Predicting gefitinib responsiveness in lung cancer by fluorescence in situ hybridization/chromogenic in situ hybridization analysis of EGFR and HER2 in biopsy and cytology specimens

In non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutational analysis is an excellent predictor of responsiveness to treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, such as gefitinib. In up to 80% of NSCLCs, cytologic samples or endoscopic biopsies are the only specimens avai...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Molecular cancer therapeutics 2007-04, Vol.6 (4), p.1223-1229
Hauptverfasser: Daniele, Lorenzo, Macrì, Luigia, Schena, Marina, Dongiovanni, Diego, Bonello, Lisa, Armando, Enrico, Ciuffreda, Libero, Bertetto, Oscar, Bussolati, Gianni, Sapino, Anna
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1229
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1223
container_title Molecular cancer therapeutics
container_volume 6
creator Daniele, Lorenzo
Macrì, Luigia
Schena, Marina
Dongiovanni, Diego
Bonello, Lisa
Armando, Enrico
Ciuffreda, Libero
Bertetto, Oscar
Bussolati, Gianni
Sapino, Anna
description In non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutational analysis is an excellent predictor of responsiveness to treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, such as gefitinib. In up to 80% of NSCLCs, cytologic samples or endoscopic biopsies are the only specimens available for molecular analysis, but PCR amplification of DNA from small fixed and paraffin-embedded samples may create artifactual mutations. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) of EGFR and HER2 has been proposed as an alternative method of analysis. This project aimed to determine the optimal scoring method for FISH or chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) assays when analyzing small NSCLC samples to predict response. FISH or CISH analysis of EGFR and HER2 genes was done on 42 small samples derived from NSCLC patients treated with gefitinib. EGFR mutational analysis was done after quantity and quality controls of DNA. In seven of seven cases, a balanced increase in EGFR gene and chromosome 7 number was found to correlate with the presence of specific EGFR mutations. In addition, seven of seven cases with balanced EGFR / HER2 polysomy and two of three cases with balanced EGFR / HER2 trisomy responded to gefitinib (75% of responders). Instead, the EGFR mutations predicted only 7 of 12 (58%) of gefitinib-responsive patients. When only endoscopic biopsies or cytologic specimens are available, we propose using FISH/CISH for EGFR and HER2 as the test of choice for selecting patients for treatment with gefitinib and to consider as negative predictive factor the absence of EGFR / HER2 gene gain. [Mol Cancer Ther 2007;6(4):1223–9]
doi_str_mv 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-06-0719
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70381079</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70381079</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-95e90d6c158d31d2a32d03c81b89f91dcced94775fc0aa6614df24fc7f9c7c63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkc1u1TAQRiMEoqXwCCCvYJXWzr-X6Oq2RSoCVXdvOeNxYpTYwU6KwnvxfjjNldiw8ujzGY88J0neM3rNWNncsDIv05pV-fXXwymlVUprxl8klzFv0qZkxcvnemcukjch_KCUNTxjr5MLVhe0ohm_TP5896gMzMZ2pENtYmFa4jFMzgbzhBZDIMaSYYkASAvoSbsSPSwuQoAx2K6DmRfSr603yvyWs3H2BnrvRtehNfB_gkgrhzWYQJwmx7vbxxgocn98zDa-NW4K63ME6-wG160kTAhmRBveJq-0HAK-O59Xyen2eDrcpw_f7r4cPj-kUNJiTnmJnKoK4r5UzlQm80zRHBrWNlxzpgBQ8aKuSw1UyqpihdJZoaHWHGqo8qvk4_7s5N3PBcMsRhP_PAzSoluCqGneMFrzCJY7CN6F4FGLyZtR-lUwKjZdYlMhNhUi6hK0Epuu2PfhPGBpR1T_us5-IvBpB3rT9b-MR7E7iLtH6aEXlSgEy7I8_wvE8qQF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70381079</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predicting gefitinib responsiveness in lung cancer by fluorescence in situ hybridization/chromogenic in situ hybridization analysis of EGFR and HER2 in biopsy and cytology specimens</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>American Association for Cancer Research</source><creator>Daniele, Lorenzo ; Macrì, Luigia ; Schena, Marina ; Dongiovanni, Diego ; Bonello, Lisa ; Armando, Enrico ; Ciuffreda, Libero ; Bertetto, Oscar ; Bussolati, Gianni ; Sapino, Anna</creator><creatorcontrib>Daniele, Lorenzo ; Macrì, Luigia ; Schena, Marina ; Dongiovanni, Diego ; Bonello, Lisa ; Armando, Enrico ; Ciuffreda, Libero ; Bertetto, Oscar ; Bussolati, Gianni ; Sapino, Anna</creatorcontrib><description>In non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutational analysis is an excellent predictor of responsiveness to treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, such as gefitinib. In up to 80% of NSCLCs, cytologic samples or endoscopic biopsies are the only specimens available for molecular analysis, but PCR amplification of DNA from small fixed and paraffin-embedded samples may create artifactual mutations. