A Prospective Comparison of AV Delay Programming Methods for Hemodynamic Optimization during Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Introduction: There are several methods for programming the optimal AV delay (AVD) during cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). These include Doppler echocardiographic measurements of mitral inflow or aortic outflow velocities, an arbitrarily fixed AVD, and calculations based on intracardiac elec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology 2007-05, Vol.18 (5), p.490-496
Hauptverfasser: GOLD, MICHAEL R., NIAZI, IMRAN, GIUDICI, MICHAEL, LEMAN, ROBERT B., STURDIVANT, J. LACY, KIM, MICHAEL H., YU, YINGHONG, DING, JIANG, WAGGONER, ALAN D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 496
container_issue 5
container_start_page 490
container_title Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology
container_volume 18
creator GOLD, MICHAEL R.
NIAZI, IMRAN
GIUDICI, MICHAEL
LEMAN, ROBERT B.
STURDIVANT, J. LACY
KIM, MICHAEL H.
YU, YINGHONG
DING, JIANG
WAGGONER, ALAN D.
description Introduction: There are several methods for programming the optimal AV delay (AVD) during cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). These include Doppler echocardiographic measurements of mitral inflow or aortic outflow velocities, an arbitrarily fixed AVD, and calculations based on intracardiac electrogram (EGM) intervals. The present study was designed to compare the acute effects of AVD programming methods during CRT. Methods and Results: We studied 28 patients at CRT implant with invasive measurements of LV dP/dt to determine the effect of AVD during atrial sensed (AS) and atrial paced (AP) modes. The optimal AVD, defined as that resulting in the maximal LV dP/dt, was then compared with that predicted by several noninvasive methods. CRT increased LV dP/dt 11%± 11% during AS (heart rate: 73 ± 14 bpm) and 17%± 12% during AP (heart rate: 86 ± 12 bpm) (P < 0.001 vs AS). There was an excellent correlation between the EGM method and the maximum achievable LV dP/dt (AS: R2= 0.99, P < 0.0001, AP: R2= 0.96, P < 0.0001) and this method performed better than other techniques. Conclusions: An electrogram‐based optimization method accurately predicts the optimal AVD among patients over a wide range of QRS intervals during CRT in both AS and AP modes. This simple technique may obviate the need for echocardiography for AVD programming.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2007.00770.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70423723</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70423723</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4700-57e3dde7fdd82e9c867ec909d3535ff6fb9abacf8ab6980eda4d6984f0caf78b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEFv0zAYhiMEYmPwF5BP3BKcOokTiUvJto5pY9O0laPl2J9XlzjO7HRrduC349Ayrliy_Ep-3s_yE0UoxUka1ud1kuYZjsu0oMkMY5qETXGyfRUdvly8DhlneUxKSg6id96vMU5JgfO30UFKSUpyQg6jX3N07azvQQz6EVBtTc-d9rZDVqH5Eh1Dy8cJuXfcGN3do0sYVlZ6pKxDZ2CsHDtutEBX_aCNfuaDDmW5cRNbcyc1F-gG_NiJlbPdX-B2BY734_vojeKthw_78yi6Oz25rc_ii6vFt3p-EYuMYhznFIiUQJWU5QwqURYURIUrGT6RK1WopuINF6rkTVGVGCTPZAiZwoIrWjbkKPq0m9s7-7ABPzCjvYC25R3YjWcUZzNCZySA5Q4UwYp3oFjvtOFuZClmk3u2ZpNiNilmk3v2xz3bhurH_RubxoD8V9zLDsCXHfCkWxj_ezA7r09CCPV4V9d-gO1LnbufrKCE5uzH9wW7PM2-Xi-WS3ZOfgMBL6VC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70423723</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Prospective Comparison of AV Delay Programming Methods for Hemodynamic Optimization during Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>GOLD, MICHAEL R. ; NIAZI, IMRAN ; GIUDICI, MICHAEL ; LEMAN, ROBERT B. ; STURDIVANT, J. LACY ; KIM, MICHAEL H. ; YU, YINGHONG ; DING, JIANG ; WAGGONER, ALAN D.</creator><creatorcontrib>GOLD, MICHAEL R. ; NIAZI, IMRAN ; GIUDICI, MICHAEL ; LEMAN, ROBERT B. ; STURDIVANT, J. LACY ; KIM, MICHAEL H. ; YU, YINGHONG ; DING, JIANG ; WAGGONER, ALAN D.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: There are several methods for programming the optimal AV delay (AVD) during cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). These include Doppler echocardiographic measurements of mitral inflow or aortic outflow velocities, an arbitrarily fixed AVD, and calculations based on intracardiac electrogram (EGM) intervals. The present study was designed to compare the acute effects of AVD programming methods during CRT. Methods and Results: We studied 28 patients at CRT implant with invasive measurements of LV dP/dt to determine the effect of AVD during atrial sensed (AS) and atrial paced (AP) modes. The optimal AVD, defined as that resulting in the maximal LV dP/dt, was then compared with that predicted by several noninvasive methods. CRT increased LV dP/dt 11%± 11% during AS (heart rate: 73 ± 14 bpm) and 17%± 12% during AP (heart rate: 86 ± 12 bpm) (P &lt; 0.001 vs AS). There was an excellent correlation between the EGM method and the maximum achievable LV dP/dt (AS: R2= 0.99, P &lt; 0.0001, AP: R2= 0.96, P &lt; 0.0001) and this method performed better than other techniques. Conclusions: An electrogram‐based optimization method accurately predicts the optimal AVD among patients over a wide range of QRS intervals during CRT in both AS and AP modes. This simple technique may obviate the need for echocardiography for AVD programming.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1045-3873</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-8167</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2007.00770.