Using the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised and the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule with Young Children with Developmental Delay: Evaluating Diagnostic Validity

Few studies have focused on the validity of the ADI-R and ADOS in the assessment of preschool children with developmental delay. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic validity of the ADI-R and the ADOS in young children. Two-hundred and nine children aged 20–55 months participated in the study...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of autism and developmental disorders 2008-04, Vol.38 (4), p.657-667
Hauptverfasser: Gray, Kylie M., Tonge, Bruce J., Sweeney, Deborah J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 667
container_issue 4
container_start_page 657
container_title Journal of autism and developmental disorders
container_volume 38
creator Gray, Kylie M.
Tonge, Bruce J.
Sweeney, Deborah J.
description Few studies have focused on the validity of the ADI-R and ADOS in the assessment of preschool children with developmental delay. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic validity of the ADI-R and the ADOS in young children. Two-hundred and nine children aged 20–55 months participated in the study, 120 of whom received a diagnosis of autism. ADI-R and ADOS diagnostic classifications were compared to consensus clinical diagnoses. Children with a clinical diagnosis of autism scored significantly higher on all algorithm domains of the ADI-R and ADOS. The ADOS performed better than the ADI-R in comparison to consensus clinical diagnosis. Characteristics of the ADI-R and ADOS false positive and false negative cases are explored. Further research is recommended in terms of examining which items of the ADI-R best predict a diagnosis of autism for very young children with developmental problems.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10803-007-0432-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70408026</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ788757</ericid><sourcerecordid>57249484</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-3f5947ef015f0bbe54151012eb2c9a94e4e421cf8a130accf2e485898f0751933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkt9qFDEUxgdR7Fp9AEFkEPRu9OTfJOld2a5aKRTUCl4N2cyZ3ZRsZp3MbJlH8i3NMksrQqnkIufk_M6X5PBl2UsC7wmA_BAJKGBFCgvgjBbjo2xGhGQFS9njbAakpAWjQh5lz2K8BgCtKH2aHRFZatClnGW_r6ILq7xfY3469C5u8jNnVqGNvbP5eeix2zm8Kb7izkWscxPqe9jLZUys6V0b8m92jfXgMb9x_Tr_2Q7phvna-brDMJ2d4Q59u91g6I1PmTfjSb7YGT8khUT_JfzDeFe7fnyePWmMj_jisB9nVx8X3-efi4vLT-fz04vCCsL6gjVCc4kNENHAcomCE0GAUFxSq43mmBYltlGGMDDWNhS5EkqrBqQgmrHj7N2ku-3aXwPGvtq4aNF7E7AdYiWBp6nT8kFQSMo1V_xBkILUQivyH2BZgmAigW_-Aa_boQtpLIkRDATnKkFkgmzXxthhU207tzHdWBGo9v6pJv9U-3Dvn2pMPa8PwsNyg_Vdx8EwCXh7AEy0xjedCdbFW44CFZxySNyricPO2dvy4otUSoq9DJ3KMZXCCru7D9z_uD99oeh1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>205305448</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised and the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule with Young Children with Developmental Delay: Evaluating Diagnostic Validity</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Gray, Kylie M. ; Tonge, Bruce J. ; Sweeney, Deborah J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gray, Kylie M. ; Tonge, Bruce J. ; Sweeney, Deborah J.</creatorcontrib><description>Few studies have focused on the validity of the ADI-R and ADOS in the assessment of preschool children with developmental delay. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic validity of the ADI-R and the ADOS in young children. Two-hundred and nine children aged 20–55 months participated in the study, 120 of whom received a diagnosis of autism. ADI-R and ADOS diagnostic classifications were compared to consensus clinical diagnoses. Children with a clinical diagnosis of autism scored significantly higher on all algorithm domains of the ADI-R and ADOS. The ADOS performed better than the ADI-R in comparison to consensus clinical diagnosis. Characteristics of the ADI-R and ADOS false positive and false negative cases are explored. Further research is recommended in terms of examining which items of the ADI-R best predict a diagnosis of autism for very young children with developmental problems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0162-3257</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-3432</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10803-007-0432-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17690967</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JADDDQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Autism ; Autistic Disorder - diagnosis ; Autistic Disorder - epidemiology ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child and School Psychology ; Child clinical studies ; Child, Preschool ; Clinical Diagnosis ; Developmental Delays ; Developmental Disabilities - diagnosis ; Developmental Disabilities - epidemiology ; Developmental disorders ; Developmentally delayed preschool children ; Diagnosis ; Female ; Humans ; Infant ; Infantile autism ; Interview, Psychological ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Neurosciences ; Observation ; Original Paper ; Pediatrics ; Preschool Children ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Public Health ; Reproducibility of Results ; Severity of Illness Index ; Test Validity ; Young Children</subject><ispartof>Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2008-04, Vol.38 (4), p.657-667</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-3f5947ef015f0bbe54151012eb2c9a94e4e421cf8a130accf2e485898f0751933</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-3f5947ef015f0bbe54151012eb2c9a94e4e421cf8a130accf2e485898f0751933</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10803-007-0432-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10803-007-0432-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12825,27901,27902,30976,30977,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ788757$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20254240$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17690967$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gray, Kylie M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tonge, Bruce J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sweeney, Deborah J.</creatorcontrib><title>Using the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised and the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule with Young Children with Developmental Delay: Evaluating Diagnostic Validity</title><title>Journal of autism and developmental disorders</title><addtitle>J Autism Dev Disord</addtitle><addtitle>J Autism Dev Disord</addtitle><description>Few studies have focused on the validity of the ADI-R and ADOS in the assessment of preschool children with developmental delay. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic validity of the ADI-R and the ADOS in young children. Two-hundred and nine children aged 20–55 months participated in the study, 120 of whom received a diagnosis of autism. ADI-R and ADOS diagnostic classifications were compared to consensus clinical diagnoses. Children with a clinical diagnosis of autism scored significantly higher on all algorithm domains of the ADI-R and ADOS. The ADOS performed better than the ADI-R in comparison to consensus clinical diagnosis. Characteristics of the ADI-R and ADOS false positive and false negative cases are explored. Further research is recommended in terms of examining which items of the ADI-R best predict a diagnosis of autism for very young children with developmental problems.</description><subject>Autism</subject><subject>Autistic Disorder - diagnosis</subject><subject>Autistic Disorder - epidemiology</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child and School Psychology</subject><subject>Child clinical studies</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Clinical Diagnosis</subject><subject>Developmental Delays</subject><subject>Developmental Disabilities - diagnosis</subject><subject>Developmental Disabilities - epidemiology</subject><subject>Developmental disorders</subject><subject>Developmentally delayed preschool children</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infantile autism</subject><subject>Interview, Psychological</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Observation</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Preschool Children</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Test Validity</subject><subject>Young Children</subject><issn>0162-3257</issn><issn>1573-3432</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkt9qFDEUxgdR7Fp9AEFkEPRu9OTfJOld2a5aKRTUCl4N2cyZ3ZRsZp3MbJlH8i3NMksrQqnkIufk_M6X5PBl2UsC7wmA_BAJKGBFCgvgjBbjo2xGhGQFS9njbAakpAWjQh5lz2K8BgCtKH2aHRFZatClnGW_r6ILq7xfY3469C5u8jNnVqGNvbP5eeix2zm8Kb7izkWscxPqe9jLZUys6V0b8m92jfXgMb9x_Tr_2Q7phvna-brDMJ2d4Q59u91g6I1PmTfjSb7YGT8khUT_JfzDeFe7fnyePWmMj_jisB9nVx8X3-efi4vLT-fz04vCCsL6gjVCc4kNENHAcomCE0GAUFxSq43mmBYltlGGMDDWNhS5EkqrBqQgmrHj7N2ku-3aXwPGvtq4aNF7E7AdYiWBp6nT8kFQSMo1V_xBkILUQivyH2BZgmAigW_-Aa_boQtpLIkRDATnKkFkgmzXxthhU207tzHdWBGo9v6pJv9U-3Dvn2pMPa8PwsNyg_Vdx8EwCXh7AEy0xjedCdbFW44CFZxySNyricPO2dvy4otUSoq9DJ3KMZXCCru7D9z_uD99oeh1</recordid><startdate>20080401</startdate><enddate>20080401</enddate><creator>Gray, Kylie M.</creator><creator>Tonge, Bruce J.</creator><creator>Sweeney, Deborah J.