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) of EGFR and HER2 has been proposed as an alternative method of analysis. This project aimed to determine the optimal scoring method for FISH or chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) assays when analyzing small NSCLC samples to predict response. FISH or CISH analysis of EGFR and HER2 genes was done on 42 small samples derived from NSCLC patients treated with gefitinib. EGFR mutational analysis was done after quantity and quality controls of DNA. In seven of seven cases, a balanced increase in EGFR gene and chromosome 7 number was found to correlate with the presence of specific EGFR mutations. In addition, seven of seven cases with balanced EGFR / HER2 polysomy and two of three cases with balanced EGFR / HER2 trisomy responded to gefitinib (75% of responders). Instead, the EGFR mutations predicted only 7 of 12 (58%) of gefitinib-responsive patients. When only endoscopic biopsies or cytologic specimens are available, we propose using FISH/CISH for EGFR and HER2 as the test of choice for selecting patients for treatment with gefitinib and to consider as negative predictive factor the absence of EGFR / HER2 gene gain. [Mol Cancer Ther 2007;6(4):1223–9]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1535-7163</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-8514</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-06-0719</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17406029</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Association for Cancer Research</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use ; Base Sequence ; Biopsy ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - diagnosis ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - drug therapy ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - pathology ; DNA Mutational Analysis ; EGFR ; Exons - genetics ; Female ; FISH/CISH ; Gene Dosage ; HER2 ; Humans ; In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence - methods ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; lung cancer ; Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Lung Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Lung Neoplasms - pathology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Molecular Sequence Data ; Mutation - genetics ; Quinazolines - therapeutic use ; Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - genetics ; Receptor, ErbB-2 - genetics ; treatment</subject><ispartof>Molecular cancer therapeutics, 2007-04, Vol.6 (4), p.1223-1229</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-95e90d6c158d31d2a32d03c81b89f91dcced94775fc0aa6614df24fc7f9c7c63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-95e90d6c158d31d2a32d03c81b89f91dcced94775fc0aa6614df24fc7f9c7c63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3354,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17406029$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Daniele, Lorenzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macrì, Luigia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schena, Marina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dongiovanni, Diego</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonello, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armando, Enrico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciuffreda, Libero</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertetto, Oscar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bussolati, Gianni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sapino, Anna</creatorcontrib><title>Predicting gefitinib responsiveness in lung cancer by fluorescence in situ hybridization/chromogenic in situ hybridization analysis of EGFR and HER2 in biopsy and cytology specimens</title><title>Molecular cancer therapeutics</title><addtitle>Mol Cancer Ther</addtitle><description>In non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutational analysis is an excellent predictor of responsiveness to treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, such as gefitinib. In up to 80% of NSCLCs, cytologic samples or endoscopic biopsies are the only specimens available for molecular analysis, but PCR amplification of DNA from small fixed and paraffin-embedded samples may create artifactual mutations. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) of EGFR and HER2 has been proposed as an alternative method of analysis. This project aimed to determine the optimal scoring method for FISH or chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) assays when analyzing small NSCLC samples to predict response. FISH or CISH analysis of EGFR and HER2 genes was done on 42 small samples derived from NSCLC patients treated with gefitinib. EGFR mutational analysis was done after quantity and quality controls of DNA. In seven of seven cases, a balanced increase in EGFR gene and chromosome 7 number was found to correlate with the presence of specific EGFR mutations. In addition, seven of seven cases with balanced EGFR / HER2 polysomy and two of three cases with balanced EGFR / HER2 trisomy responded to gefitinib (75% of responders). Instead, the EGFR mutations predicted only 7 of 12 (58%) of gefitinib-responsive patients. When only endoscopic biopsies or cytologic specimens are available, we propose using FISH/CISH for EGFR and HER2 as the test of choice for selecting patients for treatment with gefitinib and to consider as negative predictive factor the absence of EGFR / HER2 gene gain. [Mol Cancer Ther 2007;6(4):1223–9]</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Base Sequence</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - diagnosis</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - drug therapy</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - pathology</subject><subject>DNA Mutational Analysis</subject><subject>EGFR</subject><subject>Exons - genetics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>FISH/CISH</subject><subject>Gene Dosage</subject><subject>HER2</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence - methods</subject><subject>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</subject><subject>lung cancer</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Molecular Sequence Data</subject><subject>Mutation - genetics</subject><subject>Quinazolines - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - genetics</subject><subject>Receptor, ErbB-2 - genetics</subject><subject>treatment</subject><issn>1535-7163</issn><issn>1538-8514</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptkc1u1TAQRiMEoqXwCCCvYJXWzr-X6Oq2RSoCVXdvOeNxYpTYwU6KwnvxfjjNldiw8ujzGY88J0neM3rNWNncsDIv05pV-fXXwymlVUprxl8klzFv0qZkxcvnemcukjch_KCUNTxjr5MLVhe0ohm_TP5896gMzMZ2pENtYmFa4jFMzgbzhBZDIMaSYYkASAvoSbsSPSwuQoAx2K6DmRfSr603yvyWs3H2BnrvRtehNfB_gkgrhzWYQJwmx7vbxxgocn98zDa-NW4K63ME6-wG160kTAhmRBveJq-0HAK-O59Xyen2eDrcpw_f7r4cPj-kUNJiTnmJnKoK4r5UzlQm80zRHBrWNlxzpgBQ8aKuSw1UyqpihdJZoaHWHGqo8qvk4_7s5N3PBcMsRhP_PAzSoluCqGneMFrzCJY7CN6F4FGLyZtR-lUwKjZdYlMhNhUi6hK0Epuu2PfhPGBpR1T_us5-IvBpB3rT9b-MR7E7iLtH6aEXlSgEy7I8_wvE8qQF</recordid><startdate>20070401</startdate><enddate>20070401</enddate><creator>Daniele, Lorenzo</creator><creator>Macrì, Luigia</creator><creator>Schena, Marina</creator><creator>Dongiovanni, Diego</creator><creator>Bonello, Lisa</creator><creator>Armando, Enrico</creator><creator>Ciuffreda, Libero</creator><creator>Bertetto, Oscar</creator><creator>Bussolati, Gianni</creator><creator>Sapino, Anna</creator><general>American Association for Cancer Research</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070401</creationdate><title>Predicting gefitinib responsiveness in lung cancer by fluorescence in situ hybridization/chromogenic in situ hybridization analysis of EGFR and HER2 in biopsy and cytology specimens</title><author>Daniele, Lorenzo ; Macrì, Luigia ; Schena, Marina ; Dongiovanni, Diego ; Bonello, Lisa ; Armando, Enrico ; Ciuffreda, Libero ; Bertetto, Oscar ; Bussolati, Gianni ; Sapino, Anna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-95e90d6c158d31d2a32d03c81b89f91dcced94775fc0aa6614df24fc7f9c7c63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Base Sequence</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - diagnosis</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - drug therapy</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - pathology</topic><topic>DNA Mutational Analysis</topic><topic>EGFR</topic><topic>Exons - genetics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>FISH/CISH</topic><topic>Gene Dosage</topic><topic>HER2</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence - methods</topic><topic>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</topic><topic>lung cancer</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Molecular Sequence Data</topic><topic>Mutation - genetics</topic><topic>Quinazolines - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - genetics</topic><topic>Receptor, ErbB-2 - genetics</topic><topic>treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Daniele, Lorenzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macrì, Luigia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schena, Marina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dongiovanni, Diego</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonello, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armando, Enrico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciuffreda, Libero</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertetto, Oscar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bussolati, Gianni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sapino, Anna</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Molecular