Bryant traction in paediatric femoral shaft fractures, home traction versus hospitalisation

Summary Aim To evaluate Bryant traction at home in terms of feasibility, morbidity, effect on length of hospital stay, outcome and costs. Patients and methods Retrospective analysis of 54 children treated for femoral shaft fracture (1991–2004). Results of ‘home traction’ (A, n = 38) and ‘hospital tr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Injury 2008-04, Vol.39 (4), p.456-462
Hauptverfasser: Scheerder, F.J.M, Schnater, J.M, Sleeboom, Chr, Aronson, D.C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 462
container_issue 4
container_start_page 456
container_title Injury
container_volume 39
creator Scheerder, F.J.M
Schnater, J.M
Sleeboom, Chr
Aronson, D.C
description Summary Aim To evaluate Bryant traction at home in terms of feasibility, morbidity, effect on length of hospital stay, outcome and costs. Patients and methods Retrospective analysis of 54 children treated for femoral shaft fracture (1991–2004). Results of ‘home traction’ (A, n = 38) and ‘hospital traction’ (B, n = 16) were compared. Data were collected regarding demographics, length of hospital stay, traction period, various aspects of the fractures, co-morbidity, morbidity, and follow-up. The parents’ experience was evaluated by telephone questionnaire. Results Two early treatment failures occurred. One patient stopped home traction at 8 days due to skin problems and had a spica cast applied at another hospital, with subsequent development of a compartment syndrome. The other patient was placed in a hip spica after 2 weeks of hospital traction because of difficulty in getting satisfactory X-rays. At follow-up, one unacceptable shortening of 3 cm had occurred in the home traction group. There was only a significant difference in hospital stay (A 7.0 days versus B 22.5 days), total traction period (A 28.0 days versus B 22.5 days) and costs (group B 3× versus group A). The parents were overall pleased with traction at home. Complications occurred as much in the home traction group as in the control group and fracture position at union was equal in both groups. Conclusions Treatment with home traction is feasible, simple and effective; it reduces hospital stay to 1 week, and costs to one-third. Good patient selection and instructions of the parents are mandatory.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.injury.2007.07.029
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70406724</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0020138307003002</els_id><sourcerecordid>70406724</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-5842fc5ddbd75def061285638f1315b14abf3ad0061c6c1f30b0e5c9846b9f9f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkkuLFDEQgIMo7uzqPxDpi57ssfLoRy6CLq4KCx7Uk4eQTlfYtP0YU-mF-femmcEFL0JBSPHVgy9h7AWHPQdevx32YR7WeNwLgGa_hdCP2I63jS5B1M1jtgMQUHLZygt2STQA8AakfMoueAtaVprv2M8P8WjnVKRoXQrLXIS5OFjsg00xuMLjtEQ7FnRnfSr8Bq0R6U1xt0z4UHSPkVbKSTqEZMdAdks_Y0-8HQmfn88r9uPm4_frz-Xt109frt_flk6pKpVVq4R3Vd93fVP16KHmoq1q2XouedVxZTsvbQ8572rHvYQOsHK6VXWnvfbyir0-9T3E5feKlMwUyOE42hmXlUwDCupGqAyqE-jiQhTRm0MMk41Hw8FsUs1gTlLNJtVsIXQue3nuv3YT9g9FZ4sZeHUGLDk7Zk2zC_SXEyB4o9U2_92Jw2zjPmA05ALOLuuO6JLpl_C_Tf5t4MYwhzzzFx6RhmWNczZtuCFhwHzbPsD2_tAAyHyRfwBrfK3D</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70406724</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bryant traction in paediatric femoral shaft fractures, home traction versus hospitalisation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Scheerder, F.J.M ; Schnater, J.M ; Sleeboom, Chr ; Aronson, D.C</creator><creatorcontrib>Scheerder, F.J.M ; Schnater, J.M ; Sleeboom, Chr ; Aronson, D.C</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Aim To evaluate Bryant traction at home in terms of feasibility, morbidity, effect on length of hospital stay, outcome and costs. Patients and methods Retrospective analysis of 54 children treated for femoral shaft fracture (1991–2004). Results of ‘home traction’ (A, n = 38) and ‘hospital traction’ (B, n = 16) were compared. Data were collected regarding demographics, length of hospital stay, traction period, various aspects of the fractures, co-morbidity, morbidity, and follow-up. The parents’ experience was evaluated by telephone questionnaire. Results Two early treatment failures occurred. One patient stopped home traction at 8 days due to skin problems and had a spica cast applied at another hospital, with subsequent development of a compartment syndrome. The other patient was placed in a hip spica after 2 weeks of hospital traction because of difficulty in getting satisfactory X-rays. At follow-up, one unacceptable shortening of 3 cm had occurred in the home traction group. There was only a significant difference in hospital stay (A 7.0 days versus B 22.5 days), total traction period (A 28.0 days versus B 22.5 days) and costs (group B 3× versus group A). The parents were overall pleased with traction at home. Complications occurred as much in the home traction group as in the control group and fracture position at union was equal in both groups. Conclusions Treatment with home traction is feasible, simple and effective; it reduces hospital stay to 1 week, and costs to one-third. Good patient selection and instructions of the parents are mandatory.