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17313533</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; atrial pacing ; AV delay optimization ; Bundle-Branch Block - complications ; Bundle-Branch Block - diagnosis ; Bundle-Branch Block - therapy ; Cardiac Pacing, Artificial - methods ; cardiac resynchronization therapy ; Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Electrocardiography - methods ; Female ; heart failure ; hemodynamics ; Humans ; In Vitro Techniques ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prospective Studies ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Therapy, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Treatment Outcome ; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - diagnosis ; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - etiology ; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - therapy</subject><ispartof>Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology, 2007-05, Vol.18 (5), p.490-496</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4700-57e3dde7fdd82e9c867ec909d3535ff6fb9abacf8ab6980eda4d6984f0caf78b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4700-57e3dde7fdd82e9c867ec909d3535ff6fb9abacf8ab6980eda4d6984f0caf78b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1540-8167.2007.00770.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1540-8167.2007.00770.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17313533$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>GOLD, MICHAEL R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NIAZI, IMRAN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GIUDICI, MICHAEL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LEMAN, ROBERT B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STURDIVANT, J. LACY</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KIM, MICHAEL H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YU, YINGHONG</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DING, JIANG</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WAGGONER, ALAN D.</creatorcontrib><title>A Prospective Comparison of AV Delay Programming Methods for Hemodynamic Optimization during Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy</title><title>Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology</title><addtitle>J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol</addtitle><description>Introduction: There are several methods for programming the optimal AV delay (AVD) during cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). These include Doppler echocardiographic measurements of mitral inflow or aortic outflow velocities, an arbitrarily fixed AVD, and calculations based on intracardiac electrogram (EGM) intervals. The present study was designed to compare the acute effects of AVD programming methods during CRT. Methods and Results: We studied 28 patients at CRT implant with invasive measurements of LV dP/dt to determine the effect of AVD during atrial sensed (AS) and atrial paced (AP) modes. The optimal AVD, defined as that resulting in the maximal LV dP/dt, was then compared with that predicted by several noninvasive methods. CRT increased LV dP/dt 11%± 11% during AS (heart rate: 73 ± 14 bpm) and 17%± 12% during AP (heart rate: 86 ± 12 bpm) (P &lt; 0.001 vs AS). There was an excellent correlation between the EGM method and the maximum achievable LV dP/dt (AS: R2= 0.99, P &lt; 0.0001, AP: R2= 0.96, P &lt; 0.0001) and this method performed better than other techniques. Conclusions: An electrogram‐based optimization method accurately predicts the optimal AVD among patients over a wide range of QRS intervals during CRT in both AS and AP modes. This simple technique may obviate the need for echocardiography for AVD programming.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>atrial pacing</subject><subject>AV delay optimization</subject><subject>Bundle-Branch Block - complications</subject><subject>Bundle-Branch Block - diagnosis</subject><subject>Bundle-Branch Block - therapy</subject><subject>Cardiac Pacing, Artificial - methods</subject><subject>cardiac resynchronization therapy</subject><subject>Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Electrocardiography - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>heart failure</subject><subject>hemodynamics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>In Vitro Techniques</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Therapy, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - diagnosis</subject><subject>Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - etiology</subject><subject>Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - therapy</subject><issn>1045-3873</issn><issn>1540-8167</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEFv0zAYhiMEYmPwF5BP3BKcOokTiUvJto5pY9O0laPl2J9XlzjO7HRrduC349Ayrliy_Ep-3s_yE0UoxUka1ud1kuYZjsu0oMkMY5qETXGyfRUdvly8DhlneUxKSg6id96vMU5JgfO30UFKSUpyQg6jX3N07azvQQz6EVBtTc-d9rZDVqH5Eh1Dy8cJuXfcGN3do0sYVlZ6pKxDZ2CsHDtutEBX_aCNfuaDDmW5cRNbcyc1F-gG_NiJlbPdX-B2BY734_vojeKthw_78yi6Oz25rc_ii6vFt3p-EYuMYhznFIiUQJWU5QwqURYURIUrGT6RK1WopuINF6rkTVGVGCTPZAiZwoIrWjbkKPq0m9s7-7ABPzCjvYC25R3YjWcUZzNCZySA5Q4UwYp3oFjvtOFuZClmk3u2ZpNiNilmk3v2xz3bhurH_RubxoD8V9zLDsCXHfCkWxj_ezA7r09CCPV4V9d-gO1LnbufrKCE5uzH9wW7PM2-Xi-WS3ZOfgMBL6VC</recordid><startdate>200705</startdate><enddate>200705</enddate><creator>GOLD, MICHAEL R.</creator><creator>NIAZI, IMRAN</creator><creator>GIUDICI, MICHAEL</creator><creator>LEMAN, ROBERT B.</creator><creator>STURDIVANT, J. LACY</creator><creator>KIM, MICHAEL H.</creator><creator>YU, YINGHONG</creator><creator>DING, JIANG</creator><creator>WAGGONER, ALAN D.