cancer therapeutics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Daniele, Lorenzo</au><au>Macrì, Luigia</au><au>Schena, Marina</au><au>Dongiovanni, Diego</au><au>Bonello, Lisa</au><au>Armando, Enrico</au><au>Ciuffreda, Libero</au><au>Bertetto, Oscar</au><au>Bussolati, Gianni</au><au>Sapino, Anna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predicting gefitinib responsiveness in lung cancer by fluorescence in situ hybridization/chromogenic in situ hybridization analysis of EGFR and HER2 in biopsy and cytology specimens</atitle><jtitle>Molecular cancer therapeutics</jtitle><addtitle>Mol Cancer Ther</addtitle><date>2007-04-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1223</spage><epage>1229</epage><pages>1223-1229</pages><issn>1535-7163</issn><eissn>1538-8514</eissn><abstract>In non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutational analysis is an excellent predictor of responsiveness to treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, such as gefitinib. In up to 80% of NSCLCs, cytologic samples or endoscopic biopsies are the only specimens available for molecular analysis, but PCR amplification of DNA from small fixed and paraffin-embedded samples may create artifactual mutations. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) of EGFR and HER2 has been proposed as an alternative method of analysis. This project aimed to determine the optimal scoring method for FISH or chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) assays when analyzing small NSCLC samples to predict response. FISH or CISH analysis of EGFR and HER2 genes was done on 42 small samples derived from NSCLC patients treated with gefitinib. EGFR mutational analysis was done after quantity and quality controls of DNA. In seven of seven cases, a balanced increase in EGFR gene and chromosome 7 number was found to correlate with the presence of specific EGFR mutations. In addition, seven of seven cases with balanced EGFR / HER2 polysomy and two of three cases with balanced EGFR / HER2 trisomy responded to gefitinib (75% of responders). Instead, the EGFR mutations predicted only 7 of 12 (58%) of gefitinib-responsive patients. When only endoscopic biopsies or cytologic specimens are available, we propose using FISH/CISH for EGFR and HER2 as the test of choice for selecting patients for treatment with gefitinib and to consider as negative predictive factor the absence of EGFR / HER2 gene gain. [Mol Cancer Ther 2007;6(4):1223–9]</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Association for Cancer Research</pub><pmid>17406029</pmid><doi>10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-06-0719</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1535-7163
ispartof Molecular cancer therapeutics, 2007-04, Vol.6 (4), p.1223-1229
issn 1535-7163
1538-8514
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70381079
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; American Association for Cancer Research
subjects Adult
Aged
Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use
Base Sequence
Biopsy
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - diagnosis
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - drug therapy
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - pathology
DNA Mutational Analysis
EGFR
Exons - genetics
Female
FISH/CISH
Gene Dosage
HER2
Humans
In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence - methods
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
lung cancer
Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis
Lung Neoplasms - drug therapy
Lung Neoplasms - pathology
Male
Middle Aged
Molecular Sequence Data
Mutation - genetics
Quinazolines - therapeutic use
Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - genetics
Receptor, ErbB-2 - genetics
treatment
title Predicting gefitinib responsiveness in lung cancer by fluorescence in situ hybridization/chromogenic in situ hybridization analysis of EGFR and HER2 in biopsy and cytology specimens
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T12%3A09%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predicting%20gefitinib%20responsiveness%20in%20lung%20cancer%20by%20fluorescence%20in%20situ%20hybridization/chromogenic%20in%20situ%20hybridization%20analysis%20of%20EGFR%20and%20HER2%20in%20biopsy%20and%20cytology%20specimens&rft.jtitle=Molecular%20cancer%20therapeutics&rft.au=Daniele,%20Lorenzo&rft.date=2007-04-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1223&rft.epage=1229&rft.pages=1223-1229&rft.issn=1535-7163&rft.eissn=1538-8514&rft_id=info:doi/10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-06-0719&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70381079%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70381079&rft_id=info:pmid/17406029&rfr_iscdi=true