Genetic architecture of differences in oviposition preference between ancestral and derived populations of the seed beetle Acanthoscelides obtectus
We investigated the additive, dominance and epistatic genetic effects underlying differentiation in oviposition preference between two populations of the seed beetle Acanthoscelides obtectus evolved in the laboratory for 102 generations on bean and chickpea seeds. We reared and tested females on eac...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Heredity 2007-05, Vol.98 (5), p.268-273 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 273 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 268 |
| container_title | Heredity |
| container_volume | 98 |
| creator | Tucic, N Seslija, D |
| description | We investigated the additive, dominance and epistatic genetic effects underlying differentiation in oviposition preference between two populations of the seed beetle Acanthoscelides obtectus evolved in the laboratory for 102 generations on bean and chickpea seeds. We reared and tested females on each of two host legumes. The populations differed in mean oviposition preference; the preference for chickpea was stronger in population reared on the chickpea (C) than in population maintained on common bean (P). Observations in the parental populations indicated that females tend to prefer ovipositioning their eggs on the seeds they have already experienced. The patterns of the means in each of the parental populations and 12 types of hybrids (two F1, two F2 and eight backcrosses) indicated that population differences in oviposition preference from both rearing hosts could be explained by nonadditive genetic effects. Statistically detectable additive and dominance genetic effects were observed in the most parsimonious model only when females were reared on the chickpea. The most parsimonious models on both rearing hosts suggested a contribution of negative additive additive epistasis to the divergence of oviposition preference between the P and C populations. This indicates a positive effect of epistasis on the performance of the second generations of hybrids. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800930 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70431050</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>19639620</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-5ae2d8d59e4a7ed88d13a3ef4099309663e6e99d9cab9c226ff9a999f4b559363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQhS0EokvhyhEsDtx2O7ZjJz5WFRSkShygEjfLsSddr7JxsJOi_g7-MA4bqRIS4mTL881743mEvGawYyCai3zY7f3DTjUAWsATsmFCyS2XFTwlGwDWbEHV38_Ii5wPACBqrp-TM1YLYHXFNuTXNQ44BUdtcvswoZvmhDR21Ieuw4SDw0zDQON9GGMOU4gDHROuJdri9BNxoHbhpmT7cvPUYwr36OkYx7m3S09eJKc90ozlvUWceqSXzg7TPmaHffDFJrZ__PNL8qyzfcZX63lObj9--Hb1aXvz5frz1eXN1lVSTltpkfvGS42VrdE3jWfCCuwq0GUVWimBCrX22tlWO85V12mrte6qVkotlDgn70-6Y4o_5jK_OYZlmN4OGOdsaqgEAwn_BZlWQiu-gO_-Ag9xTkP5hOG8WDPOeIF2J8ilmHPZpRlTONr0YBiYJVSTD6aEatZQS8ObVXVuj-gf8TXFAlycgFxKwx2mR9t_Sr49dXQ2GnuXQja3XzkwAdBIJrQUvwHCqbpn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>229991212</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Genetic architecture of differences in oviposition preference between ancestral and derived populations of the seed beetle Acanthoscelides obtectus</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Nature</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Tucic, N ; Seslija, D</creator><creatorcontrib>Tucic, N ; Seslija, D</creatorcontrib><description>We investigated the additive, dominance and epistatic genetic effects underlying differentiation in oviposition preference between two populations of the seed beetle Acanthoscelides obtectus evolved in the laboratory for 102 generations on bean and chickpea seeds. We reared and tested females on each of two host legumes. The populations differed in mean oviposition preference; the preference for chickpea was stronger in population reared on the chickpea (C) than in population maintained on common bean (P). Observations in the parental populations indicated that females tend to prefer ovipositioning their eggs on the seeds they have already experienced. The patterns of the means in each of the parental populations and 12 types of hybrids (two F1, two F2 and eight backcrosses) indicated that population differences in oviposition preference from both rearing hosts could be explained by nonadditive genetic effects. Statistically detectable additive and dominance genetic effects were observed in the most parsimonious model only when females were reared on the chickpea. The most parsimonious models on both rearing hosts suggested a contribution of negative additive additive epistasis to the divergence of oviposition preference between the P and C populations. This indicates a positive effect of epistasis on the performance of the second generations of hybrids.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-067X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2540</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800930</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17301741</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HDTYAT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Acanthoscelides obtectus ; Adaptation, Physiological ; additive gene effects ; Animals ; asexual reproduction ; beans ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; cherries ; chickpeas ; Cicer ; Cicer arietinum ; Coleoptera - genetics ; Coleoptera - growth & development ; Crosses, Genetic ; Cytogenetics ; Ecology ; Eggs ; epistasis ; Epistasis, Genetic ; Evolutionary Biology ; Female ; Genetic effects ; genetic markers ; Genetic Variation ; Genetics ; Genetics, Population ; genotype ; Heredity ; heterosis ; Human Genetics ; Hybrids ; Inheritance Patterns ; insect genetics ; Insects ; Legumes ; loci ; microsatellite repeats ; Models, Genetic ; original-article ; oviposition ; Oviposition - physiology ; oviposition preferences ; Phaseolus vulgaris ; Plant Genetics and Genomics ; population ; Prunus avium ; reproductive behavior ; Seeds ; spatial genetic structure ; wild relatives ; woodlands</subject><ispartof>Heredity, 2007-05, Vol.98 (5), p.268-273</ispartof><rights>The Genetics Society 2007</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group May 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-5ae2d8d59e4a7ed88d13a3ef4099309663e6e99d9cab9c226ff9a999f4b559363</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-5ae2d8d59e4a7ed88d13a3ef4099309663e6e99d9cab9c226ff9a999f4b559363</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17301741$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tucic, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seslija, D</creatorcontrib><title>Genetic architecture of differences in oviposition preference between ancestral and derived populations of the seed beetle Acanthoscelides obtectus</title><title>Heredity</title><addtitle>Heredity</addtitle><addtitle>Heredity (Edinb)</addtitle><description>We investigated the additive, dominance and epistatic genetic effects underlying differentiation in oviposition preference between two populations of the seed beetle Acanthoscelides obtectus evolved in the laboratory for 102 generations on bean and chickpea seeds. We reared and tested females on each of two host legumes. The populations differed in mean oviposition preference; the preference for chickpea was stronger in population reared on the chickpea (C) than in population maintained on common bean (P). Observations in the parental populations indicated that females tend to prefer ovipositioning their eggs on the seeds they have already experienced. The patterns of the means in each of the parental populations and 12 types of hybrids (two F1, two F2 and eight backcrosses) indicated that population differences in oviposition preference from both rearing hosts could be explained by nonadditive genetic effects. Statistically detectable additive and dominance genetic effects were observed in the most parsimonious model only when females were reared on the chickpea. The most parsimonious models on both rearing hosts suggested a contribution of negative additive additive epistasis to the divergence of oviposition preference between the P and C populations. This indicates a positive effect of epistasis on the performance of the second generations of hybrids.</description><subject>Acanthoscelides obtectus</subject><subject>Adaptation, Physiological</subject><subject>additive gene effects</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>asexual reproduction</subject><subject>beans</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>cherries</subject><subject>chickpeas</subject><subject>Cicer</subject><subject>Cicer arietinum</subject><subject>Coleoptera - genetics</subject><subject>Coleoptera - growth & development</subject><subject>Crosses, Genetic</subject><subject>Cytogenetics</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Eggs</subject><subject>epistasis</subject><subject>Epistasis, Genetic</subject><subject>Evolutionary Biology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genetic effects</subject><subject>genetic markers</subject><subject>Genetic Variation</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Genetics, Population</subject><subject>genotype</subject><subject>Heredity</subject><subject>heterosis</subject><subject>Human Genetics</subject><subject>Hybrids</subject><subject>Inheritance Patterns</subject><subject>insect genetics</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Legumes</subject><subject>loci</subject><subject>microsatellite repeats</subject><subject>Models, Genetic</subject><subject>original-article</subject><subject>oviposition</subject><subject>Oviposition - physiology</subject><subject>oviposition preferences</subject><subject>Phaseolus vulgaris</subject><subject>Plant Genetics and Genomics</subject><subject>population</subject><subject>Prunus avium</subject><subject>reproductive behavior</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>spatial genetic structure</subject><subject>wild relatives</subject><subject>woodlands</subject><issn>0018-067X</issn><issn>1365-2540</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQhS0EokvhyhEsDtx2O7ZjJz5WFRSkShygEjfLsSddr7JxsJOi_g7-MA4bqRIS4mTL881743mEvGawYyCai3zY7f3DTjUAWsATsmFCyS2XFTwlGwDWbEHV38_Ii5wPACBqrp-TM1YLYHXFNuTXNQ44BUdtcvswoZvmhDR21Ieuw4SDw0zDQON9GGMOU4gDHROuJdri9BNxoHbhpmT7cvPUYwr36OkYx7m3S09eJKc90ozlvUWceqSXzg7TPmaHffDFJrZ__PNL8qyzfcZX63lObj9--Hb1aXvz5frz1eXN1lVSTltpkfvGS42VrdE3jWfCCuwq0GUVWimBCrX22tlWO85V12mrte6qVkotlDgn70-6Y4o_5jK_OYZlmN4OGOdsaqgEAwn_BZlWQiu-gO_-Ag9xTkP5hOG8WDPOeIF2J8ilmHPZpRlTONr0YBiYJVSTD6aEatZQS8ObVXVuj-gf8TXFAlycgFxKwx2mR9t_Sr49dXQ2GnuXQja3XzkwAdBIJrQUvwHCqbpn</recordid><startdate>20070501</startdate><enddate>20070501</enddate><creator>Tucic, N</creator><creator>Seslija, D</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070501</creationdate><title>Genetic architecture of differences in oviposition preference between ancestral and derived populations of the seed beetle Acanthoscelides obtectus</title><author>Tucic, N ; Seslija, D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-5ae2d8d59e4a7ed88d13a3ef4099309663e6e99d9cab9c226ff9a999f4b559363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Acanthoscelides obtectus</topic><topic>Adaptation, Physiological</topic><topic>additive gene effects</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>asexual