Uv–vis spectrophotometric direct transmittance analysis of composite resins
Abstract Objectives The objective of this experiment was to evaluate the direct transmittance of the micro-hybrid composite resins Charisma F, Solitaire II, Intens and Tetric Ceram, and the nanofilled composite resins Exthet-X and Filtek Supreme in the dentin and translucent shades. Methods Three sa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Dental materials 2007-06, Vol.23 (6), p.724-730 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 730 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 724 |
container_title | Dental materials |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Masotti, Alexandre S Onófrio, Álvaro Barcellos Conceição, Ewerton N Spohr, Ana Maria |
description | Abstract Objectives The objective of this experiment was to evaluate the direct transmittance of the micro-hybrid composite resins Charisma F, Solitaire II, Intens and Tetric Ceram, and the nanofilled composite resins Exthet-X and Filtek Supreme in the dentin and translucent shades. Methods Three samples of each composite resin and shade were obtained with dimensions of 12 mm × 12 mm and 1 mm thick. After light activation, three measurements for each sample were done with an UV–vis spectrophotometer. The spectra was analyzed by mean values for the percentage of direct transmittance at intervals of 20 nm in the range between 400 and 700 nm (% T ) and the percentage of direct transmittance in the wavelengths of 400, 560 and 700 nm ( Td ). Results The Student's t -test showed that dentin shade of Charisma F had significant higher % T than the translucent shade. For Solitaire II, Intens, Tetric Ceram and Esthet-X the translucent shade had higher % T than the dentin shade. For Filtek Supreme there was no statistical difference between the dentin and translucent shades. According to analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey multiple-range test Charisma F had the highest % T and Td at dentin and translucent shades, except for translucent shade at 700 nm, in which Esthet-X had higher Td. Significance This study indicates that the percentage of direct transmittance is not directly related with the composite resin shade. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.020 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70409852</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0109564106001618</els_id><sourcerecordid>70409852</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-4443ad48757dc2ad3ada458c557174f4cc8369a48042858e3b5c267d41e890a23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcGKFDEURYMoTs_oH4jUyl21L6lUJdkIMow6MOJCZx0yqdeYtqpS5qUbeuc_-Id-iSmqQXAz8CAkufcmnMvYKw5bDrx7u9_2OGU3bAVAt11GwBO24VqZGsCop2wDHEzddpJfsEuiPQBIYfhzdsE7wyU3csM-3x___Pp9DFTRjD6nOH-POY6YU_BVH1I5q3JyE40hZzd5rNzkhhMVQ9xVPo5zpJCxSkhhohfs2c4NhC_P6xW7_3Dz7fpTfffl4-31-7vat63OtZSycb3UqlW9F64vGydbXS4VV3InvddNZ5zU5b-61dg8tF50qpcctQEnmiv2Zs2dU_x5QMp2DORxGNyE8UBWgQSj28eFwhhltDRFKFehT5Eo4c7OKYwunSwHu_C2e7vytgtvu4yAYnt9zj88jNj_M50BF8G7VYAFxzFgsuQDFo4rW9vH8NgL_wf4IUzBu-EHnpD28ZBKIWS5JWHBfl06XyqHDkom181fra6pRg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>29979849</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Uv–vis spectrophotometric direct transmittance analysis of composite resins</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Masotti, Alexandre S ; Onófrio, Álvaro Barcellos ; Conceição, Ewerton N ; Spohr, Ana Maria</creator><creatorcontrib>Masotti, Alexandre S ; Onófrio, Álvaro Barcellos ; Conceição, Ewerton N ; Spohr, Ana Maria</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objectives The objective of this experiment was to evaluate the direct transmittance of the micro-hybrid composite resins Charisma F, Solitaire II, Intens and Tetric Ceram, and the nanofilled composite resins Exthet-X and Filtek Supreme in the dentin and translucent shades. Methods Three samples of each composite resin and shade were obtained with dimensions of 12 mm × 12 mm and 1 mm thick. After light activation, three measurements for each sample were done with an UV–vis spectrophotometer. The spectra was analyzed by mean values for the percentage of direct transmittance at intervals of 20 nm in the range between 400 and 700 nm (% T ) and the percentage of direct transmittance in the wavelengths of 400, 560 and 700 nm ( Td ). Results The Student's t -test showed that dentin shade of Charisma F had significant higher % T than the translucent shade. For Solitaire II, Intens, Tetric Ceram and Esthet-X the translucent shade had higher % T than the dentin shade. For Filtek Supreme there was no statistical difference between the dentin and translucent shades. According to analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey multiple-range test Charisma F had the highest % T and Td at dentin and translucent shades, except for translucent shade at 700 nm, in which Esthet-X had higher Td. Significance This study indicates that the percentage of direct transmittance is not directly related with the composite resin shade.