Arrhythmias after Fontan operation: comparison of lateral tunnel and extracardiac conduit

Abstract Background Arrhythmias are frequent causes of morbidity and mortality in patients with single ventricle physiology after Fontan operation. The aim of this study was to evaluate which type of Fontan procedure—lateral tunnel (LT) or extracardiac conduit (EC)—provides superior outcomes related...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of electrocardiology 2008-03, Vol.41 (2), p.173-177
Hauptverfasser: Hakacova, Nina, MD, Lakomy, Miroslav, MD, Kovacikova, Lubica, MD, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 177
container_issue 2
container_start_page 173
container_title Journal of electrocardiology
container_volume 41
creator Hakacova, Nina, MD
Lakomy, Miroslav, MD
Kovacikova, Lubica, MD, PhD
description Abstract Background Arrhythmias are frequent causes of morbidity and mortality in patients with single ventricle physiology after Fontan operation. The aim of this study was to evaluate which type of Fontan procedure—lateral tunnel (LT) or extracardiac conduit (EC)—provides superior outcomes related to the problem of early postoperative and 1-year follow-up arrhythmias. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the incidence, types, and duration of rhythm disorders in 101 consecutive patients who received either LT (n = 60) or EC (n = 41) between April 1997 and March 2006 in Slovak Children's Cardiac Center, Bratislava (Slovakia). Weight, age, sex, and the type of heart morphology did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. The rhythm was monitored and documented perioperatively and postoperatively with standard electrocardiogram (ECG) recording and continual ECG monitoring. Duration of extracorporeal circulation, duration of aortic crossclamp and hemodynamic variables were analyzed with respect to the development of early arrhythmias in both groups. Twenty-four–hour ECG Holter monitoring (DMS 300-7, Holterreader, Producer DMS, Nevada, USA) was used to detect arrhythmias at the 1-year follow-up. Results Early postoperative rhythm abnormalities were identified in 31 patients (52%) who underwent LT and in 22 patients (54%) who underwent EC. The most frequent type of rhythm disturbance was junctional rhythm in both groups. The bivariate analysis revealed that there was no significant difference in the incidence, type, or duration of early onset arrhythmias between the 2 groups. Although, there was no significant difference in the duration of arrhythmia since the admission form the operating room. The need of aortic crossclamp was significantly lower in EC group ( P < .001). However, this did not correlate with lower incidence of early onset arrhythmias with EC modification. At the 1-year follow-up, the prevalence of arrhythmias was similar in both groups. Conclusions Extracardiac conduit as compared with LT does not provide superior outcomes related to the problem of early and 1-year onset arrhythmias. Other factors than the risk of early postoperative and early follow-up arrhythmias should be considered in surgical preference of modification strategy.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2007.10.007
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70383110</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0022073607008916</els_id><sourcerecordid>1454497801</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-711bc6b77dc1d27f5bd859b17b5bed6beb7ef33bff587896da1f5b53ed6a84723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk9v1DAQxS0EosvCV0BRD9yyjO1NnPSAVBUKSJU4AAdOlv9MVIfEXmwHsd8eR7sC1BOnJ3l-82b8NIRcUthRoO3rcTfihCbHYFS0OwYgSmFX5BHZ0IazuttzeEw2AIzVIHh7QZ6lNAJAzwR7Si5ox1nH93RDvl3HeH_M97NTqVJDxljdBp-Vr8IBo8ou-KvKhPmgokuhvA7VpAqlpiov3uNUKW8r_JWjWpdxyhTa28Xl5-TJoKaEL866JV9v3325-VDffXr_8eb6rjb7FnItKNWm1UJYQy0TQ6Nt1_SaCt1otK1GLXDgXA9D04mub62ihWl4qaluLxjfklcn30MMPxZMWc4uGZwm5TEsSQrgHacUCnj5ABzDEn3ZTTLaMuB9yW5Lrk6QiSGliIM8RDereJQU5Jq-HOW_6cs1_bVWpDS_PE9Y9Iz2b-s57gK8PQFYAvnpMMpkHHqD1sViKW1w_zfnzQMbMznvjJq-4xHTn29RmZgE-Xm9g_UMQAB0PW35b_ewsyU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>216203915</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Arrhythmias after Fontan operation: comparison of lateral tunnel and extracardiac conduit</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Hakacova, Nina, MD ; Lakomy, Miroslav, MD ; Kovacikova, Lubica, MD, PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Hakacova, Nina, MD ; Lakomy, Miroslav, MD ; Kovacikova, Lubica, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Arrhythmias are frequent causes of morbidity and mortality in patients with single ventricle physiology after Fontan operation. The aim of this study was to evaluate which type of Fontan procedure—lateral tunnel (LT) or extracardiac conduit (EC)—provides superior outcomes related to the problem of early postoperative and 1-year follow-up arrhythmias. