Decision making in abdominoplasty

Improvements and variations in abdominoplasty techniques have complicated patient and procedure selection. The authors describe their guidelines for selecting the ideal procedure to be used with patients by stratifying them into treatment groups according to the presence and location of excess skin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Aesthetic plastic surgery 2007-04, Vol.31 (2), p.117-127
Hauptverfasser: Sozer, Sadri O, Agullo, Francisco J, Santillan, Alfredo A, Wolf, Coty
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 127
container_issue 2
container_start_page 117
container_title Aesthetic plastic surgery
container_volume 31
creator Sozer, Sadri O
Agullo, Francisco J
Santillan, Alfredo A
Wolf, Coty
description Improvements and variations in abdominoplasty techniques have complicated patient and procedure selection. The authors describe their guidelines for selecting the ideal procedure to be used with patients by stratifying them into treatment groups according to the presence and location of excess skin and subcutaneous tissue, lipodystrophy, and abdominal wall laxity. A prospective study analyzed 151 female patients treated for abdominal contour deformities from January 2004 to July 2005. The patients were systematically classified into five treatment groups: mini-abdominoplasty (5%), standard abdominoplasty (42%), abdominoplasty with liposuction and minimal midline undermining (10%), standard abdominoplasty with removal of deep fat (13%), and circumferential abdominoplasty (30%). The patients had a mean age of 42 years and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 26 kg/m(2). The prevalence of overweight (BMI, 25.0-29.9) was 37%, and that of obesity (BMI > 30.0) was 19%. Comparison of pre- and postoperative photographs included improved tension of the entire abdominal wall, enhancement of the waistline, and increased uniformity of the contour of the abdomen. There was a significant difference in mean BMI between preabdominoplasty (26 kg/m(2)) and postabdominoplasty (24 kg/m(2)) (p = 0.01). The prevalence of overweight and obesity decreased by 8% and 9%, respectively (p = 0.01), and a decrease in BMI occurred within each abdominoplasty subgroup (p = 0.01). The prevalence of complications was 11%. Seroma (4%) and delayed wound healing (4%) were the most common. One case of pulmonary embolus was encountered. Although there was a positive trend in complications with higher BMI, no statistically significant difference was found (p = 0.74). Half of the patients had additional procedures performed without a significant increase in complications (p = 0.5). The described algorithm for abdominoplasty selection is safe, effective, and flexible, with long-term improvement in abdominal contour and BMI.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00266-006-0148-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70386998</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70386998</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-dda07f209a4242d59a732b26d12be52d2c4bdf907707ccd4bf82331510bd65023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1Lw0AQhhdRbK3-AC9SPXhbnZ39So7S-gUFLwrelk12I1uTbM02h_x7U1oQHBjm8rwvw0PIJYM7BqDvEwAqRQHGZSKjwxGZMsGRShTsmEyBK0GRqc8JOUtpDcBQa3FKJkwjSJRiSq6XvgwpxHbe2O_Qfs1DO7eFi01o46a2aTuck5PK1slfHO6MfDw9vi9e6Ort-XXxsKIlR7WlzlnQFUJuBQp0MreaY4HKMSy8RIelKFyVg9agy9KJosqQcyYZFE5JQD4jt_veTRd_ep-2pgmp9HVtWx_7ZDTwTOV5NoI3_8B17Lt2_M1kyMaRo4MZYXuo7GJKna_MpguN7QbDwOzkmb08M8ozO3lmGDNXh-K-aLz7Sxxs8V_vWmgP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>821111514</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Decision making in abdominoplasty</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Sozer, Sadri O ; Agullo, Francisco J ; Santillan, Alfredo A ; Wolf, Coty</creator><creatorcontrib>Sozer, Sadri O ; Agullo, Francisco J ; Santillan, Alfredo A ; Wolf, Coty</creatorcontrib><description>Improvements and variations in abdominoplasty techniques have complicated patient and procedure selection. The authors describe their guidelines for selecting the ideal procedure to be used with patients by stratifying them into treatment groups according to the presence and location of excess skin and subcutaneous tissue, lipodystrophy, and abdominal wall laxity. A prospective study analyzed 151 female patients treated for abdominal contour deformities from January 2004 to July 2005. The patients were systematically classified into five treatment groups: mini-abdominoplasty (5%), standard abdominoplasty (42%), abdominoplasty with liposuction and minimal midline undermining (10%), standard abdominoplasty with removal of deep fat (13%), and circumferential abdominoplasty (30%). The patients had a mean age of 42 years and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 26 kg/m(2). The prevalence of overweight (BMI, 25.0-29.9) was 37%, and that of obesity (BMI &gt; 30.0) was 19%. Comparison of pre- and postoperative photographs included improved tension of the entire abdominal wall, enhancement of the waistline, and increased uniformity of the contour of the abdomen. There was a significant