Predation as a landscape effect: the trading off by prey species between predation risks and protection benefits
1. Predators impose costs on their prey but may also provide benefits such as protection against other (e.g. nest) predators. The optimal breeding location in relation to the distance from a nesting raptor varies so as to minimize the sum of costs of adult and nest predation. We provide a conceptual...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of animal ecology 2007-05, Vol.76 (3), p.619-629 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 629 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 619 |
container_title | The Journal of animal ecology |
container_volume | 76 |
creator | MÖNKKÖNEN, M HUSBY, M TORNBERG, R HELLE, P THOMSON, R.L |
description | 1. Predators impose costs on their prey but may also provide benefits such as protection against other (e.g. nest) predators. The optimal breeding location in relation to the distance from a nesting raptor varies so as to minimize the sum of costs of adult and nest predation. We provide a conceptual model to account for variation in the relative predation risks and derive qualitative predictions for how different prey species should respond to the distance from goshawk Accipiter gentilis nests. 2. We test the model predictions using a comprehensive collection of data from northern Finland and central Norway. First, we carried out a series of experiments with artificial bird nests to test if goshawks may provide protection against nest predation. Second, we conducted standard bird censuses and nest-box experiments to detect how the density or territory occupancy of several prey species varies with distance from the nearest goshawk nest. 3. Nest predation rate increased with distance from goshawk nest indicating that goshawks may provide protection for birds' nests against nest predation. Abundance (or probability of presence) of the main prey species of goshawks peaked at intermediate distances from goshawk nests, reflecting the trade-off. The abundance of small songbird species decreased with distance from goshawk nests. The goshawk poses little risk to small songbirds and they may benefit from goshawk proximity in protection against nest predation. Finally, no pattern with distance in pied flycatcher territory (nest box) occupation rate or the onset of egg-laying was detected. This is expected, as flycatchers neither suffer from marked nest predation risk nor are favoured goshawk prey. 4. Our results suggest that territory location in relation to the nest of a predator is a trade-off situation where adult birds weigh the risk of themselves being predated against the benefits accrued from increased nest survival. Prey species appear able to detect and measure alternative predation risks, and respond adaptively. From the prey perspective, the landscape is a mosaic of habitat patches the quality of which varies according to structural and floristic features, but also to the spatial distribution of predators. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01233.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70389070</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4539164</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4539164</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6173-e4c9dd4ccf341c6acba99daef5b2eebf02d3536239d888d3db080d1d19a1e01f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV2L1DAUhoMo7jj6D0SDoHetJx9NWy-EZVm_WFTQvQ5pcrK2zrQ16bA7_97Ull3wRnORhJMnb3J4CKEMcpbG6y5nQhUZV4XKOUCZA-NC5Df3yOb24D7ZAHCWVWUNJ-RRjB0kkoN4SE5YKUUty2pDxq8BnZnaoacmUkN3pnfRmhEpeo92ekOnH0inYFzbX9HBe9oc6RjwSOOItsVIG5yuEfu5uAaFNv5MWb1LtWFKIXOxwR59O8XH5IE3u4hP1nVLLt-dfz_7kF18ef_x7PQis4qVIkNpa-ektV5IZpWxjalrZ9AXDUdsPHAnCqG4qF1VVU64BipwzLHaMATmxZa8WnLTH34dME5630aLu9QgDoeoSxBVDWn-F8hBcqHSY1vy4i-wGw6hT01oziSIEiqZoGqBbBhiDOj1GNq9CUfNQM_udKdnRXpWpGd3-o87fZOuPlvzD80e3d3FVVYCXq6ASYp2PpjetvGOq1Q5v5C4twt33e7w-N8f0J9OP5_P2xTwdAno4jSE2wBZiJqpucfny7E3gzZXSbe-_MaBiRSmkhIpfgMzdchd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214037084</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predation as a landscape effect: the trading off by prey species between predation risks and protection benefits</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><creator>MÖNKKÖNEN, M ; HUSBY, M ; TORNBERG, R ; HELLE, P ; THOMSON, R.L</creator><creatorcontrib>MÖNKKÖNEN, M ; HUSBY, M ; TORNBERG, R ; HELLE, P ; THOMSON, R.L</creatorcontrib><description>1. Predators impose costs on their prey but may also provide benefits such as protection against other (e.g. nest) predators. The optimal breeding location in relation to the distance from a nesting raptor varies so as to minimize the sum of costs of adult and nest predation. We provide a conceptual model to account for variation in the relative predation risks and derive qualitative predictions for how different prey species should respond to the distance from goshawk Accipiter gentilis nests. 