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200705</creationdate><title>A Prospective Comparison of AV Delay Programming Methods for Hemodynamic Optimization during Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy</title><author>GOLD, MICHAEL R. ; NIAZI, IMRAN ; GIUDICI, MICHAEL ; LEMAN, ROBERT B. ; STURDIVANT, J. LACY ; KIM, MICHAEL H. ; YU, YINGHONG ; DING, JIANG ; WAGGONER, ALAN D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4700-57e3dde7fdd82e9c867ec909d3535ff6fb9abacf8ab6980eda4d6984f0caf78b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>atrial pacing</topic><topic>AV delay optimization</topic><topic>Bundle-Branch Block - complications</topic><topic>Bundle-Branch Block - diagnosis</topic><topic>Bundle-Branch Block - therapy</topic><topic>Cardiac Pacing, Artificial - methods</topic><topic>cardiac resynchronization therapy</topic><topic>Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Electrocardiography - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>heart failure</topic><topic>hemodynamics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>In Vitro Techniques</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Therapy, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - diagnosis</topic><topic>Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - etiology</topic><topic>Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>GOLD, MICHAEL R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NIAZI, IMRAN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GIUDICI, MICHAEL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LEMAN, ROBERT B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STURDIVANT, J. LACY</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KIM, MICHAEL H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YU, YINGHONG</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DING, JIANG</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WAGGONER, ALAN D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>GOLD, MICHAEL R.</au><au>NIAZI, IMRAN</au><au>GIUDICI, MICHAEL</au><au>LEMAN, ROBERT B.</au><au>STURDIVANT, J. LACY</au><au>KIM, MICHAEL H.</au><au>YU, YINGHONG</au><au>DING, JIANG</au><au>WAGGONER, ALAN D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Prospective Comparison of AV Delay Programming Methods for Hemodynamic Optimization during Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol</addtitle><date>2007-05</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>490</spage><epage>496</epage><pages>490-496</pages><issn>1045-3873</issn><eissn>1540-8167</eissn><abstract>Introduction: There are several methods for programming the optimal AV delay (AVD) during cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). These include Doppler echocardiographic measurements of mitral inflow or aortic outflow velocities, an arbitrarily fixed AVD, and calculations based on intracardiac electrogram (EGM) intervals. The present study was designed to compare the acute effects of AVD programming methods during CRT. Methods and Results: We studied 28 patients at CRT implant with invasive measurements of LV dP/dt to determine the effect of AVD during atrial sensed (AS) and atrial paced (AP) modes. The optimal AVD, defined as that resulting in the maximal LV dP/dt, was then compared with that predicted by several noninvasive methods. CRT increased LV dP/dt 11%± 11% during AS (heart rate: 73 ± 14 bpm) and 17%± 12% during AP (heart rate: 86 ± 12 bpm) (P &lt; 0.001 vs AS). There was an excellent correlation between the EGM method and the maximum achievable LV dP/dt (AS: R2= 0.99, P &lt; 0.0001, AP: R2= 0.96, P &lt; 0.0001) and this method performed better than other techniques. Conclusions: An electrogram‐based optimization method accurately predicts the optimal AVD among patients over a wide range of QRS intervals during CRT in both AS and AP modes. This simple technique may obviate the need for echocardiography for AVD programming.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><pmid>17313533</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1540-8167.2007.00770.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1045-3873
ispartof Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology, 2007-05, Vol.18 (5), p.490-496
issn 1045-3873
1540-8167
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70423723
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
atrial pacing
AV delay optimization
Bundle-Branch Block - complications
Bundle-Branch Block - diagnosis
Bundle-Branch Block - therapy
Cardiac Pacing, Artificial - methods
cardiac resynchronization therapy
Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted - methods
Electrocardiography - methods
Female
heart failure
hemodynamics
Humans
In Vitro Techniques
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Therapy, Computer-Assisted - methods
Treatment Outcome
Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - diagnosis
Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - etiology
Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - therapy
title A Prospective Comparison of AV Delay Programming Methods for Hemodynamic Optimization during Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T05%3A46%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Prospective%20Comparison%20of%20AV%20Delay%20Programming%20Methods%20for%20Hemodynamic%20Optimization%20during%20Cardiac%20Resynchronization%20Therapy&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cardiovascular%20electrophysiology&rft.au=GOLD,%20MICHAEL%20R.&rft.date=2007-05&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=490&rft.epage=496&rft.pages=490-496&rft.issn=1045-3873&rft.eissn=1540-8167&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1540-8167.2007.00770.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70423723%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70423723&rft_id=info:pmid/17313533&rfr_iscdi=true