Predation as a landscape effect: the trading off by prey species between predation risks and protection benefits

1. Predators impose costs on their prey but may also provide benefits such as protection against other (e.g. nest) predators. The optimal breeding location in relation to the distance from a nesting raptor varies so as to minimize the sum of costs of adult and nest predation. We provide a conceptual...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of animal ecology 2007-05, Vol.76 (3), p.619-629
Hauptverfasser: MÖNKKÖNEN, M, HUSBY, M, TORNBERG, R, HELLE, P, THOMSON, R.L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 629
container_issue 3
container_start_page 619
container_title The Journal of animal ecology
container_volume 76
creator MÖNKKÖNEN, M
HUSBY, M
TORNBERG, R
HELLE, P
THOMSON, R.L
description 1. Predators impose costs on their prey but may also provide benefits such as protection against other (e.g. nest) predators. The optimal breeding location in relation to the distance from a nesting raptor varies so as to minimize the sum of costs of adult and nest predation. We provide a conceptual model to account for variation in the relative predation risks and derive qualitative predictions for how different prey species should respond to the distance from goshawk Accipiter gentilis nests. 2. We test the model predictions using a comprehensive collection of data from northern Finland and central Norway. First, we carried out a series of experiments with artificial bird nests to test if goshawks may provide protection against nest predation. Second, we conducted standard bird censuses and nest-box experiments to detect how the density or territory occupancy of several prey species varies with distance from the nearest goshawk nest. 3. Nest predation rate increased with distance from goshawk nest indicating that goshawks may provide protection for birds' nests against nest predation. Abundance (or probability of presence) of the main prey species of goshawks peaked at intermediate distances from goshawk nests, reflecting the trade-off. The abundance of small songbird species decreased with distance from goshawk nests. The goshawk poses little risk to small songbirds and they may benefit from goshawk proximity in protection against nest predation. Finally, no pattern with distance in pied flycatcher territory (nest box) occupation rate or the onset of egg-laying was detected. This is expected, as flycatchers neither suffer from marked nest predation risk nor are favoured goshawk prey. 4. Our results suggest that territory location in relation to the nest of a predator is a trade-off situation where adult birds weigh the risk of themselves being predated against the benefits accrued from increased nest survival. Prey species appear able to detect and measure alternative predation risks, and respond adaptively. From the prey perspective, the landscape is a mosaic of habitat patches the quality of which varies according to structural and floristic features, but also to the spatial distribution of predators.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01233.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70389070</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4539164</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4539164</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6173-e4c9dd4ccf341c6acba99daef5b2eebf02d3536239d888d3db080d1d19a1e01f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV2L1DAUhoMo7jj6D0SDoHetJx9NWy-EZVm_WFTQvQ5pcrK2zrQ16bA7_97Ull3wRnORhJMnb3J4CKEMcpbG6y5nQhUZV4XKOUCZA-NC5Df3yOb24D7ZAHCWVWUNJ-RRjB0kkoN4SE5YKUUty2pDxq8BnZnaoacmUkN3pnfRmhEpeo92ekOnH0inYFzbX9HBe9oc6RjwSOOItsVIG5yuEfu5uAaFNv5MWb1LtWFKIXOxwR59O8XH5IE3u4hP1nVLLt-dfz_7kF18ef_x7PQis4qVIkNpa-ektV5IZpWxjalrZ9AXDUdsPHAnCqG4qF1VVU64BipwzLHaMATmxZa8WnLTH34dME5630aLu9QgDoeoSxBVDWn-F8hBcqHSY1vy4i-wGw6hT01oziSIEiqZoGqBbBhiDOj1GNq9CUfNQM_udKdnRXpWpGd3-o87fZOuPlvzD80e3d3FVVYCXq6ASYp2PpjetvGOq1Q5v5C4twt33e7w-N8f0J9OP5_P2xTwdAno4jSE2wBZiJqpucfny7E3gzZXSbe-_MaBiRSmkhIpfgMzdchd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214037084</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predation as a landscape effect: the trading off by prey species between predation risks and protection benefits</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><creator>MÖNKKÖNEN, M ; HUSBY, M ; TORNBERG, R ; HELLE, P ; THOMSON, R.L</creator><creatorcontrib>MÖNKKÖNEN, M ; HUSBY, M ; TORNBERG, R ; HELLE, P ; THOMSON, R.L</creatorcontrib><description>1. Predators impose costs on their prey but may also provide benefits such as protection against other (e.g. nest) predators. The optimal breeding location in relation to the distance from a nesting raptor varies so as to minimize the sum of costs of adult and nest predation. We provide a conceptual model to account for variation in the relative predation risks and derive qualitative predictions for how different prey species should respond to the distance from goshawk Accipiter gentilis nests. 