What drives communities' decisions and behaviours in the reuse of wastewater
This paper outlines a five year investigation which aimed to develop a measurement to predict community intended behaviour in relation to the reuse of wastewater. It has been apparent that communities support the concept of water reuse as a means of responsible water resources management. However, r...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Water science and technology 2008-01, Vol.57 (4), p.485-491 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 491 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 485 |
| container_title | Water science and technology |
| container_volume | 57 |
| creator | Nancarrow, B.E Leviston, Z Po, M Porter, N.B Tucker, D.I |
| description | This paper outlines a five year investigation which aimed to develop a measurement to predict community intended behaviour in relation to the reuse of wastewater. It has been apparent that communities support the concept of water reuse as a means of responsible water resources management. However, reactions from people when it comes to actually using the recycled water are frequently quite different, particularly when it involves close personal contact or ingestion of the water. Little has been known of how people make their decisions to accept or reject schemes. Therefore, a research program was designed to systematically identify, measure and test the major factors that govern people's decision-making. A social experiment was designed whereby a large group of random community members participated in tasting and swallowing what they believed to be recycled water from different sources and products grown with recycled waters. This provided an immediate experience for the development of measures of psychological and other factors in decisions to taste and/or swallow. This then formed the basis for whole of city surveys which tested and refined an hypothesised model of intended behaviour, and three case studies over time which sought to replicate the model. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2166/wst.2008.160 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70423247</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20711686</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-544a9b58aec6dba1b18083a2ceffdbb0e74f3cb191b32280a404efb78f6737323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0c1rFDEYx_EgFrtWb541IOjFWZ-8TF6OpfgGCz3U4jEkM0_clJ2Zmsx08b9vll0QvOgplw8_ePIl5BWDNWdKfdyXec0BzJopeEJWzFrVWC34U7ICrkXDOBfn5HkpdwCghYRn5JwZ0Vpr2hXZ_Nj6mfY5PWCh3TQMy5jmhOU97bFLJU1joX7sacCtf0jTkgtNI523SDMuBekU6d6XGfd-xvyCnEW_K_jy9F6Q28-fvl99bTbXX75dXW6aToKYm1ZKb0NrPHaqD54FZsAIzzuMsQ8BUMsousAsC4JzA16CxBi0iUqLepm4IO-Ou_d5-rVgmd2QSoe7nR9xWorTILngUv8TcrDCCvU_UDOmjKrw7V_wrn7KWK91zEqhwNj2MPfhqLo8lZIxuvucBp9_OwbuUM3Vau5QzdVqlb8-jS5hwP4PPmWq4M0RRD85_zOn4m5vODBRFyyY6h4BqQ2bWg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1943608957</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What drives communities' decisions and behaviours in the reuse of wastewater</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Nancarrow, B.E ; Leviston, Z ; Po, M ; Porter, N.B ; Tucker, D.I</creator><creatorcontrib>Nancarrow, B.E ; Leviston, Z ; Po, M ; Porter, N.B ; Tucker, D.I</creatorcontrib><description>This paper outlines a five year investigation which aimed to develop a measurement to predict community intended behaviour in relation to the reuse of wastewater. It has been apparent that communities support the concept of water reuse as a means of responsible water resources management. However, reactions from people when it comes to actually using the recycled water are frequently quite different, particularly when it involves close personal contact or ingestion of the water. Little has been known of how people make their decisions to accept or reject schemes. Therefore, a research program was designed to systematically identify, measure and test the major factors that govern people's decision-making. A social experiment was designed whereby a large group of random community members participated in tasting and swallowing what they believed to be recycled water from different sources and products grown with recycled waters. This provided an immediate experience for the development of measures of psychological and other factors in decisions to taste and/or swallow. This then formed the basis for whole of city surveys which tested and refined an hypothesised model of intended behaviour, and three case studies over time which sought to replicate the model.