Why Are Nearly Half of Expanded Criteria Donor (ECD) Kidneys Not Transplanted?
In the face of a growing demand for kidney transplants among older patients, we discard more than 40% of older deceased donor kidneys that were recovered for transplantation in the US. It is time to take a closer look at why so many donated kidneys are judged to be unsuitable for transplantation. Se...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of transplantation 2008-04, Vol.8 (4), p.735-736 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 736 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 735 |
container_title | American journal of transplantation |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Cecka, J. M. Gritsch, H. A. |
description | In the face of a growing demand for kidney transplants among older patients, we discard more than 40% of older deceased donor kidneys that were recovered for transplantation in the US. It is time to take a closer look at why so many donated kidneys are judged to be unsuitable for transplantation. See also article by Sung et al in this issue on page 783. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.02071.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70374647</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70374647</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4171-c1533a149852168d882255df393ce5053967a8b764a62e89c301360d8e28a7423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE9Lw0AQxRdRbK1-BdmT6CFx_yS7m4NISatVS71UPC7bZIIpaRJ3U2y-vYktenUuMzDvvRl-CGFKfNrV7dqnghBP0ID7jBDpE0Yk9XdHaPi7OP6deThAZ86tCaGSKXaKBlRRwYiSQ7R4_2jx2AJegLFFi2emyHCV4emuNmUKKY5t3oDNDZ5UZWXx9TSe3OCXPC2hdXhRNXhpTenqwpQNpPfn6CQzhYOLQx-ht4fpMp5589fHp3g895KASuolNOTc0CBSIaNCpUoxFoZpxiOeQEhCHglp1EqKwAgGKko4oVyQVAFTRgaMj9DVPre21ecWXKM3uUug6N6Aauu0JFwGIpCdUO2Fia2cs5Dp2uYbY1tNie5Z6rXuMekeme5Z6h-WetdZLw83tqsNpH_GA7xOcLcXfOUFtP8O1uPnZT_xb4Y4fmw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70374647</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why Are Nearly Half of Expanded Criteria Donor (ECD) Kidneys Not Transplanted?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Cecka, J. M. ; Gritsch, H. A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cecka, J. M. ; Gritsch, H. A.</creatorcontrib><description>In the face of a growing demand for kidney transplants among older patients, we discard more than 40% of older deceased donor kidneys that were recovered for transplantation in the US. It is time to take a closer look at why so many donated kidneys are judged to be unsuitable for transplantation. See also article by Sung et al in this issue on page 783.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1600-6135</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-6143</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.02071.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18162087</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Age Factors ; Aged ; California ; Europe ; Humans ; Kidney ; Kidney Transplantation - statistics & numerical data ; Patient Selection ; Tissue Donors</subject><ispartof>American journal of transplantation, 2008-04, Vol.8 (4), p.735-736</ispartof><rights>2008 The Authors Journal compilation © 2008 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4171-c1533a149852168d882255df393ce5053967a8b764a62e89c301360d8e28a7423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4171-c1533a149852168d882255df393ce5053967a8b764a62e89c301360d8e28a7423</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1600-6143.2007.02071.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1600-6143.2007.02071.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18162087$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cecka, J. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gritsch, H. A.</creatorcontrib><title>Why Are Nearly Half of Expanded Criteria Donor (ECD) Kidneys Not Transplanted?</title><title>American journal of transplantation</title><addtitle>Am J Transplant</addtitle><description>In the face of a growing demand for kidney transplants among older patients, we discard more than 40% of older deceased donor kidneys that were recovered for transplantation in the US. It is time to take a closer look at why so many donated kidneys are judged to be unsuitable for transplantation. See also article by Sung et al in this issue on page 783.</description><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>California</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney</subject><subject>Kidney Transplantation - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Tissue Donors</subject><issn>1600-6135</issn><issn>1600-6143</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE9Lw0AQxRdRbK1-BdmT6CFx_yS7m4NISatVS71UPC7bZIIpaRJ3U2y-vYktenUuMzDvvRl-CGFKfNrV7dqnghBP0ID7jBDpE0Yk9XdHaPi7OP6deThAZ86tCaGSKXaKBlRRwYiSQ7R4_2jx2AJegLFFi2emyHCV4emuNmUKKY5t3oDNDZ5UZWXx9TSe3OCXPC2hdXhRNXhpTenqwpQNpPfn6CQzhYOLQx-ht4fpMp5589fHp3g895KASuolNOTc0CBSIaNCpUoxFoZpxiOeQEhCHglp1EqKwAgGKko4oVyQVAFTRgaMj9DVPre21ecWXKM3uUug6N6Aauu0JFwGIpCdUO2Fia2cs5Dp2uYbY1tNie5Z6rXuMekeme5Z6h-WetdZLw83tqsNpH_GA7xOcLcXfOUFtP8O1uPnZT_xb4Y4fmw</recordid><startdate>200804</startdate><enddate>200804</enddate><creator>Cecka, J. M.</creator><creator>Gritsch, H. A.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200804</creationdate><title>Why Are Nearly Half of Expanded Criteria Donor (ECD) Kidneys Not Transplanted?</title><author>Cecka, J. M. ; Gritsch, H. A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4171-c1533a149852168d882255df393ce5053967a8b764a62e89c301360d8e28a7423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>California</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney</topic><topic>Kidney Transplantation - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Tissue Donors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cecka, J. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gritsch, H. A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of transplantation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cecka, J. M.</au><au>Gritsch, H. A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why Are Nearly Half of Expanded Criteria Donor (ECD) Kidneys Not Transplanted?</atitle><jtitle>American journal of transplantation</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Transplant</addtitle><date>2008-04</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>735</spage><epage>736</epage><pages>735-736</pages><issn>1600-6135</issn><eissn>1600-6143</eissn><abstract>In the face of a growing demand for kidney transplants among older patients, we discard more than 40% of older deceased donor kidneys that were recovered for transplantation in the US. It is time to take a closer look at why so many donated kidneys are judged to be unsuitable for transplantation. See also article by Sung et al in this issue on page 783.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>18162087</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.02071.x</doi><tpages>2</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1600-6135 |
ispartof | American journal of transplantation, 2008-04, Vol.8 (4), p.735-736 |
issn | 1600-6135 1600-6143 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70374647 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library; Alma/SFX Local Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Age Factors Aged California Europe Humans Kidney Kidney Transplantation - statistics & numerical data Patient Selection Tissue Donors |
title | Why Are Nearly Half of Expanded Criteria Donor (ECD) Kidneys Not Transplanted? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T18%3A44%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20Are%20Nearly%20Half%20of%20Expanded%20Criteria%20Donor%20(ECD)%20Kidneys%20Not%20Transplanted?&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20transplantation&rft.au=Cecka,%20J.%20M.&rft.date=2008-04&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=735&rft.epage=736&rft.pages=735-736&rft.issn=1600-6135&rft.eissn=1600-6143&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.02071.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70374647%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70374647&rft_id=info:pmid/18162087&rfr_iscdi=true |