2. We test the model predictions using a comprehensive collection of data from northern Finland and central Norway. First, we carried out a series of experiments with artificial bird nests to test if goshawks may provide protection against nest predation. Second, we conducted standard bird censuses and nest-box experiments to detect how the density or territory occupancy of several prey species varies with distance from the nearest goshawk nest. 3. Nest predation rate increased with distance from goshawk nest indicating that goshawks may provide protection for birds' nests against nest predation. Abundance (or probability of presence) of the main prey species of goshawks peaked at intermediate distances from goshawk nests, reflecting the trade-off. The abundance of small songbird species decreased with distance from goshawk nests. The goshawk poses little risk to small songbirds and they may benefit from goshawk proximity in protection against nest predation. Finally, no pattern with distance in pied flycatcher territory (nest box) occupation rate or the onset of egg-laying was detected. This is expected, as flycatchers neither suffer from marked nest predation risk nor are favoured goshawk prey. 4. Our results suggest that territory location in relation to the nest of a predator is a trade-off situation where adult birds weigh the risk of themselves being predated against the benefits accrued from increased nest survival. Prey species appear able to detect and measure alternative predation risks, and respond adaptively. From the prey perspective, the landscape is a mosaic of habitat patches the quality of which varies according to structural and floristic features, but also to the spatial distribution of predators.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8790</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2656</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01233.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17439478</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAECAP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Accipiter gentilis ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal behavior ; Animal ecology ; Animal nesting ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bird nesting ; Birds ; Birds - growth & development ; Birds of prey ; Breeding ; central-place foraging ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Female ; Food chains ; Forest habitats ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Grouse ; Habitat selection ; Habitats ; Male ; meta-analysis ; nest predation ; Nesting Behavior - physiology ; Oviposition - physiology ; Population Density ; Population Dynamics ; Predation ; Predators ; Predatory Behavior - physiology ; raptors ; Raptors - physiology ; Reproduction - physiology ; Risk Assessment ; Songbirds - growth & development ; Spatial Ecology ; Species Specificity</subject><ispartof>The Journal of animal ecology, 2007-05, Vol.76 (3), p.619-629</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2007 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2007 The Authors.Journal compilation© 2007 British Ecological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6173-e4c9dd4ccf341c6acba99daef5b2eebf02d3536239d888d3db080d1d19a1e01f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6173-e4c9dd4ccf341c6acba99daef5b2eebf02d3536239d888d3db080d1d19a1e01f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4539164$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4539164$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,1412,1428,27905,27906,45555,45556,46390,46814,57998,58231</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18671111$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17439478$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MÖNKKÖNEN, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HUSBY, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TORNBERG, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HELLE, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>THOMSON, R.L</creatorcontrib><title>Predation as a landscape effect: the trading off by prey species between predation risks and protection benefits</title><title>The Journal of animal ecology</title><addtitle>J Anim Ecol</addtitle><description>1. Predators impose costs on their prey but may also provide benefits such as protection against other (e.g. nest) predators. The optimal breeding location in relation to the distance from a nesting raptor varies so as to minimize the sum of costs of adult and nest predation. We provide a conceptual model to account for variation in the relative predation risks and derive qualitative predictions for how different prey species should respond to the distance from goshawk Accipiter gentilis nests. 