplnuX3eYOos6o3gYBmyNFdZvE6B0E4rhSKOmFUOrOY6Q6kh02JMzre277796DF0RV0Gi1VlGmz7UGiQQnL1P8ghTbnIIYJyC1rfhuDRFe--rI3_KhgUP0kUv0nEiS62SUTZ6eDfb2p8_hMNr4_A2QCYYE3lfHxcGX45Hm1kxrT4BjKnkJE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20662390</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interexaminer Difference in Infarct Volume Measurements on MRI : A Source of Variance in Stroke Research</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Heart Association Journals</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>AY, Hakan ; ARSAVA, E. Murat ; VANGEL, Mark ; ONER, Banu ; MINGWANG ZHU ; WU, Ona ; SINGHAL, Aneesh ; KOROSHETZ, Walter J ; SORENSEN, A. Gregory</creator><creatorcontrib>AY, Hakan ; ARSAVA, E. Murat ; VANGEL, Mark ; ONER, Banu ; MINGWANG ZHU ; WU, Ona ; SINGHAL, Aneesh ; KOROSHETZ, Walter J ; SORENSEN, A. Gregory</creatorcontrib><description>The measurement of ischemic lesion volume on diffusion- (DWI) and perfusion-weighted MRI (PWI) is examiner dependent. We sought to quantify the variance imposed by measurement error in DWI and PWI lesion volume measurements in ischemic stroke. Fifty-eight consecutive patients with DWI and PWI within 12 hours of symptom onset and follow-up MRI on &gt;or= day-5 were studied. Two radiologists blinded to each other measured lesion volumes by manual outlining on each image. Interexaminer reliability was evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and relative paired difference or RPD (ratio of difference between 2 measurements to their mean). The ratio of between-examiner variability to between-subject variability (variance ratio) was calculated for each imaging parameter. The correlation (ICC) between examiners ranged from 0.93 to 0.99. The median RPD was 10.0% for DWI, 14.1% for mean transit time, 18.9% for cerebral blood flow, 21.0% for cerebral blood volume, 16.8% for DWI/MTT mismatch, and 6.3% for chronic T2-weighted images. There was negative correlation between RPD and lesion volume in all but chronic T2-weighted images. The variance ratio ranged between 0.02 and 0.10. Despite high correlation between volume measurements of abnormal regions on DWI and PWI by different examiners, substantial differences in individual measurements can still occur. The magnitude of variance from measurement error is primarily determined by the type of imaging and lesion volume. Minimizing this source of variance will better enable imaging to deliver on its promise of smaller sample size.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-2499</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-4628</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.502104</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18292377</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SJCCA7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Acute Disease ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cerebral Infarction - diagnostic imaging ; Cerebral Infarction - pathology ; Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - standards ; Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Female ; Headache. Facial pains. Syncopes. Epilepsia. Intracranial hypertension. Brain oedema. Cerebral palsy ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Angiography - standards ; Magnetic Resonance Angiography - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Models, Statistical ; Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes) ; Neurology ; Neuroradiography - standards ; Neuroradiography - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Observer Variation ; Retrospective Studies ; Stroke - diagnostic imaging ; Stroke - pathology ; Vascular diseases and vascular malformations of the nervous system</subject><ispartof>Stroke (1970), 2008-04, Vol.39 (4), p.1171-1176</ispartof><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-fbe7002989cdbe6fce7b320c1e169581525037f755e3e161c5f0c7278e470873</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3686,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20214817$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18292377$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>AY, Hakan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ARSAVA, E. Murat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VANGEL, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ONER, Banu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MINGWANG ZHU</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WU, Ona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SINGHAL, Aneesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KOROSHETZ, Walter J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SORENSEN, A. Gregory</creatorcontrib><title>Interexaminer Difference in Infarct Volume Measurements on MRI : A Source of Variance in Stroke Research</title><title>Stroke (1970)</title><addtitle>Stroke</addtitle><description>The measurement of ischemic lesion volume on diffusion- (DWI) and perfusion-weighted MRI (PWI) is