difference in mean BMI between preabdominoplasty (26 kg/m(2)) and postabdominoplasty (24 kg/m(2)) (p = 0.01). The prevalence of overweight and obesity decreased by 8% and 9%, respectively (p = 0.01), and a decrease in BMI occurred within each abdominoplasty subgroup (p = 0.01). The prevalence of complications was 11%. Seroma (4%) and delayed wound healing (4%) were the most common. One case of pulmonary embolus was encountered. Although there was a positive trend in complications with higher BMI, no statistically significant difference was found (p = 0.74). Half of the patients had additional procedures performed without a significant increase in complications (p = 0.5). The described algorithm for abdominoplasty selection is safe, effective, and flexible, with long-term improvement in abdominal contour and BMI.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0364-216X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-5241</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00266-006-0148-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17205254</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Abdomen - surgery ; Adult ; Body Mass Index ; Buttocks - surgery ; Decision making ; Female ; Humans ; Lipectomy - methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Obesity ; Obesity - surgery ; Patient Satisfaction ; Thigh - surgery ; Treatment Outcome ; United States ; Wound healing</subject><ispartof>Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2007-04, Vol.31 (2), p.117-127</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-dda07f209a4242d59a732b26d12be52d2c4bdf907707ccd4bf82331510bd65023</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-dda07f209a4242d59a732b26d12be52d2c4bdf907707ccd4bf82331510bd65023</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17205254$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sozer, Sadri O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agullo, Francisco J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santillan, Alfredo A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolf, Coty</creatorcontrib><title>Decision making in abdominoplasty</title><title>Aesthetic plastic surgery</title><addtitle>Aesthetic Plast Surg</addtitle><description>Improvements and variations in abdominoplasty techniques have complicated patient and procedure selection. The authors describe their guidelines for selecting the ideal procedure to be used with patients by stratifying them into treatment groups according to the presence and location of excess skin and subcutaneous tissue, lipodystrophy, and abdominal wall laxity. A prospective study analyzed 151 female patients treated for abdominal contour deformities from January 2004 to July 2005. The patients were systematically classified into five treatment groups: mini-abdominoplasty (5%), standard abdominoplasty (42%), abdominoplasty with liposuction and minimal midline undermining (10%), standard abdominoplasty with removal of deep fat (13%), and circumferential abdominoplasty (30%). The patients had a mean age of 42 years and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 26 kg/m(2). The prevalence of overweight (BMI, 25.0-29.9) was 37%, and that of obesity (BMI &gt; 30.0) was 19%. Comparison of pre- and postoperative photographs included improved tension of the entire abdominal wall, enhancement of the waistline, and increased uniformity of the contour of the abdomen. There was a significant difference in mean BMI between preabdominoplasty (26 kg/m(2)) and postabdominoplasty (24 kg/m(2)) (p = 0.01). The prevalence of overweight and obesity decreased by 8% and 9%, respectively (p = 0.01), and a decrease in BMI occurred within each abdominoplasty subgroup (p = 0.01). The prevalence of complications was 11%. Seroma (4%) and delayed wound healing (4%) were the most common. One case of pulmonary embolus was encountered. Although there was a positive trend in complications with higher BMI, no statistically significant difference was found (p = 0.74). Half of the patients had additional procedures performed without a significant increase in complications (p = 0.5). The described algorithm for abdominoplasty selection is safe, effective, and flexible, with long-term improvement in abdominal contour and BMI.</description><subject>Abdomen - surgery</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>Buttocks - surgery</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lipectomy - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Obesity - surgery</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Thigh - surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Wound healing</subject><issn>0364-216X</issn><issn>1432-5241</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE1Lw0AQhhdRbK3-AC9SPXhbnZ39So7S-gUFLwrelk12I1uTbM02h_x7U1oQHBjm8rwvw0PIJYM7BqDvEwAqRQHGZSKjwxGZMsGRShTsmEyBK0GRqc8JOUtpDcBQa3FKJkwjSJRiSq6XvgwpxHbe2O_Qfs1DO7eFi01o46a2aTuck5PK1slfHO6MfDw9vi9e6Ort-XXxsKIlR7WlzlnQFUJuBQp0MreaY4HKMSy8RIelKFyVg9agy9KJosqQcyYZFE5JQD4jt_veTRd_ep-2pgmp9HVtWx_7ZDTwTOV5NoI3_8B17Lt2_M1kyMaRo4MZYXuo7GJKna_MpguN7QbDwOzkmb08M8ozO3lmGDNXh-K-aLz7Sxxs8V_vWmgP</recordid><startdate>20070401</startdate><enddate>20070401</enddate><creator>Sozer, Sadri