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0109-5641</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0097</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.020</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16914194</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Advanced Basic Science ; Analysis of Variance ; Color ; Composite resin ; Composite Resins - chemistry ; Dental Restoration, Permanent ; Dentistry ; Light ; Materials Testing ; Particle Size ; Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet - methods ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Translucency ; Transmittance</subject><ispartof>Dental materials, 2007-06, Vol.23 (6), p.724-730</ispartof><rights>Academy of Dental Materials</rights><rights>2006 Academy of Dental Materials</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-4443ad48757dc2ad3ada458c557174f4cc8369a48042858e3b5c267d41e890a23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-4443ad48757dc2ad3ada458c557174f4cc8369a48042858e3b5c267d41e890a23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.020$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16914194$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Masotti, Alexandre S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onófrio, Álvaro Barcellos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conceição, Ewerton N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spohr, Ana Maria</creatorcontrib><title>Uv–vis spectrophotometric direct transmittance analysis of composite resins</title><title>Dental materials</title><addtitle>Dent Mater</addtitle><description>Abstract Objectives The objective of this experiment was to evaluate the direct transmittance of the micro-hybrid composite resins Charisma F, Solitaire II, Intens and Tetric Ceram, and the nanofilled composite resins Exthet-X and Filtek Supreme in the dentin and translucent shades. Methods Three samples of each composite resin and shade were obtained with dimensions of 12 mm × 12 mm and 1 mm thick. After light activation, three measurements for each sample were done with an UV–vis spectrophotometer. The spectra was analyzed by mean values for the percentage of direct transmittance at intervals of 20 nm in the range between 400 and 700 nm (% T ) and the percentage of direct transmittance in the wavelengths of 400, 560 and 700 nm ( Td ). Results The Student's t -test showed that dentin shade of Charisma F had significant higher % T than the translucent shade. For Solitaire II, Intens, Tetric Ceram and Esthet-X the translucent shade had higher % T than the dentin shade. For Filtek Supreme there was no statistical difference between the dentin and translucent shades. According to analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey multiple-range test Charisma F had the highest % T and Td at dentin and translucent shades, except for translucent shade at 700 nm, in which Esthet-X had higher Td. Significance This study indicates that the percentage of direct transmittance is not directly related with the composite resin shade.</description><subject>Advanced Basic Science</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Color</subject><subject>Composite resin</subject><subject>Composite Resins - chemistry</subject><subject>Dental Restoration, Permanent</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Light</subject><subject>Materials Testing</subject><subject>Particle Size</subject><subject>Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet - methods</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Translucency</subject><subject>Transmittance</subject><issn>0109-5641</issn><issn>1879-0097</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcGKFDEURYMoTs_oH4jUyl21L6lUJdkIMow6MOJCZx0yqdeYtqpS5qUbeuc_-Id-iSmqQXAz8CAkufcmnMvYKw5bDrx7u9_2OGU3bAVAt11GwBO24VqZGsCop2wDHEzddpJfsEuiPQBIYfhzdsE7wyU3csM-3x___Pp9DFTRjD6nOH-POY6YU_BVH1I5q3JyE40hZzd5rNzkhhMVQ9xVPo5zpJCxSkhhohfs2c4NhC_P6xW7_3Dz7fpTfffl4-31-7vat63OtZSycb3UqlW9F64vGydbXS4VV3InvddNZ5zU5b-61dg8tF50qpcctQEnmiv2Zs2dU_x5QMp2DORxGNyE8UBWgQSj28eFwhhltDRFKFehT5Eo4c7OKYwunSwHu_C2e7vytgtvu4yAYnt9zj88jNj_M50BF8G7VYAFxzFgsuQDFo4rW9vH8NgL_wf4IUzBu-EHnpD28ZBKIWS5JWHBfl06XyqHDkom181fra6pRg</recordid><startdate>20070601</startdate><enddate>20070601</enddate><creator>Masotti, Alexandre S</creator><creator>Onófrio, Álvaro Barcellos</creator><creator>Conceição, Ewerton N</creator><creator>Spohr, Ana