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-1383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0267</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2007.07.029</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18093591</identifier><identifier>CODEN: INJUBF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Anesthesia ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bryant traction ; Child, Preschool ; Children ; Complications ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Costs ; Diseases of the osteoarticular system ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Femoral Fractures - economics ; Femoral Fractures - therapy ; Femoral shaft fractures ; Gallows traction ; General anesthesia. Technics. Complications. Neuromuscular blocking. Premedication. Surgical preparation. Sedation ; Home Care Services - economics ; Home traction ; Hospital stay ; Hospitalization - economics ; Humans ; Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Orthopedics ; Parents - education ; Parents - psychology ; Patient Selection ; Personal Satisfaction ; Retrospective Studies ; Traction - instrumentation ; Traction - methods ; Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Injury, 2008-04, Vol.39 (4), p.456-462</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2007 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-5842fc5ddbd75def061285638f1315b14abf3ad0061c6c1f30b0e5c9846b9f9f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-5842fc5ddbd75def061285638f1315b14abf3ad0061c6c1f30b0e5c9846b9f9f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138307003002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20217944$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18093591$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Scheerder, F.J.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schnater, J.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sleeboom, Chr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aronson, D.C</creatorcontrib><title>Bryant traction in paediatric femoral shaft fractures, home traction versus hospitalisation</title><title>Injury</title><addtitle>Injury</addtitle><description>Summary Aim To evaluate Bryant traction at home in terms of feasibility, morbidity, effect on length of hospital stay, outcome and costs. Patients and methods Retrospective analysis of 54 children treated for femoral shaft fracture (1991–2004). Results of ‘home traction’ (A, n = 38) and ‘hospital traction’ (B, n = 16) were compared. Data were collected regarding demographics, length of hospital stay, traction period, various aspects of the fractures, co-morbidity, morbidity, and follow-up. The parents’ experience was evaluated by telephone questionnaire. Results Two early treatment failures occurred. One patient stopped home traction at 8 days due to skin problems and had a spica cast applied at another hospital, with subsequent development of a compartment syndrome. The other patient was placed in a hip spica after 2 weeks of hospital traction because of difficulty in getting satisfactory X-rays. At follow-up, one unacceptable shortening of 3 cm had occurred in the home traction group. There was only a significant difference in hospital stay (A 7.0 days versus B 22.5 days), total traction period (A 28.0 days versus B 22.5 days) and costs (group B 3× versus group A). The parents were overall pleased with traction at home. Complications occurred as much in the home traction group as in the control group and fracture position at union was equal in both groups. Conclusions Treatment with home traction is feasible, simple and effective; it reduces hospital stay to 1 week, and costs to one-third. Good patient selection and instructions of the parents are mandatory.</description><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bryant traction</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Complications</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femoral Fractures - economics</subject><subject>Femoral Fractures - therapy</subject><subject>Femoral shaft fractures</subject><subject>Gallows traction</subject><subject>General anesthesia. Technics. Complications. Neuromuscular blocking. Premedication. Surgical preparation. Sedation</subject><subject>Home Care Services - economics</subject><subject>Home traction</subject><subject>Hospital stay</subject><subject>Hospitalization - economics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Parents - education</subject><subject>Parents - psychology</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Personal Satisfaction</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Traction - instrumentation</subject><subject>Traction - methods</subject><subject>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0020-1383</issn><issn>1879-0267</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkkuLFDEQgIMo7uzqPxDpi57ssfLoRy6CLq4KCx7Uk4eQTlfYtP0YU-mF-femmcEFL0JBSPHVgy9h7AWHPQdevx32YR7WeNwLgGa_hdCP2I63jS5B1M1jtgMQUHLZygt2STQA8AakfMoueAtaVprv2M8P8WjnVKRoXQrLXIS5OFjsg00xuMLjtEQ7FnRnfSr8Bq0R6U1xt0z4UHSPkVbKSTqEZMdAdks_Y0-8HQmfn88r9uPm4_frz-Xt109frt_flk6pKpVVq4R3Vd93fVP16KHmoq1q2XouedVxZTsvbQ8572rHvYQOsHK6VXWnvfbyir0-9T3E5feKlMwUyOE42hmXlUwDCupGqAyqE-jiQhTRm0MMk41Hw8FsUs1gTlLNJtVsIXQue3nuv3YT9g9FZ4sZeHUGLDk7Zk2zC_SXEyB4o9U2_92Jw2zjPmA05ALOLuuO6JLpl_C_Tf5t4MYwhzzzFx6RhmWNczZtuCFhwHzbPsD2_tAAyHyRfwBrfK3D</recordid><startdate>20080401</startdate><enddate>20080401</enddate><creator>Scheerder, F.J.M</creator><creator>Schnater, J.M</creator><creator>Sleeboom, Chr</creator><creator>Aronson, D.C</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080401</creationdate><title>Bryant traction in paediatric femoral shaft fractures, home traction versus hospitalisation</title><author>Scheerder, F.J.M ; Schnater, J.M ; Sleeboom, Chr ; Aronson, D.C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-5842fc5ddbd75def061285638f1315b14abf3ad0061c6c1f30b0e5c9846b9f9f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bryant traction</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Complications</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femoral Fractures - economics</topic><topic>Femoral Fractures - therapy</topic><topic>Femoral shaft fractures</topic><topic>Gallows traction</topic><topic>General anesthesia. Technics. Complications. Neuromuscular blocking. Premedication. Surgical preparation. Sedation</topic><topic>Home Care Services - economics</topic><topic>Home traction</topic><topic>Hospital stay</topic><topic>Hospitalization - economics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Parents - education</topic><topic>Parents - psychology</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Personal Satisfaction</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Traction - instrumentation</topic><topic>Traction - methods</topic><topic>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Scheerder, F.J.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schnater, J.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sleeboom, Chr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aronson, D.C</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Injury</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Scheerder, F.J.M</au><au>Schnater, J.M</au><au>Sleeboom, Chr</au><au>Aronson, D.C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bryant traction in paediatric femoral shaft fractures, home traction versus hospitalisation</atitle><jtitle>Injury</jtitle><addtitle>Injury</addtitle><date>2008-04-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>456</spage><epage>462</epage><pages>456-462</pages><issn>0020-1383</issn><eissn>1879-0267</eissn><coden>INJUBF</coden><abstract>Summary Aim To evaluate Bryant traction at home in terms of feasibility, morbidity, effect on length of hospital stay, outcome and costs. Patients and methods Retrospective analysis of 54 children treated for femoral shaft fracture (1991–2004). Results of ‘home traction’ (A, n = 38) and ‘hospital traction’ (B, n = 16) were compared. Data were collected regarding demographics, length of hospital stay, traction period, various aspects of the fractures, co-morbidity, morbidity, and follow-up. The parents’ experience was evaluated by telephone questionnaire. Results Two early treatment failures occurred. One patient stopped home traction at 8 days due to skin problems and had a spica cast applied at another hospital, with subsequent development of a compartment syndrome. The other patient was placed in a hip spica after 2 weeks of hospital traction because of difficulty in getting satisfactory X-rays. At follow-up, one unacceptable shortening of 3 cm had occurred in the home traction group. There was only a significant difference in hospital stay (A 7.0 days versus B 22.5 days), total traction period (A 28.0 days versus B 22.5 days) and costs (group B 3× versus group A). The parents were overall pleased with traction at home. Complications occurred as much in the home traction group as in the control group and fracture position at union was equal in both groups. Conclusions Treatment with home traction is feasible, simple and effective; it reduces hospital stay to 1 week, and costs to one-third. Good patient selection and instructions of the parents are mandatory.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>18093591</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.injury.2007.07.029</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-1383
ispartof Injury, 2008-04, Vol.39 (4), p.456-462
issn 0020-1383
1879-0267
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70406724
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Anesthesia
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Biological and medical sciences
Bryant traction
Child, Preschool
Children
Complications
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Costs
Diseases of the osteoarticular system
Feasibility Studies
Female
Femoral Fractures - economics
Femoral Fractures - therapy
Femoral shaft fractures
Gallows traction
General anesthesia. Technics. Complications. Neuromuscular blocking. Premedication. Surgical preparation. Sedation
Home Care Services - economics
Home traction
Hospital stay
Hospitalization - economics
Humans
Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine
Male
Medical sciences
Orthopedics
Parents - education
Parents - psychology
Patient Selection
Personal Satisfaction
Retrospective Studies
Traction - instrumentation
Traction - methods
Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents
Treatment Outcome
title Bryant traction in paediatric femoral shaft fractures, home traction versus hospitalisation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T22%3A50%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bryant%20traction%20in%20paediatric%20femoral%20shaft%20fractures,%20home%20traction%20versus%20hospitalisation&rft.jtitle=Injury&rft.au=Scheerder,%20F.J.M&rft.date=2008-04-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=456&rft.epage=462&rft.pages=456-462&rft.issn=0020-1383&rft.eissn=1879-0267&rft.coden=INJUBF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.injury.2007.07.029&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70406724%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70406724&rft_id=info:pmid/18093591&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0020138307003002&rfr_iscdi=true