2. We test the model predictions using a comprehensive collection of data from northern Finland and central Norway. First, we carried out a series of experiments with artificial bird nests to test if goshawks may provide protection against nest predation. Second, we conducted standard bird censuses and nest-box experiments to detect how the density or territory occupancy of several prey species varies with distance from the nearest goshawk nest. 3. Nest predation rate increased with distance from goshawk nest indicating that goshawks may provide protection for birds' nests against nest predation. Abundance (or probability of presence) of the main prey species of goshawks peaked at intermediate distances from goshawk nests, reflecting the trade-off. The abundance of small songbird species decreased with distance from goshawk nests. The goshawk poses little risk to small songbirds and they may benefit from goshawk proximity in protection against nest predation. Finally, no pattern with distance in pied flycatcher territory (nest box) occupation rate or the onset of egg-laying was detected. This is expected, as flycatchers neither suffer from marked nest predation risk nor are favoured goshawk prey. 4. Our results suggest that territory location in relation to the nest of a predator is a trade-off situation where adult birds weigh the risk of themselves being predated against the benefits accrued from increased nest survival. Prey species appear able to detect and measure alternative predation risks, and respond adaptively. From the prey perspective, the landscape is a mosaic of habitat patches the quality of which varies according to structural and floristic features, but also to the spatial distribution of predators.</description><subject>Accipiter gentilis</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal ecology</subject><subject>Animal nesting</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bird nesting</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Birds - growth & development</subject><subject>Birds of prey</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>central-place foraging</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Food chains</subject><subject>Forest habitats</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Grouse</subject><subject>Habitat selection</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>meta-analysis</subject><subject>nest predation</subject><subject>Nesting Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Oviposition - physiology</subject><subject>Population Density</subject><subject>Population Dynamics</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Predatory Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>raptors</subject><subject>Raptors - physiology</subject><subject>Reproduction - physiology</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Songbirds - growth & development</subject><subject>Spatial Ecology</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><issn>0021-8790</issn><issn>1365-2656</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkV2L1DAUhoMo7jj6D0SDoHetJx9NWy-EZVm_WFTQvQ5pcrK2zrQ16bA7_97Ull3wRnORhJMnb3J4CKEMcpbG6y5nQhUZV4XKOUCZA-NC5Df3yOb24D7ZAHCWVWUNJ-RRjB0kkoN4SE5YKUUty2pDxq8BnZnaoacmUkN3pnfRmhEpeo92ekOnH0inYFzbX9HBe9oc6RjwSOOItsVIG5yuEfu5uAaFNv5MWb1LtWFKIXOxwR59O8XH5IE3u4hP1nVLLt-dfz_7kF18ef_x7PQis4qVIkNpa-ektV5IZpWxjalrZ9AXDUdsPHAnCqG4qF1VVU64BipwzLHaMATmxZa8WnLTH34dME5630aLu9QgDoeoSxBVDWn-F8hBcqHSY1vy4i-wGw6hT01oziSIEiqZoGqBbBhiDOj1GNq9CUfNQM_udKdnRXpWpGd3-o87fZOuPlvzD80e3d3FVVYCXq6ASYp2PpjetvGOq1Q5v5C4twt33e7w-N8f0J9OP5_P2xTwdAno4jSE2wBZiJqpucfny7E3gzZXSbe-_MaBiRSmkhIpfgMzdchd</recordid><startdate>200705</startdate><enddate>200705</enddate><creator>MÖNKKÖNEN, M</creator><creator>HUSBY, M</creator><creator>TORNBERG, R</creator><creator>HELLE, P</creator><creator>THOMSON, R.L</creator><general>Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>British Ecological Society</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200705</creationdate><title>Predation as a landscape effect: the trading off by prey species between predation risks and protection benefits</title><author>MÖNKKÖNEN, M ; HUSBY, M ; TORNBERG, R ; HELLE, P ; THOMSON, R.L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6173-e4c9dd4ccf341c6acba99daef5b2eebf02d3536239d888d3db080d1d19a1e01f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Accipiter gentilis</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal ecology</topic><topic>Animal nesting</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bird nesting</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Birds - growth & development</topic><topic>Birds of prey</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>central-place foraging</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Food chains</topic><topic>Forest habitats</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Grouse</topic><topic>Habitat selection</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>meta-analysis</topic><topic>nest predation</topic><topic>Nesting Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Oviposition - physiology</topic><topic>Population Density</topic><topic>Population Dynamics</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Predatory Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>raptors</topic><topic>Raptors - physiology</topic><topic>Reproduction - physiology</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Songbirds - growth & development</topic><topic>Spatial