Rhinometry: An Important Clinical Index for Evaluation of the Nose Before and After Rhinoplasty
Background Preoperative planning and postoperative outcome assessment in rhinoplasty are important. For preoperative planning, some standard relationships are defined and evaluated primarily with standard photographs, but photographs do not necessarily reflect reality. Outcome assessment, on the oth...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Aesthetic plastic surgery 2008-03, Vol.32 (2), p.286-293 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 293 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 286 |
container_title | Aesthetic plastic surgery |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Hormozi, Abdoljalil Kalantar Toosi, Arash Beiraghi |
description | Background
Preoperative planning and postoperative outcome assessment in rhinoplasty are important. For preoperative planning, some standard relationships are defined and evaluated primarily with standard photographs, but photographs do not necessarily reflect reality. Outcome assessment, on the other hand, is mostly subjective, and again, even photographic analyses may not address real changes after rhinoplasty.
Methods
“Rhinometry” is introduced as a clinical method for preoperative evaluations and postoperative judgments, and rhinometric parameters are defined. Measurements of these parameters were performed for 300 patients before rhinoplasty and in the follow-up visits 3 months postoperatively.
Results
Preoperatively, the nasal length and tip projection for most patients were more than ideal. There was moderate reduction in nasal length (mean, 9.21 mm) and a decrease in tip projection (mean, 3.34 mm) for the majority of the patients after rhinoplasty. Reductions in nasal length, tip projection, bony base width, alar base width, and alar base width during a smile were statistically significant. Patients who underwent surgery using the closed approach had significantly more reduction in nasal length and less reduction in tip projection. All the patients were satisfied with these pre- and postoperative data. Rhinometry changed the ideas of the authors about some changes that their operative approaches produce.
Conclusions
Rhinometry can change the ideas of plastic surgeons about the changes their operative approaches accomplish and can be a very useful guide for patients. It is recommended as a part of the pre- and postoperative physical examination of patients undergoing rhinoplasty. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00266-007-9057-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70354717</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1897485011</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-4afdc3dc95880ae362414b03b23ba4dc5f061fabf48b554bdb7e85637d01507f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9r3DAQxUVJaDZpP0AvQeSQm5uR9c_ubbNs04WQQGmhNyHbUuJgS1tJDvG3r7a7EAjkNAPze29mHkJfCHwlAPIqApRCFLktauCymD-gBWG0LHjJyBFaABWsKIn4c4JOY3wCIKWU7CM6IVUWyooskPr52Ds_mhTmb3jp8Gbc-pC0S3g19K5v9YA3rjMv2PqA1896mHTqvcPe4vRo8J2PBl-bPDRYuw4vbTIB__fcDjqm-RM6tnqI5vOhnqHf39e_Vj-K2_ubzWp5W7RU1Klg2nYt7dqaVxVoQ0V-gDVAm5I2mnUttyCI1Y1lVcM5a7pGmooLKjsgHKSlZ-hy77sN_u9kYlJjH1szDNoZP0UlgXImiczgxRvwyU_B5dtUCVJwWdcsQ2QPtcHHGIxV29CPOsyKgNpFr_bRq127i17NWXN-MJ6a0XSvikPWGSj3QMwj92DC6-b3Xf8B0EWPAA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>207657994</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rhinometry: An Important Clinical Index for Evaluation of the Nose Before and After Rhinoplasty</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink_现刊</source><creator>Hormozi, Abdoljalil Kalantar ; Toosi, Arash Beiraghi</creator><creatorcontrib>Hormozi, Abdoljalil Kalantar ; Toosi, Arash Beiraghi</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Preoperative planning and postoperative outcome assessment in rhinoplasty are important. For preoperative planning, some standard relationships are defined and evaluated primarily with standard photographs, but photographs do not necessarily reflect reality. Outcome assessment, on the other hand, is mostly subjective, and again, even photographic analyses may not address real changes after rhinoplasty.
Methods
“Rhinometry” is introduced as a clinical method for preoperative evaluations and postoperative judgments, and rhinometric parameters are defined. Measurements of these parameters were performed for 300 patients before rhinoplasty and in the follow-up visits 3 months postoperatively.