2. We test the model predictions using a comprehensive collection of data from northern Finland and central Norway. First, we carried out a series of experiments with artificial bird nests to test if goshawks may provide protection against nest predation. Second, we conducted standard bird censuses and nest-box experiments to detect how the density or territory occupancy of several prey species varies with distance from the nearest goshawk nest. 3. Nest predation rate increased with distance from goshawk nest indicating that goshawks may provide protection for birds' nests against nest predation. Abundance (or probability of presence) of the main prey species of goshawks peaked at intermediate distances from goshawk nests, reflecting the trade-off. The abundance of small songbird species decreased with distance from goshawk nests. The goshawk poses little risk to small songbirds and they may benefit from goshawk proximity in protection against nest predation. Finally, no pattern with distance in pied flycatcher territory (nest box) occupation rate or the onset of egg-laying was detected. This is expected, as flycatchers neither suffer from marked nest predation risk nor are favoured goshawk prey. 4. Our results suggest that territory location in relation to the nest of a predator is a trade-off situation where adult birds weigh the risk of themselves being predated against the benefits accrued from increased nest survival. Prey species appear able to detect and measure alternative predation risks, and respond adaptively. From the prey perspective, the landscape is a mosaic of habitat patches the quality of which varies according to structural and floristic features, but also to the spatial distribution of predators.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8790</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2656</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01233.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17439478</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAECAP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Accipiter gentilis ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal behavior ; Animal ecology ; Animal nesting ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bird nesting ; Birds ; Birds - growth &amp; development ; Birds of prey ; Breeding ; central-place foraging ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Female ; Food chains ; Forest habitats ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Grouse ; Habitat selection ; Habitats ; Male ; meta-analysis ; nest predation ; Nesting Behavior - physiology ; Oviposition - physiology ; Population Density ; Population Dynamics ; Predation ; Predators ; Predatory Behavior - physiology ; raptors ; Raptors - physiology ; Reproduction - physiology ; Risk Assessment ; Songbirds - growth &amp; development ; Spatial Ecology ; Species Specificity</subject><ispartof>The Journal of animal ecology, 2007-05, Vol.76 (3), p.619-629</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2007 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2007 The Authors.Journal compilation© 2007 British Ecological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6173-e4c9dd4ccf341c6acba99daef5b2eebf02d3536239d888d3db080d1d19a1e01f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6173-e4c9dd4ccf341c6acba99daef5b2eebf02d3536239d888d3db080d1d19a1e01f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4539164$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4539164$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,1412,1428,27905,27906,45555,45556,46390,46814,57998,58231</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18671111$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17439478$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MÖNKKÖNEN, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HUSBY, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TORNBERG, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HELLE, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>THOMSON, R.L</creatorcontrib><title>Predation as a landscape effect: the trading off by prey species between predation risks and protection benefits</title><title>The Journal of animal ecology</title><addtitle>J Anim Ecol</addtitle><description>1. Predators impose costs on their prey but may also provide benefits such as protection against other (e.g. nest) predators. The optimal breeding location in relation to the distance from a nesting raptor varies so as to minimize the sum of costs of adult and nest predation. We provide a conceptual model to account for variation in the relative predation risks and derive qualitative predictions for how different prey species should respond to the distance from goshawk Accipiter gentilis nests. 