Ecology</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MÖNKKÖNEN, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HUSBY, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TORNBERG, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HELLE, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>THOMSON, R.L</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of animal ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MÖNKKÖNEN, M</au><au>HUSBY, M</au><au>TORNBERG, R</au><au>HELLE, P</au><au>THOMSON, R.L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predation as a landscape effect: the trading off by prey species between predation risks and protection benefits</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of animal ecology</jtitle><addtitle>J Anim Ecol</addtitle><date>2007-05</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>76</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>619</spage><epage>629</epage><pages>619-629</pages><issn>0021-8790</issn><eissn>1365-2656</eissn><coden>JAECAP</coden><abstract>1. Predators impose costs on their prey but may also provide benefits such as protection against other (e.g. nest) predators. The optimal breeding location in relation to the distance from a nesting raptor varies so as to minimize the sum of costs of adult and nest predation. We provide a conceptual model to account for variation in the relative predation risks and derive qualitative predictions for how different prey species should respond to the distance from goshawk Accipiter gentilis nests. 2. We test the model predictions using a comprehensive collection of data from northern Finland and central Norway. First, we carried out a series of experiments with artificial bird nests to test if goshawks may provide protection against nest predation. Second, we conducted standard bird censuses and nest-box experiments to detect how the density or territory occupancy of several prey species varies with distance from the nearest goshawk nest. 3. Nest predation rate increased with distance from goshawk nest indicating that goshawks may provide protection for birds' nests against nest predation. Abundance (or probability of presence) of the main prey species of goshawks peaked at intermediate distances from goshawk nests, reflecting the trade-off. The abundance of small songbird species decreased with distance from goshawk nests. The goshawk poses little risk to small songbirds and they may benefit from goshawk proximity in protection against nest predation. Finally, no pattern with distance in pied flycatcher territory (nest box) occupation rate or the onset of egg-laying was detected. This is expected, as flycatchers neither suffer from marked nest predation risk nor are favoured goshawk prey. 4. Our results suggest that territory location in relation to the nest of a predator is a trade-off situation where adult birds weigh the risk of themselves being predated against the benefits accrued from increased nest survival. Prey species appear able to detect and measure alternative predation risks, and respond adaptively. From the prey perspective, the landscape is a mosaic of habitat patches the quality of which varies according to structural and floristic features, but also to the spatial distribution of predators.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>17439478</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01233.x</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8790 |
ispartof | The Journal of animal ecology, 2007-05, Vol.76 (3), p.619-629 |
issn | 0021-8790 1365-2656 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70389070 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Free Content |
subjects | Accipiter gentilis Animal and plant ecology Animal behavior Animal ecology Animal nesting Animal, plant and microbial ecology Animals Biological and medical sciences Bird nesting Birds Birds - growth & development Birds of prey Breeding central-place foraging Cost-Benefit Analysis Female Food chains Forest habitats Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General aspects Grouse Habitat selection Habitats Male meta-analysis nest predation Nesting Behavior - physiology Oviposition - physiology Population Density Population Dynamics Predation Predators Predatory Behavior - physiology raptors Raptors - physiology Reproduction - physiology Risk Assessment Songbirds - growth & development Spatial Ecology Species Specificity |
title | Predation as a landscape effect: the trading off by prey species between predation risks and protection benefits |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T02%3A34%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predation%20as%20a%20landscape%20effect:%20the%20trading%20off%20by%20prey%20species%20between%20predation%20risks%20and%20protection%20benefits&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20animal%20ecology&rft.au=M%C3%96NKK%C3%96NEN,%20M&rft.date=2007-05&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=619&rft.epage=629&rft.pages=619-629&rft.issn=0021-8790&rft.eissn=1365-2656&rft.coden=JAECAP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01233.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4539164%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214037084&rft_id=info:pmid/17439478&rft_jstor_id=4539164&rfr_iscdi=true |