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the incidence, types, and duration of rhythm disorders in 101 consecutive patients who received either LT (n = 60) or EC (n = 41) between April 1997 and March 2006 in Slovak Children's Cardiac Center, Bratislava (Slovakia). Weight, age, sex, and the type of heart morphology did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. The rhythm was monitored and documented perioperatively and postoperatively with standard electrocardiogram (ECG) recording and continual ECG monitoring. Duration of extracorporeal circulation, duration of aortic crossclamp and hemodynamic variables were analyzed with respect to the development of early arrhythmias in both groups. Twenty-four–hour ECG Holter monitoring (DMS 300-7, Holterreader, Producer DMS, Nevada, USA) was used to detect arrhythmias at the 1-year follow-up. Results Early postoperative rhythm abnormalities were identified in 31 patients (52%) who underwent LT and in 22 patients (54%) who underwent EC. The most frequent type of rhythm disturbance was junctional rhythm in both groups. The bivariate analysis revealed that there was no significant difference in the incidence, type, or duration of early onset arrhythmias between the 2 groups. Although, there was no significant difference in the duration of arrhythmia since the admission form the operating room. The need of aortic crossclamp was significantly lower in EC group ( P &lt; .001). However, this did not correlate with lower incidence of early onset arrhythmias with EC modification. At the 1-year follow-up, the prevalence of arrhythmias was similar in both groups. Conclusions Extracardiac conduit as compared with LT does not provide superior outcomes related to the problem of early and 1-year onset arrhythmias. Other factors than the risk of early postoperative and early follow-up arrhythmias should be considered in surgical preference of modification strategy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0736</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8430</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2007.10.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18328341</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JECAB4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Arrhythmias, Cardiac - diagnosis ; Arrhythmias, Cardiac - epidemiology ; Cardiovascular ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Female ; Fontan Procedure - methods ; Fontan Procedure - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Heart Defects, Congenital - epidemiology ; Heart Defects, Congenital - surgery ; Humans ; Incidence ; Male ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Assessment - methods ; Risk Factors ; Slovakia - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of electrocardiology, 2008-03, Vol.41 (2), p.173-177</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2008 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Churchill Livingstone Inc., Medical Publishers Mar/Apr 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-711bc6b77dc1d27f5bd859b17b5bed6beb7ef33bff587896da1f5b53ed6a84723</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-711bc6b77dc1d27f5bd859b17b5bed6beb7ef33bff587896da1f5b53ed6a84723</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/216203915?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995,64385,64387,64389,72469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18328341$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hakacova, Nina, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lakomy, Miroslav, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kovacikova, Lubica, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Arrhythmias after Fontan operation: comparison of lateral tunnel and extracardiac conduit</title><title>Journal of electrocardiology</title><addtitle>J Electrocardiol</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Arrhythmias are frequent causes of morbidity and mortality in patients with single ventricle physiology after Fontan operation. The aim of this study was to evaluate which type of Fontan procedure—lateral tunnel (LT) or extracardiac conduit (EC)—provides superior outcomes related to the problem of early postoperative and 1-year follow-up arrhythmias. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the incidence, types, and duration of rhythm disorders in 101 consecutive patients who received either LT (n = 60) or EC (n = 41) between April 1997 and March 2006 in Slovak Children's Cardiac Center, Bratislava (Slovakia). Weight, age, sex, and the type of heart morphology did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. The rhythm was monitored and documented perioperatively and postoperatively with standard electrocardiogram (ECG) recording and continual ECG monitoring. Duration of extracorporeal circulation, duration of aortic crossclamp and hemodynamic variables were analyzed with respect to the development of early arrhythmias in both groups. Twenty-four–hour ECG Holter monitoring (DMS 300-7, Holterreader, Producer DMS, Nevada, USA) was used to detect arrhythmias at the 1-year follow-up. Results Early postoperative rhythm abnormalities were identified in 31 patients (52%) who underwent LT and in 22 patients (54%) who underwent EC. The most frequent type of rhythm disturbance was junctional rhythm in both groups. The bivariate analysis revealed that there was no significant difference in the incidence, type, or duration of early onset arrhythmias between the 2 groups. Although, there was no significant difference in the duration of arrhythmia since the admission form the operating room. The need of aortic crossclamp was significantly lower in EC group ( P &lt; .001). However, this did not correlate with lower incidence of early onset arrhythmias with EC modification. At the 1-year follow-up, the prevalence of arrhythmias was similar in both groups. Conclusions Extracardiac conduit as compared with LT does not provide superior outcomes related to the problem of early and 1-year onset arrhythmias. Other factors than the risk of early postoperative and early follow-up arrhythmias should be considered in surgical preference of modification strategy.</description><subject>Arrhythmias, Cardiac - diagnosis</subject><subject>Arrhythmias, Cardiac - epidemiology</subject><subject>Cardiovascular</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fontan Procedure - methods</subject><subject>Fontan Procedure - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Heart Defects, Congenital - epidemiology</subject><subject>Heart Defects, Congenital - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Assessment - methods</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Slovakia - epidemiology</subject><issn>0022-0736</issn><issn>1532-8430</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk9v1DAQxS0EosvCV0BRD9yyjO1NnPSAVBUKSJU4AAdOlv9MVIfEXmwHsd8eR7sC1BOnJ3l-82b8NIRcUthRoO3rcTfihCbHYFS0OwYgSmFX5BHZ0IazuttzeEw2AIzVIHh7QZ6lNAJAzwR7Si5ox1nH93RDvl3HeH_M97NTqVJDxljdBp-Vr8IBo8ou-KvKhPmgokuhvA7VpAqlpiov3uNUKW8r_JWjWpdxyhTa28Xl5-TJoKaEL866JV9v3325-VDffXr_8eb6rjb7FnItKNWm1UJYQy0TQ6Nt1_SaCt1otK1GLXDgXA9D04mub62ihWl4qaluLxjfklcn30MMPxZMWc4uGZwm5TEsSQrgHacUCnj5ABzDEn3ZTTLaMuB9yW5Lrk6QiSGliIM8RDereJQU5Jq-HOW_6cs1_bVWpDS_PE9Y9Iz2b-s57gK8PQFYAvnpMMpkHHqD1sViKW1w_zfnzQMbMznvjJq-4xHTn29RmZgE-Xm9g_UMQAB0PW35b_ewsyU</recordid><startdate>20080301</startdate><enddate>20080301</enddate><creator>Hakacova, Nina, MD</creator><creator>Lakomy, Miroslav, MD</creator><creator>Kovacikova, Lubica, MD, PhD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080301</creationdate><title>Arrhythmias after Fontan operation: comparison of lateral tunnel and extracardiac conduit</title><author>Hakacova, Nina, MD ; Lakomy, Miroslav, MD ; Kovacikova, Lubica, MD, PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-711bc6b77dc1d27f5bd859b17b5bed6beb7ef33bff587896da1f5b53ed6a84723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Arrhythmias, Cardiac - diagnosis</topic><topic>Arrhythmias, Cardiac - epidemiology</topic><topic>Cardiovascular</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fontan Procedure - methods</topic><topic>Fontan Procedure - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Heart Defects, Congenital - epidemiology</topic><topic>Heart Defects, Congenital - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Assessment - methods</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Slovakia - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hakacova, Nina, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lakomy, Miroslav, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kovacikova, Lubica, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of electrocardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hakacova, Nina, MD</au><au>Lakomy, Miroslav, MD</au><au>Kovacikova, Lubica, MD, PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Arrhythmias after Fontan operation: comparison of lateral tunnel and extracardiac conduit</atitle><jtitle>Journal of electrocardiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Electrocardiol</addtitle><date>2008-03-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>173</spage><epage>177</epage><pages>173-177</pages><issn>0022-0736</issn><eissn>1532-8430</eissn><coden>JECAB4</coden><abstract>Abstract Background Arrhythmias are frequent causes of morbidity and mortality in patients with single ventricle physiology after Fontan operation. The aim of this study was to evaluate which type of Fontan procedure—lateral tunnel (LT) or extracardiac conduit (EC)—provides superior outcomes related to the problem of early postoperative and 1-year follow-up arrhythmias. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the incidence, types, and duration of rhythm disorders in 101 consecutive patients who received either LT (n = 60) or EC (n = 41) between April 1997 and March 2006 in Slovak Children's Cardiac Center, Bratislava (Slovakia). Weight, age, sex, and the type of heart morphology did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. The rhythm was monitored and documented perioperatively and postoperatively with standard electrocardiogram (ECG) recording and continual ECG monitoring. Duration of extracorporeal circulation, duration of aortic crossclamp and hemodynamic variables were analyzed with respect to the development of early arrhythmias in both groups. Twenty-four–hour ECG Holter monitoring (DMS 300-7, Holterreader, Producer DMS, Nevada, USA) was used to detect arrhythmias at the 1-year follow-up. Results Early postoperative rhythm abnormalities were identified in 31 patients (52%) who underwent LT and in 22 patients (54%) who underwent EC. The most frequent type of rhythm disturbance was junctional rhythm in both groups. The bivariate analysis revealed that there was no significant difference in the incidence, type, or duration of early onset arrhythmias between the 2 groups. Although, there was no significant difference in the duration of arrhythmia since the admission form the operating room. The need of aortic crossclamp was significantly lower in EC group ( P &lt; .001). However, this did not correlate with lower incidence of early onset arrhythmias with EC modification. At the 1-year follow-up, the prevalence of arrhythmias was similar in both groups. Conclusions Extracardiac conduit as compared with LT does not provide superior outcomes related to the problem of early and 1-year onset arrhythmias. Other factors than the risk of early postoperative and early follow-up arrhythmias should be considered in surgical preference of modification strategy.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>18328341</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2007.10.007</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0736
ispartof Journal of electrocardiology, 2008-03, Vol.41 (2), p.173-177
issn 0022-0736
1532-8430
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70383110
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
subjects Arrhythmias, Cardiac - diagnosis
Arrhythmias, Cardiac - epidemiology
Cardiovascular
Child
Child, Preschool
Female
Fontan Procedure - methods
Fontan Procedure - statistics & numerical data
Heart Defects, Congenital - epidemiology
Heart Defects, Congenital - surgery
Humans
Incidence
Male
Postoperative Complications - epidemiology
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment - methods
Risk Factors
Slovakia - epidemiology
title Arrhythmias after Fontan operation: comparison of lateral tunnel and extracardiac conduit
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T05%3A42%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Arrhythmias%20after%20Fontan%20operation:%20comparison%20of%20lateral%20tunnel%20and%20extracardiac%20conduit&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20electrocardiology&rft.au=Hakacova,%20Nina,%20MD&rft.date=2008-03-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=173&rft.epage=177&rft.pages=173-177&rft.issn=0022-0736&rft.eissn=1532-8430&rft.coden=JECAB4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2007.10.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1454497801%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=216203915&rft_id=info:pmid/18328341&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0022073607008916&rfr_iscdi=true