examiner dependent. We sought to quantify the variance imposed by measurement error in DWI and PWI lesion volume measurements in ischemic stroke. Fifty-eight consecutive patients with DWI and PWI within 12 hours of symptom onset and follow-up MRI on &gt;or= day-5 were studied. Two radiologists blinded to each other measured lesion volumes by manual outlining on each image. Interexaminer reliability was evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and relative paired difference or RPD (ratio of difference between 2 measurements to their mean). The ratio of between-examiner variability to between-subject variability (variance ratio) was calculated for each imaging parameter. The correlation (ICC) between examiners ranged from 0.93 to 0.99. The median RPD was 10.0% for DWI, 14.1% for mean transit time, 18.9% for cerebral blood flow, 21.0% for cerebral blood volume, 16.8% for DWI/MTT mismatch, and 6.3% for chronic T2-weighted images. There was negative correlation between RPD and lesion volume in all but chronic T2-weighted images. The variance ratio ranged between 0.02 and 0.10. Despite high correlation between volume measurements of abnormal regions on DWI and PWI by different examiners, substantial differences in individual measurements can still occur. The magnitude of variance from measurement error is primarily determined by the type of imaging and lesion volume. Minimizing this source of variance will better enable imaging to deliver on its promise of smaller sample size.</description><subject>Acute Disease</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cerebral Infarction - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Cerebral Infarction - pathology</subject><subject>Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - standards</subject><subject>Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Headache. Facial pains. Syncopes. Epilepsia. Intracranial hypertension. Brain oedema. Cerebral palsy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Angiography - standards</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Angiography - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes)</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neuroradiography - standards</subject><subject>Neuroradiography - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Stroke - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Stroke - pathology</subject><subject>Vascular diseases and vascular malformations of the nervous system</subject><issn>0039-2499</issn><issn>1524-4628</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkVtLAzEQhYMoWqv_QCQv-rZ1ctvs-lbqrVgR2uLrksYJru5Fk13Qf2-kiz76NMzwncPMHEJOGEwYS9nFar18vL-e3k0nDPREAWcgd8iIKS4TmfJsl4wARJ5wmecH5DCEVwDgIlP75IBlPOdC6xF5mTcdevw0ddmgp1elc7FtLNKyofPGGW87-tRWfY30AU3oPdbYdIG2DX1YzuklndJV2_soaB19Mr40g3jV-fYN6RIDRpOXI7LnTBXweKhjsr65Xs_uksXj7Xw2XSRWKNYlboM6rplnuX3eYOos6o3gYBmyNFdZvE6B0E4rhSKOmFUOrOY6Q6kh02JMzre277796DF0RV0Gi1VlGmz7UGiQQnL1P8ghTbnIIYJyC1rfhuDRFe--rI3_KhgUP0kUv0nEiS62SUTZ6eDfb2p8_hMNr4_A2QCYYE3lfHxcGX45Hm1kxrT4BjKnkJE</recordid><startdate>20080401</startdate><enddate>20080401</enddate><creator>AY, Hakan</creator><creator>ARSAVA, E. Murat</creator><creator>VANGEL, Mark</creator><creator>ONER, Banu</creator><creator>MINGWANG ZHU</creator><creator>WU, Ona</creator><creator>SINGHAL, Aneesh</creator><creator>KOROSHETZ, Walter J</creator><creator>SORENSEN, A. Gregory</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080401</creationdate><title>Interexaminer Difference in Infarct Volume Measurements on MRI : A Source of Variance in Stroke Research</title><author>AY, Hakan ; ARSAVA, E. Murat ; VANGEL, Mark ; ONER, Banu ; MINGWANG ZHU ; WU, Ona ; SINGHAL, Aneesh ; KOROSHETZ, Walter J ; SORENSEN, A. Gregory</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-fbe7002989cdbe6fce7b320c1e169581525037f755e3e161c5f0c7278e470873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Acute Disease</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cerebral Infarction - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Cerebral Infarction - pathology</topic><topic>Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - standards</topic><topic>Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Headache. Facial pains. Syncopes. Epilepsia. Intracranial hypertension. Brain oedema. Cerebral palsy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Angiography - standards</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Angiography - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes)</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neuroradiography - standards</topic><topic>Neuroradiography - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Stroke - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Stroke - pathology</topic><topic>Vascular diseases and vascular malformations of the nervous