2. We test the model predictions using a comprehensive collection of data from northern Finland and central Norway. First, we carried out a series of experiments with artificial bird nests to test if goshawks may provide protection against nest predation. Second, we conducted standard bird censuses and nest-box experiments to detect how the density or territory occupancy of several prey species varies with distance from the nearest goshawk nest. 3. Nest predation rate increased with distance from goshawk nest indicating that goshawks may provide protection for birds' nests against nest predation. Abundance (or probability of presence) of the main prey species of goshawks peaked at intermediate distances from goshawk nests, reflecting the trade-off. The abundance of small songbird species decreased with distance from goshawk nests. The goshawk poses little risk to small songbirds and they may benefit from goshawk proximity in protection against nest predation. Finally, no pattern with distance in pied flycatcher territory (nest box) occupation rate or the onset of egg-laying was detected. This is expected, as flycatchers neither suffer from marked nest predation risk nor are favoured goshawk prey. 4. Our results suggest that territory location in relation to the nest of a predator is a trade-off situation where adult birds weigh the risk of themselves being predated against the benefits accrued from increased nest survival. Prey species appear able to detect and measure alternative predation risks, and respond adaptively. From the prey perspective, the landscape is a mosaic of habitat patches the quality of which varies according to structural and floristic features, but also to the spatial distribution of predators.</description><subject>Accipiter gentilis</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal ecology</subject><subject>Animal nesting</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bird nesting</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Birds - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Birds of prey</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>central-place foraging</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Food chains</subject><subject>Forest habitats</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Grouse</subject><subject>Habitat selection</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>meta-analysis</subject><subject>nest predation</subject><subject>Nesting Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Oviposition - physiology</subject><subject>Population Density</subject><subject>Population Dynamics</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Predatory Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>raptors</subject><subject>Raptors - physiology</subject><subject>Reproduction - physiology</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Songbirds - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Spatial Ecology</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><issn>0021-8790</issn><issn>1365-2656</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkV2L1DAUhoMo7jj6D0SDoHetJx9NWy-EZVm_WFTQvQ5pcrK2zrQ16bA7_97Ull3wRnORhJMnb3J4CKEMcpbG6y5nQhUZV4XKOUCZA-NC5Df3yOb24D7ZAHCWVWUNJ-RRjB0kkoN4SE5YKUUty2pDxq8BnZnaoacmUkN3pnfRmhEpeo92ekOnH0inYFzbX9HBe9oc6RjwSOOItsVIG5yuEfu5uAaFNv5MWb1LtWFKIXOxwR59O8XH5IE3u4hP1nVLLt-dfz_7kF18ef_x7PQis4qVIkNpa-ektV5IZpWxjalrZ9AXDUdsPHAnCqG4qF1VVU64BipwzLHaMATmxZa8WnLTH34dME5630aLu9QgDoeoSxBVDWn-F8hBcqHSY1vy4i-wGw6hT01oziSIEiqZoGqBbBhiDOj1GNq9CUfNQM_udKdnRXpWpGd3-o87fZOuPlvzD80e3d3FVVYCXq6ASYp2PpjetvGOq1Q5v5C4twt33e7w-N8f0J9OP5_P2xTwdAno4jSE2wBZiJqpucfny7E3gzZXSbe-_MaBiRSmkhIpfgMzdchd</recordid><startdate>200705</startdate><enddate>200705</enddate><creator>MÖNKKÖNEN, M</creator><creator>HUSBY, M</creator><creator>TORNBERG, R</creator><creator>HELLE, P</creator><creator>THOMSON, R.L</creator><general>Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>British Ecological Society</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200705</creationdate><title>Predation as a landscape effect: the trading off by prey species between predation risks and protection benefits</title><author>MÖNKKÖNEN, M ; HUSBY, M ; TORNBERG, R ; HELLE, P ; THOMSON, R.L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6173-e4c9dd4ccf341c6acba99daef5b2eebf02d3536239d888d3db080d1d19a1e01f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Accipiter gentilis</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal ecology</topic><topic>Animal nesting</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bird nesting</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Birds - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Birds of prey</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>central-place foraging</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Food chains</topic><topic>Forest habitats</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Grouse</topic><topic>Habitat selection</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>meta-analysis</topic><topic>nest predation</topic><topic>Nesting Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Oviposition - physiology</topic><topic>Population Density</topic><topic>Population Dynamics</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Predatory Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>raptors</topic><topic>Raptors - physiology</topic><topic>Reproduction - physiology</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Songbirds - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Spatial