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080401</creationdate><title>Using the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised and the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule with Young Children with Developmental Delay: Evaluating Diagnostic Validity</title><author>Gray, Kylie M. ; Tonge, Bruce J. ; Sweeney, Deborah J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-3f5947ef015f0bbe54151012eb2c9a94e4e421cf8a130accf2e485898f0751933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Autism</topic><topic>Autistic Disorder - diagnosis</topic><topic>Autistic Disorder - epidemiology</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child and School Psychology</topic><topic>Child clinical studies</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Clinical Diagnosis</topic><topic>Developmental Delays</topic><topic>Developmental Disabilities - diagnosis</topic><topic>Developmental Disabilities - epidemiology</topic><topic>Developmental disorders</topic><topic>Developmentally delayed preschool children</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infantile autism</topic><topic>Interview, Psychological</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Observation</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Preschool Children</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Test Validity</topic><topic>Young Children</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gray, Kylie M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tonge, Bruce J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sweeney, Deborah J.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of autism and developmental disorders</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gray, Kylie M.</au><au>Tonge, Bruce J.</au><au>Sweeney, Deborah J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ788757</ericid><atitle>Using the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised and the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule with Young Children with Developmental Delay: Evaluating Diagnostic Validity</atitle><jtitle>Journal of autism and developmental disorders</jtitle><stitle>J Autism Dev Disord</stitle><addtitle>J Autism Dev Disord</addtitle><date>2008-04-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>657</spage><epage>667</epage><pages>657-667</pages><issn>0162-3257</issn><eissn>1573-3432</eissn><coden>JADDDQ</coden><abstract>Few studies have focused on the validity of the ADI-R and ADOS in the assessment of preschool children with developmental delay. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic validity of the ADI-R and the ADOS in young children. Two-hundred and nine children aged 20–55 months participated in the study, 120 of whom received a diagnosis of autism. ADI-R and ADOS diagnostic classifications were compared to consensus clinical diagnoses. Children with a clinical diagnosis of autism scored significantly higher on all algorithm domains of the ADI-R and ADOS. The ADOS performed better than the ADI-R in comparison to consensus clinical diagnosis. Characteristics of the ADI-R and ADOS false positive and false negative cases are explored. Further research is recommended in terms of examining which items of the ADI-R best predict a diagnosis of autism for very young children with developmental problems.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>17690967</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10803-007-0432-y</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0162-3257
ispartof Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2008-04, Vol.38 (4), p.657-667
issn 0162-3257
1573-3432
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70408026
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; EBSCOhost Education Source; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Autism
Autistic Disorder - diagnosis
Autistic Disorder - epidemiology
Behavioral Science and Psychology
Biological and medical sciences
Child and School Psychology
Child clinical studies
Child, Preschool
Clinical Diagnosis
Developmental Delays
Developmental Disabilities - diagnosis
Developmental Disabilities - epidemiology
Developmental disorders
Developmentally delayed preschool children
Diagnosis
Female
Humans
Infant
Infantile autism
Interview, Psychological
Male
Medical sciences
Neurosciences
Observation
Original Paper
Pediatrics
Preschool Children
Psychology
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychopathology. Psychiatry
Public Health
Reproducibility of Results
Severity of Illness Index
Test Validity
Young Children
title Using the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised and the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule with Young Children with Developmental Delay: Evaluating Diagnostic Validity
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T00%3A51%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20the%20Autism%20Diagnostic%20Interview-Revised%20and%20the%20Autism%20Diagnostic%20Observation%20Schedule%20with%20Young%20Children%20with%20Developmental%20Delay:%20Evaluating%20Diagnostic%20Validity&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20autism%20and%20developmental%20disorders&rft.au=Gray,%20Kylie%20M.&rft.date=2008-04-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=657&rft.epage=667&rft.pages=657-667&rft.issn=0162-3257&rft.eissn=1573-3432&rft.coden=JADDDQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10803-007-0432-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57249484%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=205305448&rft_id=info:pmid/17690967&rft_ericid=EJ788757&rfr_iscdi=true