Results
Preoperatively, the nasal length and tip projection for most patients were more than ideal. There was moderate reduction in nasal length (mean, 9.21 mm) and a decrease in tip projection (mean, 3.34 mm) for the majority of the patients after rhinoplasty. Reductions in nasal length, tip projection, bony base width, alar base width, and alar base width during a smile were statistically significant. Patients who underwent surgery using the closed approach had significantly more reduction in nasal length and less reduction in tip projection. All the patients were satisfied with these pre- and postoperative data. Rhinometry changed the ideas of the authors about some changes that their operative approaches produce.
Conclusions
Rhinometry can change the ideas of plastic surgeons about the changes their operative approaches accomplish and can be a very useful guide for patients. It is recommended as a part of the pre- and postoperative physical examination of patients undergoing rhinoplasty.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0364-216X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-5241</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00266-007-9057-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18026781</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anthropometry ; Esthetics ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Nose - anatomy & histology ; Original ; Otorhinolaryngology ; Plastic Surgery ; Postoperative Care ; Preoperative Care ; Rhinometry, Acoustic - instrumentation ; Rhinoplasty - methods</subject><ispartof>Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2008-03, Vol.32 (2), p.286-293</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-4afdc3dc95880ae362414b03b23ba4dc5f061fabf48b554bdb7e85637d01507f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-4afdc3dc95880ae362414b03b23ba4dc5f061fabf48b554bdb7e85637d01507f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00266-007-9057-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00266-007-9057-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18026781$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hormozi, Abdoljalil Kalantar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toosi, Arash Beiraghi</creatorcontrib><title>Rhinometry: An Important Clinical Index for Evaluation of the Nose Before and After Rhinoplasty</title><title>Aesthetic plastic surgery</title><addtitle>Aesth Plast Surg</addtitle><addtitle>Aesthetic Plast Surg</addtitle><description>Background
Preoperative planning and postoperative outcome assessment in rhinoplasty are important. For preoperative planning, some standard relationships are defined and evaluated primarily with standard photographs, but photographs do not necessarily reflect reality. Outcome assessment, on the other hand, is mostly subjective, and again, even photographic analyses may not address real changes after rhinoplasty.
Methods
“Rhinometry” is introduced as a clinical method for preoperative evaluations and postoperative judgments, and rhinometric parameters are defined. Measurements of these parameters were performed for 300 patients before rhinoplasty and in the follow-up visits 3 months postoperatively.
Results
Preoperatively, the nasal length and tip projection for most patients were more than ideal. There was moderate reduction in nasal length (mean, 9.21 mm) and a decrease in tip projection (mean, 3.34 mm) for the majority of the patients after rhinoplasty. Reductions in nasal length, tip projection, bony base width, alar base width, and alar base width during a smile were statistically significant. Patients who underwent surgery using the closed approach had significantly more reduction in nasal length and less reduction in tip projection. All the patients were satisfied with these pre- and postoperative data. Rhinometry changed the ideas of the authors about some changes that their operative approaches produce.
Conclusions
Rhinometry can change the ideas of plastic surgeons about the changes their operative approaches accomplish and can be a very useful guide for patients. It is recommended as a part of the pre- and postoperative physical examination of patients undergoing rhinoplasty.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anthropometry</subject><subject>Esthetics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Nose - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology</subject><subject>Plastic Surgery</subject><subject>Postoperative Care</subject><subject>Preoperative Care</subject><subject>Rhinometry, Acoustic - instrumentation</subject><subject>Rhinoplasty - methods</subject><issn>0364-216X</issn><issn>1432-5241</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9r3DAQxUVJaDZpP0AvQeSQm5uR9c_ubbNs04WQQGmhNyHbUuJgS1tJDvG3r7a7EAjkNAPze29mHkJfCHwlAPIqApRCFLktauCymD-gBWG0LHjJyBFaABWsKIn4c4JOY3wCIKWU7CM6IVUWyooskPr52Ds_mhTmb3jp8Gbc-pC0S3g19K5v9YA3rjMv2PqA1896mHTqvcPe4vRo8J2PBl-bPDRYuw4vbTIB__fcDjqm-RM6tnqI5vOhnqHf39e_Vj-K2_ubzWp5W7RU1Klg2nYt7dqaVxVoQ0V-gDVAm5I2mnUttyCI1Y1lVcM5a7pGmooLKjsgHKSlZ-hy77sN_u9kYlJjH1szDNoZP0UlgXImiczgxRvwyU_B5dtUCVJwWdcsQ2QPtcHHGIxV29CPOsyKgNpFr_bRq127i17NWXN-MJ6a0XSvikPWGSj3QMwj92DC6-b3Xf8B0EWPAA</recordid><startdate>20080301</startdate><enddate>20080301</enddate><creator>Hormozi, Abdoljalil