system</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>AY, Hakan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ARSAVA, E. Murat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VANGEL, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ONER, Banu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MINGWANG ZHU</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WU, Ona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SINGHAL, Aneesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KOROSHETZ, Walter J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SORENSEN, A. Gregory</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Stroke (1970)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>AY, Hakan</au><au>ARSAVA, E. Murat</au><au>VANGEL, Mark</au><au>ONER, Banu</au><au>MINGWANG ZHU</au><au>WU, Ona</au><au>SINGHAL, Aneesh</au><au>KOROSHETZ, Walter J</au><au>SORENSEN, A. Gregory</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interexaminer Difference in Infarct Volume Measurements on MRI : A Source of Variance in Stroke Research</atitle><jtitle>Stroke (1970)</jtitle><addtitle>Stroke</addtitle><date>2008-04-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1171</spage><epage>1176</epage><pages>1171-1176</pages><issn>0039-2499</issn><eissn>1524-4628</eissn><coden>SJCCA7</coden><abstract>The measurement of ischemic lesion volume on diffusion- (DWI) and perfusion-weighted MRI (PWI) is examiner dependent. We sought to quantify the variance imposed by measurement error in DWI and PWI lesion volume measurements in ischemic stroke. Fifty-eight consecutive patients with DWI and PWI within 12 hours of symptom onset and follow-up MRI on &gt;or= day-5 were studied. Two radiologists blinded to each other measured lesion volumes by manual outlining on each image. Interexaminer reliability was evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and relative paired difference or RPD (ratio of difference between 2 measurements to their mean). The ratio of between-examiner variability to between-subject variability (variance ratio) was calculated for each imaging parameter. The correlation (ICC) between examiners ranged from 0.93 to 0.99. The median RPD was 10.0% for DWI, 14.1% for mean transit time, 18.9% for cerebral blood flow, 21.0% for cerebral blood volume, 16.8% for DWI/MTT mismatch, and 6.3% for chronic T2-weighted images. There was negative correlation between RPD and lesion volume in all but chronic T2-weighted images. The variance ratio ranged between 0.02 and 0.10. Despite high correlation between volume measurements of abnormal regions on DWI and PWI by different examiners, substantial differences in individual measurements can still occur. The magnitude of variance from measurement error is primarily determined by the type of imaging and lesion volume. Minimizing this source of variance will better enable imaging to deliver on its promise of smaller sample size.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>18292377</pmid><doi>10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.502104</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0039-2499
ispartof Stroke (1970), 2008-04, Vol.39 (4), p.1171-1176
issn 0039-2499
1524-4628
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70434257
source MEDLINE; American Heart Association Journals; Journals@Ovid Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Acute Disease
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biological and medical sciences
Cerebral Infarction - diagnostic imaging
Cerebral Infarction - pathology
Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - standards
Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - statistics & numerical data
Female
Headache. Facial pains. Syncopes. Epilepsia. Intracranial hypertension. Brain oedema. Cerebral palsy
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Angiography - standards
Magnetic Resonance Angiography - statistics & numerical data
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Models, Statistical
Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes)
Neurology
Neuroradiography - standards
Neuroradiography - statistics & numerical data
Observer Variation
Retrospective Studies
Stroke - diagnostic imaging
Stroke - pathology
Vascular diseases and vascular malformations of the nervous system
title Interexaminer Difference in Infarct Volume Measurements on MRI : A Source of Variance in Stroke Research
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T03%3A29%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interexaminer%20Difference%20in%20Infarct%20Volume%20Measurements%20on%20MRI%20:%20A%20Source%20of%20Variance%20in%20Stroke%20Research&rft.jtitle=Stroke%20(1970)&rft.au=AY,%20Hakan&rft.date=2008-04-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1171&rft.epage=1176&rft.pages=1171-1176&rft.issn=0039-2499&rft.eissn=1524-4628&rft.coden=SJCCA7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.502104&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70434257%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20662390&rft_id=info:pmid/18292377&rfr_iscdi=true