Maria</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070601</creationdate><title>Uv–vis spectrophotometric direct transmittance analysis of composite resins</title><author>Masotti, Alexandre S ; Onófrio, Álvaro Barcellos ; Conceição, Ewerton N ; Spohr, Ana Maria</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-4443ad48757dc2ad3ada458c557174f4cc8369a48042858e3b5c267d41e890a23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Advanced Basic Science</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Color</topic><topic>Composite resin</topic><topic>Composite Resins - chemistry</topic><topic>Dental Restoration, Permanent</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Light</topic><topic>Materials Testing</topic><topic>Particle Size</topic><topic>Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet - methods</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Translucency</topic><topic>Transmittance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Masotti, Alexandre S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onófrio, Álvaro Barcellos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conceição, Ewerton N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spohr, Ana Maria</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Dental materials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Masotti, Alexandre S</au><au>Onófrio, Álvaro Barcellos</au><au>Conceição, Ewerton N</au><au>Spohr, Ana Maria</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Uv–vis spectrophotometric direct transmittance analysis of composite resins</atitle><jtitle>Dental materials</jtitle><addtitle>Dent Mater</addtitle><date>2007-06-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>724</spage><epage>730</epage><pages>724-730</pages><issn>0109-5641</issn><eissn>1879-0097</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objectives The objective of this experiment was to evaluate the direct transmittance of the micro-hybrid composite resins Charisma F, Solitaire II, Intens and Tetric Ceram, and the nanofilled composite resins Exthet-X and Filtek Supreme in the dentin and translucent shades. Methods Three samples of each composite resin and shade were obtained with dimensions of 12 mm × 12 mm and 1 mm thick. After light activation, three measurements for each sample were done with an UV–vis spectrophotometer. The spectra was analyzed by mean values for the percentage of direct transmittance at intervals of 20 nm in the range between 400 and 700 nm (% T ) and the percentage of direct transmittance in the wavelengths of 400, 560 and 700 nm ( Td ). Results The Student's t -test showed that dentin shade of Charisma F had significant higher % T than the translucent shade. For Solitaire II, Intens, Tetric Ceram and Esthet-X the translucent shade had higher % T than the dentin shade. For Filtek Supreme there was no statistical difference between the dentin and translucent shades. According to analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey multiple-range test Charisma F had the highest % T and Td at dentin and translucent shades, except for translucent shade at 700 nm, in which Esthet-X had higher Td. Significance This study indicates that the percentage of direct transmittance is not directly related with the composite resin shade.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>16914194</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.020</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0109-5641 |
ispartof | Dental materials, 2007-06, Vol.23 (6), p.724-730 |
issn | 0109-5641 1879-0097 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70409852 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Advanced Basic Science Analysis of Variance Color Composite resin Composite Resins - chemistry Dental Restoration, Permanent Dentistry Light Materials Testing Particle Size Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet - methods Statistics, Nonparametric Translucency Transmittance |
title | Uv–vis spectrophotometric direct transmittance analysis of composite resins |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T11%3A52%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Uv%E2%80%93vis%20spectrophotometric%20direct%20transmittance%20analysis%20of%20composite%20resins&rft.jtitle=Dental%20materials&rft.au=Masotti,%20Alexandre%20S&rft.date=2007-06-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=724&rft.epage=730&rft.pages=724-730&rft.issn=0109-5641&rft.eissn=1879-0097&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70409852%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=29979849&rft_id=info:pmid/16914194&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0109564106001618&rfr_iscdi=true |