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0273-1223</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-9732</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2166/wst.2008.160</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18359985</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: IWA Publishing</publisher><subject>Agriculture - methods ; Attitude ; attitudes and opinions ; Behavior ; Case studies ; citizen participation ; Community involvement ; Community participation ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Decision Making ; Decisions ; Emotions ; Fruit ; Humans ; Ingestion ; irrigated farming ; methodology ; Models, Psychological ; prediction ; psychosocial factors ; public opinion ; Research programmes ; Residence Characteristics ; Risk ; social behavior ; Surveys ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; sustainable development ; Swallowing ; Trust ; Vegetables ; Victoria ; Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods ; Wastewater ; wastewater irrigation ; Wastewater reuse ; wastewater treatment ; water management ; Water resources ; Water resources management ; Water reuse ; Water Supply ; Western Australia</subject><ispartof>Water science and technology, 2008-01, Vol.57 (4), p.485-491</ispartof><rights>Copyright IWA Publishing Mar 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-544a9b58aec6dba1b18083a2ceffdbb0e74f3cb191b32280a404efb78f6737323</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18359985$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nancarrow, B.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leviston, Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Po, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porter, N.B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tucker, D.I</creatorcontrib><title>What drives communities' decisions and behaviours in the reuse of wastewater</title><title>Water science and technology</title><addtitle>Water Sci Technol</addtitle><description>This paper outlines a five year investigation which aimed to develop a measurement to predict community intended behaviour in relation to the reuse of wastewater. It has been apparent that communities support the concept of water reuse as a means of responsible water resources management. However, reactions from people when it comes to actually using the recycled water are frequently quite different, particularly when it involves close personal contact or ingestion of the water. Little has been known of how people make their decisions to accept or reject schemes. Therefore, a research program was designed to systematically identify, measure and test the major factors that govern people's decision-making. A social experiment was designed whereby a large group of random community members participated in tasting and swallowing what they believed to be recycled water from different sources and products grown with recycled waters. This provided an immediate experience for the development of measures of psychological and other factors in decisions to taste and/or swallow. This then formed the basis for whole of city surveys which tested and refined an hypothesised model of intended behaviour, and three case studies over time which sought to replicate the model.</description><subject>Agriculture - methods</subject><subject>Attitude</subject><subject>attitudes and opinions</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>citizen participation</subject><subject>Community involvement</subject><subject>Community participation</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Decisions</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Fruit</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ingestion</subject><subject>irrigated farming</subject><subject>methodology</subject><subject>Models, Psychological</subject><subject>prediction</subject><subject>psychosocial factors</subject><subject>public opinion</subject><subject>Research programmes</subject><subject>Residence Characteristics</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>social behavior</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>sustainable development</subject><subject>Swallowing</subject><subject>Trust</subject><subject>Vegetables</subject><subject>Victoria</subject><subject>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</subject><subject>Wastewater</subject><subject>wastewater irrigation</subject><subject>Wastewater reuse</subject><subject>wastewater treatment</subject><subject>water management</subject><subject>Water resources</subject><subject>Water resources management</subject><subject>Water reuse</subject><subject>Water Supply</subject><subject>Western Australia</subject><issn>0273-1223</issn><issn>1996-9732</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0c1rFDEYx_EgFrtWb541IOjFWZ-8TF6OpfgGCz3U4jEkM0_clJ2Zmsx08b9vll0QvOgplw8_ePIl5BWDNWdKfdyXec0BzJopeEJWzFrVWC34U7ICrkXDOBfn5HkpdwCghYRn5JwZ0Vpr2hXZ_Nj6mfY5PWCh3TQMy5jmhOU97bFLJU1joX7sacCtf0jTkgtNI523SDMuBekU6d6XGfd-xvyCnEW_K_jy9F6Q28-fvl99bTbXX75dXW6aToKYm1ZKb0NrPHaqD54FZsAIzzuMsQ8BUMsousAsC4JzA16CxBi0iUqLepm4IO-Ou_d5-rVgmd2QSoe7nR9xWorTILngUv8TcrDCCvU_UDOmjKrw7V_wrn7KWK91zEqhwNj2MPfhqLo8lZIxuvucBp9_OwbuUM3Vau5QzdVqlb8-jS5hwP4PPmWq4M0RRD85_zOn4m5vODBRFyyY6h4BqQ2bWg</recordid><startdate>20080101</startdate><enddate>20080101</enddate><creator>Nancarrow, B.E</creator><creator>Leviston, Z</creator><creator>Po, M</creator><creator>Porter, N.B</creator><creator>Tucker, D.I</creator><general>IWA Publishing</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080101</creationdate><title>What drives communities' decisions and behaviours in the reuse of wastewater</title><author>Nancarrow, B.E ; Leviston, Z ; Po, M ; Porter, N.B ; Tucker, D.I</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-544a9b58aec6dba1b18083a2ceffdbb0e74f3cb191b32280a404efb78f6737323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Agriculture - methods</topic><topic>Attitude</topic><topic>attitudes