reproduction</topic><topic>beans</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>cherries</topic><topic>chickpeas</topic><topic>Cicer</topic><topic>Cicer arietinum</topic><topic>Coleoptera - genetics</topic><topic>Coleoptera - growth & development</topic><topic>Crosses, Genetic</topic><topic>Cytogenetics</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Eggs</topic><topic>epistasis</topic><topic>Epistasis, Genetic</topic><topic>Evolutionary Biology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genetic effects</topic><topic>genetic markers</topic><topic>Genetic Variation</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Genetics, Population</topic><topic>genotype</topic><topic>Heredity</topic><topic>heterosis</topic><topic>Human Genetics</topic><topic>Hybrids</topic><topic>Inheritance Patterns</topic><topic>insect genetics</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Legumes</topic><topic>loci</topic><topic>microsatellite repeats</topic><topic>Models, Genetic</topic><topic>original-article</topic><topic>oviposition</topic><topic>Oviposition - physiology</topic><topic>oviposition preferences</topic><topic>Phaseolus vulgaris</topic><topic>Plant Genetics and Genomics</topic><topic>population</topic><topic>Prunus avium</topic><topic>reproductive behavior</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>spatial genetic structure</topic><topic>wild relatives</topic><topic>woodlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tucic, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seslija, D</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Heredity</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tucic, N</au><au>Seslija, D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Genetic architecture of differences in oviposition preference between ancestral and derived populations of the seed beetle Acanthoscelides obtectus</atitle><jtitle>Heredity</jtitle><stitle>Heredity</stitle><addtitle>Heredity (Edinb)</addtitle><date>2007-05-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>98</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>268</spage><epage>273</epage><pages>268-273</pages><issn>0018-067X</issn><eissn>1365-2540</eissn><coden>HDTYAT</coden><abstract>We investigated the additive, dominance and epistatic genetic effects underlying differentiation in oviposition preference between two populations of the seed beetle Acanthoscelides obtectus evolved in the laboratory for 102 generations on bean and chickpea seeds. We reared and tested females on each of two host legumes. The populations differed in mean oviposition preference; the preference for chickpea was stronger in population reared on the chickpea (C) than in population maintained on common bean (P). Observations in the parental populations indicated that females tend to prefer ovipositioning their eggs on the seeds they have already experienced. The patterns of the means in each of the parental populations and 12 types of hybrids (two F1, two F2 and eight backcrosses) indicated that population differences in oviposition preference from both rearing hosts could be explained by nonadditive genetic effects. Statistically detectable additive and dominance genetic effects were observed in the most parsimonious model only when females were reared on the chickpea. The most parsimonious models on both rearing hosts suggested a contribution of negative additive additive epistasis to the divergence of oviposition preference between the P and C populations. This indicates a positive effect of epistasis on the performance of the second generations of hybrids.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>17301741</pmid><doi>10.1038/sj.hdy.6800930</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0018-067X |
| ispartof | Heredity, 2007-05, Vol.98 (5), p.268-273 |
| issn | 0018-067X 1365-2540 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70431050 |
| source | MEDLINE; Nature; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Acanthoscelides obtectus Adaptation, Physiological additive gene effects Animals asexual reproduction beans Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine cherries chickpeas Cicer Cicer arietinum Coleoptera - genetics Coleoptera - growth & development Crosses, Genetic Cytogenetics Ecology Eggs epistasis Epistasis, Genetic Evolutionary Biology Female Genetic effects genetic markers Genetic Variation Genetics Genetics, Population genotype Heredity heterosis Human Genetics Hybrids Inheritance Patterns insect genetics Insects Legumes loci microsatellite repeats Models, Genetic original-article oviposition Oviposition - physiology oviposition preferences Phaseolus vulgaris Plant Genetics and Genomics population Prunus avium reproductive behavior Seeds spatial genetic structure wild relatives woodlands |
| title | Genetic architecture of differences in oviposition preference between ancestral and derived populations of the seed beetle Acanthoscelides obtectus |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T04%3A51%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Genetic%20architecture%20of%20differences%20in%20oviposition%20preference%20between%20ancestral%20and%20derived%20populations%20of%20the%20seed%20beetle%20Acanthoscelides%20obtectus&rft.jtitle=Heredity&rft.au=Tucic,%20N&rft.date=2007-05-01&rft.volume=98&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=268&rft.epage=273&rft.pages=268-273&rft.issn=0018-067X&rft.eissn=1365-2540&rft.coden=HDTYAT&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/sj.hdy.6800930&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19639620%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=229991212&rft_id=info:pmid/17301741&rfr_iscdi=true |