O</creator><creator>Agullo, Francisco J</creator><creator>Santillan, Alfredo A</creator><creator>Wolf, Coty</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070401</creationdate><title>Decision making in abdominoplasty</title><author>Sozer, Sadri O ; Agullo, Francisco J ; Santillan, Alfredo A ; Wolf, Coty</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-dda07f209a4242d59a732b26d12be52d2c4bdf907707ccd4bf82331510bd65023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Abdomen - surgery</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>Buttocks - surgery</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lipectomy - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Obesity - surgery</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Thigh - surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Wound healing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sozer, Sadri O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agullo, Francisco J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santillan, Alfredo A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolf, Coty</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Aesthetic plastic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sozer, Sadri O</au><au>Agullo, Francisco J</au><au>Santillan, Alfredo A</au><au>Wolf, Coty</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Decision making in abdominoplasty</atitle><jtitle>Aesthetic plastic surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Aesthetic Plast Surg</addtitle><date>2007-04-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>117</spage><epage>127</epage><pages>117-127</pages><issn>0364-216X</issn><eissn>1432-5241</eissn><abstract>Improvements and variations in abdominoplasty techniques have complicated patient and procedure selection. The authors describe their guidelines for selecting the ideal procedure to be used with patients by stratifying them into treatment groups according to the presence and location of excess skin and subcutaneous tissue, lipodystrophy, and abdominal wall laxity. A prospective study analyzed 151 female patients treated for abdominal contour deformities from January 2004 to July 2005. The patients were systematically classified into five treatment groups: mini-abdominoplasty (5%), standard abdominoplasty (42%), abdominoplasty with liposuction and minimal midline undermining (10%), standard abdominoplasty with removal of deep fat (13%), and circumferential abdominoplasty (30%). The patients had a mean age of 42 years and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 26 kg/m(2). The prevalence of overweight (BMI, 25.0-29.9) was 37%, and that of obesity (BMI &gt; 30.0) was 19%. Comparison of pre- and postoperative photographs included improved tension of the entire abdominal wall, enhancement of the waistline, and increased uniformity of the contour of the abdomen. There was a significant difference in mean BMI between preabdominoplasty (26 kg/m(2)) and postabdominoplasty (24 kg/m(2)) (p = 0.01). The prevalence of overweight and obesity decreased by 8% and 9%, respectively (p = 0.01), and a decrease in BMI occurred within each abdominoplasty subgroup (p = 0.01). The prevalence of complications was 11%. Seroma (4%) and delayed wound healing (4%) were the most common. One case of pulmonary embolus was encountered. Although there was a positive trend in complications with higher BMI, no statistically significant difference was found (p = 0.74). Half of the patients had additional procedures performed without a significant increase in complications (p = 0.5). The described algorithm for abdominoplasty selection is safe, effective, and flexible, with long-term improvement in abdominal contour and BMI.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>17205254</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00266-006-0148-y</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0364-216X
ispartof Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2007-04, Vol.31 (2), p.117-127
issn 0364-216X
1432-5241
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70386998
source MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals
subjects Abdomen - surgery
Adult
Body Mass Index
Buttocks - surgery
Decision making
Female
Humans
Lipectomy - methods
Male
Middle Aged
Obesity
Obesity - surgery
Patient Satisfaction
Thigh - surgery
Treatment Outcome
United States
Wound healing
title Decision making in abdominoplasty
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T15%3A40%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Decision%20making%20in%20abdominoplasty&rft.jtitle=Aesthetic%20plastic%20surgery&rft.au=Sozer,%20Sadri%20O&rft.date=2007-04-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=117&rft.epage=127&rft.pages=117-127&rft.issn=0364-216X&rft.eissn=1432-5241&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00266-006-0148-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70386998%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=821111514&rft_id=info:pmid/17205254&rfr_iscdi=true