and opinions</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>citizen participation</topic><topic>Community involvement</topic><topic>Community participation</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Decisions</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Fruit</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ingestion</topic><topic>irrigated farming</topic><topic>methodology</topic><topic>Models, Psychological</topic><topic>prediction</topic><topic>psychosocial factors</topic><topic>public opinion</topic><topic>Research programmes</topic><topic>Residence Characteristics</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>social behavior</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>sustainable development</topic><topic>Swallowing</topic><topic>Trust</topic><topic>Vegetables</topic><topic>Victoria</topic><topic>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</topic><topic>Wastewater</topic><topic>wastewater irrigation</topic><topic>Wastewater reuse</topic><topic>wastewater treatment</topic><topic>water management</topic><topic>Water resources</topic><topic>Water resources management</topic><topic>Water reuse</topic><topic>Water Supply</topic><topic>Western Australia</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nancarrow, B.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leviston, Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Po, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porter, N.B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tucker, D.I</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Water science and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nancarrow, B.E</au><au>Leviston, Z</au><au>Po, M</au><au>Porter, N.B</au><au>Tucker, D.I</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What drives communities' decisions and behaviours in the reuse of wastewater</atitle><jtitle>Water science and technology</jtitle><addtitle>Water Sci Technol</addtitle><date>2008-01-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>485</spage><epage>491</epage><pages>485-491</pages><issn>0273-1223</issn><eissn>1996-9732</eissn><abstract>This paper outlines a five year investigation which aimed to develop a measurement to predict community intended behaviour in relation to the reuse of wastewater. It has been apparent that communities support the concept of water reuse as a means of responsible water resources management. However, reactions from people when it comes to actually using the recycled water are frequently quite different, particularly when it involves close personal contact or ingestion of the water. Little has been known of how people make their decisions to accept or reject schemes. Therefore, a research program was designed to systematically identify, measure and test the major factors that govern people's decision-making. A social experiment was designed whereby a large group of random community members participated in tasting and swallowing what they believed to be recycled water from different sources and products grown with recycled waters. This provided an immediate experience for the development of measures of psychological and other factors in decisions to taste and/or swallow. This then formed the basis for whole of city surveys which tested and refined an hypothesised model of intended behaviour, and three case studies over time which sought to replicate the model.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>IWA Publishing</pub><pmid>18359985</pmid><doi>10.2166/wst.2008.160</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0273-1223 |
| ispartof | Water science and technology, 2008-01, Vol.57 (4), p.485-491 |
| issn | 0273-1223 1996-9732 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70423247 |
| source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | Agriculture - methods Attitude attitudes and opinions Behavior Case studies citizen participation Community involvement Community participation Conservation of Natural Resources Decision Making Decisions Emotions Fruit Humans Ingestion irrigated farming methodology Models, Psychological prediction psychosocial factors public opinion Research programmes Residence Characteristics Risk social behavior Surveys Surveys and Questionnaires sustainable development Swallowing Trust Vegetables Victoria Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods Wastewater wastewater irrigation Wastewater reuse wastewater treatment water management Water resources Water resources management Water reuse Water Supply Western Australia |
| title | What drives communities' decisions and behaviours in the reuse of wastewater |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T03%3A28%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20drives%20communities'%20decisions%20and%20behaviours%20in%20the%20reuse%20of%20wastewater&rft.jtitle=Water%20science%20and%20technology&rft.au=Nancarrow,%20B.E&rft.date=2008-01-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=485&rft.epage=491&rft.pages=485-491&rft.issn=0273-1223&rft.eissn=1996-9732&rft_id=info:doi/10.2166/wst.2008.160&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20711686%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1943608957&rft_id=info:pmid/18359985&rfr_iscdi=true |