Ecology</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MÖNKKÖNEN, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HUSBY, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TORNBERG, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HELLE, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>THOMSON, R.L</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of animal ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MÖNKKÖNEN, M</au><au>HUSBY, M</au><au>TORNBERG, R</au><au>HELLE, P</au><au>THOMSON, R.L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predation as a landscape effect: the trading off by prey species between predation risks and protection benefits</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of animal ecology</jtitle><addtitle>J Anim Ecol</addtitle><date>2007-05</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>76</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>619</spage><epage>629</epage><pages>619-629</pages><issn>0021-8790</issn><eissn>1365-2656</eissn><coden>JAECAP</coden><abstract>1. Predators impose costs on their prey but may also provide benefits such as protection against other (e.g. nest) predators. The optimal breeding location in relation to the distance from a nesting raptor varies so as to minimize the sum of costs of adult and nest predation. We provide a conceptual model to account for variation in the relative predation risks and derive qualitative predictions for how different prey species should respond to the distance from goshawk Accipiter gentilis nests. 2. We test the model predictions using a comprehensive collection of data from northern Finland and central Norway. First, we carried out a series of experiments with artificial bird nests to test if goshawks may provide protection against nest predation. Second, we conducted standard bird censuses and nest-box experiments to detect how the density or territory occupancy of several prey species varies with distance from the nearest goshawk nest. 3. Nest predation rate increased with distance from goshawk nest indicating that goshawks may provide protection for birds' nests against nest predation. Abundance (or probability of presence) of the main prey species of goshawks peaked at intermediate distances from goshawk nests, reflecting the trade-off. The abundance of small songbird species decreased with distance from goshawk nests. The goshawk poses little risk to small songbirds and they may benefit from goshawk proximity in protection against nest predation. Finally, no pattern with distance in pied flycatcher territory (nest box) occupation rate or the onset of egg-laying was detected. This is expected, as flycatchers neither suffer from marked nest predation risk nor are favoured goshawk prey. 4. Our results suggest that territory location in relation to the nest of a predator is a trade-off situation where adult birds weigh the risk of themselves being predated against the benefits accrued from increased nest survival. Prey species appear able to detect and measure alternative predation risks, and respond adaptively. From the prey perspective, the landscape is a mosaic of habitat patches the quality of which varies according to structural and floristic features, but also to the spatial distribution of predators.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>17439478</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01233.x</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8790
ispartof The Journal of animal ecology, 2007-05, Vol.76 (3), p.619-629
issn 0021-8790
1365-2656
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70389070
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Free Content
subjects Accipiter gentilis
Animal and plant ecology
Animal behavior
Animal ecology
Animal nesting
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Animals
Biological and medical sciences
Bird nesting
Birds
Birds - growth & development
Birds of prey
Breeding
central-place foraging
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Female
Food chains
Forest habitats
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
Grouse
Habitat selection
Habitats
Male
meta-analysis
nest predation
Nesting Behavior - physiology
Oviposition - physiology
Population Density
Population Dynamics
Predation
Predators
Predatory Behavior - physiology
raptors
Raptors - physiology
Reproduction - physiology
Risk Assessment
Songbirds - growth & development
Spatial Ecology
Species Specificity
title Predation as a landscape effect: the trading off by prey species between predation risks and protection benefits
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T02%3A34%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predation%20as%20a%20landscape%20effect:%20the%20trading%20off%20by%20prey%20species%20between%20predation%20risks%20and%20protection%20benefits&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20animal%20ecology&rft.au=M%C3%96NKK%C3%96NEN,%20M&rft.date=2007-05&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=619&rft.epage=629&rft.pages=619-629&rft.issn=0021-8790&rft.eissn=1365-2656&rft.coden=JAECAP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01233.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4539164%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214037084&rft_id=info:pmid/17439478&rft_jstor_id=4539164&rfr_iscdi=true