Kalantar</creator><creator>Toosi, Arash Beiraghi</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080301</creationdate><title>Rhinometry: An Important Clinical Index for Evaluation of the Nose Before and After Rhinoplasty</title><author>Hormozi, Abdoljalil Kalantar ; Toosi, Arash Beiraghi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-4afdc3dc95880ae362414b03b23ba4dc5f061fabf48b554bdb7e85637d01507f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anthropometry</topic><topic>Esthetics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Nose - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology</topic><topic>Plastic Surgery</topic><topic>Postoperative Care</topic><topic>Preoperative Care</topic><topic>Rhinometry, Acoustic - instrumentation</topic><topic>Rhinoplasty - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hormozi, Abdoljalil Kalantar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toosi, Arash Beiraghi</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Aesthetic plastic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hormozi, Abdoljalil Kalantar</au><au>Toosi, Arash Beiraghi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rhinometry: An Important Clinical Index for Evaluation of the Nose Before and After Rhinoplasty</atitle><jtitle>Aesthetic plastic surgery</jtitle><stitle>Aesth Plast Surg</stitle><addtitle>Aesthetic Plast Surg</addtitle><date>2008-03-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>286</spage><epage>293</epage><pages>286-293</pages><issn>0364-216X</issn><eissn>1432-5241</eissn><abstract>Background
Preoperative planning and postoperative outcome assessment in rhinoplasty are important. For preoperative planning, some standard relationships are defined and evaluated primarily with standard photographs, but photographs do not necessarily reflect reality. Outcome assessment, on the other hand, is mostly subjective, and again, even photographic analyses may not address real changes after rhinoplasty.
Methods
“Rhinometry” is introduced as a clinical method for preoperative evaluations and postoperative judgments, and rhinometric parameters are defined. Measurements of these parameters were performed for 300 patients before rhinoplasty and in the follow-up visits 3 months postoperatively.
Results
Preoperatively, the nasal length and tip projection for most patients were more than ideal. There was moderate reduction in nasal length (mean, 9.21 mm) and a decrease in tip projection (mean, 3.34 mm) for the majority of the patients after rhinoplasty. Reductions in nasal length, tip projection, bony base width, alar base width, and alar base width during a smile were statistically significant. Patients who underwent surgery using the closed approach had significantly more reduction in nasal length and less reduction in tip projection. All the patients were satisfied with these pre- and postoperative data. Rhinometry changed the ideas of the authors about some changes that their operative approaches produce.
Conclusions
Rhinometry can change the ideas of plastic surgeons about the changes their operative approaches accomplish and can be a very useful guide for patients. It is recommended as a part of the pre- and postoperative physical examination of patients undergoing rhinoplasty.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>18026781</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00266-007-9057-y</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0364-216X |
ispartof | Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2008-03, Vol.32 (2), p.286-293 |
issn | 0364-216X 1432-5241 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70354717 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink_现刊 |
subjects | Adult Anthropometry Esthetics Female Humans Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Nose - anatomy & histology Original Otorhinolaryngology Plastic Surgery Postoperative Care Preoperative Care Rhinometry, Acoustic - instrumentation Rhinoplasty - methods |
title | Rhinometry: An Important Clinical Index for Evaluation of the Nose Before and After Rhinoplasty |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T08%3A29%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rhinometry:%20An%20Important%20Clinical%20Index%20for%20Evaluation%20of%20the%20Nose%20Before%20and%20After%20Rhinoplasty&rft.jtitle=Aesthetic%20plastic%20surgery&rft.au=Hormozi,%20Abdoljalil%20Kalantar&rft.date=2008-03-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=286&rft.epage=293&rft.pages=286-293&rft.issn=0364-216X&rft.eissn=1432-5241&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00266-007-9057-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1897485011%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=207657994&rft_id=info:pmid/18026781&rfr_iscdi=true |